Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-618-0 | CAS number: 108-80-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- documentation insufficient for assessment
- Test organisms (species):
- other: Dreissena polymorpha pallas
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Zebra mussel
- Source: Collected from the lake of Salagou (Hérault)
- Age: 3-4 years
- Size: 20 - 30 mm
- Food type: Liquifray Marine
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 1 week - Test type:
- other: Semistatic and dynamic
- Test temperature:
- 17 - 25 °C
- Dissolved oxygen:
- Equivalent to 90%
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- The tests with crude cyanuric acid and purified cyanuric acid in a semistatic medium were conducted at 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/L.
- Details on test conditions:
- The test was conducted in glass aquaria
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- For the calculation of the LT (lethal exposure time) the experiments consisted of noting the survival time of each organism exposed to a given concentration. The logarithmic transformation of the survival times and that of the cumulative mortality percentages in probits allowed the generation of a straight line adjusted by the 'least squares' method (Bliss, 1957). From the equation of the straight line the LT10, LT50 and LT990 values were determined. The LT values were expressed in days.
- Conclusions:
- Raw cynauric acid revealed to be less toxic (LC50 1000 and 2000 mg/L > 1 month) than pure cyanuric acid (LT50 1000 and 2000 mg/L ≤ 17 days). The cyanuric acid seemed to act on 2 levels: 1) by valve decalcification and 2) by deterioration of kidney function with accumulation of the product.
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Water samples were taken from the control and each surviving test group (replicates pooled) for quantitative analysis. Samples of the fresh test preparations were taken on day 0 and of the expired test preparations on days 2, 5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 16, 19 and 21. Duplicate samples and samples of the freshly prepared solutions on days 2, 5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 16 and 19 were taken and stored at approximately -20°C for further analysis if necessary.
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION:
Amounts of test material (10000 and 5000 mg) were each seperately dissolved with the aid of ultrasonication for approximately 30 minutes at approximately 70-80°C in reconstituted water and the volumes adjusted to 2 and 1 litres respectively. Solutions were heated to aid dissolution. The stock solutions were then cooled to approximately 21°C and pooled prior to filtration through a 0.2 µm filter to give the 5000 mg/l test concentration. Aliquots (20, 64, 200 and 640 ml) of the 5000 mg/l test concentration were each separately dispersed in a final volume of 2 litres of reconstituted water to give the remainder of the test concentrations of 50, 160, 500 and 1600 mg/l respectively. - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Water flea
- Source: In house laboratory cultures
- Age: 1st instar
- Feeding during test: Each daphnid received approximately 5 to 10 µl of a unicellular algal culture (Chlorella sp.) daily. Feeding was at a level of approximately 0.1 to 0.2 mg carbon/daphnid/day dependent on the age and size of the animals. Equal amounts of food were given to each daphnid.
METHOD FOR PREPARATION AND COLLECTION OF EARLY INSTARS OR OTHER LIFE STAGES: Adult Daphnia were transferred to fresh media 3 times a week by wide bore pipette before the contents of each vessel were passed through a fine mesh. Young daphnids (live and dead) and any unhatched eggs were collected on the mesh and counted using stereo microscope. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Hardness:
- Refer to table 1
- Test temperature:
- Temperature was maintained at 18.7 to 20.4°C .Refer to attached document for measurements taken throughout the study
- pH:
- Concentration dependent differences in pH were observed throughout the tests. Refer to attached document for measurements taken throughout the study
- Dissolved oxygen:
- Refer to attached document for measurements taken throughout the study
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- 50, 160, 500, 1600 and 5000 mg/L (nominal) (equivalent to 37.8, 121, 378, 1210 and 3780 mg cyanuric acid/L).
Refer to table 2 for measured concentrations taken throughout the test. - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel:
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: 100 mL solution in 150 mL glass flasks
- Aeration: The diluent water only was aerated prior to use.
- Renewal rate of test solution: Test preparations were renewed 3 times per week on days 0, 2, 5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 16 and 19.
- No. of organisms per vessel: 1
- No. of vessels per concentration : 10
- No. of vessels per control: 10
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Reconstituted water
- Hardness: 250 mg/l as CaCO3
- Ca/mg ratio: CaCl2.2H2O: 11.76 g/L , MgSO4.7H2O: 4.93 g/L
- Conductivity: < 5 µS cm-1
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 16 h light, 8 hours dark with 20 minute dawn and dusk transition periods.
