Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 211-662-7 | CAS number: 682-11-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 7 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 176.3 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- It is assumed that the oral absorption rate is 50% that of the inhalation absorption rate (i.e. oral and inhalation absorption values of 50% and 100% respectively are assumed). The corrected inhalation NOAEC for workers is derived as: oral NOAEL x (1/0.38 m3/kg/day) x (6.7 m3/10m3 (8 h)) x (% oral absorption/ % inhalation absorption) = 200 mg/kg bw/day x (1/0.38) x 0.67 x (50/100) = 176.3 mg/m3
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default factor for extrapolating from a subchronic study to chronic exposure
- Justification:
- The application of a factor for allometric scaling is not required for the inhalation route
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default factor for workers
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- It is assumed that dermal absorption will not exceed oral absorption (i.e. oral and dermal absorption values of 50% respectively are assumed). The equivalent dermal NOAEL is derived as: oral NOAEL x (% oral absorption/ % dermal absorption) = 200 mg/kg bw/day x (50/50) = 200 mg/kg bw/day.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default factor for extrapolating from a subchronic study to chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default factor for workers
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
Identity of the substance and approach to meeting the data requirements
2 -allyloxymethyl-2 -ethylpropanediol
Toxicokinetics
Based on physicochemical data, toxicity data and theoretical assessment, the basic toxicokinetics of 2 -allyloxymethyl-2 -ethylpropanediol can be adequately characterised. The substance is likely to be rapidly and extensively absorbed following oral or inhalation exposure, absorption following dermal exposure is likely to be less extensive and more gradual. Rapid and extensive distribution is predicted. Extensive hepatic metabolism of the substance is predicted, indicating that excretion is rapid and bioaccumulation is unlikely.
Acute toxicity
The acute oral and dermal toxicity of 2-allyloxymethyl-2-ethylpropanediol is low. The oral LD50 of the substance in the rat is 4930 mg/kg bw. The dermal LD50 of the substance in the rabbit is > 15800 mg/kg bw. A waiver is proposed in accordance with Column 2 of Annex VIII of the REACH Regulation for acute inhalation toxicity on the basis that acute toxicity data are available for the oral and dermal routes. Inhalation is not predicted to be a significant route of exposure based on the physicochemical properties of the substance.
Irritation/corrosion
Based on existing datasets and structural and chemical considerations, read-across from 2-allyloxymethyl-2-ethylpropanediol to skin and eye irritation studies on 2,2 -bis(allyloxymethyl)butan-1 -ol is appropriate to meet the REACH Annex VII-IX data requirements. Studies on 2,2 -bis(allyloxymethyl)butan-1 -ol show the substance is a mild irritant but do not trigger classification of the substance as a skin or eye irritant; classification of 2-allyloxymethyl-2-ethylpropanediol for skin and eye irritation is not required.
Skin sensitisation
Based on existing datasets and structural and chemical considerations, read-across from 2-allyloxymethyl-2-ethylpropanediol to a skin sensitisation study on 2,2-bis(allyloxymethyl)butan-1-ol is appropriate to meet the REACH Annex VII-VIIII data requirements. No evidence of skin sensitisation was seen in a Maximisation assay performed using 2,2-bis(allyloxymethyl)butan-1-ol: 2-allyloxymethyl-2-ethylpropanediol is not therefore expected to have skin sensitisation potential.
Repeated dose toxicity
A NOEL of 40 mg/kg bw/day was determined for the sub-acute repeated dose oral toxicity of 2-allyloxymethyl-2-ethylpropanediol in a 28-day study, based on clinical signs (hypoactivity). Based on existing datasets and structural and chemical considerations, read-across from 2-allyloxymethyl-2-ethylpropanediol to a sub-chronic repeated dose toxicity studty on 2,2-bis(allyloxymethyl)butan-1-ol is appropriate to meet the REACH Annex VII-IX data requirements. The NOAEL for the sub-chronic (90 day) repeated dose toxicity of 2,2-bis(allyloxymethyl)butan-1-ol was determined to be 200 mg/kg bw/day, based on observations of liver weight change and possible adaptive effects on other liver parameters, in conjunction with bodyweight changes and adverse clinical observations at the highest dose level.
