Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 259-709-0 | CAS number: 55566-30-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- January to September 2000
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study, performed according to standard method.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 000
- Report date:
- 2000
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: the USA EPA, TSCA and FIFRA guidelines and the Japanese Ministry of International Trade and Industry Guidelines for testing of new chemicals.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- 1998-07-21
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium sulphate(2:1)
- EC Number:
- 259-709-0
- EC Name:
- Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium sulphate(2:1)
- Cas Number:
- 55566-30-8
- Molecular formula:
- C4H12O4P.1/2O4S
- IUPAC Name:
- tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium sulphate(2:1)
- Test material form:
- other: liquid stored at room temperature
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): THPS
- Physical state: colourless liquid
- Stability under test conditions: no data (responsability of the sponsor). However, test solutions were freshly prepared.
- Storage condition of test material: stored at room temperature
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: albino Crl:CD-1(ICR)BR
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River, UK
- sex: Range-finding study: males & females
Main study: males
- Age at study initiation: 5-8 weeks old,
- Weight at study initiation: 22-30 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Housing: caged by up to seven
- Diet and mains water were allowed ad libitum throughout the study
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 19 to 25°C
- Humidity: 30 to 70%
- Air changes: ca. 15 per hr
- Photoperiod: 12 hr dark / 12 hr light
IN-LIFE DATES: From 12 January to 2 March 2000
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: sterile water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: no toxic effects, no interaction with the test substance and recommanded by the guidelines
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: 9.38, 18.75, 37.5 mg/mL (expressed as main ingredient)
- Total volume applied: 10 mL/kg bw - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: freshly prepared in sterile water, no other information
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 and 48 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- single administration
- Post exposure period:
- clinical signs were evaluated 1 hour post dosing and once daily
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
93.8, 187.5, 375 mg/kg bw as main ingredient
Basis:
nominal conc.
equivalent to 122.45, 244.78 and 489.56 mg/kg bw expressed as active substance.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Vehicle control and test substance: 7 per group
Positive control: 5 - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Cyclophosphamide at 50 mg/kg bw
- Justification for choice of positive controls: known to produce micronuclei under the conditions of the test
- Route of administration: orally
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- erythrocytes from femur bone marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
A range-finding toxicity study was carried out in male and female mice at 250, 375 and 500 mg/kg bw, expressed as main ingredient.
In this initial toxicity test, 375 mg/kg bw was established as the maximal tolerated dose. There was no marked difference in toxicity between male and female mice. It was therefore considered acceptable to test male mice only in the micronucleus test.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES:
7 male mice/dose/sampling time were administered the test substance orally by gavage at 93.8, 187.5 and 375 mg/kg, expressed as main ingredient. The positive control cyclophosphamide was administered to 5 mice at 50 mg/kg bw.
Sampling time was 24 hours for all groups, plus an additional sampling period at 48 hours in the high dose and vehicle control groups.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: immediately following sacrifice, both femurs were dissected from each animal, aspirated with fetal calf serum and bone marrow smears prepared following centrifugation and resuspension. The smears were air-dried, fixed in absolute methanol and stained. - Evaluation criteria:
- Incidence of micronucleated cells and polychromatic/normochromatic erythrocytes ratio were evaluated per 2000 cells for each animal.
A positive mutagenic response was demonstrated when a statistically significant dose-response increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was observed for either the 24 or 48 hour kill times. - Statistics:
- The data were analysed using Student's t-test (two tailed) and any significant results were confirmed using the one way analysis of variance.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY for toxicity:
- Dose range: 250, 375 and 500 mg/kg bw, expressed as main ingredient.
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: hunched posture, lethargy, pilo-erection, increased lacrimation, hypothermia, decreased respiratory rate, laboured respiration, ataxia, ptosis, splayed gait, occasional body tremors and dehydration. 375 mg/kg bw was established as the maximal tolerated dose.
There was no marked difference in toxicity between male and female mice. It was therefore considered acceptable to test male mice only in the micronucleus test.
See table 1 below
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- clinical signs: There were two premature deaths in the 48 hour, 375 mg/kg bw test group.
Clinical signs observed at 24 and 48 hours in animals dosed with 375 mg/kg bw included hunched posture, lethargy, pilo-erection, decreased respiratory rate, laboured respiration, ataxia, pallor of extremities, ptosis, splayed or tiptoe gait, dehydration.
