Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 247-952-5 | CAS number: 26741-53-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 007
- Report date:
- 2007
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- No indepedent repeat experiment for incubation with S9 mix. Dose with S9 mix should have been slightly higher. It resulted only in 24% viability instead of the required 10 - 20% viability.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- The report includes GLP certificates from the German, Dutch and Indian Authorities. All certificates are valid for the period of the study.
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 3,9-bis(2,4-di-tert-butylphenoxy)-2,4,8,10-tetraoxa-3,9-diphosphaspiro[5.5]undecane
- EC Number:
- 247-952-5
- EC Name:
- 3,9-bis(2,4-di-tert-butylphenoxy)-2,4,8,10-tetraoxa-3,9-diphosphaspiro[5.5]undecane
- Cas Number:
- 26741-53-7
- Molecular formula:
- C33H50O6P2
- IUPAC Name:
- 3,9-bis(2,4-di-tert-butylphenoxy)-2,4,8,10-tetraoxa-3,9-diphosphaspiro[5.5]undecane
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- tk - thymidinkinase
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix from Arochlor 1254 induced rat live
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 17, 34, 68 and 136 µg/ml (3h, with S9)
55, 110, 220, 440 µg/ml (3h and 24h, without S9) - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
The results of the solubility test of Study No. 04733 for the same compound indicated that the test item forms a workable suspension with DMSO at the required concentration of 250000 /lg/mL. Also, DMSO is one of the organic solvents compatible with the test system. Hence, DMSO was selected as the vehicle to prepare the stock and dilutions ofthe test item as weil as the positive controls.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3h and 24h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48h
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): Trifluorothymidine (TFT) at 4 mug/mL
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: tests were done in duplicate
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cell growth - Evaluation criteria:
- There are several criteria for determining a positive result, such as a concentration related, or a reproducible increase in mutant frequency. Biological relevance of the results should be considered first. Statistical methods may be used as an aid in evaluating the test results. Statistical significance should not be the only determining factor for a positive response. A test item, for which the results do not meet the above criteria is considered non mutagenic in this system.
Positive results for an in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test indicate that the test substance induces gene mutations in the cultured mammalian cells
used. A positive concentration response that is reproducible is most meaningful. Negative results indicate that, under the test conditions the test
substance does not induce gene mutations in the cultured mammalian cells used. - Statistics:
- The number of negative contraI values are assumed to follow Poisson Distribution. Test of significance of difference between negative control values over different dose groups and the positive control was carried out using a method of analysis suggested by M.R.Thomas (Cole and Arlett, 1984), based on chi2. All analysis and significance tests were evaluated at 5% level of signiftcance (P<0.05).
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- RTG was 24%
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: Moderatetyl cytotoxic: RTG was 29 (24h) and 39 (3h). The next highest concentration was found to be non scorable based on precipitates upon centrifugation in pretests.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: In the presence of metabolie activation at the end of exposure to treatment, the pH of the test medium ranged between 7.05 to 7.22 with 7.10 in the DMS0 control. Similarly, in the absence of metabolic activation, the pH of the treatment medium ranged between 7.05 and 7.20 Wilh 7.21 in the DMSO control at the end of exposure to treatment.
