3-aminobenzenesulphonic acid

Endpoint summary

Description of key information

OECD 429: 3-aminobenzenesulfonic acid is not considered skin sensitizing in a LLNA (Harlan CCR, 2012)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records

Reference

Endpoint:

skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: GLP compliant guideline study, available as unpublished report, no restrictions, fully adequate for assessment.

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)

GLP compliance:

yes (incl. QA statement)

Remarks:

Harlan Cytotest Cell Research GmbH, ln den Leppsteinswiesen 19, 64380 Roßdorf

Type of study:

mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Species:

mouse

Strain:

CBA

Sex:

female

Details on test animals and environmental conditions:

TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories B.V., Postbus 6174, 5960 AD Horst / The Netherlands
- Age at study initiation: 1st pre-test: 9 - 10 weeks (beginning of treatment); 2nd pre-test: 11 - 12 weeks (beginning of treatment); 3rd pre-test: 10 – 11 weeks (beginning of treatment); Main study: 11 – 12 weeks (beginning of treatment)
- Weight at study initiation: 1st pre-test: 21.4-22.9g; 2st pre-test: 20.9 - 21.1g; 3st pre-test: 19.5g; main study: 20.3 - 23.7g
- Housing: in group in Makrolon Type II (pre-test) / III (main study), with wire mesh top (EHRET GmbH, 79302 Emmendingen, Germany) with granulated soft wood bedding (Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH + Co. KG, 73494 Rosenberg, Germany)
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): 2018C Teklad Global 18% protein rodent diet (certified), ad libitum (Harlan Laboratories B.V., 5960 AD Horst, Netherlands)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water, ad libitum (Gemeindewerke, 64380 Rossdorf, Germany)
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days prior to the start of dosing under test conditions after health examination. Only animals without any visible signs of illness were used for the study.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2
- Humidity (%): relative humidity 45-65% (during the pre-tests: for several hours on several days >95%)
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): artificial light 6.00 a.m. - 6.00 p.m.

Vehicle:

dimethyl sulphoxide

Concentration:

0.05, 0.1, 0.25 % (w/w)

No. of animals per dose:

4

Details on study design:

RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: A solubility experiment was performed according to the recommendations given by OECD 429. The highest test item concentration, which could be technically used was a 5 % suspension in dimethylsulfoxide. Vortexing and sonicating was used to formulate the test item. At higher concentrations, an applicable formulation of the test item was not achieved, neither by the use of other vehicles nor by using additional methods to formulate the test item (e.g. warming to 37°C).
- Irritation: To determine the highest non-irritant test concentration that at the same time did not induce signs of systemic toxicity, a pre-test was performed. Two mice were treated by (epidermal) topical application to the dorsal surface of each ear with test item concentrations of 2.5 and 5% once daily each on three consecutive days. At the tested concentrations, the animals did not show any signs of systemic toxicity. However, in both animals a visible ear swelling of 29.9 and 30.5%, respectively, compared to pre-treatment values was observed on day 6 of treatment, indicating excessive local skin irritation. Ear weights were also increased compared to historical vehicle data. Moreover, both animals developed a slight eschar formation on the ear skin on days 4 and 6.
Therefore, a second pre-test was performed with test item concentrations of 0.5 and 1%. Again, ear swelling of more than 25% compared to pre-treatment values was noted in the high dose animal. Excessive increase in ear weights and erythema formation (score: 1-2) also indicated a significant irritation of the ear skin in both animals.
A third pre-test was performed using concentrations of 0.1 and 0.25%. Although in the animal treated with 0.1% test item increase in ear weights was 35% compared to historical vehicle values (i.e., 27.2 mg/animal for dimethylsulfoxide), all other parameters indicating irritation of the ear skin were within the desired range for this animal. The animal treated with a concentration of 0.25% did not develop any signs of excessive skin irritation.
Thus, it was decided together with the sponsor to assay the test item in the main study at 0.05, 0.1 and 0.25% (w/w). The highest concentration tested was the highest level that could be achieved whilst avoiding systemic toxicity and excessive local skin irritation in the pre-experiment.
- Lymph node proliferation response: not determined

MAIN STUDY
Test Item Preparation:
The test item was placed into an appropriate container on a tared balance and dimethylsulfoxide was added. The different test item concentrations were prepared individually. Homogeneity of the test item in vehicle was maintained during treatment using a magnetic stirrer. The preparations were made freshly before each dosing occasion. Concentrations were in terms of material as supplied.

Topical Application:
Each test group of mice was treated by topical (epidermal) application to the dorsal surface of each ear with test item concentrations of 0.05, 0.1 and 0.25% (w/w) in dimethylsulfoxide. The application volume, 25 μL/ear/day, was spread over the entire dorsal surface (Ø ~ 8 mm) of each ear once daily for three consecutive days. A further group of mice was treated with an equivalent volume of the relevant vehicle alone (control animals).

