Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 608-209-4 | CAS number: 284461-73-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Nov to Dec 1999
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 000
- Report date:
- 2000
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5395 (In Vivo Mammalian Cytogenetics Tests: Erythrocyte Micronucleus Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 475207-59-1
- Cas Number:
- 475207-59-1
- IUPAC Name:
- 475207-59-1
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Strain: Hsd/Win: NMRI
- Source: Harlan Winkelmann GmbH (Borchen, Germany)
- Age at study initiation: approx. 6-12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 37-44 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Housing: individual in type I cages
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22.5-23.0
- Humidity (%): 39-43
- Air changes (per hr): about 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- 0.5 % aqueous Cremophor
- Frequency of treatment:
- twice, approximately 24 hours apart
- Post exposure period:
- no
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
125, 250, 500 mg/kg bw
Basis:
other: actual injected
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 males per dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Cyclophosphamide (20 mg/kg bw) : dissolved in deionized water, single i.p. injection with 10 ml/kg bw
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- The bone marrow was prepared by centrifugation. The numbers of polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) and normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE) with and without micronuclei (MN) were counted.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
The selection of the BAY 54-9085 doses was based on a pilot test, with groups consisting each of three males and three females. They received two intraperitoneally injections separated by 24 hours. The following doses were used: 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg BAY 54-9085. In males and females the following symptoms were recorded for up to at least 48 hours after the second application, starting at 500 mg/kg: apathy, roughened fur, hard abdomen, spasm, difficulty in breathing and lachrymation. 3 of 3 males and 1 of 3 females died in the 1000 mg/kg group. In addition, 1 of 3 males died in the 500 mg/kg group.
Based on these findings, 500 mg/kg BAY 54-9085 were chosen as MTD for males. Due to the results of the dose range finder it is concluded, that there are no substantial differences between sexes in toxicity. Therefore, no females were used.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
Schmid's method was used to produce the smears (Mutation Res. 31, 9-15, 1975).
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
Coded slides were evaluated using a light microscope at a magnification of about 1000. Micronuclei appear as stained chromatin particles in the anucleated erythrocytes. They can be distinguished from artifacts by varying the focus. Normally, 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes were counted per animal. The incidence of cells with micronuclei was established by scanning the slides in a meandering pattern. In addition, the number of normochromatic erythrocytes per 2000 polychromatic ones was noted. If the ratio for a single animal amounts to distinctly more than 6000 normochromatic erythrocytes per 2000 polychromatic ones, or if such a ratio seems likely without other animals in the group showing similar effects, then the case may be regarded as pathological and unrelated to treatment, and the animal may be omit-ted from the evaluation. A relevant, treatment-related alteration of the ratio polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes can only be concluded if it is clearly lower for a majority of the animals in the treated group than in the negative control. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test was considered positive if there was a relevant and significant increase in the number of polychromatic erythrocytes showing micronuclei in comparison to the negative control. A test was considered negative if there was no relevant or significant increase in the rate of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes. A test was also considered negative if there was a significant increase in that rate which, according to the laboratory's experience was within the range of historical negative controls. In addition, a test was considered equivocal if there was an increase of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes above the range of historical negative controls, provided the increase was not significant and the result of the negative control was not closely related to the data of the respective treatment group. A test was also considered equivocal, if its result was implausible.
- Statistics:
- The BAY 54-9085 group(s) with the highest mean per time point (provided this exceeded the respective negative control mean) and the positive control were checked by Wilcoxon's non-parametric rank sum test with respect to the number of polychromatic erythrocytes having micronuclei and the number of normochromatic erythrocytes. A variation was considered statistically significant if its error probability was below 5 % and the treatment group figure was higher than that of the negative control. The rate of normochromatic erythrocytes containing micronuclei was examined if the micronuclear rate for polychromatic erythrocytes was already relevantly increased. In this case, the group with the highest mean was compared with the negative control using the one-sided chi2-test. A variation was considered statistically significant if the error probability was below 5 % and the treatment group figure was higher than that of the negative control.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- see "Additional information on results"
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- After two intraperitoneal administrations of 125, 250 and 500 mg/kg BAY 54-9085, treated males showed the following compound-related symptoms until sacrifice: apathy, roughened fur, hard abdomen, spasm, periodically stretching of body and difficulty in breathing. There was no substance-induced mortality. No symptoms were recorded for the control groups. No animals died in these groups.
There was no altered ratio between polychromatic and normochromatic erythrocytes.
After two intraperitoneal treatments of males with doses up to and including 500 mg/kg no indications of a clastogenic effect of BAY 54-9085 were found.
Cyclophosphamide, the positive control, had a clear clastogenic effect, as is shown by the biologically relevant increase in polychromatic erythrocytes with micronuclei. The ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes was not altered.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Summary of results from micronucleus test with BAY 54-9085
Treatment group |
Dose i.p. (mg/kg bw) |
Number of evaluated PCE |
Number of NCE per 2000 PCE |
MNNCE per 2000 NCE |
MNPCE per 2000 PCE |
Negative control |
0 |
10,000 |
1873± 427 |
3.2 ± 1.4 |
2.4 ± 1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAY 54-9085 |
2 x 125 |
10,000 |
1017 ± 333 |
1.6 ± 1.5 |
2.8 ± 1.8 |
|
2 x 250 |
10,000 |
902 ± 148 |
2.3 ± 0.4 |
2.4 ± 0.9 |
|
2 x 500 |
10,000 |
1039 ± 304 |
0.8 ± 1.1 |
3.2 ± 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Positive control (Cyclophosphamide) |
1 x 20 |
10,000 |
1638 ± 498 |
2.3 ± 2.5 |
32.2* ± 12.2 |
* p<0.01 in non-parametric Wilcoxon ranking test
NCE = normochromatic erythrocytes
PCE = polychromatic erythrocytes
MNNCE = micronucleated NCE
MNPCE = micronucleated PCE
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
- Executive summary:
Male mice treated with BAY 54-9085 received two intraperitoneal administrations of 125, 250 and 500 mg/kg bw, respectively, separated by 24 hours. Males of the positive control received a single intraperitoneal treatment with 20 mg/kg cyclophosphamide. The femoral marrow of all groups was prepared, 24 hours after the last administration. Males treated twice with BAY 54-9085 in doses up to 500 mg/kg showed symptoms of toxicity after administration, starting at 125 mg/kg. However, all males survived until the end of the test. There was no altered ratio between polychromatic and normochromatic erythrocytes. After two intraperitoneal treatments of males with doses up to and including 500 mg/kg no indications of a clastogenic effect of BAY 54-9085 were found.
Thus, BAY 54-9085 was concluded to be negative in the mouse micronucleus assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
