Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Partition coefficient

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2012-11-22 to 2013-01-28
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
The study was conducted according to an internationally recognised method, and under GLP. No deviation affected the quality of the study. The test substance composition is adequately characterised with its purity. Therefore full validation applies.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 123 (Partition Coefficient (1-Octanol / Water), Slow-Stirring Method)
Version / remarks:
(March 23, 2006)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Inspected on 14 September 2010. Signed on 07 February 2011
Type of method:
slow-stirring method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Analytical method:
liquid chromatography
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
5.522
Temp.:
25 °C
pH:
>= 6 - <= 8.3

Equilibrium test

 Equilibration time (h)  log Pow
 24.00  5.597
 29.50  5.568
 46.17  5.560
 52.25  5.543
 70.00  5.552

The mean log Pow determined during the equilibrium test was 5.564 with a RSD of 0.37%. The slope was not significantly different from 0, indicating that equilibrium was already reached after 24 hours.

Main tests

          Measured log Pow
 Sampling time (h)  Vessel 1  Vessel 2  Vessel 3
 66.58  5.525  5.509 5.510 
 73.25  5.550 5.522  5.513 
 90.50  5.560 5.521  5.545 
 96.58  5.543 5.530  5.515 
 116.3  5.519 5.499  5.497 
          Statistical values
 Mean log Pow  5.5393 5.5161  5.5159 
 Variance  0.00029 0.000153  0.000309 
 SD  0.0171 0.0124  0.0176 
 RSD (%)  0.31 0.22  0.32 

The state of equilibrium was also checked.

The weighted average log Pow was calculated to be 5.522, with a weighted standard error of 0.019.

Conclusions:
The substance has potential to bioaccumulate in the environment, according to CLP classification criteria for aquatic chronic toxicity (log Kow >4).
Executive summary:

The partition coefficient (log Kow) of the test substance was measured under GLP according OECD 123 guideline, slow-stirring method.

A preliminary assay was conducted with a single vessel, to determine the equilibration time, which was reached from 24 hours. In the main test, three vessels were prepared, and five samples were taken in each phase after equilibration at 25°C, between 66 and 116 hours. The concentrations were measured in each phase with LC-MS/MS fully validated analysis method.

The overall average log Kow was calculated, weighted for the variance, to 5.52.

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
Based on structural similarity (the source substance is one of the constituents of the target substance, together with isomers), both substances are not expected to have significantly different partition coefficient. Therefore the result of the study is considered suitable for the target substance.
Further information is included in IUCLID Section 13.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
5.522
Temp.:
25 °C
pH:
>= 6 - <= 8.2
Conclusions:
(from analogue) The substance has potential to bioaccumulate in the environment, according to CLP classification criteria for aquatic chronic toxicity (log Kow >4).
Executive summary:

The partition coefficient (log Kow) of the analogue test substance was measured under GLP according OECD 123 guideline, slow-stirring method.

A preliminary assay was conducted with a single vessel, to determine the equilibration time, which was reached from 24 hours. In the main test, three vessels were prepared, and five samples were taken in each phase after equilibration at 25°C, between 66 and 116 hours. The concentrations were measured in each phase with LC-MS/MS fully validated analysis method.

The overall average log Kow was calculated, weighted for the variance, to 5.52.

A similar logKow is anticipated for the target substance.

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
12-2006
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study without detailed documentation
Remarks:
The study was conducted according to an internationally recognised method. Purity and isomers composition are available from the notifier. However, some informations are missing in the report. Therefore validation applies, but with restrictions.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.8 (Partition Coefficient)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
log Kow value for reference substance DDT
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
HPLC method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Analytical method:
high-performance liquid chromatography
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
6.39
Temp.:
30 °C
Remarks on result:
other: pH is not specified
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
6.23
Remarks on result:
other: recalculated for DDT reference value

Standards

RT K log K log Pow
T0 1.69 0 - -
isoprop 3.74 1.22 0.085 3.70
biph 3.97 1.35 0.131 4.00
n-but 4.87 1.88 0.275 4.50
2,6-dip 5.16 2.05 0.313 4.90
triph 6.89 3.08 0.489 5.70
DDT 7.54 3.47 0.540 6.50

Calibration

Log Pow = (log K x slope) + intercept

slope = 5.66

intercept = 3.1525

correlation = 0.9827

Sample

Tr K log K log Pow
T0 1.69 0 - -
Test substance 7.98 3.733 0.572 6.39
Conclusions:
The substance has potential to bioaccumulate in the environment, according to CLP classification criteria for aquatic chronic toxicity (log Kow >4).
Executive summary:

The partition coefficient of the test substance was measured according to the EU A8 guideline, HPLC method.

