Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-002-1 | CAS number: 102-06-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 986
- Report date:
- 1986
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA Health Effects Test Guidelines 560/6-82-001
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,3-diphenylguanidine
- EC Number:
- 203-002-1
- EC Name:
- 1,3-diphenylguanidine
- Cas Number:
- 102-06-7
- Molecular formula:
- C13H13N3
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,3-diphenylguanidine
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories (Michigan)
- Age at study initiation: 91 days approx.
- Weight at study initiation: 220 g approx.
- Fasting period before study: no data
- Housing: individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum (Purina certified rodent chow #5002)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum (tap water)
- Acclimation period: 20 days minimum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 72°C +/-3°F
- Humidity (%): 40% or above
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hr light / 12 hr dark
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: 0.5% aqueous methylcellulose
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
A specified amount of the test article DPG was weighed into a glass weigh boat for each group, transferred to a mortar and ground with the vehicle until a slurry was obtained. The slurry was transferred to a volumetric flask via a series of vehicle rinses. Vehicle was then added in sufficient quantity to achieve the appropriate concentration for each dose group. The flasks were inverted several times and stirred for 5 to 10 minutes. The mixtures were then transferred to amber dosage jars. The test mixtures were prepared fresh daily.
A dosage volume of 10 ml/kg was used for all dosage levels.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): 0.5% aqueous methylcellulose (methocel)
- Lot/batch no. (if required): 820-7112-A
- Purity: no data - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- No data
- Details on mating procedure:
- The animals were paired for mating in the home cage if the male.
- Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1 M /1 F
- Length of cohabitation: until prove of pregnancy
- Verification of same strain and source of both sexes: yes
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- days 6-15 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- once daily
- Duration of test:
- 15 days
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
5, 25 or 50 mg/kg/day
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 25 females / dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- No
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes, each morning
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes, daily during all the gestation
BODY WEIGHT: Yes , on gestation days 0, 6, 9, 12, 16 and 20
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 20 - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: No data
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- Each fetus was individually weighed, sexed and tagged for identification.
- External examinations: Yes: all per litter (eyes, palate, external orifices)
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Head examinations: No data - Statistics:
- All analyses were conducted using two-tailed tests for a minimum significance level of 5% comparing the treatment group to the control group; all means have been presented with standard deviations. The number of animals (N) used to calculate the means has been provided on the individual data tables. All statistical tests were performed by a Digital Computer with appropriate programming as referenced below.
1. The fetal sex ratios were compared by the Chi-square test with Yates’ correction factor.
2. The numbers of litters with malformations and variations were compared by Fisher's Exact Test.
3. The numbers of early and late resorptions, dead fetuses and post-implantation losses were compared by the Mann-Whitney U-test.
4. Mean numbers of corpora lutea, total implantations, viable fetuses, mean fetal and maternal body weight at each interval and maternal body weight
gains were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance, and Dunnett's test. - Indices:
- No
- Historical control data:
- No
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Alopecia on the forepaws and forelegs was observed in one a nimal in the 50 mg/kg/day group prior to dosing on gestation day 6 and in all study groups during the treatment period, with an increased incidence and duration noted in the 50 mg/kg/day group. During the treatment period, hair loss was extensive in the 50 mg/kg/day group in the pelvic, abdominal, thoracic, urogenital, inguinal, dorsal back and tail areas. All animals in this dose group were lethargic and had tachypnea and decreased limbtone during the treatment period and with one exception all animals were prostrate and ataxic. A few animals were hypersensitive to the touch, salivated and had piloerection during the treatment period. Clonic convulsions, lacrimation, clear nasal discharge, dried red material around the nose, red urogenital discharge and yellow urogenital matting were observed as single incidences in the 50 mg/kg/day group. Lethargic behavior, salivation prior to dosing, hair loss in the pelvic and abdominal areas and dried brown material around the mouth were each noted once in different animals in the 25 mg/kg/day group and may be related to treatment with DPG. No clinical signs of toxicity were observed in the 5 mg/kg/day group.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Mean maternal body weight gain in the 50 mg/kg/day dose group was significantly decreased at all intervals during the treatment period. The most severe decrease (p < 0.01) occurred during the last four days of treatment (gestation days 12-16). The mean body weight gain in the 50 mg/kg/day group was very slightly increased after the treatment period (gestation days 16-20) when compared to the vehicle control group. This resulted in significantly decreased (p < 0.01) body weight gains for the entire gestation period (days 0-20). Group mean body weights were slightly decreased on gestation day 9 and significantly decreased at p < 0.01 on gestation days 12, 16 and 20 in the 50 mg/kg/day group. Mean body weight gain in the 25 mg/kg/day group was very slightly decreased during the overall treatment period (gestation days 6-16) when compared to the vehicle control group. This effect may be related to treatment as there was also a very slight increase in body weight gain following treatment. However, mean body weights in the 25 mg/kg/day group were comparable to the vehicle control group throughout gestation. Body weights and body weight gains in the 5 mg/kg/day group were not affected by treatment with DPG.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- not examined
