Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-457-4 | CAS number: 1469983-50-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
When tested for skin irritation in vivo, Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine as a 16% solids (registered substance C12 -18 cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine)or 41.5% solution (analogue substance C8 18 cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine), was not irritating.
When tested for eye irritation in vivo at concentrations ranging from 10% solids to 41.5%, Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine induced ocular damage that was persistent at the end of the observation period (7 to 21 days) in some animals. The registed substance C12 -18 Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine is therefore considered a severe eye irritant.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 27 February 1989 - 2 March 1989
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Abraded and nonabraded skin instead of intact skin used, exposure period of 24 hours instead of 4 hours, occlusive dressing instead of semi-occlusive, observations conducted up to 72 hours instead of 14 days, not conducted at the 48 h timepoint
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: modification of Section 1500.41 of the Code of Federal Regulations
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: clipped, then abraded and nonabraded sites used
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Observation period:
- 72 hours
- Number of animals:
- 3 (2M + 1F)
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24/72 h
- Score:
- 0.5
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- probability of weak irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Score:
- 0.5
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- probability of weak irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 2472 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- probability of weak irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24/72 h
- Score:
- 0.5
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- probability of weak irritation
- Interpretation of results:
- study cannot be used for classification
- Conclusions:
- Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 16% solids solution, is not considered a skin irritant.
- Executive summary:
Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 16% solids aqueous solution, has been tested for acute skin irritation on 2 male and one female New Zealand White rabbits, in accordance with procedures of section 1500.41 of US Code of Federal Regulations, and in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice.
The test article was applied as such in a single dermal dose of 0.5 mL to a clipped area of the abraded and non-abraded skin (appr. 10% of the skin surface), for 24 hours under an occlusive dressing. Cutaneous examinations were performed at 24 and 72 hours after the application.
At removal of the dressing, very slight erythema was observed in the 2 males at the abraded and non-abraded skin sites, and a well-defined erythema (score 2) was observed in the female at both skin sites. No oedema was observed in the male rats, whereas the female presented a very slight oedema.
No cutaneous reactions were observed in any of the animals at 72 hours, at both the abraded and non-abraded skin sites.
Based on these results, Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 16% solids aqueous solution, was not considered a skin irritant.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 25 May 1995 - 27 July 1995
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: accredited supplier
- Gender: male
- Age upon arrival at test facility: approx. 9-10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.3 - 2.4 kg
- Housing: individually in stainless steel cages (48 x 59 x 37 cm) with grilled floor
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18-22
- Humidity (%): 50-85
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 30 May 1995 To: 16 June 1995 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- 72 hours after the end of exposure period (examinations at 60 min, 24, 48 and 72 h)
- Number of animals:
- 3 males
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: approx. 6 cm²
- Type of wrap if used: substance placed on 2.5 x 2.5 cm surgical gauze, patch held close to the skin using adhesive tape strips, strip of gauze wrapped around trunk of the animal using additional adhesive tape
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): once patch removed, remainder of product eliminated with water
- Time after start of exposure: 4 hours
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scale - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- probability of weak irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- See table below
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 41.5% solution, is not considered a skin irritant.
- Executive summary:
Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 41.5% solution, has been tested for acute skin irritation on 3 male New Zealand White rabbits, in accordance with OECD test guideline 404, and in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice.
The test article was applied as such in a single dermal dose of 0.5 mL to a shaved 6 cm² area of the intact skin, for 4 hours under a semi-occlusive dressing. Cutaneous examinations were performed at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the dressing removal.
One hour after dressing removal, very slight erythema (grade 1) was observed in all animals. At examinations carried out 24 and 48 h after dressing removal, only one animal showed very slight erythema (grade 1).
No cutaneous reactions were observed in any of the animals at 72 hours after dressing removal.
Mean scores for erythema and edema (24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment) were 0.22 and 0.00, respectively.
Based on these results, Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 41.5% solution, was not considered a skin irritant.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
C8-C18 AAPHS and C12-18 AAPHS have the same functional groups, and general composition. The main variable resides in the alkyl chain distribution.
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Source chemical = C8-18 cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine (EC 939-455-3)
Target chemical = C12-18 cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine (EC 939-457-4)
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
The alkyl C-chain distribution of the source chemical significantly overlaps with the one of the target chemical, the C12-alkyl derivative being the major constituent in both chemicals. The structural differences in side C-chains is not expected to lead to significant differences on phys-chem properties.
4. DATA MATRIX: see "Documentation and scientific justification of the read-across approach" in section 13.2 - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- probability of weak irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- C8-18 Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 41.5% solution, is not considered a skin irritant. By analogy, C12-18 Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine is not considered a skin irritant.
