Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 213-254-4 | CAS number: 932-64-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 5 to 7 August 2009
- Reliability:
- 3 (not reliable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- unsuitable test system
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 850.1010 (Aquatic Invertebrate Acute Toxicity Test, Freshwater Daphnids)
- Version / remarks:
- Draft version
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: Dilution series from stock solution provided by sponsor
- Eluate: water
- Differential loading:
- Controls:
- Chemical name of vehicle (organic solvent, emulsifier or dispersant): none
- Concentration of vehicle in test medium (stock solution and final test solution(s) or suspension(s) including control(s)): none
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc.): no
- Other relevant information: - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Daphnia magna
- Strain/clone: Springborn Smithers laboratory culture
- Justification for species other than prescribed by test guideline: n.a.
- Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): <24h
- Weight at study initiation (mean and range, SD): not reported
- Length at study initiation (length definition, mean, range and SD):not reported
- Stage and instar at study initiation: not specified
- Valve height at study initiation, for shell deposition study (mean and range, SD): not reported
- Peripheral shell growth removed prior to test initiation:not reported
- Method of breeding: continuos culture
- Source: house breed
- Age of parental stock (mean and range, SD): no
- Feeding during test: no
- Food type:
- Amount:
- Frequency:
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: no
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): same
- Type and amount of food: Ankistrodesmus falcatus, 4 x 107 cells/mL) at a rate of 2.0 mL, and 0.50 mL of a combination of yeast, cereal leaves and flaked fish food suspension (YCT) per vessel daily.
QUARANTINE (wild caught) NOT APPLICABLE
- Duration:
- Health/mortality:
METHOD FOR PREPARATION AND COLLECTION OF EARLY INSTARS OR OTHER LIFE STAGES, INCLUDING CULTURING CONDITIONS: - Test type:
- flow-through
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- no
- Hardness:
- Total hardness as CaCO3: 38 to 50 mg/L
- Test temperature:
- 19 to 22 ºC,
- pH:
- pH: 6.7 to 6.9
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 7.5 to 9.6 mg/L,
- Salinity:
- Total alkalinity as CaCO3: 19 to 22 mg/L
- Conductivity:
- 350 to 370 μmhos/cm
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- nominal:
0.63, 1.3, 2.5, 5.0 and 10 mg a.i./L
measured (geom mean)
0.47, 1.4, 2.4, 4.9 and 9.5 mg a.i./L - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: square glass battery jars
- Type (delete if not applicable): open
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: glass, 1600 mL
- Volume of solution: 1400 mL per vessel
- Aeration: not specified
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter):
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): 90% test solution replacement rate of approximately nine hours
- No. of organisms per vessel: 10/ conc
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 2
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 2
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): not applicable
- Biomass loading rate: not specified
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: well water
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: not specified
- Photoperiod: photoperiod of 16 hours light and 8 hours darkness
- Light intensity: 40 to 76 footcandles (430 to 820 lux)
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : immobility
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: no - Reference substance (positive control):
- not specified
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 9.5 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 2.4 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Details on results:
- - Behavioural abnormalities:
no
- Observations on body length and weight: not measured
- Other biological observations: not reported
- Mortality of control: not reported
- Other adverse effects control:not reported
- Immobilisation of control: not reported
- Abnormal responses: not reported
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: not reported
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: no, but pH shifting by the test substance did allow higher test concentrations. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- not reported
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The study principally fulfills the quality standards, but test results obtained during the test did not let conclude on a definite EC50, as the highest tested concentration was found to be below the point from where the EC50 could be derived. The observed no effect concentration however could be assessed to be 4.9 mg a.i./L.
- Executive summary:
During the test period no immobilisation in the tested concentrations 0.47, 1.4 and 2.4 mg a.i./L was observed. Observed effects occured in the 4.9 mg/L concentration and in the 9.5 mg/L concentration. The latter was determined to be the NOEC whereas the 9.5 mg/L concentration did not reach a nkuber from what the EC50 value could be derived.
Further testing to define an EC50 value was not performed since the highest nominal concentration tested (i.e., 10 mg a.i./L) represents the highest test concentration at which the pH of the exposure solutions was appropriate for the survival of Daphnia magna.
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study performed to a reliable method but not to GLP
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Acute 24 and 48 h Ceriodaphnia range-finding studies were conducted using the test substance stock solutions that were either pH-adjusted or non-adjusted to discern the toxicity that could be attributed to the acidity of the test substance, and to select between the pH treatment alternatives for exposure media in the definitive test.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- Although GLP status is not specified, this study is very detailed and was performed by the Environmental Toxicology Branch, U.S. Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center for the U. S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine.
