Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Skin irritation


key, in vivo, rabbit, skin, negative


supp, QSAR (SciQSAR model implemented in the Danish QSAR database), negative


 


Eye irritation


key, in vitro, BCOP, OECD 437, GLP, negative for serrious eye damage


key, in vivo, rabbit, eye, negative

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The test item (500 µL) was applied semi-occlusively to the inner surface of one ear of new Zealand white rabbits for 8 or 24 hours. For each duration 2 animals were used. The other ear served as control. After 8 and 24 hours, the ears were washed with soap and water.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
male and female, 2 animals per duration
- Weight at study initiation: 3-4 kg
- Housing: single
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): species-specific Feeding
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: not given
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
not specified
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: the other ear served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 500 µL/animal
- Concentration (if solution): pure / unchanged
Duration of treatment / exposure:
8 and 24 hours
Observation period:
7 days
Number of animals:
2 / duration
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: inner surface of the ear
- Type of wrap if used: fixation of substance with band-aid

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): with soap and water
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks on result:
other: After 8 and 24 hours and subsequent washing with soap and water, no signs of irritation were noticeable within the observation period of 7 days.
Irritant / corrosive response data:
not irritating
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Remarks:
EU-GHS
Conclusions:
The test item did not show any irritating potential in rabbit ears after an exposure of 8 or 24 hours.
Executive summary:

The test item (500 µL) was applied semi-occlusively to the inner surface of new Zealand white rabbits for 8 or 24 hours (Thyssen, 1979). For each duration 2 animals were used. The other ear served as control. After 8 and 24 hours and subsequent washing with soap and water, no signs of irritation were noticeable within the observation period of 7 days.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2012-03-08 to 2012-05-25
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP study according to Guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Species:
cattle
Strain:
other: not applicable
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
freshly isolated bovine cornea
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): application of 0.75 mL test item dissolved in saline (20 % (w/v))
- Concentration (if solution): 20 % (w/v)

VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): application of 0.75 mL test item dissolved in saline (20 % (w/v))
- Concentration (if solution):0.9 % (w/v)
- Lot/batch no. (if required): 310112
Duration of treatment / exposure:
240 min (+/- 15 min). At the beginning of the test, the basal opacity of all corneae was recorded (t0). After 240 minutes of incubation with the test item, the opacity was measured again (t240).
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 freshly isolated bovine eyes were used per group (positive control, negative control, test item).
Details on study design:
Positive Control
10 % (w/v) Benzalkonium chloride (Sigma, 89555 Steinheim, Germany, lot no. 036K0208) in 0.9 % (w/v) NaCl in deionised water (saline, produced in-house, lot no. 310112) served as positive control.

Negative Control
Saline (produced in-house, lot no. 310112) served as negative control.
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
mean
Value:
6.5
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid

Evaluation of Results

Opacity

The change of opacity value of each treated cornea or positive and negative control corneae was calculated by subtracting the initial basal opacity from the post treatment opacity reading (t240 - t0), for each individual cornea. The average change in opacity of the negative control corneae was calculated and this value was subtracted from the change in opacity of each treated cornea or positive control to obtain a corrected opacity.

Permeability

The corrected OD490 value of each cornea treated with positive control and test item was calculated by subtracting the average negative control cornea value from the original permeability value for each cornea.

In Vitro Irritation Score Calculation

The following formula was used to determine the in vitro irritation score of the negative control:

In vitro Irritation Score = opacity value + (15 * OD490 value)

The following formula was used to determine the in vitro irritation score of the positive control and the test item:

In vitro Irritation Score = (opacity value - opacity value mean negative control) + (15 * corrected OD490 value)

The in vitro irritation score was calculated for each individual treatment and positive control cornea. The mean in vitro irritation score irritation value of each treated group was calculated from the individual in vitro irritation score values.

Depending on the score obtained, the test item was classified into the following category according to OECD guideline 437:

In vitro Irritation Score In vitro Irritation Scale(according to OECD 437)
55.1 Corrosive/ Severe irritant CLP/EPA/GHS(Cat 1)

Data Recording

The data generated were recorded in the raw data file. The results were presented in tabular form, including experimental groups with the test item, negative, and positive controls. The data of permeability measurement were registered and transferred into an Excel sheet.