Referenceopen allclose all
Animal number |
Erythema / Eschar |
Edema |
||||
24 h |
72 h |
Individual score |
24 h |
72 h |
Individual score |
|
Intact skin |
||||||
8173M |
1 |
0 |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8174M |
1 |
0 |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8175F |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0.5 |
|
Mean score |
0.7 |
Mean score |
0.2 |
||
Abraded skin |
||||||
8173M |
1 |
0 |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8174M |
1 |
0 |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8175F |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0.5 |
|
Mean score |
0.7 |
Mean score |
0.2 |
Details of skin irritation scores (according to Draize scale)
Animal number |
Erythema / Eschar |
Edema |
||||||||
60 min |
24 h |
48 h |
72 h |
Individual score* |
60 min |
24 h |
48 h |
72 h |
Individual score* |
|
146 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
912 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
913 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0.67 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Mean score |
0.22 |
Mean score |
0 |
* For the 24, 48 and 72 h timepoints
Details of skin irritation scores (according to Draize)
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 12-19 May 1988
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 7-day observation period instead of 21 days
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: modification of the US Code of Federal Regulations 1500-42 (1985)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single instillation (lids gently held together for 1 second before releasing them to prevent loss of test material)
- Observation period (in vivo):
- Ocular reactions graded at 24, 48, 72 hours, 4 and 7 days after instillation
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 males
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1.78
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.78
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- redness
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1.78
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1.78
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- other: conjunctival discharge
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1.56
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 10% solids solution (pH 7.0), is considered a severe eye irritant.
- Executive summary:
Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 10% solids solution (pH 7.0), has been tested for ocular irritation on 3 New-Zealand White rabbits, according to US Code of Federal Regulations1500-42 (1985), and in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice.
The test article was instillated, in a single dose of 0.1 mL, into the conjunctival sac of the right eye of each animal. The left eye remained untreated and served as a control. The eyes were not rinsed. Ocular examinations were performed 24, 48 and 72 hours, then on day 4 and 7 after instillation.
Corneal opacity (score 2) on a relatively large area was observed at 24 hours in the three rabbits. This reaction was no longer present at day 4 in two of the rabbits, but was still present at day 7 in the third one. The mean scores (24-48-72 hours) calculated for each animal were 2.0 - 1.67 - 1.67 for corneal opacity.
Iridial changes were observed at 24 hours in all the animals, then until 72 hours in one rabbit, and day 4 in another one. The mean scores (24-48-72 hours) calculated for each animal were 1.0 - 1.0 - 0.33 for iris reaction.
Conjunctival irritation (redness and chemosis) was observed throughout the observation period in two of the animals with decreasing intensity, while signs were no longer present at day 7 in the third one. The mean scores (24-48-72 hours) calculated for each animal were 2.0 - 2.0 - 1.33 for both redness and chemosis. In addition, conjunctival discharge was observed in all the animals.
Ocular effects were below classification criteria of Annex VI of the Directive 67/548/EEC for R41 classification, but complete reversibility was not assessed. Considering the persistence of eye damages at the end of the observation period (7 days), Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 10% solids solution (pH 7.0), was considered a severe eye irritant.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 12-19 May 1988
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 7-day observation period instead of 21 days
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: modification of the US Code of Federal Regulations 1500-42 (1985)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single instillation (lids gently held together for 1 second before releasing them to prevent loss of test material)
- Observation period (in vivo):
- Ocular reactions graded at 24, 48, 72 hours, 4 and 7 days after instillation
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 (2M + 1F)
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- redness
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 2.45
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1.67
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- other: conjunctival discharge
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 2.56
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 16% solids solution (pH 7.0), is considered a severe eye irritant.
- Executive summary:
Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 16% solids solution (pH 7.0), has been tested for ocular irritation on 3 New-Zealand White rabbits, according to US Code of Federal Regulations1500-42 (1985), and in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice.
The test article was instillated, in a single dose of 0.1 mL, into the conjunctival sac of the right eye of each animal. The left eye remained untreated and served as a control. The eyes were not rinsed. Ocular examinations were performed 24, 48 and 72 hours, then on day 4 and 7 after instillation.
Corneal opacity (score 2) on a relatively large area was observed at 24 hours in all of the rabbits. This reaction persisted until day 4 in 1/3 rabbits and day 7 in 2/3. The mean scores (24-48-72 hours) calculated for each animal were 2.0 - 2.0 - 2.0 for corneal opacity.
Iridial alterations (score 1) were observed in two animals, and the reaction persisted until up to day 7 in one animal, whereas it was no longer present at day 4 in the other. The mean scores (24-48-72 hours) calculated for each animal were 1.0 - 1.0 - 0.0.
