Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 485-430-0 | CAS number: 923954-49-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
- in vitro gene mutation (bacteria):
negative (OECD 471)
- in vitro chromosome aberration (mammalian cells): negative (OECD 473)
- in vitro gene mutation (mammalian cells): negative (OECD 476)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5375 - In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, BASF SE
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: MEM (minimal essential medium with Earle's salts) containing a L-glutamine source supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS), 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin (10 000 IU / 10 000 μg/mL), 1% (v/v) amphotericin B (250 μg/mL). During exposure to the test substance (only 4-hour treatment), MEM medium was used without FCS supplementation.
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S-9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 µg/ml
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO; 1% (v/v)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Due to the insolubility of the test substance in the commonly used solvents, a homogeneous dispersion in DMSO was used in this study. It had been demonstrated that the vehicle DMSO is suitable in several mutagenicity test methods including the V79 in vitro cytogenetic test and for which historical control data are available. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation Migrated to IUCLID6: 500 μg/ml dissolved in MEM without FCS (2.5 mg/mL)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation Migrated to IUCLID6: 0.5 μg/ml dissolved in MEM without FCS (2.5 μg/mL)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4, 18 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 10, 14, 24 h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 2 - 3 hours
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): 100 μL colcemid
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 7.5% (v/v) Giemsa/Titrisol solution pH 7.2 for 10 minutes.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- experiment 1: 4h exposure, 18h sampling time, with and without metabolic activation
- experiment 2: 18h exposure, 18h sampling time, without metabolic activation; 18 h exposure, 28 hours sampling time, without metabolic activation; 4 hours exposure, 28 hours sampling time, with metabolic activation
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 consecutive well-spread metaphases of each culture were counted for all test groups
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index (1 000 cells, incl. mitotic cells, were counted per culture) - Evaluation criteria:
- As a rule, the first 100 consecutive well-spread metaphases of each culture were counted for all test groups, and if cells had 20 - 22 chromosomes, they were analyzed for structural chromosome aberrations. In the case of clearly increased aberration rates, the number of metaphases to be analyzed for this test group can be reduced to at least 50 metaphases per culture.
In addition, numerical chromosome aberrations were scored and recorded. - Statistics:
- The statistical evaluation of the data was carried out using the MUCHAN program system (BASF SE). The proportion of metaphases with structural aberrations was calculated for each group. A comparison of each dose group with the negative control group was carried out using Fisher's exact test for the hypothesis of equal proportions. This test was Bonferroni-Holm corrected versus the dose groups separately for each time and was performed one-sided. If the results of this test were statistically significant compared with the respective negative control, labels are printed in the tables.
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: was not influenced by test substance treatment
- Effects of osmolality: was not influenced by test substance treatment
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
In the pretests for toxicity 5 000 μg/mL test substance was used as top concentration. The cells were prepared at a sampling time of 18 hours (about 1.5-fold cell cycle time) after 4 and 18 hours exposure time without S9 mix and after 4 hours exposure time with S9 mix.
The pretests were performed following the method described for the main experiment. As indication of test substance toxicity mitotic index, cell count, cell attachment (morphology) and quality of the slides were determined for dose selection.
In the pretests the parameters pH value and osmolarity were not relevant influenced by the addition of the test substance preparation to the culture medium at the concentrations measured.
Regarding the toxicity of the test substance reduced cell numbers of below 50% of control were observed at 5 000 μg/mL after 4 hours treatment in the absence of S9 mix only. No cytotoxicity occurred after 4 hours treatment in the presence of S9 mix or after 18 hours treatment in the absence of S9 mix.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
- Mitotic index: In the main experiments, according to the results of the determination of the mitotic index, no suppression of the mitotic activity was observed under all experimental conditions up to the highest applied concentration in the absence and presence of S9 mix.
- Cell counts: According to the results of the determination of the cell count in the main experiments, no growth inhibition was observed under all experimental conditions up to the highest applied concentration in the absence and presence of S9 mix.
