Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-712-4 | CAS number: 124-76-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data from peer reviewed journal
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Developmental toxicity of d- camphor in New Zealand white (new) rabbits.
- Author:
- U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP)
- Year:
- 1 992
- Bibliographic source:
- U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP), 1992
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: As mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Reproduction and developmental toxicity evaluation of d-camphor administered by gavage to new zealand white (new) rabbits on gestational days 6 through 19
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (+)-bornan-2-one
- EC Number:
- 207-355-2
- EC Name:
- (+)-bornan-2-one
- Cas Number:
- 464-49-3
- Molecular formula:
- C10H16O
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,7,7-Trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-one
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report):d-camphor
- Molecular formula : C10H16O
- Molecular weight : 152.235g/mol
- Substance type:Organic
- Physical state: Solid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report):d-camphor
- Molecular formula : C10H16O
- Molecular weight : 152.235g/mol
- Substance type:Organic
- Physical state: Solid
Test animals
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Details on test animals and env. conditions
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hazelton Research Products, I n c . , Denver. PA
- Age at study initiation: (P) approximately 6 mos
- Weight at study initiation: Females: 2490-4440g
- Fasting period before study: No data available
- Housing: Animals were individually hosed in stainless steel cage with mesh flooring (Hoeltge. In c .Cincinnat,, OH).
- Use of restrainers for preventing ingestion (if dermal):no
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Purina certified Rabbit chow@ (#5322) pellets , ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): deionized/filtered water ad libitum
- Acclimation period:14 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):18.33-18.66°C
- Humidity (%):58%-64%
- Air changes (per hr): No data available
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): lights were on from 07.00h to 19.00h.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- Details on exposure
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Test materials dissolved in corn oil. The corn oil used i n the dose formulations contained less than 2 mill equivalents of peroxide/kg corn oil.
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency):No data available
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food )
- Storage temperature of food: No data available
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Test material dissolved in corn oil and stable throughout the study.
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 50,200,400mg/kg bw/day
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 2ml/kg bw
- Lot/batch no. (if required): No data available
- Purity: No data available - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage:A artificially inseminated female animals were used
- Length of cohabitation: No data available
- Proof of pregnancy: [vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear] referred to as [day 0 / day 1] of pregnancy:The day of insemination was designated as
Gestational day (gd) 0
- After ... days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility.No data available
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: [no / yes (explain)]No data available
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): No data available
- Any other deviations from standard protocol:No data available - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 13 days ( gestational days 6-19)
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Details on study schedule:
- No data available
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- 0, 50, 200, 400 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Total:104
0 mg/kg bw/day:26
50mg/kg bw/day:26
200mg/kg bw/day:26
400 mg/kg bw/day:26 - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The designated dose level were based upon Preliminary dose rang – finding study.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random):
- Other: - Positive control:
- No data available
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- Parental animals observation and examinations
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: yes
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS:
Time schedule: Animals were observed daily before (gd 0-5). During (gd 6-19). and after (gd 20-30) dosing
For clinical signs of toxicity .
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
Time schedule for examinations: animals were weighed on the mornings of gd 0, 6 through 19,25 and 30
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes Food was weighed on gd 0,3,6,9,12,15,18,19,22,25,28 and 30.
Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: Yes / No / No data: No data available
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data
Time schedule for examinations: - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- No data available
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- No data available
- Litter observations:
- STANDARDISATION OF LITTERS
- Performed on day 4 postpartum: [yes/no]
- If yes, maximum of [...] pups/litter ([...]/sex/litter as nearly as possible); excess pups were killed and discarded. No data available
PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in [F1] offspring:
number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality, presence of gross anomalies were observed
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS:
yes, for external and internal abnormalities; possible cause of death was/was not determined for pups born or found dead
ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROTOXICITY:No data available
ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL IMMUNOTOXICITY:No data available - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
- Male animals: All surviving animals [describe when, e.g. as soon as possible after the last litters in each generation were produced.]No data available
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals [describe when, e.g. after the last litter of each generation was weaned.]The animals were killed with an injection of sodium pentobarbital (Barber Veterinary Supply. Fayetteville NC) in the marginal ear vein on gd 30
GROSS NECROPSY: yes
At gross necropsy Liver and intact uterus was weighed and corpora lutea were counted. Uterine contents were examined to determine the number of implantation sites, resorptions, dead foetuses and live foetuses. Uteri which had no visible implantation sites was stained with ammonium sulphide (10%) to detect very early resorptions
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
The tissues indicated in Table [#] were prepared for microscopic examination and weighed, respectively. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE:live foetuses were dissected from the uterus and also anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital.
