Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 222-294-1 | CAS number: 3407-42-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Toxic effect type:
- dose-dependent
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
Reproductive toxicity
The test chemical was given to 7 rats per sex per dose level at 0 (vehicle; corn oil), 125, 375 and 1125 mg/kg/day. The study was performed according to GLP and according to OECD 407 with some additional reproductive-related endpoints included.Results:All animals survived to planned death and there were no clinical signs attributed to the test chemical. No significant changes in body weight were observed, except for a slight increase in male body weight at 1125 mg/kg on day 8 of treatment (mean, 248 g) compared to the control group (mean 237 g). This effect was considered incidental and not toxicologically significant. No significant changes in food intake or water intake were observed. No significant changes in locomotor activity were observed. No abnormalities were found during the ophthalmic examinations. Significant changes in haematology were as follows: significant increase in % monocytes in males treated at 125 mg/kg; significant increase in % basophils in males treated at 125 mg/kg; significant increases in white blood cell counts in females treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg; significant decreases in red blood cell counts in females treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg; significant decrease in haematocrit counts in females treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in MCV in females treated at 1125 mg/kg; and significant increases in MCH in females treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg. The observed changes in haematology were considered not toxicologically relevant due to lack of dose relationship and due to lack of associated histopathological findings. Significant changes in clinical chemistry were as follows: significant increase in total cholesterol in male rats treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in creatinine in male rats treated at 125 mg/kg; significant increase in glucose in male rats treated at 375 mg/kg; significant increases in total proteins in male rats treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in potassium in female rats treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in sodium in female rats treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in SGPT in female rats treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg; significant decrease in glucose in female rats treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in total protein in female rats treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increases in urea nitrogen in female rats treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg; and a significant increase in bile acid in female rats treated at 375 mg/kg. No significant changes in serum testosterone or serum oestrogen were observed. The observed changes in clinical chemistry were considered not toxicologically relevant due to lack of dose relationship and due to lack of associated histopathological findings. No significant changes in absolute organ weight were observed, with the exception of significant increases in liver weight in female rats treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg. Significant changes in relative organ weight included a significant decrease in relative heart weight in male rats treated at 125 mg/kg and two significant increases in relative liver weight in female rats treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg. In male rats, no gross pathological findings were observed. In female rats, gross pathological findings were limited to a slightly increased stomach at 1125 mg/kg and an enlarged uterus with uterine fluid at 1125 mg/kg. Histopathology performed at 0 and 1125 mg/kg showed excess of lymphocytes in the lungs of 2/7 control males, 1/7 high-dosed males, 1/7 control females, and 1/7 high-dosed females and reactive spleens in 3/7 control males, 1/7 high-dosed males, 2/7 control females, and 1/7 high-dosed females. These histopathological findings were consistent with the historical control data of the test facility and were therefore not considered to be toxicologically relevant. The histopathologic examinations did not reveal any significant effects on spermatogenesis.Conclusion:NOAEL was considered at 1125 mg/kg bw/day.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- reproductive toxicity, other
- Remarks:
- 28-days repeated dose toxicity study with extended reproductive parameters
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from study report
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: According to OECD Guideline 407 with additional examinations for reproductive performance.
- Version / remarks:
- Adopted 3 October 2008
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Additional reproductive-related endpoints included serum testosterone, serum estrogen, and spermatogenesis stages during microscopic examinations.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Justification for study design:
- No Data Available
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- - Source: Central Animal Facility (CAF), NIPER, Sector-67, S.A.S. Nagar, 160 062, Punjab, India.
- Age at study initiation: (P) x wks; (F1) x wks: (P) 7 to 8 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: (P) Males: x-x g; Females: x-x g; (F1) Males: x-x g; Females: x-x g: No data available
- Fasting period before study: Yes, 2 hrs fasted before dose admonition.
- Housing: Animals were housed in sterilized solid bottom polypropylene cages with stainless steel grill tops with facilities for food, water bottles and bedding of clean paddy husk. The cages were suspended on stainless steel racks. Animal was identified by a unique identification (ID) number. The animals were identified by individual numerical number written on the tail, also specified on individual cage tag.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Standard laboratory sterile extruded pelleted rodent feed, ad libitum.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Potable tap water filtered through Reviva Reverse Osmosis System (water filter cum purifier) of Eureka Forbes was provided in polypropylene bottles with stainless steel sipper tubes, ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22±3º C
- Humidity (%): 30-70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 25±5 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12hrs dark/ light cycle - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The test chemical was dissolved in corn oil prior to treatment.
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): No data available
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): No data available
- Storage temperature of food: No data available
VEHICLE- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Corn oil
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 125, 375 or 1125 mg/kg/day
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5 ml/kg
- Lot/batch no. (if required): No data available
- Purity: No data available - Details on mating procedure:
- No mating was performed.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The test item (125, 375 and 1125 mg) was weighed on balance and dissolved in 5 ml of corn oil. An aliquot was taken from three different layers of the dose mixtures and was extracted in methanol for GCMS analysis. The concentration of the test item in each layer was calculated using the standard curve (5 mg IBC / ml methanol).
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 28 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once per day.
- Details on study schedule:
- No data available
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 125 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 375 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 125 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 7 rats per sex per dose.
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- No data available
- Positive control:
- No positive control was included.
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- Mortality, clinical signs (once per day), detailed clinical signs (once per week), body weight (treatment days 1, 8, 15, 22, 28, 29) food intake (once per week), water intake (once per week), ophthalmology (4th week of treatment), locomotor activity (4th week of treatment), hematology (end of treatment), clinical chemistry (end of treatment)
Hematologic parameters: Haemoglobin, RBC, Total and differential leucocyte count, Haematocrit, Mean corpuscular volume (MCV), Mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), and Platelet count
Clinical chemistry parameters: Sodium, Potassium, Glucose, Total cholesterol, Blood urea, Creatinine, Total protein, Albumin, SGPT (Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase), ALT, SGOT (Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase), AST, Hormones analysis (testosterone and estrogen) and Total bile acids. - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- The following organs were weighed: liver, adrenals, spleen, heart, kidney, brain, testes, epididymides, ovaries, thymus. The following organs/tissues were examined microscopically: brain, stomach, large intestine, small intestine, liver, kidney, adrenal gland, spleen, heart, thymus, lungs, testis, ovaries, uterus, lymph nodes, perihperal nerve, bone marrow, and gross lesions (if any).
- Statistics:
- Statistical analysis was carried out by using Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS statistics version-20.0. All analyses and comparisons were evaluated at the 5 % level, statistically significant differences (p≤0.05) indicated by appropriate notation. The focus was to examine the mean differences and their significance between control and low dose group, control and mid dose group and control and high dose group. The statistical decision was taken by preparing the univariant GLM MODEL procedure was used to check the significance between above mentioned groups. For multiple comparisons Turkey’s HSD test was applied.
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no clinical signs attributed to the test item. Some abnormalities like nasal discharge, slight dullness, hunched posture, fore paw stained red, sneezing, red crust around the nostrils, perineum wet were common to all the groups.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- All animals survived to planned death.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant changes in body weight were observed, except for a slight increase in male body weight at 1125 mg/kg on day 8 of treatment (mean, 248 g) compared to the control group (mean 237 g). This effect was considered incidental and not toxicologically significant.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant effects were observed in the study.
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant effects were observed.
- Ophthalmological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant effects were observed.
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Significant changes in haematology were as follows: significant increase in % monocytes in males treated at 125 mg/kg; significant increase in % basophils in males treated at 125 mg/kg; significant increases in white blood cell counts in females treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg; significant decreases in red blood cell counts in females treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg; significant decrease in haematocrit counts in females treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in MCV in females treated at 1125 mg/kg; and significant increases in MCH in females treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg. The observed changes in haematology were considered not toxicologically relevant due to lack of dose relationship and due to lack of associated histopathological findings.