The system was calibrated with 6 reference substances, and the result for the sample was interpolated from the linear regression.

The partition coefficient (logKow) of the test substance was determined to be 6.23.

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
1994-09-05 to 1994-09-07
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
The study was conducted according to an internationally recognised method, and under GLP. However, the flask method is not considered suitable for substances with log Kow > 4, and concentrations were determined versus a single calibration point. Moreover, purity is specified, but no certificate of analysis is provided (i.e. isomers composition and impurities not stated). Therefore, validation applies, but with restrictions.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.8 (Partition Coefficient)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Inspected on 31 January 1994. Signed on 16 March 1994
Type of method:
shake-flask method to: flask method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Analytical method:
gas chromatography
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
> 4.88
Temp.:
22.5 °C
pH:
6.6

The preliminary test determined the partition coefficient to be greater than 1.02 x 104, Log10 Pow > 4.01.

The peak heights of the pair of standards associated with a particular sample were corrected to nominal concentration and the mean value taken prior to the calculation of the sample concentrations.

Sample number Volume of n-octanol (mL) Volume of water (mL) Total weight (mg) n-octanol phase Water phase
Analysed concentration (mg/L) Total weight (mg) Analysed concentration (mg/L) Total weight (mg) pH
1 5 200 5.27 1.04 x 103 5.20 < 1.34 x 10-2 < 2.67 x 10-3 6.6
2 5 200 5.27 1.05 x 103 5.26 < 1.34 x 10-2 < 2.67 x 10-3 6.5
3 10 200 10.5 1.03 x 103 10.3 < 1.34 x 10-2 < 2.67 x 10-3 6.6
4 10 200 10.5 1.03 x 103 10.3 < 1.34 x 10-2 < 2.67 x 10-3 6.6
5 20 200 21.1 1.02 x 103 20.4 < 1.34 x 10-2 < 2.67 x 10-3 6.6
6 20 200 21.1 1.06 x 103 21.3 < 1.34 x 10-2 < 2.67 x 10-3 6.7

Temperature = 22.5 +/-0.5°C

pH of n-octanol saturated water = 6.6

Calculations

Sample number n-octanol / water volume ratio Partition coefficient Log10 Pow
1 1:40 > 7.78 x 104 > 4.89
2 1:40 > 7.87 x 104 > 4.90
3 1:20 > 7.71 x 104 > 4.89
4 1:20 > 7.72 x 104 > 4.89
5 1:10 > 7.66 x 104 > 4.88
6 1:10 > 7.97 x 104 > 4.90

Pow > 7.66 x 104, Log10 Pow > 4.88

Conclusions:
The substance has potential to bioaccumulate in the environment, according to CLP classification criteria for aquatic chronic toxicity (log Kow >4).
Executive summary:

The partition coefficient of the test substance was measured, under GLP, according to the EU A8 guideline, flask method.

Three ratio were prepared in duplicate, each phase was analysed by GC, and the mean result from the 6 samples was retained. As no test substance was detected in the aqueous phase, the result is expressed as a limit value.

The partition coefficient of the test substance was determined to be > 4.88.

Description of key information

(from analogue) Potential for bioaccumulation, according to CLP classification criteria for aquatic chronic toxicity (log Kow >4).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Log Kow (Log Pow):
5.52
at the temperature of:
25 °C

Additional information

Three reliable studies, conducted according to recognized OECD/EC methods are available:

- The oldest (Safepharm 1994) was performed with the flask method, but provides only a limit value, sufficient for classification purpose, but not for ERA, and was therefore considered as supporting;

- (Firmenich 2006) was performed with the HPLC method, based on comparative elution versus standards; isomers were not differentiated;

- (Fraunhofer 2013) was not performed on the parent substance, but on an analogue, i.e. single isomer of the present multiconstituent, so the read-across was considered justified, in particular as isomers were not differentiated in the previous study. This study was conducted, under GLP, with the slow-stirring method, which is considered more accurate as based on actual phase partitioning and analysis (see IUCLID section 13 for justification).

Therefore the slow-stirring result is preferred and retained as key data, rather than the mean value.