Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 439-840-1 | CAS number: 20846-91-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to microorganisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
No activated sludge respiration tests were identified for EDDS acid (or its trisodium salt). However, in a test for biodegradability in sludge, 85% of trisodium EDDS was degraded after 28 days, demonstrating that the test substance did not significantly inhibit the activity of the sludge microflora (Lisec, 1993).
A 22-h NOEC and EC50 of 0.125 and 0.23 mg/L, respectively, were calculated for EDDS acid in the Microtox test (which measures the ability of a substance to inhibit the metabolic conversion of chemical energy to bioluminescence) in the marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri (Radix et al. 1999). [The bacterium used requires a saline environment, and therefore the results are only of limited relevance for assessing the potential toxicity to microorganisms residing in sewage treatment plants.]
However, in a test conducted according to OECD Guideline 209, no significant inhibition of the respiration rate was detected in an activated domestic sewage sludge treated with disodium EDTA at up to 500 mg/L ("referred as H4EDTA") after 30 minutes. Equimolar amounts of CaCl2 were added, thus calcium EDTA was formed in the stock solutions. Both the EC10 and NOEC values were concluded to be above 500 mg/L (van Ginkel and Stroo, 2000). The EU RAR (2004a,b) considers the EC10 of 500 mg/L determined in this study as the most relevant to use for deriving a PNEC.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC10 or NOEC for microorganisms:
- 500 mg/L
Additional information
No activated sludge respiration tests were identified for EDDS acid (or its trisodium salt). However, in a test for biodegradability in sludge, 85% of trisodium EDDS was degraded after 28 days, demonstrating that the test substance did not significantly inhibit the activity of the sludge microflora (Lisec, 1993). However, relevant data on related compounds were identified in the literature.
In an agar inhibition test, with the fungi Aspergillus niger and Pycnoporus sanguineus and the bacterium Staphylococcus aureus, no growth inhibition was noted with 100 mM EDDS complexes with Mn2+, Fe3+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+ or Pb2+. EDDS complexed with Hg2+at 10 mM slightly inhibited the growth of A. niger and S. aureus, but the zone of inhibition was equal to that of the free metal ion alone. Similarly, comparable zones of inhibition were seen with Cd2+-EDDS and Cd2+ when tested with P. sanguineus at 100 mM, although this chelate was slightly more toxic to A. niger than the free metal ion (presumably by facilitating the delivery of the toxic metal into the fungus). These results demonstrate that metal chelates of EDDS do not add to the toxicity of the free metal ions (Costa et al. 2008).
EDDS acid was tested for its potential toxicity (decrease in the ability of the bacteria to produce luminescence) in the bacterium Vibrio fischeri. Using a Microtox chronic test kit, which supplied all the reagents and the freeze-dried bacterium, the reconstituted bacterial cells were incubated for 22 h at 27oC with five unspecified concentrations of the test substance in a saline culture medium; each test was prepared in quadruplicate. Inhibition of luminescence (which is a combined function of cell division, metabolism, growth and luciferase induction) was measured photometrically. Full details of method not given. The 22-h EC10, EC20, EC50 and NOEC were 0.15, 0.17, 0.23 and 0.125 mg/L (Radix et al. 1999). [The bacterium used requires a saline environment, and therefore the results are only of limited relevance for assessing the potential toxicity to microorganisms residing in sewage treatment plants].
In a test conducted according to OECD Guideline 209, no significant inhibition of the respiration rate was detected in an activated domestic sewage sludge. Disodium EDTA was tested for 30 minutes in concentrations up to 500 mg/L ("referred as H4EDTA"), however equimolar amounts of CaCl2 were added, thus CaEDTA was formed in the stock solutions. Thus, both the EC10 and NOEC values were concluded to be above 500 mg/L (van Ginkel and Stroo, 2000). The EU RAR (2004a,b) considers the EC10 of 500 mg/L determined in this study as the most relevant to use for deriving a PNEC.
In a bacterial oxygen consumption test conducted according to the method of Robra with disodium EDTA, the 30-minute EC10 was 55 mg/L (i.e. 48 mg/L EDTA) (BASF, 1990). A test on the growth inhibition of Pseudomonas putida with tetrasodium EDTA gave a 16-h toxic effect concentration (EC3) of 105 mg/L (i.e. 81 mg/L EDTA) (Bringmann and Kühn, 1976). [According to the citing source (EU, 2004a,b) no data on the test conditions were available for either test.]