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Significant changes in clinical chemistry were as follows: significant increase in total cholesterol in male rats treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in creatinine in male rats treated at 125 mg/kg; significant increase in glucose in male rats treated at 375 mg/kg; significant increases in total proteins in male rats treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in potassium in female rats treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in sodium in female rats treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in SGPT in female rats treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg; significant decrease in glucose in female rats treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in total protein in female rats treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increases in urea nitrogen in female rats treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg; and a significant increase in bile acid in female rats treated at 375 mg/kg. No significant changes in serum testosterone or serum oestrogen were observed.
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant changes in locomotor activity scores were observed.
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Histopathology performed at 0 and 1125 mg/kg showed excess of lymphocytes in the lungs of 2/7 control males, 1/7 high-dosed males, 1/7 control females, and 1/7 high-dosed females and reactive spleens in 3/7 control males, 1/7 high-dosed males, 2/7 control females, and 1/7 high-dosed females. These histopathological findings were consistent with the historical control data of the test facility and were therefore not considered to be toxicologically relevant. The histopathologic examinations did not reveal any significant effects on spermatogenesis.
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- not examined
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 125 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- mortality
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- ophthalmological examination
- haematology
- clinical biochemistry
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- histopathology: neoplastic
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- NOAEL was considered to be 1125 mg/kg bw/day in both male and female SD rats.
- Executive summary:
The test chemical was given to 7 rats per sex per dose level at 0 (vehicle; corn oil), 125, 375 and 1125 mg/kg/day. The study was performed according to GLP and according to OECD 407 with some additional reproductive-related endpoints included. Results: All animals survived to planned death and there were no clinical signs attributed to the test chemical. No significant changes in body weight were observed, except for a slight increase in male body weight at 1125 mg/kg on day 8 of treatment (mean, 248 g) compared to the control group (mean 237 g). This effect was considered incidental and not toxicologically significant. No significant changes in food intake or water intake were observed. No significant changes in locomotor activity were observed. No abnormalities were found during the ophthalmic examinations. Significant changes in haematology were as follows: significant increase in % monocytes in males treated at 125 mg/kg; significant increase in % basophils in males treated at 125 mg/kg; significant increases in white blood cell counts in females treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg; significant decreases in red blood cell counts in females treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg; significant decrease in haematocrit counts in females treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in MCV in females treated at 1125 mg/kg; and significant increases in MCH in females treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg. The observed changes in haematology were considered not toxicologically relevant due to lack of dose relationship and due to lack of associated histopathological findings. Significant changes in clinical chemistry were as follows: significant increase in total cholesterol in male rats treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in creatinine in male rats treated at 125 mg/kg; significant increase in glucose in male rats treated at 375 mg/kg; significant increases in total proteins in male rats treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in potassium in female rats treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in sodium in female rats treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in SGPT in female rats treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg; significant decrease in glucose in female rats treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increase in total protein in female rats treated at 1125 mg/kg; significant increases in urea nitrogen in female rats treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg; and a significant increase in bile acid in female rats treated at 375 mg/kg. No significant changes in serum testosterone or serum oestrogen were observed. The observed changes in clinical chemistry were considered not toxicologically relevant due to lack of dose relationship and due to lack of associated histopathological findings. No significant changes in absolute organ weight were observed, with the exception of significant increases in liver weight in female rats treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg. Significant changes in relative organ weight included a significant decrease in relative heart weight in male rats treated at 125 mg/kg and two significant increases in relative liver weight in female rats treated at 375 and 1125 mg/kg. In male rats, no gross pathological findings were observed. In female rats, gross pathological findings were limited to a slightly increased stomach at 1125 mg/kg and an enlarged uterus with uterine fluid at 1125 mg/kg. Histopathology performed at 0 and 1125 mg/kg showed excess of lymphocytes in the lungs of 2/7 control males, 1/7 high-dosed males, 1/7 control females, and 1/7 high-dosed females and reactive spleens in 3/7 control males, 1/7 high-dosed males, 2/7 control females, and 1/7 high-dosed females. These histopathological findings were consistent with the historical control data of the test facility and were therefore not considered to be toxicologically relevant. The histopathologic examinations did not reveal any significant effects on spermatogenesis. Conclusion: NOAEL was considered at 1125 mg/kg bw/day.
Reference
SUMMARY OF ABSOLUTE ORGAN WEIGHTS (g) Male and Female
Dose |
|
Testes |
Epididymides |
Ovaries |
Uterus |
0 (mg/kg) |
Mean |
2.6556 |
1.0201 |
0.0944
|
0.5236 |
SD |
0.6146 |
0.1210 |
0.0322 |
0.1078 |
|
SEM |
0.2323 |
0.0457 |
0.0122 |
0.0407 |
|
125 (mg/kg) |
Mean |
2.7550 |
0.9950 |
0.0953 |
0.5293 |
SD |
0.2371 |
0.1474 |
0.0382 |
0.1607 |
|
SEM |
0.0896 |
0.0557 |
0.0144 |
0.0607 |
|
375 (mg/kg) |
Mean |
2.8762 |
0.9389 |
0.0725 |
0.4847 |
SD |
0.1901 |
0.1180 |
0.0209 |
0.0706 |
|
SEM |
0.0718 |
0.0446 |
0.0079 |
0.0267 |
|
1125 (mg/kg) |
Mean |
2.6205 |
0.9031 |
0.0693 |
0.5155 |
SD |
0.4577 |
0.2122 |
0.0290 |
0.1438 |
|
SEM |
0.1730 |
0.0802 |
0.0110 |
0.0543 |
SUMMARY OF RELATIVE ORGAN WEIGHTS Male and Female
Dose |
|
Testes |
Epididymides |
Ovaries |
Uterus |
0 (mg/kg) |
Mean |
0.9291 |
0.3560 |
0.0383 |
0.2180 |
SD |
0.2331 |
0.0436 |
0.0136 |
0.0385 |
|
SEM |
0.0881 |
0.0165 |
0.0051 |
0.0146 |
|
375 (mg/kg) |
Mean |
0.9504 |
0.3462 |
0.0384 |
0.2135 |
SD |
0.1070 |
0.0756 |
0.0158 |
0.0687 |
|
SEM |
0.0405 |
0.0286 |
0.00601 |
0.0260 |
|
1125 (mg/kg) |
Mean |
0.9617 |
0.3139 |
0.0297 |
0.1994 |
SD |
0.0908 |
0.0451 |
0.0083 |
0.0375 |
|
SEM |
0.0343 |
0.0171 |
0.0031 |
0.0135 |
|
1000 (mg/kg) |
Mean |
0.9235 |
0.3176 |
0.0295 |
0.2213 |
SD |
0.1438 |
0.0678 |
0.0116 |
0.0614 |
|
SEM |
0.0544 |
0.0256 |
0.0044 |
0.0232 |
Clinical chemistry:
Dose |
|
Testesterone nmol/L |
Estrogen ng/L |
0 (mg/kg) |
Mean |
14.11 |
9.01 |
SD |
2.94 |
0.87 |
|
SEM |
1.11 |
0.33 |
|
125 (mg/kg) |
Mean |
15.19 |
9.14 |
SD |
1.07 |
1.14 |
|
SEM |
0.40 |
0.43 |
|
375 (mg/kg) |
Mean |
12.30 |
10.00 |
SD |
1.80 |
2.03 |
|
SEM |
0.68 |
0.77 |
|
1125 (mg/kg) |
Mean |
13.64 |
10.39 |
SD |
1.94 |
1.35 |
|
SEM |
0.73 |
0.51 |
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 125 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Klimisch 1.
