Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1979
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Proprietary study reported in summary form only
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1979

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Deviations:
not applicable
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The study method is broadly comparable to OECD 405
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
(the study pre-dates GLP)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Chromium hydroxide sulphate
EC Number:
235-595-8
EC Name:
Chromium hydroxide sulphate
Cas Number:
12336-95-7
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder
Details on test material:
The test material is referred to by the tradename 'Chromsal B'

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Single exposure; no details on washing
Observation period (in vivo):
7 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Two

Results and discussion

In vivo

Results
Irritation parameter:
other: scores for eye irritation not reported.
Time point:
other: Not applicable
Other effects:
Not detailed

Any other information on results incl. tables

The scores for eye irritation are not reported, however it is stated that the test material was not found to be a primary eye irritant in this study.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The test material was not irritating to the rabbit eye under the conditions of this study
Executive summary:

50 mg of the test material was instilled into one eye of two New Zealand White rabbits; ocular reactions were observed for 7 days. Scores for eye irritation are not reported, however the test material was not irritating to the rabbit eye under the conditions of this study.