Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 259-709-0 | CAS number: 55566-30-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Three key studies of reliability 1 have been
identified for the three routes of exposure, the conclusions are the
following:
- oral toxicity: LD50/rat = 431 mg/kg bw (expressed as main ingredient;
THPS 100%) and LD50/rat = 575 mg/kg bw (expressed as active substance,
75% in water), (OECD 401, Kr.1)
- dermal toxicity: LD50/rat > 1500 mg/kg bw (expressed as main
ingredient; THPS 100%) and LD50/rat > 2000 mg/mk bw (expressed as active
substance, 75% in water), (OECD 402, Kr.1).
- inhalation toxicity: LC50/rat (aerosol) = 0.443 mg/L (expressed as
main ingredient; THPS 100%) and LC50/rat (aerosol) = 0.591
mg/L(expressed as active substance, 75% in water),(OECD 403, Kr.1)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 575 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Key study according to OECD 401 with reliability 1.
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Value:
- 0.591 µg/m³ air
- Quality of whole database:
- Key study according to OECD 403 with reliability 1.
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Quality of whole database:
- Key study according to OECD 402 with reliability 1.
Additional information
Acute oral toxicity:
The key study (Guest, 1994a) was performed with THPS 75% in Sprague-Dawley rats according to the EPA OPP 81 -1 (equivalent to OECD Guideline 401) and in compliance with GLP. Five animals/sex/dose were dosed once at three doses 500, 595 and 707 mg/kg bw by gavage (active substance) corresponding to 375, 446 and 530 mg/kg bw as main ingredient by gavage.
The LD50 after 14 days was for the active substance (THPS 75%) 575 mg/kg bw, and for the main ingredient (THPS 100%) = 431 mg/kg bw. Most relevant results were the appearance of the first clinical signs during the first day after dosing, with mainly hunched posture, ataxia and respiratory disturbance. If death had to occur, it was in the first 2 days, otherwise rats recovered a normal behaviour and no anatomical disruption was noticed. Based on this result, THPS (75% and 100%) is considered harmful by oral route.
Acute dermal toxicity:
One study was available and considered as the key study. This study was performed with THPS 75%, in CD rats according to the US EPA Pesticide Assessment Guidelines, Subdivision F, § 81-2 in compliance with the EPA OPPTS 870.1200 and OECD 402 guidelines and in compliance with GLP. Ten animals (5 males and 5 females) were dermally exposed to 2000 mg/kg bw of the test substance (THPS 75%) or 1500 mg/kg bw as main ingredient (THPS 100%) for 24 hours .
No death was observed. Except slight or well-defined temporary erythema observed in two females, no abnormal clinical or anatomical sign was noticed. Results expressed as main ingredient are: LD50> 1500 mg/kg bw, THPS would not have a potential for acute dermal toxicity.
Acute inhalation toxicity:
The acute inhalation toxicity test referenced was performed with THPS in aqueous solution (75.5 %) in Sprague-Dawley rats according to the OECD Guideline 403. This study was not chosen to decide upon the appropriate classification for inhalation; an other study is freely available at the US EPA.
This study was submitted by Cytec Industries Inc. and was accepted by theUScompetent authority. We decided to base the assessment of the acute inhalation toxicity of THPS on this study because:
- It is a GLP study complying with the OECD guideline 403 procedure,
- There is no major difference in the applied method,
- Qualitative description of the toxicological effect (clinical signs, necropsy observations) were similar,
- The aerosolization of the test substance seems to be more relevant in the study produced by Cytec Industries Inc, with more than 70 % of the inhaled particles characterised with an aerodynamic diameter lower or equal to the generally accepted maximum respirable particle size (4µm). While in the Rhodia UK Ltd's study, this proportion falls to 22-26 %,
- The acute inhalation median lethal concentration (LC50) for 4 hour exposure period calculated in the Cytec Industries Inc's study was one order of magnitude lower the value calculated in the study submitted by Rhodia UK Ltd., with 0.591 mg/L and 5.55mg/L respectively.
According to the GLP compliance and the experimental procedure homogeneity (OECD guideline 403) between the studies sponsored by Rhodia UK Ltd. and Cytec Industries Inc., and assuming a possible difference on in the aerosolization process of the test substance and the subsequent effect on the nose only exposure of the rats, the more protective study is chosen for the Human Risk Assessment, that is the study sponsored by Cytec Industries Inc.
Results of this study was as follows; (expressed as main ingredient, considering a typical concentration of 75 %)
Combined sexes: LC50= 0.591 mg/L, THPS as active ingredient is toxic by inhalation (THPS 75%).
In conclusion, acute oral and inhalation exposures to THPS induce common clinical signs of systemic toxicity, with piloerection, ataxia, hunched posture and laboured respiration. Necropsy findings, recorded mainly on animals that died within the observation period after exposure, included coloured/discoloured organs (lung, liver, kidney, digestive tracts). When clinical signs/symptoms of toxicity were observed without any associated adverse pathological findings at necropsy, these affected animals appeared to recover within the observation period following oral dosing but did not all recover completely even following extended observation in the case of inhalation exposure.
Following acute dermal exposure only local dermal effects (erythema) were observed.
THPS 75% is then classified toxic by inhalation, harmful if swallowed, and not hazardous by dermal exposure.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
GLP Guideline study with reliability 1. Further studies are
available. However, they are considered not valid (Kr. 3).
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – inhalation endpoint
Two key studies of reliability 1 are available. The selected key
study was chosen because the results were used to classify THPS 75% in
the worst case (see below for more details).
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
Only one study was available.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Acute oral toxicity:
- As the LD50/rat/THPS (100%) is 431 mg/kg bw THPS (expressed as main ingredient) is considered as harmful if swallowed and classified into category. 4 (H302) according to the Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 criteria.
- As the LD50/rat/THPS (75% in water) in rat was 575 mg/kg bw (expressed as active substance) is considered as harmful if swallowed and classified into category. 4 (H302) according to the Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 criteria.
Acute dermal toxicity:
- The dermal LD50 for THPS (100%) was > 1500 mg/kg bw. Considering that i) no death nor any toxicity effects was seen during the study with THPS 75% and after post-mortem analysis, ii) dermal absorption is approximately 40 -18 fold lower than oral absorption (depending on dilution) iii) oral LD50 is 431 mg/kg bw (expressed as active ingredient), it can be expected that the dermal LD50 for the active ingredient is higher than 2000 mg/kg bw resulting in no need of classification for this end-point.
- As the combined acute median lethal dose (LD50) of the active substance (THPS 75% in water) in rat was > 2000 mg/kg bw, no classification is required according to EU criteria.
Acute inhalation toxicity:
- As the LC50/4h-aerosol/rat/THPS (100%) is 0.443 mg/L THPS (expressed as main ingredient) is considered as fatal if inhaled and classified into category. 2 (H330) according to the Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 criteria.
- As the LC50/4h-aerosol/rat/THPS (75% in water) is 0.591 mg/L as active substance, THPS (75% in water) is considered as toxic if inhaled and classified into category 3 (H331) according to the Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 criteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.