Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 234-433-3 | CAS number: 12003-65-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2005-10-24 to 2005-12-27
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- The solubility of aluminium lanthanum trioxide (AlLaO3) is low since dissolution of AlLaO3 in water resulted in La concentrations < 0.01 mg/L and Al concentrations < 0.03 mg/L after 34 days. The dissolution of AlLaO3 in water results in Al (3+) (=Al(H2O)6 (3+)) ions and La (3+) ions. Thus, the toxicological moieties of concern are aluminium and lanthanum ions. Thus, in the assessment of toxicity, data available for different aluminium and lanthanum substances are read-across since aluminium and lanthanum ions determine the toxicological potential of aluminium lanthanum trioxide, i.e. are the common toxicological moieties of concern. The effects of the substance aluminium lanthanum trioxide with regard to skin sensitisation are predicted to be equal to the effects of Al (3+) ions and La (3+) ions.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 005
- Report date:
- 2005
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- 1996
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- A reliable guinea pig maximisation study has been performed, which would not justify conducting an additional LLNA due to animal welfare.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Lanthanum oxide
- EC Number:
- 215-200-5
- EC Name:
- Lanthanum oxide
- Cas Number:
- 1312-81-8
- Molecular formula:
- La2O3
- IUPAC Name:
- Lanthanum oxide
- Details on test material:
- not specified
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
Storage condition of test material : at room temperature (20 ± 5 °C), light protected
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS:
- Source: Charles River Deutschland GmbH
- Age at study initiation: 5 - 6 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 336 - 392 g
- Housing: individually in Makrolon type-4 cages with standard softwood bedding
- Diet: pelleted standard Provimi Kliba 3418, ad libitum
- Water: community tap water from Füllinsdorf, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 13 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 22 ± 3 °C
- Humidity: 30 - 70 %
- Air changes: 10 - 15 per hr
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- other: PEG 300
- Concentration / amount:
- 15 % or 25 % (w/w) of the test item
- Day(s)/duration:
- Day 1
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: PEG 300
- Concentration / amount:
- 50 % (w/w) of the test item
- Day(s)/duration:
- day 8 (duration: 48 hours)
- Adequacy of induction:
- other: pretreated with 10 % SDS
Challenge
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: PEG 300
- Concentration / amount:
- 50 % (w/w) of the test item
- Day(s)/duration:
- day 22 (duration: 24 hours)
- No. of animals per dose:
- 15 (main study: 5 in control group, 10 in test group), 3 (pretest)
- Details on study design:
- * RANGE FINDING TEST:
>>> INTRADERMAL INJECTIONS:
One guinea pig was intradermally injected into the clipped flank at concentrations of B = 25 % and C = 15 % (w/w) of the test item in PEG 300. Due to the high viscosity of the application dilution and the obstacle caused by the tissues, it was not technically possible to inject the liquid dilution at concentration of A = 50 % (w/w) into the intra-cellular space.
Dermal reactions were assessed approximately 24 hours later.
Based on the results, the test item concentration of 25 % was selected for intradermal induction in the main study. However, due to the high viscosity of the test item preparation, the two first animals of the test group could not be applied successfully (only partial application) intracutaneously with the test item concentration of 25 % (w/w) in PEG 300. Therefore, the next lower concentration of 15 % (w/w) tested in the pretest was selected.
>>> EPIDERMAL APPLICATION:
4 patches of filter paper were saturated with the test item at D = 50 % (technically the highest possible concentration to be applied sufficiently), E = 25 %, F = 15 % and G = 10 % (w/w) in PEG 300 and applied to the clipped and shaved flanks of 2 guinea pigs. The patches were covered by a strip of aluminum foil and firmly secured by elastic plaster wrapped around the trunk and covered with impervious adhesive tape.
21 hours after removal of the dressing the application site was depilated in order to visualize any resulting erythema.
3 hours later (48 hours from the epidermal application) the skin reaction was observed and recorded. After this observation a second observation (approximately 72 hours from the epidermal application) was made and once again recorded.
Based on the results obtained the concentration selected for induction and challenge in the main study was 50 % (w/w).
* MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2
- Type of epicutaneous induction: occlusive
- SLS application: yes (0.5 mL at 10% w/w)
- Exposure period: on D1 (intradermal) and D8 (epidermal, 48-hr exposure)
- Test groups:
>>> Intradermal induction:
1) 1:1 (v/v) mixture of Freund's Complete Adjuvant and physiological saline
2) The test item at 25 % or 15 % (w/w) in PEG 300
3) The test item at 25 % or 15 % (w/w) in a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of Freund's Complete Adjuvant and physiological saline
>>> Epidermal application: test item at 50 % (w/w) in PEG 300
- Control group:
>>> Intradermal induction:
1) 1:1 (v/v) mixture of Freund's Complete Adjuvant and physiological saline
2) PEG 300
3) 1:1 (w/w) mixture of PEG 300 in a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of Freund's Complete Adjuvant and physiological saline
>>> Epidermal application: PEG 300 only
- Site: dorsal skin of the scapular region
- Frequency of applications: not applicable
- Duration: 8 days (duration of the induction phase)
- Concentrations: 15 or 25 % w/w by intradermal injection, 50 % by epidermal application
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day of challenge: day 22
- Exposure period: 24 hours
- Test groups: test item in the vehicle only (+ vehicle only in the other flank)
- Control group: test item in the vehicle only (+ vehicle only in the other flank)
- Site: left (test item) and right (vehicle) flanks
- Concentrations: 50% (w/w)
- Evaluation: 48 hr after the beginning of the challenge
- Statistics: descriptive statistics were calculated for body weights. No inferential statistics were used. - Challenge controls:
- Please refer to the field "Details on study design" above.
- Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0) (regularly control)
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- hexyl cinnamic aldehyde was tested in the same conditions as described above. Based on the findings, hexyl cinnamic aldehyde at 1% in PEG 300 was considered as a skin sensitizer.
The positive control was not included in the study, but put in an other report , as regularly control.
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 50 % of the test item
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- 1% of the postive control
- No. with + reactions:
- 4
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 50% of the test item
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Clinical observations:
- In the control group, no skin reactions were observed in the animals when treated with either PEG 300 only or when treated with the test item at 50 % (w/w) in PEG 300.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50% of the test item
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- No mortality, no sign of systemic toxicity and no effect on body weight were observed during the study. In the test group, no skin reactions were observed in the animals when treated with either PEG 300 or the test item at 50 % (w/w) in PEG 300.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- 1% of the positive control
- No. with + reactions:
- 1
- Total no. in group:
- 10
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The substance is not a skin sensitiser.
According to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 and subsequent adaptations, the substance does not require classification as skin sensitiser. - Executive summary:
The sensitisation potential of Lanthane oxide was evaluated on Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs according to the maximisation method of Magnusson and Kligman, described in EU method B.6, and in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice.
Ten test and five control guinea pigs were included in this study. Induction was carried out as the following:
- on day one, animals were injected by the intracutaneous route with Lanthane oxide (15 and 25% % w/w in PEG 300) +/- Freund Complete Adjuvant (treated group) or with PEG 300 +/- Freund Complete Adjuvant (control group) or with Freund Complete Adjuvant alone (both groups);
- on day 7, the same region received a topical application of sodium lauryl sulfate (10 % w/w in paraffinum perliquidum) in order to induce local irritation;
- on day 8, a 48-hour topical occlusive application was performed with Lanthane oxide at 50 % w/w in PEG 300 (test animals) or the vehicle (controls).
- on day 22, the control and test animals were challenged by a cutaneous application of the test substance at 50 % w/w in PEG 300 to the left flank. The right flank served as control and received the vehicle only. The test substance and the vehicle were maintained under an occlusive dressing for 24 hours.
Skin reactions (erythema and oedema) were evaluated approximately 24 and 48 hours after removal of the dressing.
No clinical signs and no deaths related to treatment were noted during the study.
After the challenge application, at the 24-hour and 48-hour readings, no cutaneous reactions were noted.
In this study, Lanthane oxide is not a dermal sensitizer.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.