- Light intensity: 521-537 lux
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED: Immobilisation and reproduction. On a daily basis the numbers of live and dead of the ‘parental’ (P1) generation, the numbers of live and dead ‘filial’ (F1) daphnia and the number of discarded unhatched eggs were counted.
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 2 600 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- immobilisation
- Remarks on result:
- other: Equivalent to 1966 mg/l cyanuric acid
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 2 800 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: equivalent to 2117 mg/l cyanuric acid
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 500 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: mortality and reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: equivalent to 378 mg/l cyanuric acid
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 160 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: mortality and reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: equivalent to 121 mg/l cyanuric acid
- Details on results:
- Refer to table 3 and table 4
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The EC50 (immobilisation) values up to day 14 of the test were estimated by inspection of the data. The EC50 (immobilisation) value at day 21 was calculated by the maximum-likelihood logit method (Finney 1978) using the ToxCalc computer software package (ToxCalc 1999). 95% confidence limits could not be calculated due to the unsuitable nature of the data resulting from a flat dose response.
Logit analysis is used where two or more partial responses to exposure are shown. This method of statistical analysis was used as opposed to the probit method due to the unsuitable nature of the data for analysis by probit.
The observed mortalities in the parental (P1) generation of the 50 and 160 mg/L test groups were compared to the control group using the chi-squared statistic (Breslow and Day 1980).
The EC50 (reproduction) value and associated confidence limits after 21 days were calculated by the maximum-likelihood probit method (Finney 1971) using the ToxCalc computer software package (ToxCalc 1999).
Probit analysis was used where two or more partial responses to exposure are shown.
For the estimation of the “Lowest Observed Effect Concentration” (LOEC) and the “No Observed Effect Concentration” (NOEC) the numbers of live young produced per adult over the duration of the test control and each test group were compared using one way analysis of variance incorporating Bartlett’s test for homogeneity of variance (Sokal and Rohlf 1981) and Dunnett’s multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control (Dunnett 1955). Results from the control and each test group’s Daphnia length data, determined for the surviving daphnids on termination of the test, were compared using one way analysis of variance incorporating Bartlett’s test for homogeneity of variance (Sokal and Rohlf 1981) and Dunnett’s multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control (Dunnett 1955). Statistical analyses were performed using the SAS computer software. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Control mortality: 20%, Dissolved oxygen > 7.3 mg O2/l, pH (control): 0.5, Mean number of live young surviving adult (control group): 76, Coefficient of variation for control group: 9%
- Conclusions:
- Exposure of Daphnia magna to monosodium salt of cyanuric acid resulted in signifciant mortalities at the test concentrations of 500,1600 and 5000 mg/l resulting in 30%, 50% and 70% mortalities by day 21 respectively, compared to an observed mortality of 20% in the control by day 21.
The 21 day EC50 (immobilisation) values, based on nominal test concentrations, for the parental Daphnia (P1) was calculated to be 2600 mg/l. 95% confidence limits could not be calculated due to the unsuitable nature of the data resulting from a flat dose response.
The 21-day EC50 (reproduction) based on nominal test concentrations was 2800 mg/l with 95% confidence limits of 1800 - 4400 mg/l.
Referenceopen allclose all
The series of tests conducted with crude cyanuric acid (CCA) and purified cyanuric acid (PCA) in a semistatic medium at concentrations of 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/L allowed the calculation of the LT50and the confidence interval. Inspection of the LT50values distinguished two types of toxicity: a long term toxicity for the three concentrations of CCA and for the concentration of 500 mg/L for PCA, whose LT50values were higher at 1 month, as well as a medium term toxicity for the concentrations of 1000 and 2000 mg/L of PCA, whose LT50values were 16 and 17 days respectively.
The LT10 values obtained reflect the 5 times more rapid appearance of the lethal effect with PCA at 1000 and 2000 mg/L (LT10= 1 week) compared to PCA at 500 mg/L and CCA at the three concentrations tested (LT10> 5 weeks). The LT90values for the PCA at the concentration of 1000 and 2000 mg/L. (LT90~ 1 month) reflect an effectiveness that is two times better than with PCA at 500 mg/L and CCA at the three concentrations tested (LT90> 2 months).
