Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 250-418-4 | CAS number: 30989-05-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 14.8 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- effect on fertility
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 370.3 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The following parameters were taken into account for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- sRVrat, 8h = 0.38 m³/kg bw
- Absorption (ABS): oral = ½ inhalation
- sRVhuman/wRV = 6.7 m³ (8h)/10 m³ (8h)
- Correction factor for experimental vs. human exposure conditions (animals were exposed daily, workers work 5 days per week): 7 d (per week)/5 d (per week)
modifed NOAEC (worker, 8h inhalation) = NOAEL (oral, rat) * [1/sRV(rat, 8h)] * [ABS (oral) / ABS (inhalation)] * [sRV (human) / worker Respiratory Volume (wRV)] * [7d (per week) / 5d (per week)]
modified NOAEC (worker, 8h inhalation) = 300 mg/kg bw/d * [1/0.38 m³/kg bw/d] * [0.5 / 1] * [6.7 m³ (8h) / 10 m³ (8h)] * [7d (per week) / 5d (per week)] = 370.3 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The starting point for the DNEL calculation is a NOAEL. Therefore, the default assessment factor 1 is chosen.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- The default AF for time extrapolation from subchronic exposure (OECD 443) to chronic exposure is applied.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- The AF has already been handled within the correction of the modification of the dose descriptor.
Therefore, no additional factor has to be applied. - AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- The default AF for other interspecies differences, i.e. toxicokinetic/-dynamic differences is used.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- The default factor of 5 for workers is set in line with the REACH guidance.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 4.2 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- effect on fertility
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 420 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The following parameters were taken into account for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- Absorption (ABS): oral = dermal
- Correction factor for experimental vs. human exposure conditions (animals were exposed daily, workers work 5 days per week): 7 d (per week)/5 d (per week)
modified NOAEL (worker, dermal) = NOAEL (oral, rat) * [ABS (oral) / ABS (dermal)] * [7d (per week) / 5d (per week)]
modified NOAEL (worker, dermal) = 300 mg/kg bw/d * [1 / 1] * [7d (per week) / 5d (per week)] = 420 mg/kg bw/d
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The starting point for the DNEL calculation is a NOAEL. Therefore, the default assessment factor 1 is chosen.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- The default AF for time extrapolation from subchronic exposure (OECD 443) to chronic exposure is applied.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- ECHA default factor for interspecies allometric scaling from rat to human is used.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- The default AF for other interspecies differences, i.e. toxicokinetic/-dynamic differences is used.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- The default factor of 5 for workers is set in line with the REACH guidance.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
Long-term DNELs for systemic effects are based on the key oral extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (according to OECD 443), in which the test item B-TEGME was administered by oral gavage to Sprague-Dawley rats at dose levels of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Based on the results obtained in this study it was concluded that the No-Observed-Adverse-Effect-Level (NOAEL) for reproductive performance of the F0 and F1 Cohort 1B animals was 300 mg/kg/day due to the high incidences of reduced fertility in females of F1 Cohort 1B receiving 1000 mg/kg/day and the increased incidences of minimal epididymal cellular debris coupled with sperm motility and morphology changes in both F0 and F1 Cohort 1B males given 1000 mg/kg/day, accompanied with degeneration in the testes for F1 Cohort 1B males at 1000 mg/kg/day only.
Aside from the above-mentioned instances of reduced fertility and male reproductive system changes at 1000 mg/kg/day, increased incidences of basophilic tubules in the kidneys of F0 females and increased incidence of decreased lymphocytes in the cortex of the thymus in the F0 generation males were observed at 1000 mg/kg/day, therefore the NOAEL for systemic toxicity in the F0 and F1 adult animals was concluded to be 300 mg/kg/day.
The NOAEL for the F1 and F2 offspring up to weaning was concluded to be 300 mg/kg/day due to reduced early post-partum survival at 1000 mg/kg/day in both generations and low litter size in F2 litters.
There was no evidence of developmental neurotoxicity or developmental immunotoxicity on this study, therefore the NOAEL for these endpoints was concluded to be 1000 mg/kg/day.
For the derivation of DNELs, the ECHA Guidance on IR&CSA, Chapter R.8, was followed, and ECHA default assessment factors were considered to be appropriate for workers.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.6 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- effect on fertility
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 130.4 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The following parameters were taken into account for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- sRVrat, 24h = 1.15 m³/kg bw
- Absorption (ABS): oral = ½ inhalation
modifed NOAEC (general population, 24h inhalation) = NOAEL (oral, rat) * [1/sRV(rat, 24h)] * [ABS (oral) / ABS (inhalation)]
modified NOAEC (general population, 24h inhalation) = 300 mg/kg bw/d * [1/1.15 m³/kg bw/d] * [0.5 / 1] = 130.4 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The starting point for the DNEL calculation is a NOAEL. Therefore, the default assessment factor 1 is chosen.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- The default AF for time extrapolation from subchronic exposure (OECD 443) to chronic exposure is applied.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- The AF has already been handled within the correction of the modification of the dose descriptor.
Therefore, no additional factor has to be applied. - AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- The default AF for other interspecies differences, i.e. toxicokinetic/-dynamic differences is used.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- The default factor of 10 for general population is set in line with the REACH guidance.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- effect on fertility
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The following parameters were taken into account for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- Absorption (ABS): oral = dermal
modifed NOAEL (general population, dermal) = NOAEL (oral, rat) * [ABS (oral) / ABS (dermal)]
modified NOAEC (general population, dermal) = 300 mg/kg bw/d * [1 / 1] = 300 mg/kg bw/d
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The starting point for the DNEL calculation is a NOAEL. Therefore, the default assessment factor 1 is chosen.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- The default AF for time extrapolation from subchronic exposure (OECD 443) to chronic exposure is applied.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- ECHA default factor for interspecies allometric scaling from rat to human is used.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- The default AF for other interspecies differences, i.e. toxicokinetic/-dynamic differences is used.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- The default factor of 10 for general population is set in line with the REACH guidance.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- effect on fertility
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The modification of the NOAEL is not necessary as no route-to-route extrapolation is performed.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The starting point for the DNEL calculation is a NOAEL. Therefore, the default assessment factor 1 is chosen.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- The default AF for time extrapolation from subchronic exposure (OECD 443) to chronic exposure is applied.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- ECHA default factor for interspecies allometric scaling from rat to human is used.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- The default AF for other interspecies differences, i.e. toxicokinetic/-dynamic differences is used.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- The default factor of 10 for general population is set in line with the REACH guidance.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
The detailed information of the study and dose descriptor used as point of departure for the derivation of long-term DNELs is described in 'additional information - worker' above.
For the DNELs, the ECHA Guidance on IR&CSA, Chapter R.8, was followed, and ECHA default assessment factors were considered to be appropriate for the general population.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.