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
The substance was given by oral gavage to 24 pregnant wistar rats at 0, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day from GD5 to GD19. The study was performed according to OECD 414 (adopted in 2018) and GLP.Results (adults): There were no unscheduled deaths, clinical signs, or gross pathological findings at 250 and 500 mg/kg/day. At 1000 mg/kg/day, one dam (Rz1075) had reddish discharge from the vagina on GD18 which was attributed to test item. No other clinical signs were observed at 1000 mg/kg/day, and there were no unschedulded deaths nor any gross pathological findings at 1000 mg/kg/day. As compared to the vehicle control group, statistically and dose-dependent decreases in maternal body weight (from -5 to -32%), in maternal body weight gain (from -17 to -199%), in adjusted maternal body weight (from -8 to -14%) and in adjusted maternal body weight gain (from -61 to -133%) were observed in all dosed groups. These effects at 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day were attributed to the test item.As compared to vehicle control group, significant and dose-dependent decreases in mean food consumption (from -15 to -53%) were observed in all dosed groups during different periods of gestation.These effects at 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day were attributed to the test item.No significant changes in T3 or T4 levels were observed.Significant increases in TSH levels were observed at 500 and 1000 mg/kg, however these effects were not considered to be of toxicological significance since the TSH levels at 500 and 1000 mg/kg were well within the historical control range of the test facility and since no significant changes in thyroid weight or histology of the thyroid were observed.No significant effects were observed at 250 mg/kg/day.Ten dams of 24 pregnant rats treated at 500 mg/kg/day and 22 dams of 23 pregnant rats treated at 1000 mg/kg/day had complete resorptions (i.e. only implantation sites with no fetuses). Hence, therewere only 14 litters at 500 mg/kg/day and 1 litter at 1000 mg/kg/day available for evaluation. Significant changes in uterine weight, number of implantations, implantation index, early resorptions, and post-implantation losses were observed at 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day. The effects observed at 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day were attributed to the test item. Gross evaluations of the placenta revealed no remarkable findings.Results (foetus):The total number of fetuses were 293, 302, 150, and 3 at 0, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day, respectively. No dead fetuses were observed at any dose level. No significant changes in sex ratio or AGD were observed. Significant decreases in male fetal weight and in sex-combined fetal weight were observed at 250 and 500 mg/kg/day and these effects were attributed to the test item. External, visceral and skeletal examinations revealed no teratogenic effects attributed to the test item at 250 and 500 mg/kg/day. There were 14 litters at 500 mg/kg/day and only 1 litter at 1000 mg/kg/day available for evaluation. Due to low sample size at 1000 mg/kg/day, the data from fetal external, visceral and skeletal evaluations were considered insufficient for evaluation of teratological effects.Conclusions:NOAEL for maternal toxicity could not be established due to significant decreases in body weight, body weight gain, and food intake at≥250mg/kg/day.NOAEL for maternal developmental toxicity was considered at250 mg/kg/day.Significant changes in uterine weight, early resorptions, postimplantation loss, and implantation index were observed at≥500mg/kg/dayand this dose level was therefore considered to be LOAEL for maternal developmental toxicity.NOAEL for fetal developmental toxicity could not be established due to significant decreases in fetal weights at≥250mg/kg/day. NOAEL for teratogenicity was considered at500 mg/kg/daysince fetal external, visceral and skeletal examinations did not reveal any signs of teratogenicity at 250 and 500 mg/kg/day.
The observed effects on fetal developmental toxicity (i.e. the small changes in fetal body weight) were considered to be secondary to maternal systemic toxicity whereas the observed effects on maternal developmental toxicity were not considered to be entirely due to maternal systemic toxicity.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- The data is from study report.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- Adopted 25 June 2018
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hylasco Biotechnology (India) Pvt. Ltd. 4B, MN Park, Shameerpet Mandal, Turkapally Village, Medchal District, Telangana -500078
- Age at study initiation: 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: G1: 259.946 ± 17.79; G2: 256.054 ± 19.41; G3: 258.465 ± 18.33; G4: 259.443 ± 15.27
- Fasting period before study: No data available
- Housing: standard polysulfone rat cages (size: Length 425 mm × Width 266 mm × Height 185 mm) with stainless steel top grill.
- Bedding: Steam sterilized corn cob was used as bedding material and was changed along with the cage at least twice a week.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Altromin Rat/Mice Maintenance diets, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Deep bore-well water, ad libitum in polycarbonate bottles with stainless steel sipper tubes.
- Acclimation period: five days before initiation.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 to 23 °C
- Humidity (%): 58 - 66 %
- Air changes (per hr): 12 to 15 air changes/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12-hour light and 12-hours dark cycle - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The test checmical was dissolved in Corn oil prior to dosing.
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): No data available
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): No data available
- Storage temperature of food: No data available
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): The test item is insoluble in water, but soluble in various oils and organic solvents. The test item was found to be miscible in corn oil and corn oil was therefore selected as vehicle.
- Concentration in vehicle: G1: 0 mg/ml; G2: 62.5 mg/ml; G3: 125 mg/ml; G4: 250 mg/ml
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 4 ml/kg
- Lot/batch no. (if required): NA
- Purity: NA - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused: yes
- M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: Two weeks
- After ... days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility.
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: [no / yes (explain)]
- Verification of same strain and source of both sexes: [yes / no (explain)]
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: No data available - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Two Weeks
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Duration of test:
- GD 5 to GD 19
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 24 females per group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: gestation days 0, 3, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17 and 20.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): No data
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No data
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data
- Time schedule for examinations: No data available.
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 20.
- Organs examined: placenta, thoracic and abdominal viscera, uterine content, thyroid gland
OTHER: - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
- Other: Gross evaluation of placenta - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes
- Skeletal examinations: Yes
- Head examinations: Yes - Statistics:
- The data on maternal body weight, body weight change in interval, maternal food consumption, gravid uterine weight, body weight change corrected to gravid uterine weight, hormone analyses (T4, T3, TSH), and the weight of thyroid gland were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) after testing for homogeneity for intra group variance using Levene’s test. Where intra group variances were heterogeneous, ANOVA was performed after suitable transformation of data. Dunnett’s pairwise comparison of the treated group means with the control group mean was performed, when the group differences were found significant. Fetal weight for male and female was analyzed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) taking litter size as covariate for group. Anogenital distance for male and female was analyzed using ANCOVA taking weight as covariate for group. Number of corpora lutea, number of implantations, early and late resorptions, pre-implantation and post-implantation loss observations were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test for group comparison. Wilcoxon pairwise comparisons of the treated groups with the control group were performed, when the group differences were significant. The incidence of dams with resorptions were tested for using Chi-square test followed by Fisher’s exact test for group association. The incidence of fetus and litter (incidence and percent) observations for external, visceral and skeletal observations were tested using Cochran-Armitage trend test and pair-wise comparison will be tested by Fisher’s exact test for group association.
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no clinical signs at at 250 and 500 mg/kg/day. At 1000 mg/kg/day, one dam had reddish discharge from vagina on GD18 which was considered to be treatment-related. No other clinical signs were observed at 1000 mg/kg/day.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- All animals survived to scheduled necropsy.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- As compared to the vehicle control group, statistically and dose-dependent decreases in maternal body weight (from -5 to -32%), in maternal body weight gain (from -17 to -199%), in adjusted maternal body weight (from -8 to -14%) and in adjusted maternal body weight gain (from -61 to -133%) were observed during most recorded time points and intervals. These observed effects on body weight, body weight gain, adjusted body weight, and adjusted body weight gain at ≥250 mg/kg/day were considered treatment-related.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- As compared to the vehicle control group, significant reductions in mean food consumption were noticed following treatment at 250, 500 and
1000 mg/kg/day, during GD 5 - 8, 8 - 11, 11 - 14, 14 – 17 and 17 - 20. The decreases ranged from -15 to -27% at 250 mg/kg/day, from -25 to -30% at 500 mg/kg/day, and from -41 to -53% at 1000 mg/kg/day. Net food intakes during GD 5-20 were -22%, -27%, -46% and during gestation (GD 0-20) they were -17%, -21%, -35% lower at 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day, respectively, when compared to the vehicle control group. The observed effects on food intake at ≥250 mg/kg/day were considered treatment-related. - Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant changes in T3 or T4 levels were observed. Significant increases in TSH levels were observed at 500 and 1000 mg/kg, however these effects were not considered to be of toxicological significance since the TSH levels at 500 and 1000 mg/kg were well within the historical control range of the test facility and since no significant changes in thyroid weight or histology of the thyroid were observed.
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant changes in thryoid weight were observed.
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No gross pathological effects were observed in the study.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant changes in the histology of the thyroid were observed in the study. The incidences of ectopic thymus were randomly distributed across the groups and were considered incidental background findings and not related to the test item administration.