Genetic toxicity
No evidence of mutagenicity was seen for 2-allyloxymethyl-2-ethylpropanediol in a bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test). Based on available datasets and chemical and structural considerations, read across from 2-allyloxymethyl-2-ethylpropanediol to mammalian in vitro genotoxicity studies on 2,2-bis(allyloxymethyl)butan-1 -ol is appropriate to address the REACH Annex VII-IX data requirements. In a mouse lymphoma assay, a weak positive response was reported in the presence of metabolic activation and only at concentrations associated with marked cytogenicity. No evidence of clastogenicity was seen in a standard mouse micronucleus assay.
Toxicity to reproduction
No data are available on the reproductive toxicity of 2-allyloxymethyl-2-ethylpropanediol. Histopathological changes in reproductive organs in repeated dose toxicity studies are indicative of effects on fertility. In this respect, repeated dose toxicity studies should be considered sensitive and sufficient information to evaluate toxicity on fertility if histological examination of the reproductive organs is covered.
In a study on the sub-acute oral repeated dose toxicity of 2 -allyloxymethyl-2 -ethylpropanediol in rats, no evidence of an effect on the reproductive organs was seen at dose levels of up to and including 200 mg/kg bw/day for 28 days (Perstorp, 2010). Read-across to the findings from a 90-day repeated dose toxicity study and a prenatal developmental toxicity study using 2,2 -bis(allyloxymethyl)butan-1 -ol is considered appropriate to provide a characterisation of the reproductive hazard of 2 -allyloxymethyl-2 –ethylpropanediol. On the basis that no effects were observed on any reproductive parameters in these studies, 2 -allyloxymethyl-2 –ethylpropanediol is not predicted to be a reproductive toxicant.
Based on existing datasets and structural and chemical considerations, read-across from 2 -allyloxymethyl-2 -ethylpropanediol to a developmental toxicity study using 2,2 -bis(allyloxymethyl)butan-1 -ol is appropriate to meet the REACH Annex VII-IX data requirements. Based on the results of this study, the maternal No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) was 50 mg/kg bw/day and the maternal No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was 200 mg/kg bw/day due to slight food consumption decreases and liver weight changes at 200 and 800 mg/kg bw/day, and bodyweight changes at 800 mg/kg bw/day. The NOAEL for developmental toxicity was considered to be 800 mg/kg bw/day (i.e. the highest dose tested).
DNEL derivation [Workers]
Based on the data available, the substance is of low acute toxicity, is not a skin or eye irritant or a skin sensitiser and is not mutagenic, a developmental or reproductive toxin.
The relevant (lowest) NOAEL for systemic toxicity for DNEL derivation is the NOAEL of 200 mg/kg bw/day from an OECD Test Guideline 408 90-day repeated dose toxicity study conducted on the read-across substance 2,2 -bis(allyloxymethyl)butan-1-ol.
Local effects
DNEL values for local effects are not derived. The substance is not a skin or eye irritant or a skin sensitiser. DNELs for local effects are not therefore derived.
Systemic effects
The substance is of low systemic toxicity. No acute toxicity hazard resulting in classification has been identified, therefore DNELs for acute systemic effects are not proposed.
The relevant (lowest) NOAEL for systemic toxicity for DNEL derivation is the NOAEL of 200 mg/kg bw/day from an OECD Test Guideline 408 90-day repeated dose toxicity study conducted on the read-across substance 2,2 -bis(allyloxymethyl)butan-1-ol.
