Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-302-2 | CAS number: 7488-55-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Additional ecotoxological information
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- additional ecotoxicological information
- Type of information:
- other: Literature review
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: review of different literature, without guideline, in part from US EPA
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- other: Literautre review
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline required
- GLP compliance:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sn2+
- IUPAC Name:
- Sn2+
- Test material form:
- other: not relevant
Constituent 1
Results and discussion
Any other information on results incl. tables
Malinovskiy et al. (2009) studied the methylation and demethylation of Sn in aqueous solution by isotopic fractionation. It was shown, that mechanism of biomethylation includes equilibrium fractionation between Sn(II) and Sn(IV) Species in solution, followed by addition of a methyl group to Sn(II) atoms directly or via an CH3Sn(III)* intermediate. In the presence of oxygen the monomethyltin(II) or CH3Sn(III) intermediate are quickly oxidized to monomethyltin (IV), further the mechanism is depending on the pH.
Tressier et al. (2003) showed that the biomethylation does not stop with the monomethylation, there was found natural di- and trimethylated species, too.
On the other side studies of alkylated Sn compounds have similarly shown their degradation in the sediment and it is likely that anaerobic microbes can demethylate most of the commonly found methylated metal(loid)s in the environment (Manson et al., 2013). The data form Kubilay et al. (1996) shows the following distribution of Methyltin compounds in the North-Eastern Mediterranean:
Table 1– Methyltin concentrations in seawater samples (ng/l as chlorides), adopted from Kubilay (1996)
Sample station |
Sampling date |
Methyltin concentrations |
||
MeSnCl3 |
Me2SnCl2 |
Me3SnCl |
||
Iskendreum Habour |
May 1988 |
< 0.30 |
< 0.15 |
7.40 |
Oct. 1988 |
< 0.30 |
< 0.15 |
13.70 |
|
Feb. 1989 |
< 0.30 |
< 0.15 |
< 0.25 |
|
Botas |
May 1988 |
< 0.30 |
< 0.15 |
5.30 |
Oct. 1988 |
< 0.30 |
< 0.15 |
17.10 |
|
Isdemir |
Nov. 1988 |
< 0.30 |
1.00 |
2.80 |
Mar. 1989 |
< 0.30 |
< 0.15 |
< 0.25 |
|
Mersin Harbour |
Oct. 1988 |
< 0.30 |
< 0.15 |
39.70 |
Antalya Marina |
Oct. 1988 |
< 0.30 |
4.40 |
44.2 |
Mar. 1989 |
< 0.30 |
< 0.15 |
< 0.25 |
|
Göksu River Delta |
Oct. 1988 |
< 0.30 |
< 0.15 |
27.50 |
Feb. 1989 |
< 0.30 |
< 0.15 |
< 0.25 |
Table 2– Methyltins concentrations (as chlorides) in sediment samples (ng/g dry wt), adopted from Kubilay (1996)
Sample station |
MeSnCl3 |
Me2SnCl2 |
Me3SnCl |
Manavgat |
15 |
36 |
143 |
Esen |
38 |
58 |
107 |
Seyhan |
65 |
81 |
159 |
Göksu |
375 |
477 |
1696 |
Marmaris |
22 |
36 |
87 |
Iskenderum |
26 |
56 |
81 |
In the sediments were find higher concentrations than in the seawater. This is allegeable amongst other things with the models discussed before.
In order there is not to see a local concentration maximum for the monomethyltin, it can be concluded, that the demethylation is faster than the methylation. This evidence is supported (Manson et al., 2013) by studies in freshwater and marine sediments, which confirm that the rate of demethylation is rapid, and that the rate constant for this process is higher than that of methylation, and that demethylation occurs across the redox gradient. The complex kinetic is discussed by Pasquale et al. (2000), Hollweg et al. (2010), Heyes et al. (2006), Oremland et al. (1991), Kim et al. (2006) using mercury, arsenic and selenic.
Kim et al. found, that the demethylation rate constants were 2–3 orders of magnitude higher than methylation rate constants. According to Hintelman et al. (2000) methylation and demethylation can be described as pseudo first order reactions.
So in a first order approximation a steady state with insignificant concentrations will be reached in a short period.
In conclusion the data show, that the biomethylation is a part of the oxidation process of Sn(II) to Sn(IV), after the oxidizing process the demethylation is part of the formation of a more thermodynamic stable Sn(VI) species.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Biomethylation of Sn2+ is part in the oxidation process of Sn2+ to Sn4+. The Methyltin species is only an instable intermediate with very short life time. So the biomethylation of Sn2+ is not relevant for human and environment
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.