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Number of abortions:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant effects were observed at 250 mg/kg/day. Ten dams of 24 pregnant rats treated at 500 mg/kg/day and 22 dams of 23 pregnant rats treated at 1000 mg/kg/day had complete resorptions (i.e. only implantation sites with no fetuses). Hence, there were only 14 litters at 500 mg/kg/day and 1 litter at 1000 mg/kg/day available for evaluation.
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant changes in pre- or post-implantation loss were observed at 250 mg/kg/day. At 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day there were significant decreases in the number of implantations by -11% and -19%, respectively; significant decreases in implantation indexes by -14 and -20%, respectively; and significant increases in % post-implantation losses by 55 and 99%, respectively.
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant effects were observed at 250 mg/kg/day. Ten dams of 24 pregnant rats treated at 500 mg/kg/day and 22 dams of 23 pregnant rats treated at 1000 mg/kg/day had complete resorptions (i.e. only implantation sites with no fetuses). Hence, there were only 14 litters at 500 mg/kg/day and 1 litter at 1000 mg/kg/day available for evaluation.
- Early or late resorptions:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day there were significant increases in % early resorptions by 50 and 98%, respectively, when compared to the control group. No other significant changes were observed.
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No dead fetuses were observed at any dose level.
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- not examined
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The number of pregnant rats were 21, 24, 24, 23 at 0, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg /day, respectively.
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- maternal systemic toxicity
- Effect level:
- <= 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- maternal developmental toxicity
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- changes in number of pregnant
- dead fetuses
- early or late resorptions
- maternal abnormalities
- necropsy findings
- number of abortions
- pre and post implantation loss
- total litter losses by resorption
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- maternal developmental toxicity
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- early or late resorptions
- number of abortions
- pre and post implantation loss
- total litter losses by resorption
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Localisation:
- placenta
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Gross evaluation of placenta did not reveal any remarkable findings in any dams at any dose level.
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Sex-combined fetal weights were significantly decreased at 250 (by -5%) and 500 mg/kg/day (by -6%) compared to the control data. Significant decreases in male fetal weight were observed at 250 (by -5%) and 500 mg/kg/day (by -8%) compared to the control data, whereas only a significant decrease in female fetal weight was observed at 250 mg/kg/day (by -4%) compared to the control data.
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No dead fetuses were observed in the study.
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant changes in sex ratio were observed.
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were only 14 litters at 500 mg/kg/day and 1 litter at 1000 mg/kg/day available for evaluation.
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not examined
- External malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There was one incidence of a fetus (1/302 fetuses) with a thread like tail at 250 mg/kg/day [malformation], one small fetus (1/150 fetuses) at 500 mg/kg/day [anomaly] and two fetuses with hindlimbs turned inwards at 1000 mg/kg/day (2/3 fetuses) [malformation]. These observations at 250 and 500 mg/kg were considered incidental and not treatment-related.
- Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 250 mg/kg/day, there was one fetus from one dam (Rz1025) which had absent caudal vertebrae (centrum and arch absent) [malformation]. The same fetus had thread like tail during external examination [malformation]. These malformations at 250 mg/kg/day were considered to be spontaneous in nature since no such malformations were observed at 500 mg/kg/day. At 1000 mg/kg/day, one fetus from one dam (Rz1075) had tarsal bones bent inwards [malformation]. The same fetus had hind limbs turned inwards during external examination [malformation]. There were significant increases in variations of incomplete ossification of skull bones namely parietal, interparital and supraoccipital bones at 500 mg/kg/day. Delayed/incomplete ossifications are generally considered transient changes and these finding denote generalized growth delays which normally ossify late in gestation. They also do not have general predictive value for teratogenicity [Carney and Kimmel (2007)]. A significant increase in the incidene of bilateral wavy ribs (#4 to #11) [anomaly] was observed at 500 mg/kg/day as compared to vehicle control group. Wavy ribs are manifestations of delayed ossification, are transient and reversible and are not of developmental importance since they are expected to resolve during maturation (Hayasaka et al., 1985; Kast, 1994; Mitchard & Stewart, 2014). The observed variations and anomalies at 500 mg/kg/day were considered non-adverse based on the discussions above, and they were likely secondary to maternal systemic toxicity at 500 mg/kg/day.
- Visceral malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related changes were observed during visceral examination at 250 and 500 mg/kg. There was one incidence of moderate bilateral renal pelvis dilation at 250 mg/kg/day (1/145 fetuses) [anomaly]. This finding was considered spontaneous in nature and therefore not treatment-related. All fetal heads from the Wilsons-Razor blade sectioning were found to be normal (i.e. no malformations, anomalies, or variations were observed).
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- A total of 14 litters at 500 mg/kg and only 1 litter at 1000 mg/kg were available for evaluation due to the number of complete resorptions observed at 500 and 1000 mg/kg. The results from the external, visceral, and seketal examinations performed at 1000 mg/kg were not considered to be conclusive due to low sample size.
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- <= 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- fetal/pup body weight changes
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- Teratogenicity
- Effect level:
- >= 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- external malformations
- skeletal malformations
- visceral malformations
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Developmental effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Relation to maternal toxicity:
- developmental effects occurring together with maternal toxicity effects, but not as a secondary non-specific consequence of maternal toxicity effects
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
- Relevant for humans:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- NOAEL for maternal toxicity could not be established due to significant decreases in body weight, body weight gain, and food intake at ≥250mg/kg/day. NOAEL for maternal developmental toxicity was considered at 250 mg/kg/day. Significant changes in uterine weight, early resorptions, postimplantation loss, and implantation index were observed at ≥500 mg/kg/day and this dose level was therefore considered to be LOAEL for maternal developmental toxicity. NOAEL for fetal developmental toxicity could not be established due to significant decreases in fetal weights at ≥250mg/kg/day. NOAEL for teratogenicity was considered at 500 mg/kg/day since fetal external, visceral and skeletal examinations did not reveal any signs of teratogenicity at 250 and 500 mg/kg/day. The observed effects on fetal developmental toxicity (i.e. the small changes in fetal body weight) were considered to be secondary to maternal systemic toxicity whereas the observed effects on maternal developmental toxicity were not considered to be entirely due to maternal systemic toxicity.
- Executive summary:
The substance was given by oral gavage to 24 pregnant wistar rats at 0, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day from GD5 to GD19. The study was performed according to OECD 414 (adopted in 2018) and GLP. Results (adults): There were no unscheduled deaths, clinical signs, or gross pathological findings at 250 and 500 mg/kg/day. At 1000 mg/kg/day, one dam (Rz1075) had reddish discharge from the vagina on GD18 which was attributed to test item. No other clinical signs were observed at 1000 mg/kg/day, and there were no unschedulded deaths nor any gross pathological findings at 1000 mg/kg/day. As compared to the vehicle control group, statistically and dose-dependent decreases in maternal body weight (from -5 to -32%), in maternal body weight gain (from -17 to -199%), in adjusted maternal body weight (from -8 to -14%) and in adjusted maternal body weight gain (from -61 to -133%) were observed in all dosed groups. These effects at 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day were attributed to the test item.As compared to vehicle control group, significant and dose-dependent decreases in mean food consumption (from -15 to -53%) were observed in all dosed groups during different periods of gestation.These effects at 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day were attributed to the test item.No significant changes in T3 or T4 levels were observed.Significant increases in TSH levels were observed at 500 and 1000 mg/kg, however these effects were not considered to be of toxicological significance since the TSH levels at 500 and 1000 mg/kg were well within the historical control range of the test facility and since no significant changes in thyroid weight or histology of the thyroid were observed.No significant effects were observed at 250 mg/kg/day. Ten dams of 24 pregnant rats treated at 500 mg/kg/day and 22 dams of 23 pregnant rats treated at 1000 mg/kg/day had complete resorptions (i.e. only implantation sites with no fetuses). Hence, therewere only 14 litters at 500 mg/kg/day and 1 litter at 1000 mg/kg/day available for evaluation. Significant changes in uterine weight, number of implantations, implantation index, early resorptions, and post-implantation losses were observed at 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day. The effects observed at 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day were attributed to the test item. Gross evaluations of the placenta revealed no remarkable findings.Results (foetus): The total number of fetuses were 293, 302, 150, and 3 at 0, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day, respectively. No dead fetuses were observed at any dose level. No significant changes in sex ratio or AGD were observed. Significant decreases in male fetal weight and in sex-combined fetal weight were observed at 250 and 500 mg/kg/day and these effects were attributed to the test item. External, visceral and skeletal examinations revealed no teratogenic effects attributed to the test item at 250 and 500 mg/kg/day. There were 14 litters at 500 mg/kg/day and only 1 litter at 1000 mg/kg/day available for evaluation. Due to low sample size at 1000 mg/kg/day, the data from fetal external, visceral and skeletal evaluations were considered insufficient for evaluation of teratological effects. Conclusions: NOAEL for maternal toxicity could not be established due to significant decreases in body weight, body weight gain, and food intake at ≥250mg/kg/day. NOAEL for maternal developmental toxicity was considered at 250 mg/kg/day. Significant changes in uterine weight, early resorptions, postimplantation loss, and implantation index were observed at ≥500mg/kg/dayand this dose level was therefore considered to be LOAEL for maternal developmental toxicity. NOAEL for fetal developmental toxicity could not be established due to significant decreases in fetal weights at ≥250mg/kg/day. NOAEL for teratogenicity was considered at 500 mg/kg/day since fetal external, visceral and skeletal examinations did not reveal any signs of teratogenicity at 250 and 500 mg/kg/day.