[Dermal – long-term systemic DNEL]
A long-term systemic dermal DNEL is derived from the oral NOAEL of 200 mg/kg bw/day using the route-to-route extrapolation approach and default assumptions given in the REACH guidance. It is assumed that dermal absorption will not exceed oral absorption (i.e. oral and dermal absorption values of 50% respectively are assumed). The equivalent dermal NOAEL is derived as: oral NOAEL x (% oral absorption/ % dermal absorption) = 200 mg/kg bw/day x (50/50) = 200 mg/kg bw/day.
The use of assessment factors according to REACH guidance is considered below:
Intraspecies: default values of 4 (allometric scaling: rat) and 2.5 (remaining differences) are proposed.
Interspecies: a default value of 5 is proposed for workers.
Exposure duration: a default value of 2 is proposed for extrapolation from a sub-chronic study to chronic exposure. This represents a conservative approach, as the data indicate low toxicity following single and repeated exposures
Dose-response: a default value of 1 is proposed as, based on the available data, the substance is of low toxicity
Quality of the data base: a default value of 1 is proposed.
An overall assessment factor of 100 for long-term dermal effects is therefore calculated for workers.
Applying the assessment factor of 100 to the dermal equivalent NOAEL of 200 mg/kg bw/d gives a dermal DNEL value of 2 mg/kg bw/day for long-term systemic effects.
[Inhalation – long-term systemic DNEL]
A long-term systemic inhalation DNEL is derived from the oral NOAEL of 200 mg/kg bw/day using the route-to-route extrapolation approach and default assumptions given in the REACH guidance. It is assumed that the oral absorption rate is 50% that of the inhalation absorption rate (i.e. oral and inhalation absorption values of 50% and 100% respectively are assumed). The corrected inhalation NOAEC for workers is derived as: oral NOAEL x (1/0.38 m3/kg/day) x (6.7 m3/10m3(8 h)) x (% oral absorption/ % inhalation absorption) = 200 mg/kg bw/day x (1/0.38) x 0.67 x (50/100) = 176.3 mg/m3
The use of assessment factors according to REACH guidance is considered below:
Intraspecies: a default value of 2.5 (remaining differences) is proposed (the application of a factor for allometric scaling is not required for the inhalation route).
Interspecies: a default value of 5 is proposed for workers.
Exposure duration: a default value of 2 is proposed for extrapolation from a sub-chronic study to chronic exposure. This represents a conservative approach, as the data indicate low toxicity following single and repeated exposures
Dose-response: a default value of 1 is proposed as, based on the available data, the substance is of low toxicity
Quality of the data base: a default value of 1 is proposed
An overall assessment factor of 25 for long-term inhalational effects is therefore calculated for workers.
Applying the assessment factor of 25 to the corrected inhalation NOAEC of 176.3 mg/m3gives an inhalation DNEL value of 7.0 mg/m3for long-term systemic effects.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.7 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 87 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- It is assumed that the oral absorption rate is 50% that of the inhalation absorption rate (i.e. oral and inhalation absorption values of 50% and 100% respectively are assumed). The corrected inhalation NOAEC for the general population is derived as: oral NOAEL x (1/1.15 m3/kg/day) x (% oral absorption/ % inhalation absorption) = 200 mg/kg bw/day x (1/1.5) x (50/100) = 87 mg/m3.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default factor for extrapolating from a subchronic study to chronic exposure
- Justification:
- A factor for allometric scaling is not required for the inhalation route
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default factor for general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- It is assumed that dermal absorption will not exceed oral absorption (i.e. oral and dermal absorption values of 50% respectively are assumed). The equivalent dermal NOAEL is derived as: oral NOAEL x (% oral absorption/ % dermal absorption) = 200 mg/kg bw/day x (50/50) = 200 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default factor for extrapolating from a subchronicstudy to chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default factor for general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default factor for extrapolating from a subchronic study to chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default factor for general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Based on the data available, the substance is of low acute toxicity, is not a skin or eye irritant or a skin sensitiser and is not mutagenic, a developmental or reproductive toxin.