- Cell morphology: Cell attachment was not influenced at any dose evaluated for structural chromosomal aberrations in the absence and presence of S9 mix. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, BASF AG
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S-9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Standard plate test: 20, 100, 500, 2500 and 5000 μg/plate
Preincubation test: 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 μg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: due to the limited solubility of the test substance in water, DMSO was used as vehicle, which had been demonstrated to be suitable in bacterial reverse mutation tests and for which historical control data are available - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene (2-AA); 2.5 μg/plate, dissolved in DMSO for strains TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, TA 98; 60 μg/plate, dissolved in DMSO for strain Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG); 5 μg/plate, dissolved in DMSO for strains TA 1535, TA 100
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylendiamine (NOPD); 10 μg/plate, dissolved in DMSO for strain TA 98
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation Migrated to IUCLID6: 100 μg/plate, dissolved in DMSO for strain TA 1537
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation Migrated to IUCLID6: 5 μg/plate, dissolved in DMSO for strain E. coli WP2 uvrA
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min, 37°C
- Exposure duration: 48-72h, 37°C
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplates
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: decrease in the number of revertants, clearing or diminution of the background lawn (= reduced his- or trp- background growth), reduction in the titer - Evaluation criteria:
- The test chemical is considered positive in this assay if the following criteria are met:
- A dose-related and reproducible increase in the number of revertant colonies, i.e. about doubling of the spontaneous mutation rate in at least one tester strain either without S9 mix or after adding a metabolizing system.
A test substance is generally considered non-mutagenic in this test if:
- The number of revertants for all tester strains were within the historical negative control range under all experimental conditions in at least two experiments carried out independently of each other. - Species / strain:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvrA
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Weak bacteriotoxic effects were occasionally observed depending on the strain and the test conditions from about 2 500 μg/plate onward
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: precipitation was found from 2 500 μg/plate onward with and without S9 mix. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted: 21 st July 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1st Experiment:
- Without S9 mix 4-hour exposure: 2.5 μg/mL, 5.0 μg/mL, 10.0 μg/mL, 20.0 μg/mL, 400.0 μg/mL, 800.0 μg/mL, 1600.0 μg/mL, 3200.0 μg/mL
- With S9 mix 4-hour exposure: 1.3 μg/mL, 2.5 μg/mL, 5.0 μg/mL, 10.0 μg/mL, 20.0 μg/mL, 40.0 μg/mL
2nd Experiment:
- Without S9 mix 24-hour exposure: 2.5 μg/mL, 5.0 μg/mL, 10.0 μg/mL, 20.0 μg/mL, 400.0 μg/mL, 800.0 μg/mL
- With S9 mix 4-hour exposure: 1.9 μg/mL, 3.8 μg/mL, 7.5 μg/mL, 15.0 μg/mL, 30.0 μg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Without metabolic activation: 300 μg/mL ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS); With metabolic activation: 20 μg/mL methylcholanthrene (MCA)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: Seeding of the cells pretreated with "HAT" medium for one day
- Exposure duration: 4-hour and 24-hour
- Selection time:
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): Day 7 - 9: 2nd passage of the treated cells with seeding in the selection medium ("TG" medium); 2nd cytotoxicity determination (cloning efficiency 2: viability). From day 16: Drying, fixation, staining and counting of the selected colonies.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency - Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptance criteria:
The HPRT assay is considered valid if the following criteria are met:
• The absolute cloning efficiencies of the negative/vehicle controls should not be less than 50% (with and without S9 mix).
• The background mutant frequency in the negative/vehicle controls should fall within the historical negative control data range of 0 – 15.95 mutants per 10e6 clonable cells.
• The positive controls both with and without S9 mix must induce distinctly increased mutant frequencies.
• At least 4 dose levels ranging up to a toxic concentration or up to or beyond the limit of solubility under culture conditions should be tested. Freely soluble and apparently non-toxic substances are not tested at concentrations higher than 5 mg/mL or 10 mM.
Assessment criteria:
A finding is assessed as positive if the following criteria are met:
• Increase of the corrected mutation frequencies (MFcorr.) both above the concurrent negative control values and the historical negative control data range.
• Evidence of reproducibility of any increase in mutant frequencies.
• A statistically significant increase in mutant frequencies and the evidence of a doseresponse relationship.
Isolated increases of mutant frequencies above the historical negative control range (i.e. 15 mutants per 10e6 clonable cells) or isolated statistically significant increases without a dose-response relationship may indicate a biological effect but are not regarded as sufficient evidence of mutagenicity.
The test substance is considered non-mutagenic according to the following criteria:
• The corrected mutation frequency (MFcorr.) in the dose groups is not statistically significant increased above the concurrent negative control and is within the historical negative control data range. - Statistics:
- Due to the clearly negative findings, a statistical evaluation was not carried out.
