Registration Dossier

Administrative data

Endpoint:
distribution modelling
Type of information:
calculation (if not (Q)SAR)
Remarks:
Migrated phrase: estimated by calculation
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Validated model used, published in peer reviewed literature, adequate for assessment

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Assessing the fate of new and existing chemicals: a five stage process.
Author:
Mackay D, Paterson S, Kicsi G, Di Guardo A and Cowan CE
Year:
1996
Bibliographic source:
Environ Toxicol Chem 15:1618-1626
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Evaluating the environmental fate of a variety of types of chemicals using the EQC Model
Author:
Mackay D, Paterson S, Di Guardo A and Cowan CE
Year:
1996
Bibliographic source:
Toxicol Chem 15:1627- 1637
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Assessment of chemical fate in the environment using evaluative, regional and local-scale models: illustrative application to chlorobenzene and linear alkylbenzene sulfonates.
Author:
Mackay D, Paterson S, Kicsi G, Cowan CE, Di Guardo A and Kane DM
Year:
1996
Bibliographic source:
Environ Toxicol Chem 15:1638-1648

Materials and methods

Model:
calculation according to Mackay, Level I
Calculation programme:
Level I v2.02
Release year:
2 003
Media:
air - biota - sediment(s) - soil - water

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent
Details on test material:
Not applicable

Results and discussion

Percent distribution in media

Air (%):
100
Water (%):
0.03
Soil (%):
0
Sediment (%):
0
Susp. sediment (%):
0
Biota (%):
0

Applicant's summary and conclusion