Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1979
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Non-GLP non-guideline study, available as unpublished report, predates implementation of GLP and/or development of study guidelines, notable limitations in design and/or reporting.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1979
Report date:
1979

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
according to:
- AMES, B.N., F.D. LEE, and W.E. DURSTON (1973), An Improved Bacterial Test System for the Detection and Classification of Mutagens and Carcinogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 10_, 782-786.
- AMES, B.N., W.E. DURSTON, E. YAMASAKI, and F.D. LEE (1973), Carcinogens are Mutagens: A Simple Test System Combining Liver Homogenates for Activation and Bacteria for Detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70, 2281-2285.
- AMES, B.N., J. McCANN, and E. YAMASAKI (1975), Methods for Detecting Carcinogens and Mutagens with the Salmonella/ ammaliannyiicrosome Mutagenicity Test. Mut. Res. 31, 347-364.
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
prior to GLP implementation
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Mixture of octachloro, monomethoxy-heptachloro and bismethoxy-hexachloro derivatives of 3,3'-[(2-methyl-1,3-phenylene)diimino]bis[2,3-dihydro-1H-isoindol-1-one]
EC Number:
600-735-2
Cas Number:
106276-79-3
Molecular formula:
Mixture of C23H8Cl8N4O2, C24H11Cl7N4O3, C25H14Cl6N4O4
IUPAC Name:
Mixture of octachloro, monomethoxy-heptachloro and bismethoxy-hexachloro derivatives of 3,3'-[(2-methyl-1,3-phenylene)diimino]bis[2,3-dihydro-1H-isoindol-1-one]

Method

Target gene:
his-locus
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver S9 mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
25, 75, 225, 675 and 2025 µg/0.1 mL
Vehicle / solvent:
DMSO
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
other: Daunorubicin-HCl; N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine; 9(5)aminoacridine hydrochloride monohydrate
Remarks:
Without metabolic activation
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
Remarks:
Wth metabolic activation
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION: The plates were incubated for about 48 hours at 37°C in darkness.

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: three petri dishes were prepared per strain and per group (i.e. per concentration or per control group).

Evaluation criteria:
When the colonies had been counted, the arithmetic mean was calculated. A test substance is generally considered to be non-mutagenic if the colony count in relation to the negative control is not doubled at any concentration.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not specified
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: At the concentrations 225, 675, 2025 µg/0.1 mL the substance precipitated in soft agar.

COMPARISON WITH CONTROL DATA:
In the experiments performed with and without microsomal activation, comparison of the number of histidine-prototrophic mutants in the controls and after treatment with the test substance revealed no marked differences.

No evidence of the induction of point mutations by the test substance or by the metabolites of the substance formed as a result of microsomal activation was detectable in the strains of S. typhimurium used in these experiments.

Applicant's summary and conclusion