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Without S9 mix, there was a decrease in the number of colonies from 800 μg/mL onward in the 1st and 2nd Experiment. Besides in both experiments after 4 hours exposure in the presence of S9 mix no change in colony numbers were obtained.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: not influenced by test substance treatment
- Effects of osmolality: not influenced by test substance treatment
- Precipitation: In the absence of S9 mix test substance precipitation in culture medium at the end of treatment was observed macroscopically from 400 μg/mL onward in the 1st Experiment and from 20.0 μg/mL onward in the 2nd Experiment. Besides, in the presence of S9 mix test substance precipitation in culture medium occured 4 hours after start of treatment from 40 μg/mL onward in the 1st Experiment and from 30 μg/mL onward in the 2nd Experiment.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: The mutant frequencies at any concentration were within the range of the concurrent vehicle control values and within the range of the historical negative control data.
The mutation frequencies of the vehicle control groups were within the historical negative control data range including all vehicles used in the laboratory and, thus, fulfilled the acceptance criteria of this study.
The increase in the frequencies of mutant colonies induced by the positive control substances EMS and MCA clearly demonstrated the sensitivity of the test method and of the metabolic activity of the S9 mix employed. The values were within the range of the historical positive control data.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
-CELL MORPHOLOGY: Observations on adversely effected cell morphology (cell attachment) were obtained in the absence of S9 mix from 1600 μg/mL onward in the 1st Experiment after 4 hours exposure and from 400 μg/mL onward in the 2nd Experiment after 24 hours exposure. In the presence of S9 mix no changes in cell morphology (cell attachment) were observed up to the highest applied concentration in both experiments. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
Referenceopen allclose all
Results:
Genotoxicity | Cytotoxicity | |||||||
Schedule | Test group | S-9 mix | aberrant cells (%) | polyploid cells (%) | ||||
Exposure/Preparation period | incl gaps | excl. Gaps | with exchanges | Cell number (%) | Mitotic index (%) | |||
4/18 h | vehicle | - | 3.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 2 | 100 | 100 |
0.5 µg/ml | - | - | - | - | - | 101.1 | - | |
1 µg/ml | - | 9.5s | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 121.3 | 124.9 | |
2 µg/ml | - | 9.5s | 5 | 2 | 2 | 105.2 | 104 | |
4 µg/ml | - | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 98.3 | 109 | |
8 µg/ml | - | - | - | - | - | 110.9 | - | |
EMS | - | 22.0s | 20.0s | 11s | 0 | 105.1 | ||
18/18 h | vehicle | - | 5 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 100 | 100 |
0.5 µg/ml | - | - | - | - | - | 108.5 | - | |
1 µg/ml | - | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 110 | 110.3 | |
2 µg/ml | - | 6 | 2 | 1.5 | 0 | 116.6 | 119.3 | |
4 µg/ml | - | 6 | 3 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 117.5 | 104.1 | |
8 µg/ml | - | - | - | - | - | 104.7 | - | |
EMS | - | 29.0s | 24.0s | 15.0s | 0 | 81.4 | ||
18/28 h | vehicle | - | 4.5 | 3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 100 | 100 |
2 µg/ml | - | - | - | - | - | 100.6 | - | |
4 µg/ml | - | 5 | 4 | 2.5 | 0 | 83.1 | 101.4 | |
8 µg/ml | - | - | - | - | - | 73.9 | - | |
EMS | 23.0s | 22.0s | 19.0s | 0 | 90.8 | |||
4/18 h | vehicle | + | 7.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 100 | 100 |
0.5 µg/ml | + | - | - | - | - | 80.8 | - | |
1 µg/ml | + | 8.5 | 2.5 | 1 | 2.9 | 81.2 | 90.4 | |
2 µg/ml | + | 11.5 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 3.4 | 76.6 | 105.7 | |
4 µg/ml | + | 9 | 3 | 2 | 1.9 | 79.5 | 79.7 | |
8 µg/ml | + | - | - | - | - | 83.3 | - | |
CPP | + | 22.0s | 19.0s | 14.0s | 0 | 81.2 | ||
4/28 h | vehicle | + | 9.5 | 4 | 1 | 0.5 | 100 | 100 |
0.5 µg/ml | + | - | - | - | - | 11.6 | - | |
1 µg/ml | + | 3.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 114.9 | 115.9 | |
2 µg/ml | + | 3 | 2.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 101.8 | 1117.7 | |
4 µg/ml | + | 8.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 103.5 | 86.8 | |
8 µg/ml | + | - | - | - | - | 111.4 | - | |
CPP | + | 15 | 15.0s | 9.0s | 1 | 129.1 |
s: aberration frequency statistically significant higher than corresponding control values