The observed effects on fetal developmental toxicity (i.e. the small changes in fetal body weight) were considered to be secondary to maternal systemic toxicity whereas the observed effects on maternal developmental toxicity were not considered to be entirely due to maternal systemic toxicity.
Reference
Table for Maternal Survival, Pregnancy Status and Fetus Disposition
Parameters |
Group No. |
G1 |
G2 |
G3 |
G4 |
Dose (mg/kg/day) |
0 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
|
Total No. of rats found sperm positive / group |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
Duration of treatment |
GD 5 to 19 (total 15 days) |
||||
Caesarean section (day of presumed gestation) |
GD 20 |
||||
Number of rats sacrificed at caesarean section |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
Number. of rats non-pregnant at caesarean section |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Number of rats pregnant at caesarean section |
21 |
24 |
24 |
23 |
|
Number of dams with complete resorptions Number of litters examined |
0 21 |
0 24 |
10 14 |
22 1 |
|
Total number of fetuses |
293 |
302 |
150 |
3 |
|
Total number of dead fetuses |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of fetuses evaluated |
|
|
|
|
|
a. External examination |
293 |
302 |
150 |
3 |
|
b. Visceral examination |
140 |
145 |
72 |
1 |
|
c. Skeletal examination |
153 |
157 |
78 |
2 |
Table for Clinical Signs and Mortality
Observation Type: All Types From Day 0 (Mating (A)) to 20 (Mating)
|
Female |
|||
G1 0 mg/kg/day |
G2 250 mg/kg/day |
G3 500 mg/kg/day |
G4 1000 mg/kg/day |
|
Normal Killed ‑ terminal kill Discharge |
24 24 0 |
24 24 0 |
24 24 0 |
24 24 1 |
Values = Number of Animals Affected
Table for Maternal Body Weight of Pregnant Rats
Sex: Female
Day(s) Relative to Mating |
G1 0 mg/kg/day |
G2 250 mg/kg/day |
G3 500 mg/kg/day |
G4 1000 mg/kg/day |
||
Body Weight (g) |
0[a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
258.46 15.81 21 ‑ |
256.05 19.41 24 ‑0.93 |
258.47 18.33 24 0.00 |
259.76 15.53 23 0.51 |
3[a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
274.90 16.40 21 ‑ |
270.79 20.34 24 ‑1.49 |
273.00 19.47 24 ‑0.69 |
275.44 15.62 23 0.20 |
|
5[a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
282.41 16.75 21 ‑ |
278.79 21.26 24 ‑1.28 |
281.42 21.02 24 ‑0.35 |
283.22 16.10 23 0.29 |
|
8[a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
291.59 17.75 21 ‑ |
279.67 22.14 24 ‑4.09 |
282.03 20.26 24 ‑3.28 |
274.09* 19.69 23 ‑6.00 |
|
11[a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
306.63 20.97 21 ‑ |
290.32* 22.28 24 ‑5.32 |
291.51* 19.37 24 ‑4.93 |
278.92* 20.20 23 ‑9.04 |
|
14[a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
325.57 20.75 21 ‑ |
302.34* 22.59 24 ‑7.14 |
299.74* 19.23 24 ‑7.94 |
279.46* 19.22 23 ‑14.17 |
|
17[a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
356.30 27.33 21 ‑ |
329.30* 26.60 24 ‑7.58 |
310.98* 27.02 24 ‑12.72 |
273.96* 22.27 23 ‑23.11 |
|
20[a1] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
400.72 31.91 21 ‑ |
366.14* 31.33 24 ‑8.63 |
329.87* 40.22 24 ‑17.68 |
274.36* 21.62 23 ‑31.53 |
[a] ‑ Anova & Dunnett: * = p < 0.05 ; [a1] ‑ Anova & Dunnett(Rank): * = p < 0.05
Table for Maternal Body Weight Gain of Pregnant Rats
Sex: Female
Day(s) Relative to Mating |
G1 0 mg/kg/day |
G2 250 mg/kg/day |
G3 500 mg/kg/day |
G4 1000 mg/kg/day |
||
Absolute Weight Gain (g) |
0 → 3 [a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
16.44 4.88 21 - |
14.74 5.73 24 ‑10.33 |
14.53 3.97 24 ‑11.61 |
15.68 4.57 23 ‑4.61 |
3 → 5 [a1] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
7.52 3.56 21 - |
8.00 3.32 24 6.38 |
8.43 3.84 24 12.12 |
7.78 3.15 23 3.47 |
|
5 → 8 [a2] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
9.18 5.21 21 - |
0.88* 4.37 24 ‑90.46 |
0.61* 5.17 24 ‑93.37 |
‑9.13* 9.25 23 ‑199.44 |
|
8 → 11 [a2] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
15.04 7.19 21 - |
10.66 4.78 24 ‑29.13 |
9.48* 7.51 24 ‑36.97 |
4.83* 10.45 23 ‑67.91 |
|
11 → 14 [a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
18.94 5.07 21 - |
12.02* 5.53 24 ‑36.57 |
8.23* 5.85 24 ‑56.58 |
0.54* 7.8 23 ‑97.15 |
|
14 → 17 [a2] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
30.73 9.08 21 - |
26.96 8.46 24 ‑12.25 |
11.24* 15.43 24 ‑63.41 |
‑5.50* 8.91 23 ‑117.89 |
|
17 → 20 [a2] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
44.42 9.78 21 - |
36.83* 9.64 24 -17.09 |
18.90* 18.50 24 -57.46 |
0.41* 5.87 23 -99.09 |
|
0 → 5 [a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
23.95 5.78 21 - |
22.74 5.68 24 -5.09 |
22.96 4.68 24 -4.16 |
23.46 4.63 23 -2.08 |
|
5 → 20 [a1] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
118.31 21.77 21 - |
87.35* 17.03 24 -26.17 |
48.45* 40.72 24 -59.05 |
8.86* 15.43 23 -107.48 |
|
0 → 20 [a1] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
142.27 25.20 21 - |
110.08* 18.56 24 -22.62 |
71.41* 40.35 24 -49.81 |
14.60* 17.18 23 -89.74 |
|
Adjusted Bodyweight (g) |
GD20 GU WT [a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
316.02 19.35 21 - |
291.78* 23.20 24 -7.67 |
291.86* 19.67 24 -7.65 |
272.24* 17.79 23 -13.85 |
Adjusted BW Gain (g) |
ADJ BWT GD5B [a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
33.61 8.82 21 - |
12.99* 10.08 24 -61.35 |
10.44* 14.59 24 -68.95 |
10.98* 11.40 23 -132.65 |
[a] ‑ Anova & Dunnett: * = p < 0.05; [a1] ‑ Anova & Dunnett(Log); [a1] ‑ Anova & Dunnett(Rank): * = p < 0.05; [a2] ‑ Anova & Dunnett(Rank): * = p < 0.05
Table for Food Consumption of Pregnant Rats
Sex: Female
Day(s) Relative to Mating |
G1 0 mg/kg/day |
G2 250 mg/kg/day |
G3 500 mg/kg/day |
G4 1000 mg/kg/day |
||
Food Mean Consumption (g/day) |
0 → 3 [a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
22.59 2.66 21 - |
21.59 2.46 24 ‑4.42 |
22.66 1.93 24 0.35 |
22.61 2.71 23 0.09 |
3 → 5 [a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
24.06 2.3 21 - |
23.42 2.42 24 ‑2.66 |
24.34 1.98 24 1.14 |
23.37 2.23 23 ‑2.90 |
|
5 → 8 [a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
21.77 3.75 21 - |
15.87* 2.71 24 ‑27.09 |
15.18* 3.43 24 ‑30.30 |
10.21* 3.59 23 ‑53.11 |
|
8 → 11 [a1] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
21.83 4.26 21 - |
16.35* 2.26 24 ‑25.11 |
16.41* 2.6 24 ‑24.83 |
12.8* 2.62 23 ‑41.39 |
|
11 → 14 [a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
