Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-457-4 | CAS number: 1469983-50-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Oxidising properties
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- oxidising liquids
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 04 December 2012 to 15 February 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- UN Manual of Tests and Criteria: Test O.2 (Test for oxidizing liquids)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The mean pressure rise time for sodium chlorate/cellulose mixture recorded was slower than expected . As the mean pressure rise time of test item/cellulose was even slower, this deviation was not considered to have affected the results.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- UN Manual of Tests and Criteria: Test O.2 (Test for oxidizing liquids)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The 0.3-mm thickness of the aluminium bursting disk differed from the one prescribed by the guideline. This deviation was not considered to have affected the results.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- 2010-12-15
- Contact with:
- powdered cellulose
- Sample tested:
- reference mixture with 50% perchloric acid + cellulose (1:1 ratio)
- Parameter:
- mean pressure rise time
- Result:
- 52 ms
- Sample tested:
- reference mixture with 40% aqueous sodium chlorate + cellulose (1:1 ratio)
- Parameter:
- mean pressure rise time
- Result:
- 12 164 ms
- Sample tested:
- reference mixture with 65% nitric acid + cellulose (1:1 ratio)
- Parameter:
- mean pressure rise time
- Result:
- 3 486 ms
- Key result
- Sample tested:
- test mixture 1:1
- Parameter:
- mean pressure rise time
- Result:
- 23 700 ms
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The mean pressure rise time obtained with the test item / cellulose mixture was slower than the mean pressure rise time obtained with the three mixtures of reference item / cellulose.
The test item was not classified as an oxidizing liquid of Division 5.1 and thus was not assigned to any packing group, under the experimental conditions used. - Executive summary:
The oxidizing properties of the test item (= substance EC 939-455-3 in aqueous commercial product) were investigated in a GLP-compliant study performed in accordance with UN Manual of Tests and Criteria: Test O.2 (Test for oxidizing liquids). The mean pressure rise time obtained with the test item / cellulose mixture was slower than the mean pressure rise time obtained with the mixtures of reference item / cellulose. The test item was not classified as an oxidizing liquid of Division 5.1 and thus was not assigned to any packing group, under the experimental conditions used.
The study was performed on a commercial product (aqueous solution) as the substance EC 939-455-3 is manufactured and used in a liquid form.
- Endpoint:
- oxidising liquids
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
C8-C18 AAPHS and C12-18 AAPHS have the same functional groups, and general composition. The main variable resides in the alkyl chain distribution.
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Source chemical = C8-18 cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine (EC 939-455-3).
Target chemical = C12-18 cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine (EC 939-457-4).
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
The alkyl C-chain distribution of the source chemical significantly overlaps with the one of the target chemical, the C12-alkyl derivative being the major constituent in both chemicals. The structural differences in side C-chains is not expected to lead to significant differences on phys-chem properties.
4. DATA MATRIX
See "Documentation and scientific justification of the read-across approach" in section 13.2. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Sample tested:
- reference mixture with 50% perchloric acid + cellulose (1:1 ratio)
- Parameter:
- mean pressure rise time
- Result:
- 52 ms
- Sample tested:
- reference mixture with 40% aqueous sodium chlorate + cellulose (1:1 ratio)
- Parameter:
- mean pressure rise time
- Result:
- 12 164 ms
- Sample tested:
- reference mixture with 65% nitric acid + cellulose (1:1 ratio)
- Parameter:
- mean pressure rise time
- Result:
- 3 486 ms
- Key result
- Sample tested:
- test mixture 1:1
- Parameter:
- mean pressure rise time
- Result:
- 23 700 ms
- Remarks on result:
- other: read-across from EC 939-455-3 in aqueous solution
- Conclusions:
- By analogy with the source substance EC 939-455-3 in aqueous solution, the target substance 1-Propanaminium, N-(3-aminopropyl)-2-hydroxy-N,N-dimethyl-3-sulfo-, N-(C12-18(even numbered) acyl) derivs., hydroxides, inner salts (EC 939-457-4) in aqueous solution, at a similar concentration range, was not classified as an oxidizing liquid of Division 5.1 and thus was not assigned to any packing group.
The source and target substances are both manufactured and used in a liquid form (aqueous solutions at a similar contentration range). The security physico-chemical parameters were therefore assessed from tests performed on aqueous solutions.
Referenceopen allclose all
Results
Preparation of the fibrous cellulose
Drying time 1 day, 16 hours and 50 min
Drying temperature Between 101.0 and(mean)
Mixtures with reference item / cellulose
With 50% perchloric acid aqueous solution as reference item
Assay No. |
Reference item mass(g) |
Cellulose mass |
Atmospheric pressure(kPa) |
Corrected pressure rise time(ms) |
Mean corrected pressure rise time(ms) |
Theorical calculated min and max accepted value: ± 30% of the mean pressure rise time(ms) |
1 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
98.6 |
53 |
52 |
[36 ; 68] |
4 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
98.6 |
62 |
||
6 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
98.6 |
45 |
||
7 |
2.49 |
2.50 |
98.6 |
52 |
||
10 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
97.6 |
46 |
Remark: Five other assays were performed, but due to the speed of the reaction, some values were missing for the calculation of the pressure rise time.