It was concluded that the test substance was absorbed.
- Induction of micronuclei: There was a statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes at the maximal tolerated dose of 375 mg/kg bw sampled at 24 hours compared to vehicle control group.
Testing at 48 hours showed no response.
Examination of a further 2000 PCEs at 24 hours showed a non-significant slight increase only over vehicle controls. The increase at 24 hours in the first evaluation was within historical control values.
- Ratio of PCE/NCE: There were no statistically significant decreases in PCE/NCE ratio in test groups compared to concurrent vehicle control groups. A slight decrease in PCE/NCE ratio was observed in animals treated at 375 mg/kg bw after 48 hours, compared to current control group. This was considered indicative of slight cytotoxicity, showing that exposure of the target tissue had been achieved.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 8.5. 1 Range-finding toxicity test
Dose level (mg/kg bw main ingredient) |
Sex |
Number of animals |
Deaths on day |
Total deaths |
||
0 |
1 |
2 |
||||
250 |
Male |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0/4 |
Female |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
375 |
Male |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0/4 |
Female |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
500 |
Male |
2 |
0 |
2 |
- |
4/4 |
Female |
2 |
0 |
2 |
- |
Table 8.5.2 micronucleus study - summary of group mean data
Treatment Group |
Number of PCE with Micronuclei per 2000 PCE |
PCE/NCE Ratio |
||
Group Mean |
SD |
Group Mean |
SD |
|
Vehicle control (48-hour sampling time) |
1.1 |
0.9 |
1.51 |
0.82 |
Vehicle control (24-hour sampling time) |
0.9 (0.9)a |
1.2 (1.9)a |
1.54 |
0.57 |
Positive control (24-hour sampling time) |
47.6*** |
19.8 |
2.07 |
1.71 |
THPS (375 mg/kg 48-hour sampling time) |
1.6 |
1.8 |
1.02 |
0.54 |
THPS (375 mg/kg 24-hour sampling time) |
2.9**(2.3)a |
1.9 (1.5)a |
1.64 |
0.84 |
THPS (187.5 mg/kg 24-hour sampling time) |
2.0 |
3.1 |
1.38 |
0.62 |
THPS (93.8 mg/kg 24-hour sampling time) |
1.0 |
1.4 |
1.50 |
0.52 |
a : supplementary data from extra 2000 PCEs
PCE: polychromatic erythrocytes
NCE: normochromatic erythrocytes
SD: standard deviation
***: p < 0.001
**: p < 0.01
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions of this study, THPS was considered to be non-genotoxic.
- Executive summary:
A study was performed to assess the potential of THPS to produce damage to chromosomes or aneuploidy when administered to mice. The method used was OECD 474 and in compliance with GLP.
A range-finding toxicity study was carried out in male and female mice at 250, 375 and 500 mg/kg bw, expressed as main ingredient.
7 male mice/dose/sampling time were administered the test substance orally by gavage at 93.8, 187.5 and 375 mg/kg bw, expressed as main ingredient. The positive control cyclophosphamide was administered to 5 mice at 50 mg/kg bw.
Sampling time was 24 hours for all groups, plus an additional sampling period at 48 hours in the high dose and vehicle control groups.
In the initial toxicity test, 375 mg/kg bw was established as the maximal tolerated dose. There was no marked difference in toxicity between male and female mice. It was therefore considered acceptable to test male mice only in the micronucleus test.
There were two premature deaths in the 48-hour 375 mg/kg bw test group. These deaths were not considered to have affected the integrity of the study, since 5 animals remained for evaluation as required under the OECD guideline.
Clinical signs observed at 24 and 48 hours in animals dosed with 375 mg/kg bw indicated that the test substance was systemically absorbed. A slight decrease in PCE/NCE ratio observed in animals treated at 375 mg/kg bw after 48 hours compared to the vehicle control group was considered indicative of slight cytotoxicity, showing that exposure of the target tissue had been achieved.
There was a statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes at the maximal tolerated dose of
375 mg/kg bwsampled at 24 hours compared to vehicle control group. Testing at 48 hours showed no response. Examination of a further 2000 PCEs sampled at 24 hours showed a slight, non-significant, increase over vehicle controls.
The increase at 24 hours in the first evaluation was within historical control values and consequently is not considered of toxicological significance. THPS is therefore considered to be non-genotoxic in this assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.