25.96 2.87 21 - |
19.35* 2.92 24 ‑25.48 |
18.73* 2.69 24 ‑27.85 |
14.93* 2.90 23 ‑42.52 |
|
14 → 17 [a1] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
26.83 2.57 21 - |
22.00* 2.76 24 ‑18.00 |
19.77* 4.98 24 ‑26.31 |
13.72* 3.77 23 ‑48.85 |
|
17 → 20 [a1] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
27.73 2.42 21 - |
23.67* 3.36 24 ‑14.65 |
20.28* 4.78 24 ‑26.89 |
15.32* 2.94 23 ‑44.77 |
[a] ‑ Anova & Dunnett: * = p < 0.05; [a1] ‑ Anova & Dunnett(Rank): * = p < 0.05
Contd. Table for Food Consumption of Pregnant Rats
Sex: Female
Day(s) Relative to Mating (Litter: A) |
G1 0 mg/kg/day |
G2 250 mg/kg/day |
G3 500 mg/kg/day |
G4 1000 mg/kg/day |
||
Food Mean Consumption (g/day) |
0 → 5 [a] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
23.18 2.37 21 - |
22.32 2.23 24 ‑3.69 |
23.33 1.67 24 0.68 |
22.91 2.37 23 ‑1.15 |
5 →20 [a1] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
24.83 2.72 21 - |
19.45* 2.29 24 ‑21.66 |
18.07* 3.00 24 ‑27.20 |
13.39* 2.24 23 ‑46.05 |
|
0 → 20 [a2] |
Mean SD N %Diff |
24.41 2.52 21 - |
20.17* 2.15 24 ‑17.40 |
19.39* 2.37 24 ‑20.58 |
15.77* 1.89 23 ‑35.39 |
[a] ‑ Anova & Dunnett: * = p < 0.05
Table for Maternal Data
Sex: Female
|
G10 mg/kg/day |
G2 250 mg/kg/day |
G3 500 mg/kg/day |
G4 1000 mg/kg/day |
||
Group size |
|
N |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
Pregnant at C/S |
|
N |
21 |
24 |
24 |
23 |
Gravid Uterus Weight |
[a] |
Mean SD |
84.702 20.604 |
74.357 18.785 |
38.015 * 33.505 |
2.121 * 5.989 |
Number of Corpora Lutea |
[k] |
Mean SD Sum |
17.0 2.6 356.0 |
16.5 1.9 396.0 |
17.7 2.5 425.0 |
17.1 2.5 394.0 |
Number of Implantation |
[k] |
Mean SD Sum |
15.3 2.7 321.0 |
15.3 2.0 368.0 |
13.6 * 2.5 326.0 * |
12.4 * 3.2 285.0 * |
Number of dams with Early Resorption |
|
N |
14 |
16 |
19 |
23 |
Number of Early Resorptions |
[k] |
Mean SD Sum |
1.2 1.3 26.0 |
2.3 2.5 56.0 |
6.8 * 5.9 162.0 * |
12.1 * 3.5 278.0 * |
% Early Resorption /Animal |
[k] |
Mean SD |
9.23 11.06 |
15.59 17.01 |
50.46 * 44.36 |
97.66 * 11.23 |
Number of dams with Late Resorption |
|
N |
2 |
7 |
7 |
1 |
Number of Late Resorptions |
[k] |
Mean SD Sum |
0.1 0.3 2.0 |
0.4 0.9 10.0 |
0.6 1.6 14.0 |
0.2 0.8 4.0 |
% Late Resorption /Animal |
[k] |
Mean SD |
0.68 2.17 |
2.72 5.59 |
4.22 12.56 |
1.34 6.42 |
Number of dams with Resorptions |
[f] |
N |
16 |
18 |
21 |
23 |
Total Number of Resorptions (Early + Late) |
[f] |
Mean SD Sum |
1.3 1.2 28.0 |
2.8 2.8 66.0 |
7.3 5.6 176.0 |
12.3 3.3 282.0 |
Pre-implantation Loss/Animal |
[k] |
Mean SD |
1.67 1.77 35.00 |
1.17 1.31 28.00 |
4.13 * 2.64 99.00 * |
4.74 * 1.94 109.00 * |
% Pre-implantation Loss |
[k] |
Mean SD |
9.8 10.2 |
6.9 7.7 |
22.8 * 13.7 |
28.4 * 12.5 |
Post-implantation Loss/Animal |
[k] |
Mean SD |
1.33 1.20 28.00 |
2.75 2.77 66.00 |
7.33 * 5.60 176.00 * |
12.26 * 3.25 282.00 * |
% Post-implantation Loss (%) |
[k] |
Mean SD |
9.9 10.7 |
18.3 18.7 |
54.7 * 41.9 |
99.0 * 4.8 |
Implantation Index |
[a1] |
Mean SD N |
90.24 10.20 21 |
93.05 7.68 24 |
77.17 * 13.67 24 |
71.57 * 12.52 23 |
Note: Gross evaluation of placenta revealed no findings;
[a] - Anova & Dunnett(Rank): * = p < 0.05; [a1] - Anova & Dunnett(Log): * = p < 0.05; [k] - Kruskal-Wallis & Wilcoxon: * = p < 0.05; [f] - Cochran Armitage, Chi-Squared & Fisher's Exact
Table for Litter Data
Sex: Female
|
G10 mg/kg/day |
G2 250 mg/kg/day |
G3 500 mg/kg/day |
G4 1000 mg/kg/day |
||
Total Number of fetuses |
|
Sum |
293 |
302 |
150 |
3 |
Total Number of Dead Fetuses |
|
Sum |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total Number of Live fetuses |
|
Sum |
293 |
302 |
150 |
3 |
Live Male fetus |
|
Sum |
150 |
156 |
75 |
3 |
% Male Fetus |
|
|
51.2 |
51.7 |
50.0 |
100.0 |
Mean Fetal Weight- Male (g) |
[c] |
Mean SD |
4.153 0.328 |
3.933 * 0.415 |
3.836 * 0.306 |
4.697 . |
Mean AGD- Male (mm) |
[c1] |
Mean SD |
2.67 0.16 |
2.62 0.13 |
2.64 0.15 |
3.00 |
Live Female fetus |
|
Sum |
143 |
146 |
75 |
0 |
% Female Fetus |
|
|
48.8 |
48.3 |
50.0 |
0.0 |
Mean Fetal Weight- Female (g) |
[c2] |
Mean SD |
3.898 0.335 |
3.728 * 0.428 |
3.725 0.359 |
. . |
Mean AGD- Female (mm) |
[c3] |
Mean SD |
0.96 0.12 |
1.00 0.13 |
0.96 0.10 |
. . |
Mean Fetal Weight -Male+Female (g) |
[c4] |
Mean SD |
4.027 0.318 |
3.827 * 0.405 |
3.776 * 0.302 |
4.697 . |
Mean AGD Male + Female (mm) |
[c5] |
Mean SD |
1.83 0.19 |
1.82 0.31 |
1.84 0.32 |
3.00 |
[c] - Ancova/Anova & Dunnett(Rank): * = p < 0.05;{Covariate(s): Number of Live Male Fetuses}
[c1] - Ancova/Anova & Dunnett;Covariate(s): Number of LiveMaleFetuses}
[c2] - Ancova/Anova & Dunnett(Rank): * = p < 0.05;{Covariate(s): Number of Live Female Fetuses}
[c3] - Ancova/Anova & Dunnett;{Covariate(s): Number of Live Female Fetuses}
[c4] - Ancova/Anova & Dunnett(Rank): * = p < 0.05;{Covariate(s): Number of Live Fetuses}
[c5] - Ancova/Anova & Dunnett;Covariate(s): Number of Live Fetuses}
Table for Fetal External Observations
Exam type: External
Number of Live Fetuses Examined Number of Litters Evaluated |
G1 0 mg/kg/day |
G2 250 mg/kg/day |
G3 500 mg/kg/day |
G4 1000 mg/kg/day |
|
293 21 |
302 24 |
150 14 |
3 1 |
||
Limbs Tail, Thread‑like tail – Malformation
Limb, both, Bent Inward – Malformation
General Fetus, Small Anomaly
|
Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%)
Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
1(0.3) 1(4.2) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
1(0.7) 1(7.1) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(66.7) 1(100.0)
0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
Fetuses N] ‑ Cochran Armitage, Chi‑Squared & Fisher's Exact; [Litters N] ‑ Cochran Armitage, Chi‑Squared & Fisher's Exact
Table for Fetal Visceral Observations
Exam type: Fresh Visceral Body Only
Number of Live Fetuses Examined Number of Litters Evaluated |
G1 0 mg/kg/day |
G2 250 mg/kg/day |
G3 500 mg/kg/day |
G4 1000 mg/kg/day |
|
140 21 |
145 24 |
72 14 |
1 1 |
||
Abdomen Kidney, both, Renal pelvis dilation, Moderate – Anomaly |
Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
1(0.7) 1(4.2) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
Fetuses N] ‑ Cochran Armitage, Chi‑Squared & Fisher's Exact; [Litters N] ‑ Cochran Armitage, Chi‑Squared & Fisher's Exact
Table for Fetal Skeletal Observations
Exam type: Skeletal-Entire
Number of Live Fetuses Examined Number of Litters Evaluated |
G1 0 mg/kg/day |
G2 250 mg/kg/day |