- These animals were subjected to postmortem examinations (macroscopic and/or microscopic examination) as follows:
GROSS NECROPSY: yes
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGTHS
The tissues indicated in Table [#] were prepared for microscopic examination and weighed, respectively. - Statistics:
- General Linear Models (GLM) procedures were applied for the analyses of variance (ANOVA) of maternal and fetal parameters. Prior to GLM analysis ,an arcsine-square root transformation was performed on a litter- derived percentage data (Snedecor and Cochran. 1967) and Bartletts test for homogeneity of variance was performed on all data to be analysed by ANOVA (Winer. 196'2). GLM analysis determined the significance of dose-response relationships and the significance of dose effects. Replicate effects and dose x replicate interactions. When ANOVA revealed a significant (p<0.05) dose effect. Williams' and Dunnett's Multiple Comparison Tests (Williams, 1971: 1972: Dunnett. 1955: 1964) compared CAM-exposed to control groups. One-tailed tests were used for all pairwise comparisons except maternal body and organ weights. Maternal food consumption. fetal body weight and percent males per litter. Non-significant (p>0.05) dose x replicate effects on selected fetal parametric measures were considered justification for pooling data across replicates for nonparametric analysis on related measures. When a significant (p<0.05#) dose x replicate' interaction occurred, the data for that endpoint and f0.r any related nominal scale data were analysed separately for dose effects within each replicate in the study. As well as for all replicates combined. Nominal scale measures were analysed by a x2 test for independence and by a test 'f0.r linear trend on proportions. When x2 test showed significant group differences. a one tailed
Fisher's exact probability test was used for pairwise comparisons of CAM and control groups. - Reproductive indices:
- No data available
- Offspring viability indices:
- No data available
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related clinical signs were observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- There were no dose related maternal deaths during the study, but two does were removed from the 400 mg/kg/day dose group because of dosing error.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Maternal body weight before, during and after treatment period in the treated animals was also comparable to control weights at all gestational ages.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Food consumption in all dose -treated groups was similar to control throughout the study
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not specified
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not specified
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
Effect levels (P0)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 400 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- mortality
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
- reproductive performance
- Remarks on result:
- other: No maternal toxicity was observed
Target system / organ toxicity (P0)
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- not specified
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Live litter size were unaffected .
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- average fetal body weight were unaffected
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Sexual maturation:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No external ,skeletal and visceral malformations were observed .
- Histopathological findings:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No incidence of anatomical variation or defects were observed
Developmental neurotoxicity (F1)
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
Developmental immunotoxicity (F1)
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not specified
Effect levels (F1)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 400 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- viability