Conjunctival redness (score 2 to 3) was observed at 24 hours and persisted until day 7 (score 3) in one rabbit, and day 4 in the two others (score 1). Chemosis was observed throughout the observation period with varying intensity depending on the animals. The mean scores (24-48-72 hours) calculated for each animal were 3.0 - 2.67 - 1.67 for redness and 2.0 - 2.0 - 1.0 for chemosis. In addition, significant conjunctival discharge was observed in all the animals at 24 and 48 hours, decreasing in intensity thereafter.
Considering the persistence of corneal damages at the end of the observation period (7 days), Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 16% solids solution (pH 7.0), should be considered a severe eye irritant.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 25 May 1995 - 28 July 1995
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: B&K Universal G.J., Barcelona, Spain
- Gender: male
- Age upon arrival at test facility: approx. 9-10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.2 - 2.4 kg
- Housing: individually in stainless steel cages (48 x 59 x 37 cm) with grilled floor
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18-22
- Humidity (%): 50-85
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 30 May 1995 To: 27 June 1995 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single instillation
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 21 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 males
- Details on study design:
- ADMINISTRATION OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Location: into the right conjunctival sac, made accessible by carefully pulling lower lid down
- Procedure immediately after instillation: lids of treated eye held closed for approx. 10 sec
OBSERVATION TIMEPOINTS: 1, 24, 48, 72 hours, and on day 7, 14 and 21 after instillation
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring on conjunctivae, iris and cornea (as per OECD test guideline 405 recommendations)
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE:
- Use of hand-slit lamp / biomicroscope: not specified
- Use of fluorescein: for all observations except 1 h after instillation - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of moderate irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of moderate irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of moderate irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.67
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of moderate irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of moderate irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.67
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of moderate irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.33
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of moderate irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 21
- Remarks on result:
- probability of severe irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- See table below
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 41.5% solution, is considered a severe eye irritant.
- Executive summary:
Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 41.5% solution (Betadet SHR), has been tested for acute eye irritation on 3 male New Zealand White rabbits, in accordance with OECD test guideline 405, and in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice.
The test article was applied as such in a single conjunctival dose of 0.1 mL in the right eye of each rabbit, the untreated eye being used as a control. Ocular examinations, grading cornea, iris and conjunctiva (redness and chemosis) reactions, were performed at 1, 24, 48, 72 hours, and on day 7, 14 and 21 after instillation of the test article.
Within the first hour following instillation, the test article induced conjunctival abnormalities including hyperhaemia ranging from grade 2 (diffuse, crimson color, individual vessels not easily discernible) to grade 3 (diffuse, deep red color), edema ranging from grade 2 to 3, redness of the bulbar conjunctivae, lacrimation and congestion and injection of the iris (grade 1).
At the observations carried out 24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation, all rabbits showed hyperhaemia ranging from grade 2 to grade 3, chemosis from grade 1 to grade 3, redness of the bulbar conjunctivae, lacrimation and congestion and injection of the iris (grade 1). Corneal opacity (grade 1) was also observed in all animals.
Some of the corneal and conjunctival abnormalities persisted up to day 14 after instillation inclusive. Conjunctival chemosis was still observed in one of the rabbits 21 days after instillation of the test article.
Based on these results, Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 41.5% solution, was considered a severe eye irritant.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
C8-C18 AAPHS and C12-18 AAPHS have the same functional groups, and general composition. The main variable resides in the alkyl chain distribution.
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Source chemical = C8-18 cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine (EC 939-455-3)
Target chemical = C12-18 cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine (EC 939-457-4)
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
The alkyl C-chain distribution of the source chemical significantly overlaps with the one of the target chemical, the C12-alkyl derivative being the major constituent in both chemicals. The structural differences in side C-chains is not expected to lead to significant differences on phys-chem properties.
4. DATA MATRIX: see "Documentation and scientific justification of the read-across approach" in section 13.2 - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 males
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of moderate irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of moderate irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of moderate irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.67
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of moderate irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of moderate irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.67
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of moderate irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.33
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- probability of moderate irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 21
- Remarks on result:
- probability of severe irritation
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Remarks:
- Based on conjunctival chemosis still observed in one rabbit 21 days after instillation
- Conclusions:
- C8-18 Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, as a 41.5% solution, is considered a severe eye irritant. By analogy, C12-18 Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine is considered as a severe eye irritant.