G3 500 mg/kg/day |
G4 1000 mg/kg/day |
|
153 21 |
157 24 |
78 14 |
2 1 |
||
Hindlimbs Tarsal bone, both, Bent – Malformation
Caudal vertebrate 14th caudal centrum, Absent – Anomaly
13th caudal centrum, Absent – Anomaly
12th caudal centrum, Absent – Anomaly
11th caudal centrum, Absent – Anomaly
10th caudal centrum, Absent – Anomaly
9th caudal centrum, Absent – Anomaly
8th caudal centrum, Absent – Malformations
7th caudal centrum, Absent – Malformations
6th caudal centrum, Absent – Malformations
5th caudal centrum, Absent – Malformations
4th caudal centrum, Absent – Malformations
3rd caudal centrum, Absent – Malformations
2nd caudal centrum, Absent – Malformations
1st caudal centrum, Absent – Malformations
6th caudal arch, Absent – Malformation
5th caudal arch, Absent – Malformation
4th caudal arch, Absent – Malformation
3rd caudal arch, Absent – Malformation
2nd caudal arch, Absent – Malformation
1st caudal arch, Absent – Malformation
|
Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%)
Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0)
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0)
1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0)
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
1(50.0) 1(100.0)
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
[Fetuses N] Cochran Armitage, Chi Squared & Fisher's Exact; [Litters N] Cochran Armitage, Chi Squared & Fisher's Exact
Contd.
Exam type: Skeletal-Entire
Number of Live Fetuses Examined Number of Litters Evaluated |
G1 0 mg/kg/day |
G2 250 mg/kg/day |
G3 500 mg/kg/day |
G4 1000 mg/kg/day |
|
153 21 |
157 24 |
78 14 |
2 1 |
||
sacral vertebrae 4th sacral centrum, Absent – Malformation
3rd sacral centrum, Absent – Malformation
2nd sacral centrum, Absent – Malformation
1st sacral centrum, Absent – Malformation
4th sacral arch, Absent – Malformation
4rd sacral arch, Absent – Malformation
4nd sacral arch, Absent – Malformation
1st sacral arch, Absent – Malformation
Lumbar vertebrae 6th lumbar centrum, Absent – Malformation
5th lumbar centrum, Hypoplastic – Anomaly
2nd lumbar centrum, Dumbbell‑shaped – Anomaly 6th lumbar arch, Displaced – Anomaly 6th lumbar arch, Incomplete ossification Anomaly 7th lumbar centrum and arch, Extra – Anomaly |
Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%)
Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.7) 1(4.8) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.7) 1(4.8) |
1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2)
1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
[Fetuses N] Cochran Armitage, Chi Squared & Fisher's Exact; [Litters N] Cochran Armitage, Chi Squared & Fisher's Exact
Contd.
Exam type: Skeletal-Entire
Number of Live Fetuses Examined Number of Litters Evaluated |
G1 0 mg/kg/day |
G2 250 mg/kg/day |
G3 500 mg/kg/day |
G4 1000 mg/kg/day |
|
153 21 |
157 24 |
78 14 |
2 1 |
||
thoracic vertebrae 13th thoracic centrum, Dumbbell shaped – Anomaly
13th thoracic centrum, Asymmetrical split – Anomaly 12th thoracic centrum, Unilateral Ossification –Anomaly 12th thoracic centrum, Split – Anomaly
12th thoracic centrum, Dumbbell‑shaped – Anomaly 12th thoracic centrum, Asymmetrical dumbbell shaped – Anomaly 12th thoracic centrum, Asymmetrical split – Anomaly 11th thoracic centrum, Unilateral Ossification – Anomaly 11th thoracic centrum, Dumbbell‑shaped – Anomaly
11th thoracic centrum, Asymetrical dumbbell shaped – Anomaly 10th thoracic centrum, Split – Anomaly
10th thoracic centrum, Dumbbell‑shaped – Anomaly
10th thoracic centrum, Assymetrical dumbbell shaped – Anomaly 9th thoracic centrum, Split – Anomaly
9th thoracic centrum, Dumbbell‑shaped – Anomaly
9th thoracic centrum, Assymetrical dumbbell shaped – Anomaly 8th thoracic centrum, Split – Anomaly
8th thoracic centrum, Dumbbell‑shaped – Anomaly
7th thoracic centrum, Split – Anomaly
7th thoracic centrum, Dumbbell‑shaped – Anomaly
6th thoracic centrum, Unilateral Ossification – Anomaly 6th thoracic centrum, Assymetrical dumbbell shaped – Anomaly 5th thoracic centrum, Assymetrical dumbbell shaped – Anomaly 4th thoracic centrum, Dumbbell‑shaped – Anomaly
4th thoracic centrum, Assymetrical dumbbell shaped – Anomaly 3rd thoracic centrum, Dumbbell‑shaped – Anomaly
2nd thoracic centrum, Dumbbell‑shaped – Anomaly
2nd thoracic centrum, Delayed skeletal ossification – Variation 2nd thoracic centrum, Incomplete ossification – Variation 1st thoracic centrum, Delayed skeletal ossification – Variation 1st thoracic centrum, Incomplete ossification – Variation Cervical vertebrae Cervical rib, Bilateral, Rudimentary – Anomaly |
Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%)
Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) |
2(1.3) 2(9.5) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(1.3) 2(9.5) 10(6.5) 8(38.1) 2(1.3) 2(9.5) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 11(7.2) 9(42.9) 1(0.7) 1(4.8) 2(1.3) 2(9.5) 23(15.0) 11(52.4) 2(1.3) 2(9.5) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 23(15.0) 11(52.4) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 5(3.3) 5(23.8) 1(0.7) 1(4.8) 1(0.7) 1(4.8) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.7) 1(4.8) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.7) 1(4.8) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.7) 1(4.8) 2(1.3) 2(9.5) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.7) 1(4.8)
0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
3(1.9) 3(12.5) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 9(5.7) 9(37.5) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 13(8.3) 11(45.8) 2(1.3) 2(8.3) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 13(8.3) 9(37.5) 2(1.3) 2(8.3) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 12(7.6)* 9(37.5)* 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 0(0.0)* 0(0.0)* 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
1(0.6) 1(4.2) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 4(5.1) 3(21.4) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 4(5.1) 4(28.6) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 6(7.7) 3(21.4) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(2.6)* 2(14.3)* 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 3(3.8) 3(21.4) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 1(1.3) 1(7.1)
0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
Contd.