- body weight and weight gain
- gross pathology
- Remarks on result:
- other: No developmental toxicity was observed at given dose level
Target system / organ toxicity (F1)
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Relation to other toxic effects:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Maternal toxicity in New Zealand white rabbits exposed to d- Camphor on gestational day 6 through 19
|
d- Camphor (mg/kg/day) |
|||
0 |
50 |
200 |
400 |
|
Subjects |
|
|
|
|
Total treated |
26 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
No . removed or deade |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
No. (%) pregnant at sacrifice |
23(88) |
20(77) |
21 (81) |
20(83) |
Maternal body weight gain (g)a.b |
|
|||
Treatment period (gd 6 to 19) |
165±38$ |
144± 22 |
157±32 |
67 ± 33 |
Gestation period (gd 0 to 30) |
529± 36 |
577 ± 43 |
533 ± 44 |
506 ± 46 |
Corrected gestation wt. gainc |
81± 54 |
67± 59 |
41 ± 58 |
11 ± 55 |
Gravid uterine weighta |
474 ± 33 |
509± 33 |
492 ± 24 |
495 ± 30 |
Maternal liver weighta.b |
|
|||
Absolute (g) relative (% body weight) |
108± 4.7 2.7 ± 0.1 |
114 ± 6.2 2.9 ±0.1 |
114 ± 4.2 2.8 ± 0.1 |
111 ± 5.9 2.8 ±0.1 |
Relative food consumptiona.b(g/kg /day) |
|
|||
Gd 0 to 6 |
50.4 ± 2.3 |
53.9 ± 2.4 |
56.3 ±2.2 |
54.2 ± 1.6 |
Gd 6 to 9 |
37.1 ± 3.2 |
37.3 ± 3.2 |
37.2± 2.9 |
31.1 ±2.8 |
Gd 9 to 12 |
48.2 ±2.5 |
48.1 ± 2.0 |
48.6± 2.1 |
43.7 ±2.0 |
Gd 12 to 15 |
34.9 ±2.7 |
35.0 ±3.0 |
34.8 ±3.1 |
30.8 ± 2.7 |
Gd 15 to 19 |
33.4 ±3.1 |
30.4 ± 3.0 |
34.2 ±2.8 |
28.3 ±3.3 |
Gd 19 to 25 |
44.1 ±1.9 |
42.7 ±1.2 |
43.3 ±2.7 |
43.2 ±2.1 |
Gd 25 to 30 |
35.8 ±2.2 |
36.5 ± 1.7 |
35.0 ±2.0 |
35.9 ±2.2 |
$Test for Liner Trend .p<0.05
A includes all dams pregnant at sacrifice. Mean ± SEM.
B Maternal gestational and corrected weight changes and relative organ weight were calculated using body weight at the time of sacrifice an gd 30
C Weight gain during gestation minus gravid uterine weight.
D body weight was recorded in morning of each designated gestational day. Relative food intake was calculated using these weights.
E Two does were removed in the 400mg/kg bw dose group because of gavage error.
Results of the Uterine Examination of New Zealand White Rabbits
Exposed to d-Camphor on Gestational Days 6 Through 19
|
D – camphor |
|||
|
0 |
50 |
200 |
400 |
All litters (no.)a |
23 |
20 |
21 |
20 |
No corpora lutea per doe c |
9.2±0.6 |
9.4±0.6 |
10.1±0.7 |
9.2 ±0.5 |
No. implantation sites per litter c |
6.9 ±0.6 |
7.4 ±0.7 |
7.1 ±0.5 |
7.1±0.6 |
% resporption per litter c |
4.7±1.8 |
5.9 ±2.9 |
5.1± 1.8 |
5.6±2.1 |
% litters with one or more resorption |
26 |
25 |
33 |
30 |
%late fetal death per litterc |
0.9 ±0.6 |
0.8±0.6 |
0.0±0.0 |
2.3±1.6 |
% litters with one or more late fetal death |
9 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
% nonlive implants per litterc d |
5.6±1.8 |
6.7 ±3.1 |
5.1±1.8 |
7.8±2.4 |
% litters with one or more nonlive implantsd |
35 |
25 |
33 |
40 |
% litters with 100% nonlive implantsd |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
% adversely affected implants per litterc e |
8.1±2.3 |
8.4± 3.3 |
5.1±1.8 |
8.3±2.4 |
% litters with one or more adversely affected implantse |
43 |
30 |
33 |
45 |
No . live littersb |
23 |
20 |
21 |
20 |
No. live foetuses per litterc |
6.5±0.6 |
6.7 ±0.5 |
6.7±0.5 |
6.5±0.6 |
Av. Fetal body wt. (g) per litterc |
|
|
|
|
Male foetuses |
51.9±1.6 |
54.2±1.7 |
51.8± 1.6 |
53.3± 1.5 |
Female foetuses |
49.9 ±1.4 |
53.7±1.4 |
52.5±2.0 |
53.3±1.4 |
% male foetuses per litterc |
49 ±6 |
51±5 |
44± 5 |
55±6 |
Malformationsb |
|
|
|
|
% foetuses malformed per litterc |
|
|
|
|
Both sexes |
2.5±1.8 |
1.7 ±1.7 |
0.0±0.0 |
0.5±0.5 |
Male foetuses |
1.2 ±1.2 |
2.6±2.6 |
0.0 ±0.0 |
0.0 ±0.0 |
Female foetuses |
4.8 ±4.8 |
0.0±0.0 |
0.0±0.0 |
0.8 ±0.8 |
Variationb |
|
|
|
|
% fetuse with variations per litter c |
61.5±6.9 |
54.0±8.6 |
54.3±8.2 |
60.4 ±6.8 |
% litter with one or more variations per litter |
91 |
80 |
86 |
95 |
a Includes all does pregnant at sacrifice ; litter size = no. implantation site per doe.
