Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
3.52 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
75
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
150 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
264.47 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

Long term exposure – inhalation systemicDose description modification - Guidance [1. Appendix R8-1] was followed for route to route extrapolation as no relevant dose descriptor were available for inhalation exposure. As noted in R.8.4.2, as no information regarding inhalation absorption is available, a worse case scenario that 100% of the dose will be absorbed via the inhalation route. The dose descriptor was modified to take into account an 8 hour exposure and the respiratory volume corrected for light work.

 NOAECcorr = NOAEL *1 / rat resp. volume * oral / inhalation absorption * human resting resp. volume / worker resp. volume

 NOAECcorr(general) = 150 mg/kg/bw *(1 / 0.38) * (100% (default) / 100%(default)) * 6.7 m3 (8hr) / 10 m3 (8hr) = 264.47 mg/m3

 Assessment factors -Default assessment factors [1. R-8.4.3.3.] were applied.

Assessment factor = Interspecies * Intraspecies * Exposure duration * Dose-response * Quality of whole database

Assessment factor (general) = 2.5 * 5 * 6 * 1 * 1 = 75

 DNEL derivation - DNEL = NOAELcorr / Assessment factor

 DNEL = 264.47 mg/kg bw/day / 75 = 3.52 mg/kg bw/day

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
No issues
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
Subacute to chromic
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
rat to human
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
remaining differences
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
worker
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
No issues
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
No issues
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
3.3 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
75
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
150 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

Long term exposure –dermal systemic -

NOAELcorr = NOAEL/Allometric scaling*(ABS oral rat / ABS derm rat) * (ABS derm rat / ABS derm human)

 NOAELcorr (general) = 150mg/kg bw/4 * (100% (default) / 15% (default)) * (100% (default) / 100% (default)) = 250mg/kg bw

 Assessment factors - Default assessment factors [1. R-8.4.3.3.] were applied.

Assessment factor = Interspecies * Intraspecies * Exposure duration * Dose-response * Quality of whole database

Assessment factor (general) = 2.5 * 5 * 6 * 1 * 1 = 75

 DNEL derivation - DNEL = NOAELcorr / Assessment factor

 DNEL = 250 mg/kg bw/day / 75 = 3.3 mg/kg bw/day

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
No issues
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
sub-acute to chronic
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
6
Justification:
rat to human
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
remaining
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
worker
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
no issues
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
No issues
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)

Additional information - workers

Wear eye protection

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected

Additional information - General Population

The substance is consumed in the manufacture of a pharmaceutical product and the substance is not exposed to the general population