Exam type: Skeletal-Entire
Number of Live Fetuses Examined Number of Litters Evaluated |
G1 0 mg/kg/day |
G2 250 mg/kg/day |
G3 500 mg/kg/day |
G4 1000 mg/kg/day |
|
153 21 |
157 24 |
78 14 |
2 1 |
||
ribs 14th rib, Right, Rudimentary - Anomaly
14th rib, Right, Accessory – Anomaly
14th rib, Left, Rudimentary – Anomaly
14th rib, Left, Accessory – Anomaly 14th rib, Bilateral, Rudimentary – Anomaly
14th rib, Bilateral, Accessory – Anomaly
14th rib, Bilateral, Extra – Anomaly
13th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
13th rib, Left, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
13th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
12th rib, Left, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
12th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
12th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
11th rib, Left, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
11th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
11th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
11th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
11th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
10th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
10th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
10th rib, Left, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
10th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
10th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
9th rib, Left, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
9th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
9th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
9th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
9th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
8th rib, Left, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
8th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
8th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
8th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
8th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
7th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
7th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
7th rib, Left, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
7th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
7th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
6th rib, Left, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
6th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
6th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
6th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
6th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
5th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
5th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
5th rib, Left, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
5th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
5th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
4th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
4th rib, Right, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
4th rib, Left, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
4th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Slight – Anomaly
4th rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
3rd rib, Bilateral, Wavy Rib, Moderate – Anomaly
|
Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) |
12(7.8) 8(38.1) 2(1.3) 2(9.5) 14(9.2) 11(52.4) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 12(7.8) 9(42.9) 2(1.3) 2(9.5) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
7(4.5) 6(25.0) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 12(7.6) 9(37.5) 4(2.5) 3(12.5) 17(10.8) 12(50.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 2(1.3) 2(8.3) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 3(1.9) 3(12.5) 4(2.5) 3(12.5) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 7(4.5)* 7(29.2)* 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 3(1.9) 2(8.3) 2(1.3) 2(8.3) 9(5.7)* 6(25.0)* 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 6(3.8)* 4(16.7) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 8(5.1)* 5(20.8) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 7(4.5)* 5(20.8) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 6(3.8)* 4(16.7) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 2(1.3) 2(8.3) 4(2.5) 4(16.7) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
3(3.8) 3(21.4) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 5(6.4) 4(28.6) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 12(15.4) 7(50.0) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 3(3.8) 3(21.4) 2(2.6) 2(14.3) 3(3.8)* 3(21.4) 4(5.1)* 3(21.4) 10(12.8)* 8(57.1)* 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 6(7.7)* 6(42.9)* 5(6.4)* 4(28.6)* 10(12.8)* 8(57.1)* 3(3.8)* 3(21.4) 2(2.6) 2(14.3) 4(5.1)* 4(28.6)* 3(3.8)* 3(21.4) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 11(14.1)* 9(64.3)* 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 4(5.1)* 4(28.6)* 4(5.1)* 4(28.6)* 3(3.8)* 3(21.4)* 11(14.1)* 9(64.3) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 4(5.1)* 4(28.6)* 2(2.6) 2(14.3) 10(12.8)* 8(57.1)* 5(6.4)* 5(35.7)* 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 4(5.1)* 4(28.6)* 4(5.1)* 4(28.6)* 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 8(10.3)* 7(50.0)* 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 4(5.1) 4(28.6) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 6(7.7)* 5(35.7)* 2(2.6) 2(14.3) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 4(5.1)* 4(28.6)* 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 3(3.8)* 3(21.4)* 1(1.3) 1(7.1) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
Contd.
Exam type: Skeletal-Entire
Number of Live Fetuses Examined Number of Litters Evaluated |
G1 0 mg/kg/day |
G2 250 mg/kg/day |
G3 500 mg/kg/day |
G4 1000 mg/kg/day |
|
153 21 |
157 24 |
78 14 |
2 1 |
||
sternebrae 6th sternebra, Hypoplastic – Anomaly
6th sternebra, Delayed skeletal ossification – Variation 6th sternebra, Incomplete ossification – Variation
5th sternebra, Hypoplastic – Anomaly
5th sternebra, Asymmetrical ossification – Anomaly
5th sternebra, Split – Anomaly
4th sternebra, Asymmetrical ossification – Anomaly
4th sternebra, Incomplete ossification – Variation
4th sternebra, Split – Anomaly
3rd sternebra, Asymmetrical ossification – Anomaly
3rd sternebra, Incomplete ossification – Variation
2nd sternebra, Hypoplastic – Anomaly
2nd sternebra, Split – Anomaly
1st sternebra, Incomplete ossification – Variation
Skull Supraoccipital, Incomplete ossification – Variation
Parietal, Incomplete ossification – Variation
Interparietal, Incomplete ossification – Variation
Hyoid, Incomplete ossification – Variation
Frontal, Incomplete ossification – Variation
|
Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%)
Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) Fetuses N(%) Litters N(%) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 7(4.6) 6(28.6) 43(28.1) 18(85.7) 19(12.4) 11(52.4) 1(0.7) 1(4.8) 2(1.3) 2(9.5) 1(0.7) 1(4.8) 13(8.5) 9(42.9) 1(0.7) 1(4.8) 1(0.7) 1(4.8) 7(4.6) 7(33.3) 2(1.3) 2(9.5) 1(0.7) 1(4.8) 1(0.7) 1(4.8)
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(1.3) 2(9.5) 2(1.3) 2(9.5) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
1(0.6) 1(4.2) 15(9.6) 6(25.0) 50(31.8) 19(79.2) 21(13.4) 13(54.2) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(1.3) 2(8.3) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 6(3.8) 4(16.7) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 6(3.8) 5(20.8) 1(0.6) 1(4.2) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
20(12.7)* 13(54.2)* 35(22.3)* 15(62.5)* 41(26.1)* 16(66.7)* 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(2.6) 2(14.3) 34(43.6) 14(100.0) 10(12.8) 8(57.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(2.6) 2(14.3) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(1.3) 1(7.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 5(6.4) 3(21.4) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(1.3) 1(7.1)
25(32.1)* 10(71.4)* 31(39.7)* 12(85.7)* 34(43.6)* 12(85.7)* 7(9.0)* 3(21.4) 2(2.6) 1(7.1) |
0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
1(50.0) 1(100.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 1(50.0) 1(100.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) |
[Fetuses N] Cochran Armitage, Chi Squared & Fisher's Exact; [Litters N] Cochran Armitage, Chi Squared & Fisher's Exact
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Klimisch 1
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
As per CLP guidance, a comparison between the severity of the effects on fertility and (or) development and the severity of other toxicological findings must made during classification. In the presented OECD 414 study, the observed effects on development were observed in the presence of maternal systemic toxicity. The observed effects on fetal developmental toxicity (i.e. the small changes in fetal body weight) were considered to be secondary to maternal systemic toxicity whereas the observed effects on maternal developmental toxicity were not considered to be entirely due to maternal systemic toxicity.
By taking into account CLP guidance, the substance is regarded to be classified as “H361d: suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child” (Category 2).
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.