b Includes only does with live foetuses: litter size = no. live fetuses per doe.
c Mean±SEM.
d Non live = resorptions and late fetal deaths.
e Adversely affected = non live and malformed.
Morphological Abnormalities Observed i n New Zealand White Rabbit Fetuses Following Maternal
Exposure to d-Camph or on Gestational Days6through 19: Listing by Defect
|
D – camphor |
|||
|
0 |
50 |
200 |
400 |
Total No. of Fetuses Examinedb |
149 |
134 |
140 |
129 |
Total No. of Litters Examinedd |
23 |
20 |
21 |
20 |
Any malformation |
|
|||
No of fetuese with any malformationsc |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
% fetuses with any malformations |
1.3% |
0.7% |
0.0% |
0.8% |
No of litters with any malformationse |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
% litters with any malformations |
8.7% |
5.0% |
0.0% |
5.0% |
External malformation |
|
|||
No of fetuese with external malformationsc |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
% fetuses with external malformations |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
No of litters with external malformationse |
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
% litters with external malformations |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
Skeletal malformation |
|
|||
No of fetuese with skeletal malformationsc |
1 |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
% fetuses with skeletal malformations |
0.7% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
No of litters with skeletal malformations e |
1 |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
% litters with skeletal malformations |
4.3% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
Fused sternebrae : III and IV |
1 |
|
|
|
Visceral malformation |
|
|||
No of fetuese with visceral malformationsc |
1 |
1 |
0 1 |
|
% fetuses with visceral malformations |
0.7% |
0.7% |
0.0% |
0.8% |
No of litters with visceral malformations e |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
% litters with visceral malformations |
4.3% |
5.0% |
0.0% |
5.0% |
Left subclavian Arising from the apparent ductus arteriosis |
1 |
|
|
|
reversed Aorta |
1 |
|
|
|
Gall bladder: small and round |
|
1 |
|
1 |
Any variation |
|
|||
No of fetuese with any variationsc |
95 |
75 |
77 |
79 |
% fetuses with any variations |
63.8% |
56.0% |
55.0% |
61.2% |
No of litters with any variations |
21 |
16 |
18 |
19 |
% litters with any variations |
91.3% |
80.0% |
85.7% |
95.0% |
External variations |
|
|||
No of fetuese with external variationsc |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
% fetuses with external variations |
0.0% |
0.0% |
2.1% |
0.0% |
No of litters with external variations |
0.0% |
0.0% |
1 |
0.0% |
% litters with external variations |
0.0% |
0.0% |
4.8% |
0.0% |
Hematoma : most or All of body |
|
|
3 |
|
Skeletal variations |
|
|||
No of fetuese with Skeletal variationsc |
92 |
67 |
71 |
71 |
% fetuses with Skeletal variations |
61.7% |
50.0% |
50.7% |
55.0% |
No of litters with Skeletal variations |
20 |
13 |
16 |
16 |
% litters with Skeletal variations |
87.0% |
65.0% |
76.2% |
80.0% |
Rib on lumbar I : Bilateral full |
71 |
52 |
55 |
52 |
Left full |
9 |
2 |
8 |
8 |
Right full |
4 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
Bilateral rudimentary |
3 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
Left rudimentary |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Right rudimentary |
8 |
|
3 |
2 |
Visceral variations |
|
|||
No of fetuese with Visceral variationsc |
4 |
8 |
7 |
10 |
% fetuses with Visceral variations |
2.7% |
6.0% |
5.0% |
7.8% |
No of litters with Visceral variations |
3 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
% litters with Visceral variations |
13.0% |
25.0% |
28.6% |
30.0% |
Agenesis of the innominate Artery abnormal number of papillary muscles :2 in right ventricle |
|
|
1 |
|
4 in right ventricle |
5 |
|
1 |
6 |
5 in right ventricle |
1 |
|
|
|
6 in right ventricle |
|
|
1 |
|
Bifurcated papillary muscle : 1 in left ventricle |
|
|
1 |
|
1 in left ventricle |
|
|
|
|
2 in left ventricle |
1 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
Trifurcated papillary muscles : 1 in right ventricle |
|
|
1 |
|
Right kidney slightly displaced and ureter shorter than normal |
1 |
|
|
|
gall bladder: Half normal size |
2 |
|
|
1 |
Half normal size with a constriction at the fundus |
|
|
1 |
|
Twice normal size |
|
|
|
1 |
A incidence of individual defects is expressed a s the number of individual fetuses exhibiting defect. Thus a single fetus may be represented more than once in listing defects. Approximately 50% of the fetuses were decapitated prior to skeletal staining: heads were fixed in Bouin's solution and examined using a free-hand section method.