Results standard plate assay:
Dose µg/plate | metabolic activation | TA98 | TA100 | TA1535 | TA1537 | E.coli WP2 uvra | ||||||||||
Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | ||
0 | + | 46 | 45 | 45 | 101 | 124 | 118 | 15 | 14 | 20 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 50 | 53 | 55 |
20 | + | 52 | 52 | 44 | 134 | 128 | 124 | 18 | 14 | 14 | 15 | 14 | 13 | 50 | 52 | 22 |
100 | + | 45 | 55 | 37 | 122 | 127 | 110 | 16 | 18 | 20 | 13 | 12 | 15 | 60 | 71 | 52 |
500 | + | 44 | 53 | 51 | 137 | 128 | 127 | 19 | 15 | 21 | 13 | 12 | 14 | 47 | 44 | 53 |
2500 | + | 52P | 42P | 51P | 121P | 124P | 135P | 24P | 17P | 15P | 14P | 7P | 10P | 59P | 48P | 46P |
5000 | + | 48P | 34P | 61P | 168P | 110P | 122P | 16P | 14P | 18P | 12P | 15P | 11P | 47P | 50P | 42P |
60 µg 2 -Aminoanthracene | + | 270 | 281 | 226 | ||||||||||||
2.5 µg 2-Aminoanthracene | + | 669 | 828 | 796 | 917 | 756 | 704 | 190 | 169 | 185 | 157 | 186 | 155 | |||
0 | - | 41 | 37 | 38 | 102 | 115 | 103 | 15 | 12 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 44 | 43 | 33 |
20 | - | 42 | 30 | 36 | 103 | 114 | 108 | 17 | 21 | 13 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 63 | 40 | 47 |
100 | - | 52 | 36 | 39 | 111 | 91 | 122 | 14 | 11 | 19 | 5 | 16 | 6 | 42 | 44 | 41 |
500 | - | 35 | 37 | 35 | 113 | 112 | 113 | 14 | 18 | 12 | 7 | 12 | 4 | 39 | 33 | 52 |
2500 | - | 31P | 30P | 30P | 115P | 116P | 110P | 12P | 15P | 13P | 11P | 7P | 6P | 46P | 52P | 39P |
5000 | - | 32P | 34P | 29P | 105P | 116P | 110P | 14P | 13P | 15P | 9P | 8P | 2P | 46P | 48P | 51P |
5 µg MNNG | - | 626 | 600 | 660 | 514 | 559 | 604 | |||||||||
10 µg 4-Nitro-o-phenylendiamin | - | 700 | 725 | 675 | ||||||||||||
5 µg 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide | - | 974 | 774 | 664 | ||||||||||||
100 µg 9-amninoacridine | - | 307 | 334 | 352 |
P: precipitation
Results preincubation test:
Dose µg/plate | metabolic activation | TA98 | TA100 | TA1535 | TA1537 | E.coli WP2 uvra | ||||||||||
Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | ||
0 | + | 36 | 28 | 27 | 119 | 130 | 102 | 17 | 18 | 14 | 11 | 9 | 11 | 45 | 46 | 38 |
312.5 | + | 27 | 30 | 24 | 104 | 102 | 95 | 12 | 17 | 15 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 29 | 39 | 44 |
625 | + | 29 | 22 | 26 | 111 | 100 | 114 | 13 | 16 | 17 | 9 | 5 | 13 | 51 | 35 | 34 |
1250 | + | 31 | 25 | 27 | 127 | 120 | 119 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 39 | 36 | 42 |
2500 | + | 20P | 24P | 22P | 107P | 114P | 115P | 16P | 17P | 16P | 9P | 7P | 9P | 45P | 30P | 34P |
5000 | + | 17P | 14P | 14P | 107P | 120P | 106P | 8P | 10P | 11P | 6P | 6P | 3P | 38P | 28P | 21P |
2.5 µg 2 -Aminoanthracene | + | 594 | 600 | 544 | 888 | 832 | 709 | 111 | 104 | 129 | 109 | 115 | 120 | |||
60 µg 2-Aminoanthracene | + | 214 | 228 | 253 | ||||||||||||
0 | - | 22 | 28 | 29 | 124 | 119 | 137 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 33 | 42 | 34 |
312.5 | - | 34 | 32 | 26 | 117 | 111 | 97 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 11 | 8 | 6 | 24 | 39 | 39 |
625 | - | 24 | 27 | 24 | 93 | 112 | 120 | 18 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 44 | 43 | 30 |
1250 | - | 27 | 27 | 23 | 104 | 113 | 114 | 19 | 14 | 14 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 32 | 37 | 45 |
2500 | - | 25P | 26P | 21P | 113P | 124P | 11P | 10P | 15P | 14P | 7P | 8P | 9P | 34P | 31P | 36P |
5000 | - | 16P | 17P | 11P | 108P | 93P | 104P | 8P | 8P | 9P | 3P | 3P | 5P | 22P | 17P | 20P |
5 µg MNNG | - | 774 | 734 | 708 | 559 | 652 | 571 | |||||||||
10 µg 4-Nitro-o-phenylendiamin | - | 582 | 468 | 447 | ||||||||||||
5 µg 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide | 509 | 558 | 517 | |||||||||||||
100 µg 9-amninoacridine | - | 335 | 402 | 347 |
P: precipitation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Bacteria gene mutation
The test substance was evaluated for its ability to cause bacteria mutation in a test protocol conucted under GLP according to OECD guideline 471. Bacteria strains S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvr A were treated with 20 – 5000 µg/mL test substance with and without metabolic activation by Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S-9 mix (BASF, 2007). In both, the standard plate assay and the preincubation test, weak bacteriotoxic effects and precipitation were occasionally observed depending on the strain from about 2500 μg/plate. No increase reverse mutation. Therefore, according to the results of the study, the test substance is not mutagenic in bacteria cells under the test conditions chosen.
