Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 229-222-8 | CAS number: 6440-58-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- two-generation reproductive toxicity
- Remarks:
- based on test type (migrated information)
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 416 (Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: CD
- Sex:
- male/female
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- other: diet
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Continuously for 2 generations
- Frequency of treatment:
- Continuously in diet
- Details on study schedule:
- P and F1 generation were exposed to the diet for a 10 week pre-breed period, a 21 day mating period and through gestation, parturition and lactation. F2 generation were exposed through lactation and until one week after weaning.
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2000ppm
Basis:
nominal in diet - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
6000ppm
Basis:
nominal in diet - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
20000ppm
Basis:
nominal in diet - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 28
- Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Twice daily for mortality and moribund status and once daily for any clinical signs of toxicity. Detailed clinical examinations were conducted weekly.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Weekly
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Weekly
WATER CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Weekly - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- Not evaluated
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Not evaluated
- Litter observations:
- PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in offspring:
number and sex of pups, weight gain, physical abnormalities - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- ORGAN WEIGHTS
- not evaluated
HISTOPATHOLOGY
Control and high dose groups:
Vagina, uterus, ovaries, testis, epididymis, seminal vesicle, prostate, Other tissues with gross lesions
For low and intermediate dose groups:
Testes and epididymides from males which did not sire litters and any tissues which exhibited gross lesions. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- ORGAN WEIGHTS
- not evaluated
HISTOPATHOLOGY
F1, Control and high dose groups:
Vagina, uterus, ovaries, testis, epididymis, seminal vesicle, prostate, Other tissues with gross lesions
For low and intermediate dose groups:
Testes and epididymides from males which did not sire litters and any tissues which exhibited gross lesions.
F1 not selected for mating, F2
Vagina, uterus, ovaries, testis, epididymis, seminal vesicle, prostate, Other tissues with gross lesions - Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 20 000 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 20 000 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 20 000 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 6 000 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Generation:
- F2
- Effect level:
- 20 000 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F2
- Effect level:
- 6 000 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The NO(A)ELs are as follows:
Parent males = 20000 ppm (~1395 mg/kg bw/d)
Parent females = 20000 ppm (~1774 mg/kg bw/d)
F1 males = 6000 ppm (~379 mg/kg bw/d)
F1 females = 6000 ppm (~475 mg/kg bw/d)
F2 males = 6000ppm
F2 females = 6000ppm - Executive summary:
DMH is not a reproductive toxin in this study but there may be an effect on lactation.
Reference
Parent females: Maternal food consumption was consistently increased in the 20000 ppm treatment group during gestation.
F1 females: Reduced body weights in the 20000ppm treatment group in the last two weeks of lactation and one week after weaning (postnatal day 28) Weight gains substantially reduced from postnatal days 7 to 14 and slightly reduced from postnatal days 14 to 28
F2 males: Reduced body weights in the 20000ppm treatment group for days 14-28 but not sufficient to reach statistical significance.
F2 females: Reduced body weights in the 20000ppm treatment group for lactation days 14, 21 and one week after weaning.
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 395 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Sufficient to meet data requirements. The study is Klimisch 1.
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
- Quality of whole database:
- An inhalation toxicity study is scientifically unjustified and is not in the interests of animal welfare.
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
- Quality of whole database:
- A dermal toxicity study is scientifically unjustified and is not in the interests of animal welfare.
Additional information
DMDMH readily undergoes hydrolysis to DMH and therefore chronic effects are most appropriately assessed by testing DMH rather than DMDMH. DMH was tested in a two generation reproductive toxicity study and did not demonstrate parental toxicity or adverse effects on reproductive performance or reproductive tissues at dietary concentrations as high as 20000ppm (equivalent to 1395 mg/kg in males and 1774 mg/kg in females).
Short description of key information:
DMDMH readily undergoes hydrolysis to DMH and therefore long-term data is provided for DMH. In a two generation study, DMH is not a reproductive toxin.
Justification for selection of Effect on fertility via oral route:
Only one study available
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
DMDMH readily undergoes hydrolysis to DMH and therefore long-term data is provided for DMH. DMH is not a developmental toxin.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPP 83-3 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: CD
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Day 6-15 post mating
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily
- Duration of test:
- To gestation day 21
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
100 mg/kg
Basis:
actual ingested - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
300 mg/kg
Basis:
actual ingested - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
1000 mg/kg
Basis:
actual ingested - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 25 females/group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Maternal examinations:
- DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily (twice daily during dosing)
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: gd 0, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 21
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: measured at 3 day intervals throughout the study (gd 0-21) - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- - General examinations: Yes, litter Size, no. of dead foetuses, foetal weight, sex ratio, early and late resorptions
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes, approximately one-half of the live foetuses
- Skeletal examinations: Yes, pproximately one-half of the live foetuses - Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- NO(A)EL maternal toxic effects >=1000 mg/kg/day
NO(A)EL embryotoxic / teratogenic effects >=1000mg/kg/day - Executive summary:
DMH is not a developmental toxin.
Reference
Maternal Examinations: No females died, aborted, delivered early or were removed from the study prior t sacrifice. All females that bore litters had one or more viable fetuses. No treatment-related clinical signs were observed during or subsequent to treatment at any dose level. There were no dose related changes in maternal body weights or body weight changes throughout gestation. Statistically significant reductions in average weight gain for days 9-12 at 1000mg/kg/day were not considered to be related to treatment but rather were considered to reflect stabilization of body weight in the 1000mg/kg/day group which exhibited a slightly higher weight gain for days 6-9. There were no differences in body weight gain at 1000mg/kg/day fro the entire treatment period. There were no treatment-related effects on food consumption during or subsequent to dosing. There were no treatment related findings observed at necropsy. There were no effects on terminal body weight, gravid uterine weight, corrected body weight, corrected weight change, or relative and absolute liver weights.
Fetal Examinations: No treatment-related effects on fetal body weights for male and female were observed in any group. There were no differences in individual external, visceral or skeletal malformations by category, or in total malformations among groups. There were no treatment-related increases in the incidences of individual fetal external, visceral or skeletal variations by category, or of total variations among groups. Statistically significant decreases in 1 external variation, excessive bleeding at the umbilicus, and 1 skeletal variation, majority of proximal phalanges unossified at 1000mg/kg/day were not considered to be treatment related or biologically significant due to the lack of a dose-related trend.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Sufficient to meet data requirements. The study is Klimisch 1.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
- Quality of whole database:
- An inhalation toxicity study is scientifically unjustified and is not in the interests of animal welfare.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
- Quality of whole database:
- A dermal toxicity study is scientifically unjustified and is not in the interests of animal welfare.
Additional information
DMDMH readily undergoes hydrolysis to DMH and therefore chronic effects are most appropriately assessed by testing DMH rather than DMDMH. DMH was tested in three developmental toxicity studies and did not demonstrate developmental toxicity. The structurally related substance EMH was also tested in three developmental toxicity studies and also did not demonstrate developmental toxicity.
Justification for selection of Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route:
Six studies are available, three on the hydrolysis product DMH and three on the structurally related substance EMH. All are good quality, reliable, GLP, guideline studies which gave the same negative result. This study is the most recent study on the hydrolysis product DMH.
Justification for classification or non-classification
DMDMH readily undergoes hydrolysis to DMH which did not demonstrate adverse effects on reproductive performance, reproductive tissues or developmental toxicity. The structurally related substance EMH also did not demonstrate developmental toxicity. Therefore there is no justification for classification of DMDMH.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.