Administration of ³H-Methyl Thymidine
³H-methyl thymidine (³HTdR) was purchased from Hartmann Analytic, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany (specific activity, 2 Ci/mmol; concentration, 1 mCi/mL). Five days after the first topical application (day 6) 250 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 20.5 μCi of ³HTdR (equivalent to ³HTdR 81.8 μCi/mL) were injected into each test and control mouse via the tail vein.

Determination of Incorporated ³HTdR:
Approximately five hours after treatment with ³HTdR all mice were euthanised by intraperitoneal injection of Pentobarbital-Sodium (Release®, WDT, 30827 Garbsen, Germany).
The draining lymph nodes were rapidly excised and pooled per group (8 nodes per group). Single cell suspensions (in phosphate buffered saline) of pooled lymph node cells were prepared by gentle mechanical disaggregation through stainless steel gauze (200 μm mesh size). After washing two times with phosphate buffered saline (approx. 10 mL) the lymph node cells were resuspended in 5 % trichloroacetic acid (approx. 3 mL) and incubated at approximately +4 °C for at least 18 hours for precipitation of macromolecules. The precipitates were then resuspended in 5 % trichloroacetic acid (1 mL) and transferred to plastic scintillation vials with 10 mL of ‘Ultima Gold’ scintillation liquid (Perkin Elmer (LAS) GmbH, 63110 Rodgau, Germany) and thoroughly mixed.
The level of ³HTdR incorporation was then measured on a ß-scintillation counter (Tricarb 2900 TR, Perkin Elmer (LAS) GmbH, 63110 Rodgau, Germany). Similarly, background ³HTdR levels were also measured in two 1 mL-aliquots of 5 % trichloroacetic acid. The ß-scintillation counter expresses ³HTdR incorporation as the number of radioactive disintegrations per minute (DPM).

Determination of Ear Weights:
After the lymph nodes have been excised, both ears (left and right) of mice were punched at the apical area using a biopsy punch (Stiefel, Ø 8 mm corresponding to 0.5 cm²). For each animal both punches were immediately weighed per animal using an analytical balance.

Interpretation of Raw Data:
The proliferative response of lymph node cells is expressed as the number of radioactive disintegrations per minute per lymph node (DPM/lymph node) and as the ratio of ³HTdR incorporated into lymph node cells of test lymph nodes relative to that recorded for control lymph nodes (Stimulation Index; S.I.). Before DPM/lymph node values were determined, mean scintillation-background DPM was subtracted from test and control raw data. A test item is regarded as a sensitiser in the LLNA if the following criteria are fulfilled:
- First, that exposure to at least one concentration of the test item resulted in an incorporation of ³HTdR at least 3-fold or greater than that recorded in control mice, as indicated by the Stimulation Index.
- Second, that the data are compatible with a conventional dose response, although allowance must be made (especially at high topical concentrations) for either local toxicity or immunological suppression.

Observations:
In addition to the sensitising reactions the following observations and data were recorded during the test and observation period:
Mortality / Viability: At least once daily from experimental start to necropsy.
Body weights: In the pre-test prior to the first application and prior to sacrifice. In the main experiment: prior to the first application and prior to treatment with ³HTdR.
Ear thickness: In the pre-test prior to the first application of the test item (day 1), on day 3 and before sacrifice (day 6).
Ear weights: In the pre-test and main test after sacrifice; biopsy punches were taken from each ear.
Clinical signs (local / systemic): Clinical signs (systemic toxicity or local skin irritation) were recorded at least once daily. Especially the treatment sites were observed carefully.

Positive Control Data:
The sensitivity and reliability of the experimental technique employed was assessed by use of a substance which is known to have skin sensitisation properties in CBA/CaOlaHsd mice. The periodic positive control experiment was performed with α-Hexyl cinnamaldehyde in acetone:olive oil (4+1 v/v) using CBA/CaOlaHsd mice in April 2012.

Positive control substance(s):

other: α-Hexyl cinnamaldehyde in acetone:olive oil (4+1 v/v)

Statistics:

Statistical Analysis:
The mean values and standard deviations were calculated in the body weight tables. For all statistical calculations SigmaStat for Windows (Version 2.0) was used. A One-Way-Analysis-of-Variance was used as statistical method on the ear weights to assess whether the difference was statistically significant between test item groups and negative control (vehicle) group. In case of significant results of the One-Way-ANOVA, multiple comparisons were performed with the Dunnett test or the Student Newman Keuls test. However, both biological and statistical significance were considered together.

Positive control results:

Experiment performed in April 2012 (Harlan study number 1486301) with α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde an EC3=20.1% was observed.