A supporting study according OECD TG 471 was performed (Johnson Matthey Speciality Coatings, 2004). Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA102, TA98 and TA100 were treated with suspensions of the test material using the Ames plate incorporation method at five dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range was determined in a preliminary toxicity assay and was 50 to 5000 µg/plate in the first and second experiment. The vehicle (sterile distilled water) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies generally within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The test material caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level. The test material was, therefore, tested up to the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 µg/plate. A slight yellow film was observed at 5000 µg/plate, this did not prevent the scoring of revertant colonies. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test material, either with or without metabolic activation. The test material was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.
DNA damage/clastogenicity
The test substance was evaluated for its ability to induce chromosome aberration in mammalian cells in a test protocol conducted under GLP according to OECD guideline 473, where Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79) were treated with concentrations of 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 µg/mL 4 or 18 hours. After the additional sampling time of 18 or 28 hours, the cells were harvested, fixed and analyzed for chromosomal aberrations. No increase in chromosomal damages was found. No increase in the number of structural chromosomal aberrations was observed after treatment with the test substance. Therefore, the test substance is not a chromosome damaging agent in V79 celss under the test conditions chosen.
A supporting study according OECD TG 473 was conducted (Johnson Matthey Speciality Coatings, 2004). Duplicate cultures of human lymphocytes, treated with the test material, were evaluated for chromosome aberrations at three dose levels, together with vehicle and positive controls. Four treatment conditions were used for the study, ie. In Experiment 1, 4 hours in the presence of an induced rat liver homogenate metabolising system (S9), at a 2% final concentration with cell harvest after a 20-hour expression period and a 4 hours exposure in the absence of metabolic activation (S9) with a 20-hour expression period. In Experiment 2, the 4 hours exposure with addition of S9 was repeated (using a 1% final S9 concentration), whilst in the absence of metabolic activation the exposure time was increased to 24 hours.
All vehicle (solvent) controls had frequencies of cells with aberrations within the range expected for normal human lymphocytes.
All the positive control materials induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations indicating the satisfactory performance of the test and of the activity of the metabolising system.
The test material was slightly toxic but did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations, in either of two separate experiments, using a dose range that included the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 µg/mL. The test material was considered to be non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro.
Mammalian cell gene mutation
The test substance was evaluated for its ability to induce gene mutation in mammalian cells in a test protocol under GLP according to the OECD guideline 476 using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells which were treated with 1.3 - 800 μg/mL test substance Tin titanium zinc oxide for 4 hours both with and without metabolic activation and 24 hours without metabolic activation (BASF, 2011). In the 1st and 2nd Experiment in the absence of metabolic activation the highest concentrations tested for gene mutations were clearly cytotoxic. Besides, in both experiments in the presence of metabolic activation no cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest tested concentration. In the absence of S9 mix test substance precipitation in culture medium at the end of treatment was observed macroscopically from 400 μg/mL onward in the 1st Experiment and from 20.0 μg/mL onward in the 2nd Experiment. Besides, in the presence of S9 mix test substance precipitation in culture medium occured 4 hours after start of treatment from 40 μg/mL onward in the 1st Experiment and from 30 μg/mL onward in the 2nd Experiment. The test substance did not cause any relevant increase in the mutant frequencies both without S9 mix and after adding a metabolizing system in two experiments performed independently of each other. Thus, under the experimental conditions of this study, the test substance is not mutagenic in the HPRT locus assay under in vitro conditions in CHO cells in the absence and the presence of metabolic activation.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labeling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
The available test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Thus, the test item is considered not to be classified for genotoxicity under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the twelfth time in Regulation (EU) 2019/521.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.