The inhibition of cell multiplication with different protozoa was assessed in several studies, but apparently under identical experimental conditions. Stock and preliminary cultures of the test protozoa were fed with viable bacteria, whereas the test cultures were fed with inactivated bacteria. Tetrasodium EDTA was used as the test substance. The test medium (pH 6.9) contained 290 mg/L Ca(NO3)2.4 H2O and 70 mg/L Mg(NO3)2.6 H2O, therefore the EDTA was completely complexed with Ca and Mg. At the end of the test period, the cells were counted, and the toxic effect concentration (i.e. EC5) was determined as EDTA equivalents. The toxic effect concentrations were: 13 mg/L (20 h), 510 mg/L (48 h) and 28 mg/L (72 h) for Uronema parduczi, Chilomonas paramaecium and Entosiphon sulcatum, respectively (Bringmann, 1978; Bringmann et al. 1980; Bringmann and Kühn, 1980). The citing source (EU, 2004a,b) considered these studies were not well documented and felt that nutrient deficiency could not be excluded as the cause of these results.
[Due to their structural similarity, data on EDTA (and its simple salts) are considered relevant to use for understanding the effects of EDDS acid on the inhibition of microbial respiration rate, and is acceptable for using as read-across information].
References (for which no ESR has been created; need to move to reference list in CSR)
BASF (1990a). Sauerstoffkonsumptionstest nach Robra, Titriplex III (cited in EU, 2004a,b).
Bringmann G (1978). Bestimmung der biologischen Schadwirkung wassergefährdender Stoffe gegen Protozoen. Z. Wasser Abwasser Forsch. 11, 210-15 (cited in EU, 2004a,b).
Bringmann G and Kühn R (1976). Vergleichende Befunde der Schadwirkung wassergefährdender Stoffe gegen Bakterien (Pseudomonas putida) und Blaualgen (Microcystis aeruginosa). Gwf-wasser/abwasser 117, 410-413 (cited in EU, 2004a,b).
Bringmann G and Kühn R (1980). Bestimmung der biologischen Schadwirkung wassergefährdender Stoffe gegen Protozoen, II. Bakterienfressende Cilliaten. Z. Wasser Abwasser Forsch. Nr. 1, 26-31 (cited in EU, 2004a,b).
Bringmann G, Kühn R and Winter A (1980). Bestimmung der biologischen Schadwirkung wassergefährdender Stoffe gegen Protozoen. III. Saprozoische Flagellaten. Z. Wasser Abwasser Forsch. 13, 170-173 (cited in EU, 2004a,b).
Costa NSJ et al. (2008). Antimicrobial activity of ethylenediaminedisuccinate metal complexes. Short cummunication. Chemistry and Diversity 5, 2156 -2159.
EU (2004a). European Union Risk Assessment Report (RAR); edetic acid (EDTA). Vol. 49. European Chemicals Bureau (ECB). Final report available at http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/DOCUMENTS/Existing-Chemicals/RISK_ASSESSMENT/REPORT/edtareport061.pdf.
EU (2004b). European Union Risk Assessment Report (RAR); tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (Na4EDTA). Vol. 51. European Chemicals Bureau (ECB). Final report available at http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/DOCUMENTS/Existing-Chemicals/RISK_ASSESSMENT/REPORT/na4edtareport062.pdf.
Lisec (1993) Adsorption/Desorption of E-4591.01 to Activated Sludge with 14C Analysis. Study No. WG-03- 002, LISEC Genk, Belgium (Unpublished report submitted by Procter and Gamble Manufacturing Pty Ltd) (cited in NICNAS, 2003).
NICNAS (2003). Full public report on trisodium ethylene diamine disuccinate. STD/1044. Available at http://www.nicnas.gov.au/publications/CAR/new/std/stdFULLR/std1000FR/std1044FR.pdf.
van Ginkel and Stroo (2000). Toxicity of EDTA to Activated Sludge. Final Research Report August 9, 2000 (cited in EU, 2004a,b).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.