The relevant (lowest) NOAEL for systemic toxicity for DNEL derivation is the NOAEL of 200 mg/kg bw/day from an OECD Test Guideline 408 90-day repeated dose toxicity study conducted on the read-across substance 2,2 -bis(allyloxymethyl)butan-1 –ol.
Local effects
DNEL values for local effects are not derived. The substance is not a skin or eye irritant or a skin sensitiser. DNELs for local effects are not therefore proposed.
Systemic effects
The substance is of low systemic toxicity. No acute toxicity hazard resulting in classification has been identified, therefore DNELs for acute systemic effects are not proposed.
The relevant (lowest) NOAEL for systemic toxicity for DNEL derivation is the NOAEL of 200 mg/kg bw/day from an OECD Test Guideline 408 90-day repeated dose toxicity study conducted on the read-across substance 2,2 -bis(allyloxymethyl)butan-1 –ol.
[Dermal – long-term systemic DNEL]
A long-term systemic dermal DNEL is derived from the oral NOAEL of 200 mg/kg bw/day using the route-to-route extrapolation approach and default assumptions given in the REACH guidance. It is assumed that dermal absorption will not exceed oral absorption (i.e. oral and dermal absorption values of 50% respectively are assumed). The equivalent dermal NOAEL is derived as: oral NOAEL x (% oral absorption/ % dermal absorption) = 200 mg/kg bw/day x (50/50) = 200 mg/kg bw/day.
The use of assessment factors according to REACH guidance is considered below:
Intraspecies: default values of 4 (allometric scaling: rat) and 2.5 (remaining differences) are proposed.
Interspecies: a default value of 10 is proposed for the general population.
Exposure duration: a default value of 2 is proposed for extrapolation from a sub-chronic study to chronic exposure. This represents a conservative approach, as the data indicate low toxicity following single and repeated exposures
Dose-response: a default value of 1 is proposed as, based on the available data, the substance is of low toxicity
Quality of the data base: a default value of 1 is proposed
An overall assessment factor of 200 for long-term dermal effects is therefore calculated for the general population
Applying the assessment factor of 200 to the dermal equivalent NOAEL of 200 mg/kg bw/d gives a dermal DNEL value of 1 mg/kg bw/d for long-term systemic effects.
[Inhalation – long-term systemic DNEL]
A long-term systemic inhalation DNEL is derived from the oral NOAEL of 200 mg/kg bw/day using the route-to-route extrapolation approach and default assumptions given in the REACH guidance. It is assumed that the oral absorption rate is 50% that of the inhalation absorption rate (i.e. oral and inhalation absorption values of 50% and 100% respectively are assumed). The corrected inhalation NOAEC for the general population is derived as: oral NOAEL x (1/1.5 m3/kg/day) x (% oral absorption/ % inhalation absorption) = 200 mg/kg bw/day x (1/1.5) x (50/100) = 87 mg/m3
The use of assessment factors according to REACH guidance is considered below:
Intraspecies: a default value of 2.5 (remaining differences) is proposed (the application of a factor for allometric scaling is not required for the inhalation route).
Interspecies: a default value of 10 is proposed for the general population.
Exposure duration: a default value of 2 is proposed for extrapolation from a sub-chronic study to chronic exposure. This represents a conservative approach, as the data indicate low toxicity following single and repeated exposures
Dose-response: a default value of 1 is proposed as, based on the available data, the substance is of low toxicity
Quality of the data base: a default value of 1 is proposed
An overall assessment factor of 50 for long-term inhalational effects is therefore calculated for the general population.
Applying the assessment factor of 50 to the corrected inhalation NOAEC of 87 mg/m3gives an inhalation DNEL value of 1.7 mg/m3for long-term systemic effects.
[Oral – long term systemic DNEL]
Applying the assessment factor of 200 to the oral NOAEL of 200 mg/kg bw/day gives an oral DNEL of 1 mg/kg bw/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.