Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Experimental starting date: 09 April 2018, Experimental completion date: 12 April 2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 107 (Partition Coefficient (n-octanol / water), Shake Flask Method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
flask method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N-octylpyridin-4-amine
EC Number:
265-019-0
EC Name:
N-octylpyridin-4-amine
Cas Number:
64690-19-3
Molecular formula:
C13H22N2
IUPAC Name:
N-octylpyridin-4-amine

Study design

Analytical method:
not specified

Results and discussion

Partition coefficientopen allclose all
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
2.28
Temp.:
22.5 °C
pH:
7
Type:
Pow
Partition coefficient:
191
Temp.:
22.5 °C
pH:
7

Any other information on results incl. tables

Preliminary Estimate

The estimated partition coefficient was222at22.5± 0.5 °C, log Powof2.35, with a total phase recovery of 105%. The aqueous phase pH was 7.0.

Definitive Test

The mean peak areas obtained for the standard, stock and sample solutions are shown in the following two tables:

Table 3            Organic Phase

Solution

Mean Peak Area

Standard 20.7 mg/L

5.1992 x 106

Standard 21.0 mg/L

5.2244 x 106

Organic phase matrix blank

none detected

Organic Sample 1

4.9760 x 106

Organic Sample 2

5.0873 x 106

Organic Sample 3

5.0490 x 106

Organic Sample 4

5.1114 x 106

Organic Sample 5

5.0339 x 106

Organic Sample 6

5.1442 x 106

Stock solution A

5.2219 x 106

Stock solution B

5.3237 x 106

Table 4 – Aqueous Phase

Solution

Mean Peak Area

Standard 20.7 mg/L

5.0771 x 106

Standard 21.0 mg/L

5.0841 x 106

Aqueous phase matrix blank

none detected

Aqueous Sample 1

6.8811 x 105

Aqueous Sample 2

5.6174 x 105

Aqueous Sample 3

7.1646 x 105

Aqueous Sample 4

5.2840 x 105

Aqueous Sample 5

3.2104 x 105

Aqueous Sample 6

1.9963 x 105

The mean peak areas obtained for the standard, stock and sample solutionsfrom the additional ratioare shown in the following two tables:

Table 5            Organic Phase

Solution

Mean Peak Area

Standard 22.6 mg/L

5.4962 x 106

Standard 21.0 mg/L

5.0931 x 106

Organic phase matrix blank

1.9321 x 105

Organic Sample 7

5.0786 x 106

Organic Sample 8

5.0866 x 106

Stock solution A

5.1932 x 106

Stock solution B

5.1872 x 106

Table 6 – Aqueous Phase

Solution

Mean Peak Area

Standard 22.6 mg/L

5.4119 x 106

Standard 21.0 mg/L

5.0848 x 106

Aqueous phase matrix blank

none detected

Aqueous Sample 7

7.4594 x 105

Aqueous Sample 8

7.3609 x 105

The analyzed concentration (mg/L) and test item weight (mg) of the respective phases are shown in the following table:

Table 7

Flask

Total Weight (mg)*

Organic Phase

Aqueous Phase

% Recovery

Analyzed Concentration (mg/L)

Weight (mg)†

Analyzed Concentration (mg/L)

Weight (mg)†

pH

1

14.8

9.97 x 102

14.0

5.66

0.317

7.0

96.5

2

1.58

1.02 x 103

15.3

4.62

0.277

7.0

98.2

3

10.6

1.01 x 103

10.2

5.89

0.471

7.0

100

4

8.45

1.02 x 103

8.19

4.34

0.278

7.0

100

5

4.75

1.01 x 103

4.54

2.64

0.190

7.0

99.5

6

4.75

1.03 x 103

4.64

1.64

0.118

7.0

100

7

25.7

1.05 x 103

25.1

6.20

0.298

7.0

99.0

8

27.8

1.05 x 103

27.2

6.12

0.318

7.0

99.1

pH of n-octanol saturatedpH 7 buffer:         7.0

The partition coefficient determined for each flask is shown in the following table:

Table 8

Flask

Organic/Aqueous Volume Ratio

Partition Coefficient

Log10Pow

Mean Partition Coefficient

1

1:4

176

2.25

198

2

221

2.34

3

1:8

172

2.23

204

4

236

2.37

5

1:16

382

2.58

505

6

628

2.80

7

1:2

169

2.23

170

8

171

2.23

Overall Pow:   191
log10Pow:        2.28
Temperature:  22.5 ± 0.5°C

Validation

The linearity of the detector response with respect to concentrationfor the organic phase analysiswas assessed over the nominal concentration range of 5 to 50 mg/L. The results were satisfactory with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.998 being obtained.

The linearity of the detector response with respect to concentrationfor the aqueous phase analysiswas assessed over the nominal concentration range of 5 to 50mg/L. The results were satisfactory with a correlation coefficient (r) of 1.000 being obtained.

Discussion

The shake-flask method was chosen over the HPLC method as the test item contained an amine functional group; amines can have secondary interactions which would affect the result generated by the HPLC method.

The test item had an estimated dissociation constant of 8.32. Therefore, to be fully in its non-ionized form the aqueous pH would need to be at least 10.3. As this was considered higher than the environmentally relevant pH range, it was discussed with the Sponsor and agreed to perform the test at a neutral pH which was considered more environmentally relevant. At this pH the test item would mostly be in its ionized form.

With the aqueous phase being required to be pH 7, a pH 7 buffer was mutually saturated withn-octanol prior to testing.

The organic phase matrix blank for the additional ratio analysis had a small peak at the retention time of the test item. It was considered that this was probably contamination and as it didn’t appear in other matrix blanks it was not considered intrinsic to the matrix and was therefore not accounted for in the calculations.

Two additional flasks at a ratio of 1:2 were performed due to the higher and inconsistent results obtained at a ratio of 1:16. It was considered that the small volume of stock solution was not enough during the 5 minutes of shaking to full partition into the aqueous phase.

For additional information and as a comparison with the pH 7 result, another single shake-flask was performed during the preliminary test but with the aqueous phase buffered to pH 9.3. As for pH 7, the buffer was mutually saturated withn-octanol prior to testing. At this pH the test item was mostly in its non-ionized form and close to the environmentally relevant pH range. The result produced was a log Powof approximately 4.1. 


* From analysis of the stock solution

† From analysis of the respective phase

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The partition coefficient of the test item at pH 7 has been determined to be 191 at 22.5 ± 0.5 °C, and a log10 Pow of 2.28.