Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-223-0 | CAS number: 93-15-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation: Key study: Test method similar to OECD 404. The mean primary irritation score of the test item in rabbits was determined to be 0.9 (lower than 5) and thus, it was concluded not be an skin irritant.
Eye irritation: Key study: Test method similar to OECD 405. The mean eye irritation score in rabbits was determined to be 0 and thus, the test item was concluded not to be an eye irritant.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- poorly documented
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Purity of each material was checked in the Organic Chemicals Synthesis Laboratory, AEQI, in Beltsville by gas chromatography: > 98%
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 1.9-3.1 kg - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.5 mL
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Observation period:
- 72 hours
- Number of animals:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- The hair was clipped from the back and flanks of each of 6 rabbits, and two sites located lateral to the midline of the back and approximately 10 cm apart were selected for the test; one site was abraded by making four epidermal incisions, two perpendicular to the other two. A 0.5-ml dose of undiluted test material was applied to each site. The sites were immediately covered with 2-in.-square gauze patches that were secured with masking tape, and the trunk of each animal was wrapped with plastic sheeting to maintain the patches in position and retard evaporation of the test material. After 24 h the plastic wrappings and gauze patches were removed, and the intact and abraded test sites were scored separately for erythema and edema on a graded scale of 0 to 4; after 72 h, the sites were scored again. The mean primary irritation score (maxi- mum = 8) represents an average of the 24- and 72-h ratings of the intact and abraded sites.
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.9
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The substance was determined to be non irritant since the primary irritation score was lower than 5.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test item was determined to be non irritating to the skin.
- Executive summary:
A primary skin irritation test was performed in Albino rabbits. The hair was clipped from the back and flanks of each of 6 rabbits, and two sites located lateral to the midline of the back and approximately 10 cm apart were selected for the test; one site was abraded by making four epidermal incisions, two perpendicular to the other two. A 0.5-ml dose of undiluted test material was applied to each site. The sites were immediately covered with 2-in.-square gauze patches that were secured with masking tape, and the trunk of each animal was wrapped with plastic sheeting to maintain the patches in position and retard evaporation of the test material. After 24 h the plastic wrappings and gauze patches were removed, and the intact and abraded test sites were scored separately for erythema and edema on a graded scale of 0 to 4; after 72 h, the sites were scored again. The mean primary irritation score (maxi- mum = 8) represents an average of the 24- and 72-h ratings of the intact and abraded sites. The mean primary irritation score of the test item was determined to be 0.9 (lower than 5) and thus, it was concluded not be an skin irritant.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- poorly documented
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Purity of each material was checked in the Organic Chemicals Synthesis Laboratory, AEQI, in Beltsville by gas chromatography: > 98%
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 1.9-3.1 kg - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL - Observation period (in vivo):
- 7 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Not specified.
- Time after start of exposure: Not specified.
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize et. al. 1944 - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The eye irritation score was found to be 0.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test item was determined to be non irritating to the eye.
- Executive summary:
The eye-irritating properties were determined by installing a 0.1 ml dose of undiluted sample into the conjunctival sac of the right eye of each of six rabbits; the left eye of each animal served as the control. Grading for eye injury was made at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hr and at 7 days after treatment according to the grading and scoring system of Draize et al. (1944) in which a zero score indicates no irritation and the maximum score at any one scoring period is 110 (maximum irritation and damage to the cornea, iris, and conjunctiva). The mean eye irritation score in rabbits was determined to be 0 and thus, the test item was concluded not to be an eye irritant.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data, the substance is not classified for skin irritation nor eye irritation according to the CLP Regulation (EC) no. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.