Referenceopen allclose all
Animal number |
24 h |
48 h |
72 h |
4 d |
7 d |
Individual score* |
Cornea |
||||||
7844 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
7845 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1.67 |
7846 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1.67 |
|
Mean score |
1.78 |
||||
Iris |
||||||
7844 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
7845 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7846 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.33 |
|
Mean score |
0.78 |
||||
Conjunctival redness |
||||||
7844 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
7845 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
7846 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1.33 |
|
Mean score |
1.78 |
||||
Conjunctival chemosis |
||||||
7844 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
7845 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
7846 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1.33 |
|
Mean score |
1.78 |
||||
Conjunctival discharge |
||||||
7844 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1.67 |
7845 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
7846 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Mean score |
1.56 |
* For the 24, 48 and 72 h timepoints
Details of eye irritation scores (according to Draize)
Animal number |
24 h |
48 h |
72 h |
4 d |
7 d |
Individual score* |
Cornea |
||||||
8167M |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
8168M |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
8169F |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
Mean score |
2 |
||||
Iris |
||||||
8167M |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
8168M |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8169F |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Mean score |
0.67 |
||||
Conjunctival redness |
||||||
8167M |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
8168M |
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2.67 |
8169F |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1.67 |
|
Mean score |
2.45 |
||||
Conjunctival chemosis |
||||||
8167M |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
8168M |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
8169F |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Mean score |
1.67 |
||||
Conjunctival discharge |
||||||
8167M |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2.67 |
8168M |
3 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2.33 |
8169F |
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2.67 |
|
Mean score |
2.56 |
* For the 24, 48 and 72 h timepoints
Details of eye irritation scores (according to Draize)
Animal number |
1 h |
24 h |
48 h |
72 h |
7 d |
14 d |
21 d |
Individual score* |
Cornea |
||||||||
299 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
289 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
190 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Mean score |
1 |
||||||
Iris |
||||||||
299 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
289 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
190 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Mean score |
1 |
||||||
Conjunctival redness |
||||||||
299 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2.67 |
289 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
190 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2.67 |
|
Mean score |
2.78 |
||||||
Conjunctival chemosis |
||||||||
299 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1.33 |
289 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2.33 |
190 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
Mean score |
1.89 |
* For the 24, 48 and 72 h timepoints
Details of eye irritation scores (according to Draize)
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
As the local effects of the registered substance C12 -18 cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine were assessed only with diluted substances, studies conducted in the structural analogue substance C8 -18 cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine (= source substance EC 939-455-3) were used to complete the dataset and assess the skin and eye irritation potential of the registered substance.
Skin irritation:
C8 -18 Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine was tested in vivo in a Klimisch score 1 study (1995), used as a key study. In this study, the test substance was applied to rabbits at 41.5% under semi-occlusive conditions for 4 hours. Very slight erythema was observed, which was fully reversible within 72 hours.
In another study (Klimisch score 2, 1989), used as supportive, the registere substance C12 -18 Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine had been applied to rabbits at 16% solids under occlusive conditions for 24 hours, either to intact or abraded skin. Whatever conditions, very slight erythema and/or edema were observed, which were fully reversible within 72 hours.
This correlates with the results of a Repeated Insult Patch Test in healthy human volunteers (see section 7.10.3. Direct observations), where the repeated dermal application of a 2.5% aqueous solution of C8 -C18 amidopropylhydroxysultaine to 44 healthy human volunteers under occlusive conditions did not result in any skin reaction indicative of irritation.
Eye irritation:
The structural analogue C8 -18 Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine was tested in vivo in a Klimisch score 1 study (1995), used as a key study. In this study, the test substance was instillated at 41.5% in the eyes of rabbits observed for up to 21 days. Corneal and conjunctival injuries persisted for up to day 14 inclusive in some animals. Conjunctival chemosis was still observed in one of the rabbits 21 days after instillation.
In two other studies (Klimisch score 2, 1988 or 1989), used as supportive, C12 -18 Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine had been instillated in rabbit eyes at 10% or 16% solids, the animals being observed for up to 7 days. Although the period of observation was not extended up to 21 days, corneal opacity and conjunctival redness, chemosis or discharge were still observed in some animals 7 days after instillation. The severity of the ocular findings was concentration-related.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion
endpoint:
Recent GLP and OECD test guideline-compliant study (Klimisch score 1)
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Recent GLP and OECD test guideline-compliant study (Klimisch score 1)
Effects on eye irritation: highly irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin irritation:
No relevant signs of skin irritation were noted in rabbits at concentrations of 16% solids or 41.5%. Therefore, Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine as a pure substance does not need to be classified for skin irritation.
Eye irritation:
Due to the persistence of ocular damage in some rabbits at the end of a 7 -day or 21 -day observation period following instillation of concentrations ranging from 10% solids to 41.5%, Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine as a pure substance needs to be considered a severe eye irritant and classified accordingly as Eye damage 1, H318 (according to Reg. 1272/2008 (CLP) criteria).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.