Parameter:

SI

Value:

1

Test group / Remarks:

0%

Remarks on result:

other: negative control

Parameter:

SI

Value:

0.87

Test group / Remarks:

0,05%

Parameter:

SI

Value:

0.97

Test group / Remarks:

0,10%

Key result

Parameter:

SI

Value:

0.78

Test group / Remarks:

0.25 %

Remarks on result:

other:

Cellular proliferation data / Observations:

ETAILS ON STIMULATION INDEX CALCULATION
Concentration Disintegrations per minute (DPM)
0% 861.6
0,05% 745.9
0,10% 835.1
0,25% 668.3

Viability / Mortality:

No deaths occurred during the study period.

Clinical Signs:

No systemic findings were observed during the study period. On day 2, a very slight erythema of the ears was observed in the animals treated with 0.25% of the test item (score: 1). On day 4, a very slight erythema of the ears was observed in all treatment groups (score: 1). On day 6, the ears of the animals were scabby in all treatment groups.

Body Weights:

The body weight of the animals, recorded prior to the first application and prior to treatment with ³HTdR, was within the range commonly recorded for animals of this strain and age.

Ear Weights:

The measured ear weight of all animals treated was recorded on day 6 (after necropsy). In the animals treated with the highest test item dose (i.e., 0.25%), a statistically significant increase (p < 0.05) in ear weight was observed in comparison to the values of the vehicle control group.

Interpretation of results:

not sensitising

Conclusions:

The test item 3-Aminobenzensulphonic acid was not a skin sensitizer.

Executive summary:

In order to study a possible skin sensitising potential of Metanilsäure, three groups each of four female mice were treated once daily with the test item at concentrations of 0.05, 0.1 and 0.25% (w/w) in dimethylsulfoxide by topical application to the dorsum of each ear for three consecutive days. The highest concentration tested was the highest concentration that could be achieved whilst avoiding systemic toxicity and excessive local skin irritation as confirmed by three pre-experiments. A control group of four mice was treated with the vehicle (dimethylsulfoxide) only. Five days after the first topical application the mice were injected intravenously into a tail vein with radio-labelled thymidine (3 H-methyl thymidine). Approximately five hours after intravenous injection, the mice were sacrificed, the draining auricular lymph nodes excised and pooled per group. Single cell suspensions of lymph node cells were prepared from pooled lymph nodes, which were subsequently washed and incubated with trichloroacetic acid overnight. The proliferative capacity of pooled lymph node cells was determined by the incorporation of 3 H-methyl thymidine measured in a beta-scintillation counter.
All treated animals survived the scheduled study period and no signs of systemic toxicity were observed. On day 2 a very slight erythema of the ears was observed in the animals treated with 0.25% of the test item. On day 4, a very slight erythema of the ears was observed in all treatment groups. Moreover, a statistically significant increase in ear weights was observed in the animals treated with 0.25% of the test item,indicating an irritation potential of the test item. A test item is regarded as a sensitiser in the LLNA if the exposure to one or more test concentration resulted in a 3-fold or greater increase in incorporation of 3 HTdR compared with concurrent controls, as indicated by the Stimulation Index (S.I.). The estimated concentration of test item required to produce a S.I. of 3 is referred to as the EC3 value. In this study Stimulation Indices of 0.87, 0.97 and 0.78 were determined with the test item at concentrations of 0.05, 0.1 and 0.25% (w/w) in dimethylsulfoxide. A clear dose response was not observed. The EC3 value could not be calculated, since none of the tested concentrations induced a S.I. greater than the threshold value of 3.

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)

Additional information:

In a GLP compliant study according to OECD guideline 429 3 -aminobenzenesulfonic acid formulated in dimethylsulfoxide was assessed for its possible skin sensitising potential (Harlan CCR 2012). For this purpose a local lymph node assay was performed using test item concentrations of 0.05, 0.1 and 0.25% (w/w). The highest concentration tested was the highest concentration that could be achieved whilst avoiding systemic toxicity and excessive local skin irritation as confirmed by three pre-experiments. The animals did not show any signs of systemic toxicity during the course of the study and no cases of mortality were observed. On day 2 a very slight erythema of the ears was observed in the animals treated with 0.25% of the test item (score: 1). On day 4, a very slight erythema of the ears was observed in all treatment groups (score: 1). Moreover, a statistically significant increase in ear weights was observed in the animals treated with 0.25% of the test item, indicating an irritation potential of the test item. In this study Stimulation Indices (S.I.) of 0.87, 0.97 and 0.78 were determined with the test item at concentrations of 0.05, 0.1 and 0.25% (w/w) in dimethylsulfoxide, respectively. A dose response was not observed. 3 -Aminobenzenesulfonic acid was not a skin sensitiser under the test conditions of this study.

Migrated from Short description of key information:
3-Aminobenzenesulfonic acid was not a skin sensitiser under the test conditions of this LLNA study in mice.

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

 

The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. As a result the substance is considered not to be classified for sensitisation toxicity under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, as amended for the 13th time in Regulation (EU) 2018/1480.