The study of the physicochemical properties conducted during the course of the tests reflected an increase over time in the values of pH as well as concentrations of Ca++and (NH3 + NH4+). The pH values which are acidic at the beginning (6.2 ≤ pH ≤ 6.8), increase and stabilize after 48 h (7.5 ≤ pH ≤ 7.9.). The lower the starting pH values, the greater the increase in the Ca++concentrations. The increase n the level of ammonical nitrogen is more pronounced with CCA than with PCA. At the end of the experiment, the valves of the molluscs had been attacked or perforated in the vicinity of the apex, whereas no sign of alteration was observed in the controls. This alteration of the shells appeared earlier with PCA than with CCA; it was related to the concentrations of the two products.
Table 1: Water hardness measurements
Day |
Water hardness (mg/l as CaCO3) |
|
Control |
Highest surviving concentration |
|
0 (fresh media) |
260 |
244 |
2 (old media) |
252 |
240 |
7 (fresh media) |
252 |
134 |
9 (old media) |
258 |
226 |
14 (fresh media) |
250 |
126 |
16 (old media) |
248 |
94 |
Table 2: Measured concentrations of test substance:
Day |
Nominal concentration (mg/L) |
|||||
Control |
50 |
160 |
500 |
1600 |
5000 |
|
0 |
less than LOQ1 |
49.6 |
161 |
502 |
1610 |
4990 |
2 |
less than LOQ |
49.4 |
160 |
502 |
1600 |
4940 |
5 |
less than LOQ |
50.0 |
163 |
517 |
1650 |
5000 |
7 |
less than LOQ |
49.2 |
160 |
494 |
1590 |
4910 |
9 |
less than LOQ |
49.4 |
160 |
498 |
1590 |
4950 |
12 |
less than LOQ |
49.2 |
161 |
504 |
1600 |
3810/147000* |
14 |
less than LOQ |
48.6 |
158 |
503 |
1600 |
4900 |
16 |
less than LOQ |
49.2 |
160 |
498 |
1600 |
4880 |
19 |
less than LOQ |
50.5 |
160 |
486 |
1570 |
4750 |
21 |
less than LOQ |
4901 |
158 |
486 |
1580 |
4820 |
1 LOQ = Limit of quantitation
* Duplicate sample, stored frozen prior to analysis - considered as erroneious result due to analytical error
.
Table 3: Daphnia lengths of the parental generation
Nominal concentration (mg/l) |
Daphnia length at day 21 (mm) |
|
Control |
Mean Standard deviation |
4.5 0.3 |
50 |
Mean Standard deviation |
4.6 0.3 |
160 |
Mean Standard deviation |
4.5 0.5 |
500 |
Mean Standard deviation |
4.5 0.3 |
1600 |
Mean Standard deviation |
4.5 0.2 |
5000 |
Mean Standard deviation |
4.1* 0.2 |
* Significant differences (p <0.05)
Table 4: Summary of findings following the exposure of Daphnia magna for 21 days
Nominal concnetration (mg/l) |
% survival of P1 |
Number of live young |
Number of dead young |
Number of unhatched eggs |
|||
Total |
Per female (cumulative) |
Total |
Per female (cumulative) |
Total |
Per female (cumulative |
||
Control |
80 |
611 |
76 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
90 |
702 |
78 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
160 |
80 |
515 |
64 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
500 |
30 |
232 |
77 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1600 |
50 |
340 |
68 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
5000 |
70 |
52 |
7 |
348 |
50 |
1 |
0 |
.
Description of key information
A Daphnia magna reproduction study (OECD 211) performed with the Monosodium salt of cyanuric acid (equivalent to 75.6% cyanuric acid).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 121 mg/L
Additional information
A Daphnia magna reproduction study (Sewell 2007) was performed with the monosodium salt of cyanuric acid (equivalent to 75.6% cyanuric acid). Daphnia were exposed to nominal concentrations of 50, 160, 500, 1600 and 5000 mg/L (equivalent to 37.8, 121, 378, 1210 and 3780 mg cyanuric acid/L) for a period of 21 days.The numbers of live and dead adult Daphnia and young daphnids (live and dead) were determined daily. Exposure of Daphnia magna to monosodium salt of cyanuric acid resulted in significant mortalities at the test concentrations of 500,1600 and 5000 mg/L resulting in 30%, 50% and 70% mortalities by day 21 respectively, compared to an observed mortality of 20% in the control by day 21. The NOEC was considered to be 160 mg/L (equivalent to 121 mg/L CYA) on the basis that at this concentration there were no significant mortalities (immobilisation) observed in the parental generation (P1) and that there were no significant differences between the control and the 160 mg/L test group in terms of numbers of live young per adult by day 21.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.