Historical Data

  Positive Control Negative Control
Mean in vitro Irritation Score 173.79 1.74
Standard Deviation 43.90 0.74
Values of 138 studies with solid test items performed in 2008 to 2012

Results

Results after 240 Minutes Incubation Time
Test Group Opacity value = Difference (t240 -t0) of Opacity Permeability at 490nm (OD490) In vitro Score Mean in vitro irritation score Proposed in vitro Irritation Scale
    Mean   Mean      
Negative Control 1 0,67 0,048 0.050 1.72 1.42 Non corrosive / non severe irritant
1 0,050 1.75
0 0,053 0.80
Positive Control 230.33* 0.035* 230.85 234.77 Corrosive / severe irritant
257.33* 0.020* 257.63
214.33* 0.100* 215.83
Test Item 6.33* 0.046* 7.02 6.50 Non corrosive / non severe irritant
3.33* 0.054* 4.14
8.33* 0.000* 8.33
*corrected values
Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Conclusions:
In conclusion, according to the current study and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item Diphenyl methylphosphonate is not corrosive / not severely irritating to the eye (CLP/EPA/GHS (Cat 1)).
Executive summary:

In compliance with GLP criteria and according to OECD guideline 437 as well as EU guideline No 1152/2010: B.47, this in vitro study was performed to assess the corneal irritation and damage potential of Diphenyl methylphosphonate by means of the BCOP assay using fresh bovine corneae.

After a first opacity measurement of the fresh bovine corneae (t0), the 20 % (w/v) solution in saline (0.9 % (w/v) NaCl in deionised water) of the test item Diphenyl methylphosphonate, the positive, and the negative controls were applied to corneae and incubated for 240 minutes at 32 ± 1 °C. The posterior chamber contained MEM medium supplemented with sodium bicarbonate and L-glutamine and 1 % fetal calf serum (FCS) (complete medium = cMEM). After the incubation phase the test item, the positive, and the negative controls were each rinsed from the corneae and opacity was measured again (t240).

After the opacity measurements, permeability of the corneae was determined by measuring spectrophotometrically the transfer of fluorescein after incubation in a horizontal position for 90 minutes at 32 ± 1 °C.

With the negative control (saline) neither an increase of opacity nor permeability of the corneae could be observed.

The positive control (10 % (w/v) Benzalkonium chloride in saline) showed clear opacity and distinctive permeability of the corneae corresponding to a classification as corrosive / severe irritant to the eye (CLP/EPA/GHS (Cat 1)).

Relative to the negative control, the test item Diphenyl methylphosphonate did not cause a relevant increase of the corneal opacity or permeability. The calculated mean in vitro irritation score was 6.50. According to OECD 437 the test item is classified as not corrosive / not severe irritant to the eye.

In conclusion, according to the current study and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item Diphenyl methylphosphonate is not corrosive / not severe irritant to the eye (CLP/EPA/GHS (Cat 1)).

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Skin irritation


Diphenyl methylphosphonate was tested in an in vivo study whereby 500 µL was applied semi-occlusively to the inner surface of the ear of New Zealand white rabbits for 8 or 24 hours (Thyssen, 1979). For each duration 2 animals were used. The other ear served as control. After 8 and 24 hours and subsequent washing with soap and water, no signs of irritation were noticeable within the observation period of 7 days.


The test item was predicted negative for skin irritation by SciQSAR model (Danish QSAR database), which is implemented in the OECD QSAR toolbox v4.5. The prediction falls into the applicability domain of this model.


 


Eye irritation


In compliance with GLP criteria and according to OECD guideline 437 as well as Commission Regulation (EU) guideline No. 1152/2010: B.47, this in vitro study was performed to assess the corneal irritation and damage potential of Diphenyl methylphosphonate by means of the BCOP assay using fresh bovine corneae.


After a first opacity measurement of the fresh bovine corneae (t 0), the 20 % (w/v) solution in saline (0.9 % (w/v) NaCl in deionised water) of the test item Diphenyl methylphosphonate, the positive, and the negative controls were applied to corneae and incubated for 240 minutes at 32 ± 1 °C. The posterior chamber contained MEM medium supplemented with sodium bicarbonate and L-glutamine and 1 % fetal calf serum (FCS) (complete medium = cMEM). After the incubation phase the test item, the positive, and the negative controls were each rinsed from the corneae and opacity was measured again (t 240).


After the opacity measurements, permeability of the corneae was determined by measuring spectrophotometrically the transfer of fluorescein after incubation in a horizontal position for 90 minutes at 32 ± 1 °C. With the negative control (saline) neither an increase of opacity nor permeability of the corneae could be observed. The positive control (10 % (w/v) Benzalkonium chloride in saline) showed clear opacity and distinctive permeability of the corneae corresponding to a classification as corrosive / severe irritant to the eye (CLP/EPA/GHS (Cat 1)).


Relative to the negative control, the test item Diphenyl methylphosphonate did not cause a relevant increase of the corneal opacity or permeability. The calculated mean in vitro irritation score was 6.50. According to OECD 437 the test item is classified as not corrosive / not severe irritant to the eye.


In conclusion, according to the current study and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item Diphenyl methylphosphonate is not corrosive / not severe irritant to the eye (CLP/EPA/GHS (Cat 1)).


 


In an in vivo eye irritation study, the test item ( ca. 100 µL, undiluted) was applied into the conjunctival sac of New Zealand White rabbits (Thyssen, 1979). The other eye served as control. No signs of irritation were noticeable within the observation period of 7 days.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the results of available irritation studies the substance is not subject to classification and labelling according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.