Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 279-506-0 | CAS number: 80584-92-5
Toxicological Summary
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 5 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: German MAK value was applied
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 5 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: German MAK value was applied
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 6.3 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 20
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 125 mg/kg bw/day
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
Rationale for omitting "Factor 2.5"
According to ECETOC’s “guidance on Assessment Factors to derive a DNEL, Technical Report No. 110”, the application of a factor of 2.5 for ‘remaining uncertainties’ is unjustified. There is evidence that multiplicative association between inter- and intraspecies assessment factors is overly conservative and that the inclusion of a factor for remaining differences is unnecessary. ECETOC further recommends using allometric scaling and the 5th percentile of the human distribution of intraspecies variability. Consequently, the ‘remaining uncertainty’ for interspecies variability is already accounted for by the intraspecies AF (Calabrese, 1985; Hattis et al 1987). This is further supported by results of the ongoing ERASM project which examines studies in rats and mice to determine interspecies differences based on a probabilistic approach. In their recent publication (Escher, 2013), the authors confirmed the ECETOC position regarding the factor of 2.5 for remaining uncertainties (i. e. the factor does not apply). Therefore, the factor of 2.5 for remaining uncertainties is omitted for this risk assessment.
Literature:
- Calabrese EJ, Uncertainty factors and interindividual variation, Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1985 Jun;5(2):190-6.
- Hattis D et al, Human variability in susceptibility to toxic chemicals-a preliminary analysis of pharmacokinetic data from normal volunteers, Risk Anal. 1987 Dec;7(4):415-26.
- Escher SE et al, Interspecies extrapolation based on the RepDose database—A probabilistic approach, Toxicology Letters 218 (2013) 159– 165.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.25 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: DNEL was derived based on the German MAK value.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.25 mg/m³
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: DNEL was derived based on the German MAK value.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 3.1 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 80
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 125 mg/kg bw/day
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 12.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 80
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Rationale for omitting "Factor 2.5"
According to ECETOC’s “guidance on Assessment Factors to derive a DNEL, Technical Report No. 110”, the application of a factor of 2.5 for ‘remaining uncertainties’ is unjustified. There is evidence that multiplicative association between inter- and intraspecies assessment factors is overly conservative and that the inclusion of a factor for remaining differences is unnecessary. ECETOC further recommends using allometric scaling and the 5th percentile of the human distribution of intraspecies variability. Consequently, the ‘remaining uncertainty’ for interspecies variability is already accounted for by the intraspecies AF (Calabrese, 1985; Hattis et al 1987). This is further supported by results of the ongoing ERASM project which examines studies in rats and mice to determine interspecies differences based on a probabilistic approach. In their recent publication (Escher, 2013), the authors confirmed the ECETOC position regarding the factor of 2.5 for remaining uncertainties (i. e. the factor does not apply). Therefore, the factor of 2.5 for remaining uncertainties is omitted for this risk assessment.
Literature:
- Calabrese EJ, Uncertainty factors and interindividual variation, Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1985 Jun;5(2):190-6.
- Hattis D et al, Human variability in susceptibility to toxic chemicals-a preliminary analysis of pharmacokinetic data from normal volunteers, Risk Anal. 1987 Dec;7(4):415-26.
- Escher SE et al, Interspecies extrapolation based on the RepDose database—A probabilistic approach, Toxicology Letters 218 (2013) 159– 165.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