B Only live fetuses were examined.
C Fetuses with one or more malformations/variations.
D Includes only litters with live fetuses.
E Litters with one or more malformed/variant fetuses
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for maternal and foetal toxicity was considered to be 400 mg/kg/day. When female new Zealand white rabbits were treated with d-camphor (464-49-3) orally.
- Executive summary:
The reproductive and developmental toxicity study ofd-camphor(464-49-3) was performed in new Zealand white rabbits.104 rabbits were divided as 26/ dose group. The test material dissolved in corn oil and administered in dose volume 2ml /kg in concentration0, 50, 200, 400 mg/kg bw/day by oral gavage routeon gestational day 6 through 19.The designated dose level were based upon
Preliminary dose rang – finding study. A artificially inseminated female animals were used and the day of insemination was designated as Gestational day (gd) 0. Animals were observed daily before (gd 0-5),during (gd 6-19) and after (gd 20-30) dosing for clinical signs of toxicity.Animalswere weighed on the mornings of gd 0, 6 through 19,25and 30.Food was weighed on gd 0,3,6,9,12,15,18,19,22,25,28 and 30. At necropsy,The animals were killed with an injection of sodium pentobarbital(Barber Veterinary Supply. Fayetteville NC)in the marginal ear vein on gd 30. Liver and intact uterus was weighed and corpora lutea were counted. Uterine contents were examined to determine the number of implantation sites, resorptions, dead foetuses and live foetuses. Uteri which had no visible implantation sites was stained with ammonium sulphide (10%) to detect very early resorptions.live foetuses were dissected from the uterus and also anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital.The foetuses were weighed, sexed and subjected to external, soft tissue or skeletal examinations.Half of the foetuses were decapitated prior to dissection, the heads were fixed in bouins solution and then examined by free hand sectioning technique . All fetal carcasses (50% without heads) were stained with alcian blue/ alizarin red S and examined for skeletal malformations
There were no dose related maternal deaths during the study, but two animals were removed from the 400 mg/kg/day dose group because of dosing error. Food consumption in all dose -treated groups was similar to control throughout the study. Maternal body weight before, during and after treatment period in the treated animals was also comparable to control weights at all gestational ages. Maternal weight gain during the dosing period tended to decrease with increasing dose. Maternal weight gain relative to control animals was reduced 13%, 5% and59%in the 50, 200 and 400 mg/kg/day dose groups respectively. Gravid uterine and absolute and relative maternal liver weights were similar to vehicle control values.
Results of the uterine examination revealed that test material was not developmental toxic effects even at the highest dose. No effect was seen for the percent resorption per litter. The percent late fetal deaths per litter , the percent non live implants per litter or the percent adversely affected implants per litter. The proportion of litters with one or more resorption , late fetal deaths, nonlive implants or adversely affected implants were not affected by dose exposure. Live litter size and average fetal body weight were also unaffected .No external , skeletal and visceral malformations were observed . No incidence of anatomical variation or defects were observed. HenceNo Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for maternal and foetal toxicity was considered to be 400 mg/kg/day.When femalenew Zealand white rabbits were treated withd-camphor(464-49-3)orally.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.