With 40% sodium chlorate aqueous solution as reference item
First series:
Assay No. |
Reference item mass(g) |
Cellulose mass |
Atmospheric pressure(kPa) |
Corrected pressure rise time(ms) |
Mean corrected pressure rise time(ms) |
Theorical calculated min and max accepted value: ± 30% of the mean pressure rise time(ms) |
2 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
98.5 |
9986 |
13665 |
[9565 ;] |
3 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
98.5 |
15417 |
||
4 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
98.5 |
13870 |
||
5 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
98.4 |
16280 |
||
7 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
97.6 |
12771 |
Remark: Two other assays were performed but one was not taken into account as it did not comply with the quality criteria and the other one did not rise Patm+ 2070 kPa.
The results were not, as expected around 2500 ms, between the mean pressure rise time of the aqueous nitric acid / cellulose mixture and that of the perchloric acid / cellulose mixture. Another series was performed with sodium chlorate of another provider. This first series was not taken into account.
Second series:
Assay No. |
Reference item mass(g) |
Cellulose mass |
Atmospheric pressure(kPa) |
Corrected pressure rise time(ms) |
Mean corrected pressure rise time(ms) |
Theorical calculated min and max accepted value: ± 30% of the mean pressure rise time(ms) |
1 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
98.8 |
9129 |
12164 |
[8515 ; 15813] |
2 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
98.8 |
10617 |
||
3 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
98.8 |
12378 |
||
4 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
98.8 |
14863 |
||
5 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
98.8 |
13831 |
The results of the second series were slightly lower than the results of the first series, but they were not around 2500 ms as indicated in the standard procedure.This second series was taken into account.
With 65% nitric acid aqueous solution reference item
Assay No. |
Reference item mass(g) |
Cellulose mass |
Atmospheric pressure(kPa) |
Corrected pressure rise time(ms) |
Mean corrected pressure rise time(ms) |
Theorical calculated min and max accepted value: ± 30% of the mean pressure rise time(ms) |
1 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
98.3 |
4338 |
3486 |
[2440 ; 4532] |
2 |
2.51 |
2.50 |
98.3 |
3485 |
||
4 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
98.3 |
4062 |
||
5 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
97.4 |
2815 |
||
6 |
2.51 |
2.50 |
97.4 |
2728 |
Remark: Another assay was performed but it was not taken into account as it did not comply with the quality criteria.
Mixtures with test item / cellulose
Assay No. |
Test item mass |
Cellulose mass |
Atmospheric pressure(kPa) |
Corrected pressure rise time(ms) |
Mean corrected pressure rise time(ms) |
Theorical calculated min and max accepted value: ± 30% of the mean pressure rise time(ms) |
1 |
2.49 |
2.50 |
97.6 |
23301 |
23700 |
[16590 ; 30810] |
2 |
2.51 |
2.50 |
97.6 |
21758 |
||
3 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
97.6 |
23249 |
||
5 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
97.6 |
24782 |
||
8 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
97.6 |
25411 |
Remark: Three other assays were performed but were not taken into account as they did not comply with the quality criteria.
The mean pressure rise time obtained with the test item / cellulose mixture was slower than the mean pressure rise time obtained with the three mixtures of reference item / cellulose.
The test item was not classified as an oxidizing liquid of Division 5.1 and thus was not assigned to any packing group,under the experimental conditions used.
Description of key information
The substance EC 939-457-4 is manufactured and used in a liquid form (aqueous solutions). The security physico-chemical parameters were therefore assessed from tests performed on aqueous solutions.
As the oxidising properties of the substance EC 939-457-4 in aqueous solution have not been investigated experimentally, a read-across approach was followed to fill in the endpoint. The oxidising properties of a structural analogue substance (= source substance EC 939-455-3) in aqueous solution were investigated in a GLP-compliant study (Demangel, 2013) performed in accordance with UN Manual of Tests and Criteria: Test O.2 (Test for oxidizing liquids). The mean pressure rise time obtained with the analogue substance / cellulose mixture was slower than the mean pressure rise time obtained with the mixtures of reference item / cellulose. The analogue substance (in aqueous solution) was not classified as an oxidizing liquid of Division 5.1 and thus was not assigned to any packing group, under the experimental conditions used. By analogy, the target substance 1-Propanaminium, N-(3-aminopropyl)-2-hydroxy-N,N-dimethyl-3-sulfo-, N-(C12-18(even numbered) acyl) derivs., hydroxides, inner salts (EC 939-457-4) in aqueous solution, at a similar concentration range, was not classified as an oxidizing liquid of Division 5.1 and thus was not assigned to any packing group.
The alkyl C-chain distribution of the source substance EC 939-455-3 significantly overlaps with the one of the target substance EC 939-457-7, the C12-alkyl derivative being the major constituent in both chemicals. The structural differences in side C-chains is not expected to lead to significant differences on phys-chem properties.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Oxidising properties:
- no
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
The oxidising properties of the structural analogue substance (= source substance EC 939-455-3) in aqueous solution were investigated in a GLP-compliant study (Demangel, 2013) performed in accordance with standard methods, without deviations. The study is considered as reliable (Klimisch 1) and was selected as key study for the endpoint of the target substance EC 939-457-4 in aqueous solution.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.