- Precipitation: from 800 µg/ml onward, in presence and absence of metabolic activation
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
Preliminary test results of Study No. 04733 for the same test item indicated heavy precipitation of the test item at and above 2400 µg/ml. This precipitation interfered with the observation of the cells. Hence, the test item was checked fo it precipitation in the treatment medium (TM) up to the maximum concentration of 1600 µg/ml of the medium. At and abave 800 µg/mL, the test item precipitated In the form of a pellet in the centrifuge tubes both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation in the 3-hour as weil as in the 24-hour exposure regime. Hence cell counts could not be determined. Based on these observations, it was decided to test up to 136 µg/mL in the presence of metabolie aetivation for the 3-hour exposure and up to 440 µg/mL for the 3-hour as well as the 24-hour exposure in the absence of metabolic activation.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: yes, solvent and positive control data
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
In the preliminary toxicity test, the test item was toxic to the cells at and above 200 µg/mL when exposed for 3 hours in the presence of metabolic activation resulting in dead and disfigured cells. There was evidence of growth inhibition as relative total growth (RTG) at 100 µg/mL. However, this growth inhibition was not significant. In the 3-hour as well as the 24-hour exposure in the absence of metablic activation, there was evidence of growth inhibition as relativ total growth (RTG) at 400 µg/mL. However, this growth inhibition was not significant. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Summary Results of In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test in the Presence of Metabolic Activation (Experiment 1)
Group | Test item concn. (µg/mL) | Non-selective medium | Selective medium P(0) individual plates |
M.F x 10-6 | M.F/survivor x 10-6 | Induced M.F x 10-6 | RTG | ||||
P(0) | C.E. | RCE | R1 | R2 | Total | ||||||
G1 | DMSO (200 µI) | 16/96 | 90 | 100 | 78/96 | 83/96 | 161/192 | 88 | 0.98 | - | 100 |
G2 | 17 | 18/96 | 84 | 93 | 79/96 | 84/96 | 163/192 | 82 | 0.98 | - | 69 |
G3 | 34 | 16/96 | 90 | 100 | 86/96 | 81/96 | 167/192 | 70 | 0.78 | - | 60 |
G4 | 68 | 20/96 | 78 | 88 | 89/96 | 80/96 | 169/192 | 64 | 0.81 | - | 43 |
G5 | 136 | 22/96 | 74 | 82 | 79/96 | 87/96 | 166/192 | 73 | 0.99 | - | 24 |
G6 | CPA 12 | 23/96 | 71 | 80 | 23/96 | 36/96 | 59/192 | 590+ | 8.26 | 7.28 | 43 |
Summary Results of In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test in the Absence of Metabolic Activation (Experiment 2)
Group | Test item concn. (µg/mL) | Non-selective medium | Selective medium P(0) individual plates |
M.F x 10-6 | M.F/survivor x 10-6 | Induced M.F x 10-6 | RTG | ||||
P(0) | C.E. | RCE | R1 | R2 | Total | ||||||
G1 | DMSO (200 µI) | 14/96 | 96 | 100 | 78/96 | 84/96 | 162/192 | 85 | 0.88 | - | 100 |
G2 | 55 | 16/96 | 90 | 93 | 81/96 | 85/96 | 166/192 | 73 | 0.81 | - | 80 |
G3 | 110 | 16/96 | 90 | 93 | 83/96 | 80/96 | 163/192 | 82 | 0.91 | 0.03 | 62 |
G4 | 220 | 18/96 | 84 | 87 | 78/96 | 79/96 | 157/192 | 101 | 1.20 | 0.32 | 51 |
G5 | 440 | 18/96 | 84 | 87 | 76/96 | 78/96 | 154/192 | 110 | 1.32 | 0.44 | 39 |
G6 | MMS 20 | 21/96 | 76 | 79 | 42/96 | 33/96 | 75/192 | 470+ | 6.18 | 5.30 | 50 |
Summary Results of In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test in the Absence of Metabolic Activation (Experiment 3)
Group | Test item concn. (µg/mL) | Non-selective medium | Selective medium P(0) individual plates |
M.F x 10-6 | M.F/survivor x 10-6 | Induced M.F x 10-6 | RTG | ||||
P(0) | C.E. | RCE | R1 | R2 | Total | ||||||
G1 | DMSO (200 µJ) | 15/96 | 93 | 100 | 80/96 | 83/96 | 163/192 | 82 | 0.88 | - | 100 |
G2 | 55 | 15/96 | 93 | 100 | 79/96 | 81/96 | 160/192 | 91 | 0.98 | 0.10 | 82 |
G3 | 110 | 18/96 | 84 | 90 | 86/96 | 76/96 | 162/192 | 85 | 1.01 | 0.13 | 74 |
G4 | 220 | 19/96 | 81 | 87 | 77/96 | 80/96 | 157/192 | 101 | 1.24 | 0.36 | 44 |
G5 | 440 | 20/96 | 78 | 85 | 81/96 | 84/96 | 165/192 | 76 | 0.97 | 0.08 | 27 |
G6 | MMS20 | 20/96 | 78 | 85 | 36/96 | 32/96 | 68/192 | 519+ | 6.62 | 5.74 | 29 |
M.F = Mutant Frequency
C.E = Cloning Efficiency
RCE = Relative Cloning Efficiency
RTG = Relative Total Growth
+ = Significantly higher than control (p ≤ 0.05)
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The study indicated that the test item does not have the potential to cause gene mutation at the tk locus at the concentrations tested and under the conditions of testing.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.