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not examined
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- In all groups treated with DPG, foetal sex ratios, the mean numbers of viable foetuses, implantation sites and corpora lutea were comparable to the vehicle control group. Mean foetal weights in the 5 and 25 mg/kg/day groups were comparable to the vehicle control. Mean foetal weight in the 50 mg/kg/day group was significantly reduced (p < 0.05) when compared to the vehicle control group. Mean postimplantation loss was slightly increased in the 5 mg/kg/day group due to one female with twelve early resorptions. This increase was not considered biologically meaningful since the effect was not observed at the 25 mg/kg/day dose level. An increase in mean post-implantation loss was also apparent in the 50 mg/kg/day group. One female in the 50 mg/kg/day had all five of the late resorptions occurring in this study, which may be a secondary effect of maternal toxicity. Internal gross necropsy findings for females sacrificed at the scheduled laparotomy such as cystic ovaries, pitted kidneys, white foci or nodules on the lungs and hydronephrosis are considered normal for animals of this strain and age and could not be attributed to the compound.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 5 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 25 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
Maternal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- effects observed, treatment-related
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- The infrequent occurrence of foetal malformations observed in this study was not indicative of a response to treatment with DPG; each study group, including the control, had one foetus with malformations. One foetus in the control group had multiple anomalies including vertebral agenesis, mandibular microagnathia, a dome-shaped head and microphthalmia. Situs inversus was observed in one foetus in the 5 mg/kg/day group, anophthalmia and internal hydrocephaly were observed in one foetus in the 25 mg/kg/day group and a thread-like tail with anal atresia was observed in one foetus in the 50 mg/kg/day group. Developmental variations observed in the DPG groups were similar to those in the control group except for an increase in the number of fetuses with unossified sternebrae (#5 and/or #6), reduced ossification of the thirteenth ribs, 25 presacral vertebrae and bent ribs in the 50 mg/kg/day group. Reduced ossification would be expected in view of the foetal body weight inhibition at this dose level. The increased number of foetuses with bent ribs in the 50 mg/kg/day dose group is probably associated with maternal toxicity. Although three foetuses from one dam in the 25 mg/kg/day group had bent ribs, the incidence is within the range of our historical control data. In addition, maternal toxicity was slight at this dose level and foetal body weight inhibition was not apparent. The expression of bent ribs at the 25 mg/kg/day dose level was not considered compound-related.
Effect levels (fetuses)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- foetoxicity
- Effect level:
- 25 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- reduction in number of live offspring
- fetal/pup body weight changes
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- foetoxicity
- Effect level:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: A slight increase in post implantation loss and a significantly decreased mean fetal weight.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- teratogenicity
- Effect level:
- > 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- effects observed, treatment-related
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Relation to maternal toxicity:
- developmental effects occurring together with maternal toxicity effects, but not as a secondary non-specific consequence of maternal toxicity effects
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, DPG induced severe maternal toxicity at a dose level of 50 mg/kg/day. Fetotoxicity was also expressed at this dose level by a significantly reduced mean fetal body weight and by an increase in fetal variations. A dose level of 25 mg/kg/day was considered a marginal "no-effect" level for maternal toxicity; a fetotoxic response was not apparent. A dose level of 5 mg/kg/day was considered a "no-effect" level.
- Executive summary:
Potential maternal, embryotoxic and teratogenic effects of DPG were evaluated in this study in rats. DPG was admixed in 0.5% aqueous Methocel and administered orally by gavage to three groups of 25 bred Charles River COBS CD female rats as a single daily dose from days 6 through 15 of gestation. Dose levels of5, 25 and 50 mg/kg/day were selected. For comparative purposes, 25 control females were concurrently dosed with 0.5% aqueous Methocelon a comparable regimen at 10ml/kg/day. Throughout gestation, all females were observed twice daily for toxicity and body weights were recorded at appropriate intervals. On day 20 of gestation, all surviving females were sacrificed for Cesarean section; fetuses were weighed, sexed and examined for external, skeletal and soft tissue anomalies and developmental variations.No unscheduled deaths occurred in any study group. Severe clinical signs oftoxicity, decreased maternal body weights and body weight gains, a slight increase in postimplantation loss and a significantly decreased mean fetal weight were evident inthe50mg/kg/day dose group. A slight increase in fetuses with reduced ossification (associated with reduced fetal weights) and an increase in bent ribs (attributed to maternal toxicity in this group) were observed at the 50 mg/kg/day dose level. Scattered, infrequent clinical findings and a slightly reduced body weight gain over the treatment period (gestation days 6-16) occurred at the 25 mg/kg/day dose level.The 5 mg/kg/day group was comparable to the vehicle control group in all parametersmeasured. The infrequent occurrence and nature of the malformations were not indicative of a teratogenic response in any dose group.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.