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Source BAE Systems
- Lot No. BAE07B305-001
- Purity: 99.6% - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- None stated
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Chemical name of vehicle (organic solvent, emulsifier or dispersant): acetonitrile with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid
No additional data - Test organisms (species):
- Ceriodaphnia dubia
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Strain: Ceriodaphnia dubia
No additional data - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- None stated
- Hardness:
- None stated
- Test temperature:
- 25℃
- pH:
- pH-adjusted media pH: 7.5
pH non-adjusted media pH: 3.1-7.5 - Dissolved oxygen:
- None stated
- Salinity:
- None stated
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Measured concentrations: 0 (control), 62, 124, 246, 479, and 881 mg/L for the pH-adjusted treatment groups; 0 (control), 33, 64, 127, 248, 489, and 904 mg/L for the non-pH-adjusted treatment groups.
- Details on test conditions:
- None stated
- Reference substance (positive control):
- not specified
- Duration:
- 24 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 830 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: 807-854 mg/L, pH-adjusted media
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 460 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: pH-adjusted media
- Duration:
- 24 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 66 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: non-pH-adjusted media
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 62 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: non-pH-adjusted media
- Details on results:
- The results showed that adjusting the pH of the test substance treatment groups decreased toxicity by 92% in the 24 h exposure test, and by 87% in the 48 h exposure test
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- No information provided
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- No information provided
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Increasing the pH of Ceriodaphnia media containing the test substance (to pH 7.5; the pH of Ceriodaphnia media without test substance) decreased the toxicity in acute Ceriodaphnia tests. The LC50 values differed by approximately an order of magnitude between the two pH treatments of the exposure media containing the test substance (pH unadjusted, or pH adjusted to accommodate the respective test substance content).
The 48h LC50 to Ceriodaphnia dubia is 460 mg/L for pH-adjusted media and 62 mg/L for non-pH-adjusted media. - Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The result is calculated data as modeled by EPIWIN.
- Justification for type of information:
- QSAR prediction: migrated from IUCLID 5.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Model for determining aquatic toxicity based on Log Kow and water solubility.
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 222.878 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: This value is predicted for Phenols class.
- Conclusions:
- Based on the prediction results described, the test substance, NTO, was predicted to have LC50 of 222.878 mg/L after 48 hours exposure.
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- other: Published paper publically available
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: US Environmental Protection Agency. 2002. Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms,
- Version / remarks:
- 5th ed. EPA 821/R-02/012. Office of Water, Washington
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: Holston Army Ammunition Plant (BAE Systems, Kingsport, TN, USA. Btach no not stated
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: Not stated
- Purity test date: >95%
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Preliminary purification step (if any): none
- Final preparation of a solid: NTO was dissolved directly into a standard synthetic freshwater bioassay medium (moderately hard reconstituted water [MHRW]]) by
magnetic stirring overnight. The pH of the resultant solution was pH2.9, as the test requires pH 6.5 - 9.0 the pH of the NTO solution was increased (to 7.7–8.2) using reagent grade NaOH. Test solutions and pHmodifications, where applicable, were tested within 24 h.
FORM AS APPLIED IN THE TEST - see above
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Test solutions and pH modifications, where applicable, were tested within 24 h. All test solutions were measure at 0 and 48 h during the test.
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
NTO was dissolved directly into a standard synthetic freshwater bioassay medium (moderately hard reconstituted water [MHRW]]) by magnetic stirring overnight. The pH of the resultant solution was pH2.9, as the test requires pH 6.5 - 9.0 the pH of the NTO solution was increased (to 7.7–8.2) using reagent grade NaOH. Test solutions and pHmodifications, where applicable, were tested within 24 h.
- Concentration of vehicle in test medium (stock solution and final test solution(s) or suspension(s) including control(s)): stock solution of 1500 mg/l prepared then for the bioassay experiment a furthe 6 concentrations (in order to reach a concentration no-effect level) were created from a 50% serial dilution (100%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25%, etc.), using MHRW as the diluent and control.
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc.): Not stated - Test organisms (species):
- Ceriodaphnia dubia
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Test organisms were obtained from in-house cultures, originally purchased from a commercial source (ECTesting). Ceriodaphnia dubia was selected because of its relatively high sensitivity to aquatic contaminants and its routine use in National Pollutant Discharge
Phototoxicity of insensitive munitions Elimination System permit whole effluent toxicity testing.
- Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): Not stated
- Weight at study initiation (mean and range, SD): Not stated
- Length at study initiation (length definition, mean, range and SD): Not stated
- Stage and instar at study initiation: Not stated
- Source: see above
- Age of parental stock (mean and range, SD): Not stated
- Feeding during test Not stated
- Food type: Not stated
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: Not stated
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): Not stated
- Type and amount of food: Not stated
- Feeding frequency: Not stated
- Health during acclimation (any mortality observed): Not stated
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- other: standard synthetic freshwater bioassay medium (moderately hard reconstituted water [MHRW]
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Hardness:
- 80-100 mg CaCO3/L
- Test temperature:
- 25 ± 1 C
- pH:
- 7.9 - 8.3
- Dissolved oxygen:
- Not stated
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations for the non photo-degradation test were 0, 24, 47, 96, 192, 384, 768 and 1536 mg/L and measured concentrations (at 0h) were 20.8, 41.0, 90.3, 178.8, 365.7, 746.5 and 1507.6 mg/L
Nominal concentrations for the first photo-degradation test were 3, 6, 12, 24, 47, 94, 188, 377, 754 and 1507 mg/L and measured concentrations (at 0h) were 2.6,5.1, 10.2, 20.3, 40.8, 85.5, 173.6, 345.4, 726.7 and 1451.7 mg/L
Nominal concentrations for the second photo-degradation test were 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 14, 55 and 110 mg/L and measured concentrations (at 0h) were 0, 0.2, 0.3, 0.6, 1.3, 2.6, 5.1, 10.2, 19.7, 41.9 and 91.4 mg/L - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 20mL glass scintillation vial
- Type (delete if not applicable): closed
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume:
- Volume of solution: Not stated
- Aeration: no
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter): n/a
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate):n/a
- No. of organisms per vessel:5
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 4
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 4
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates):
- Biomass loading rate: n/a
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: moderately hard reconstituted water [MHRW] prepared for study use
- Total organic carbon:
- Particulate matter:
- Metals:
- Pesticides:
- Chlorine:
- Alkalinity: 57-64 (nominal)
- Ca/mg ratio: 1:1 (nominal)
- Conductivity:
- Salinity:
- Intervals of water quality measurement: 0 and 48h
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: pH adjusted to 7.2 - 7.8
- Photoperiod: 16 h light, 8 h darkness
- Light intensity: normal laboratory light
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: yes
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 799.1 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat. (total fraction)
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- non-photodegraded test
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 111 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- photo degraded test 2
- Details on results:
- - Behavioural abnormalities:
- Observations on body length and weight:
- Other biological observations:
- Mortality of control:
- Other adverse effects control:
- Immobilisation of control:
- Abnormal responses:
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values:
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- not reported
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The presented paper deals with the abiotic (photo) degradation and biotic (aquatic) toxicity of these degradation products of various explosives. The results are qualtitative pointing to a higher toxicity of degradation products then of the parental substance NTO. But, as chemical analysis for these degradation products is missing, just the parental substance can be assessed.
Referenceopen allclose all
Since no concentration tested resulted in ≥ 50% immobilization, the 48-hour EC50 value was empirically estimated to be > 9.5 mg a.i./L, the highest geometric mean measured concentration tested. The No-Observed-Effect Concentration (NOEC) was determined to be 2.4 mg a.i./L.
Further testing to define an EC50 value was not performed since the highest nominal concentration tested (i.e., 10 mg a.i./L) represents the highest test concentration at which the pH of the exposure solutions was appropriate for the survival of Daphnia magna.
The study reveals a negligible toxicity of the parent compound, and a far higher toxicity of photodegradation products. However, these have not been chemically quantified sufficiently and consequently not been reported.
Description of key information
According to the computer program EPISUITE, the test substance, NTO, was predicted to have LC50 of 222.878 mg/L after 48 hours exposure.
As stated in the published data (Haley Mark V., Kuperman Roman G., Checkai Ronald T. ) the 48h LC50 to Ceriodaphnia dubia is 460 mg/L for pH-adjusted media and 62 mg/L for non-pH-adjusted media.
Kennedy et al .reported for NTO a relatively low toxicity of around 800 mg/L and a so-called "NSDS" ( not significantly different from the control) comparable to a NOEC of 366 mg/L. In contrast, a BAE study revealed a far lower NOEC of 2.4 mg/L in a very sensible system, what did not let conclude on a EC50 value, as the pH was shifiting towards levels which limited the applicability of the test system for the substance. Accordingly the Kennedy study was assessed as the more relevant in this case.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 62 mg/L
Additional information
The short term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates was determined using the computer program EPISUITE, based onLog Kow and water solubility. The test substance, NTO, was predicted to have LC50 of 222.878 mg/L after 48 hours exposure.
Determination of short term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates, Ceriodaphnia dubia, has been also described in published data (Haley Mark V., Kuperman Roman G., Checkai Ronald T. ) describing the test performed at RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE. The 48h LC50 to Ceriodaphnia dubia is 460 mg/L for pH-adjusted media and 62 mg/L for non-pH-adjusted media.
From a BAE system study no EC50 could be derived due to to test material inherent pH changing properties.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.