Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-523-9 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Water solubility
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- water solubility
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- June 27, 2017 - November 02, 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC) was determined by measuring the surface tension of test item solutions at different test item concentrations. For surface active substances which form micelles in solution, the surface tension decreases with increasing concentration until the CMC is reached. At concentrations above the CMC, the surface tension remains constant.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of method:
- other: OECD harmonized ring method
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Analytical purity: 100% (UVCB)
- Purity test date: 06 June 2017
- Lot/batch No.: 180517GT41
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 31 December 2017
- Appearance: Beige pasty solid
- Storage: At room temperature - Key result
- Water solubility:
- 39.9 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Remarks on result:
- other: Expressed as Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC)
- Conclusions:
- The Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC) of the test item was determined by measuring the surface tension of test item solutions at different test item concentrations. The CMC was 39.9 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
The Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC) of the test item was determined by measuring the surface tension of test item solutions at different test item concentrations, according to the OECD harmonized ring method. The CMC was 39.9 mg/L.
- Endpoint:
- water solubility
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- June 27, 2017 - December 11, 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 105 (Water Solubility)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method A.6 (Water Solubility)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of method:
- flask method
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Analytical purity: 100% (UVCB)
- Purity test date: 06 June 2017
- Lot/batch No.: 180517GT41
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 31 December 2017
- Appearance: Beige pasty solid
- Storage: At room temperature - Water solubility:
- 100 g/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Conclusions:
- Based on the response for C18:1 amido propyl betaine at m/z 425.3 > m/z 322.3, it was concluded that the test item has completely dissolved at a nominal test item concentration of 10 g/L and that at 100 g/L maximum solubility has been reached since recovery was lower.
- Executive summary:
The water solubility of the test item was determined in a GLP-compliant study performed in accordance with EU Method A.6 and OECD Guideline No. 105. Based on the response for C18:1 amido propyl betaine, it was concluded that the test item has completely dissolved at a nominal test item concentration of 10 g/L and that at 100 g/L maximum solubility has been reached since recovery was lower.
Referenceopen allclose all
The CMC was determined from the intersection of the two trend lines y1 and y2. Trendline y1 was obtained using the data of the test solutions with test item concentrations of 1.0129, 5.0341, 10.020 and 30.102 mg/L. Trendline y2 was obtained from the mean surface tension of the test solutions with test item concentrations of 200.49, 499.5 and 999.01 mg/L. The intersection was calculated to be at a log C value of 1.60. It corresponded with a CMC of 39.9 mg/L.
RESULTS
Preliminary test
Preliminary test – 10 g/L. The 10 g/L solution had dissolved completely (visual observation) which was confirmed by the result of the analysis: based on the response for C18:1 amido propyl betaine, the content of test item dissolved in the water sample was 10.8 g/L.
Preliminary test – 100 g/L. The 100 g/L solution had become a green/yellow gel that could just be stirred. Centrifugation did not give phase separation. Therefore the gel was analysed. Concentration measured was the nominal concentration: based on the response for C18:1 amido propyl betaine, the content of test item dissolved in the water sample was 98.8 g/L.
Main study
Main study – 10 g/L. The results for the samples taken at 24, 48 and 72 hours are given in the table below. The maximum difference of the concentrations determined in the 24, 48 and 72 hour test
samples was ≤ 15%. Based on this, the water solubility of the test item is given as the mean value of the analyzed concentrations. No test item was detected in the pretreated sample from the corresponding blank water mixture.
Stirring time [hours] |
Prepared concentrations [g/L] |
Analyzed concentrations [g/L] |
Recovery [%] |
pH |
24 48 72 |
10.1 10.1 10.1 |
12.2 11.0 11.8 |
121 109 117 |
5.8 6.0 6.0 |
Main study – 100 g/L. The results for the samples stirred for 24, 48 and 72 hours are given in the table below. The maximum difference of the concentrations determined in the test samples stirred for 24, 48 and 72 hour was 18% and 7.0% in the test samples stirred for 48 and 72 hours. Based on this, the water solubility of the test item is given as the mean value of the analyzed concentrations after 48 and 72 hours of stirring. A very small response at the retention time of the test item was detected in the pretreated sample from the corresponding blank water mixture. The contribution to the test samples was negligible.
Stirring time [hours] |
Prepared concentrations [g/L] |
Analyzed concentrations [g/L] |
Recovery [%] |
pH |
24 48 72 |
100 101 102 |
84.0 93.4 100 |
84 93 99 |
n.a. n.a. n.a. |
Testing at concentrations > 100 g/L was not possible since the mixture could not be stirred anymore.
Description of key information
The Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC) of the test item was determined by measuring the surface tension of test item solutions at different test item concentrations, according to the OECD harmonized ring method. The CMC was 39.9 mg/L. The water solubility of the test item was otherwise determined in a GLP-compliant study performed in accordance with EU Method A.6 and OECD Guideline No. 105. Based on the response for C18:1 amido propyl betaine, it was concluded that the test item has completely dissolved at a nominal test item concentration of 10 g/L and that at 100 g/L maximum solubility has been reached since recovery was lower.
As the test item proved to be surface active, the Critical Micelle Concentration is preferred to characterize the water solubility of the test item.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Water solubility:
- 39.9 mg/L
- at the temperature of:
- 20 °C
Additional information
The water solubility of the test item was determined in two GLP-compliant studies performed in accordance with standard methods, without deviations. In a first study, the Critical Micelle Concentration was determined by measuring the surface tension of test item solutions at different concentrations. In a second study, the water solubility was determined by measuring the saturation limit of test item solutions at different concentrations. Both studies are considered as reliable (Klimisch 1) but as the test item proved to be surface active, the Critical Micelle Concentration is preferred to characterize the water solubility of the test item. The first study is thus selected as a key study for the endpoint whereas the second study is selected as a supporting study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.