Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-713-4 | CAS number: 98-92-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation
The key study on skin irritation assessed the irritancy potential of the test material to the skin of the New Zealand White rabbit. The method used followed the recommendations of EU Method B.4 and OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion). A single 4-hour, semi-occluded application of the test material to the intact skin of three rabbits produced no evidence of skin irritation. The test material produced a primary irritation index of 0.0 and was classified as non irritant to rabbit skin according to the Draize classification scheme. No corrosive effects were noted.
Similar results were obtained in supporting studies.
Respiratory irritation
No indication of respiratory irritation from handling and use.
Eye irritation
The key study assessed the irritancy potential of the test material to the eye of the New Zealand White rabbit. The study followed EU Method B.5 and OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion). A single application of the test material to the non-irrigated eye of three rabbits produced a dulling of the normal lustre of the corneal surface, diffuse corneal opacity, iridial inflammation and moderate to severe conjunctival irritation. The test material produced a maximum group mean score of 34.3 and was classified as a moderate irritant (Class 5 on a 1 to 8 scale) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system.
Similar results were obtained in supporting studies.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Safepharm Laboratories Ltd.
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: Twelve to sixteen weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.61 to 2.96 kg
- Housing: The animals were individually housed in suspended metal cages
- Diet: Ad libitum
- Water: Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Minimum acclimatisation period of five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 to 23
- Humidity (%): 30 -70 (any occasional deviations from these targets were considered not to have affected the purpose or integrity of the study)
- Air changes (per hr): Fifteen changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES:
- From: 05 April 2000
- To: 13 April 2000 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 g
VEHICLE
- Amount applied: 0.5 ml - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hour exposure
- Observation period:
- Approximately one hour following the removal of the patches, and 24, 48 and 72 hours later
- Number of animals:
- 1 Male, 2 Females
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm
- Type of wrap if used: Cotton gauze patch secured in position with a strip of surgical adhesive tape (BLENDERM: approximate size 2.5 cm x 4.0 cm). To prevent the animals interfering with the patches, the trunk of each rabbit was wrapped in an elasticated corset (TUBIGRIP).
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Residual test material was removed by gentle swabbing with cotton wool soaked in distilled water.
- Time after start of exposure: 4 hours
SCORING SYSTEM:
- Draize J H, (1977) "Dermal and Eye Toxicity Tests" In: Principles and Procedures for Evaluating the Toxicity of Household Substances, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC p.31. - Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: Not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: Not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: Not applicable
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- See table 1 below.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The test material produced a primary irritation index of 0.0 and was classified as non-irritant to rabbit skin according to the Draize classification scheme. No corrosive effects were noted.
- Executive summary:
A study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test material to the skin of the New Zealand White rabbit. The method used followed the recommendations of EU Method B.4 and OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion). A single 4-hour, semi-occluded application of the test material to the intact skin of three rabbits produced no evidence of skin irritation. The test material produced a primary irritation index of 0.0 and was classified as nonirritant to rabbit skin according to the Draize classification scheme. No corrosive effects were noted.
Reference
Table 1: Individual irritation scores
Individual scores - rabbit number and sex (body weight kg) | |||||
Skin reaction | Observation time (hours) | 133 Male (2.96) | 174 Female (2.62) | 63 Female (2.61) | Total |
Erythema/eschar formation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Oedema formation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Safepharm Laboratories Ltd.
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 12 to 16 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.54 - 2.97 kg
- Housing: The animals were individually housed in suspended metal cages.
- Diet: Ad libitum
- Water: Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Minimum acclimatisation period of five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 16 - 20
- Humidity (%): 43 - 48
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: Fro
- From: 25 April 1990
- To: 3 May 1990 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 0.1 g - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The right eye of each animal was treated. The left eye remained untreated and was used for control purposes.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 1, 24, 48 and 72-hour and 7 days after exposure
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 female animals. Immediately before the start of the test, both eyes of the three provisionally selected test rabbits were examined for evidence of ocular irritation or defect with the aid of a light source from a standard ophthalmoscope. Animals showing evidence of ocular lesions were rejected and replaced.
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM:
- Draize J.H. 1959, Association of Food and Drug Officials of the United States, Austin, Texas, "The Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics"
- Kay J.H. and Calandra J.C., J. Soc. Cosmet. Chern., 1962 13 281-289
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE:
- Standard ophthalmoscope. - Irritation parameter:
- maximum mean total score (MMTS)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1 hour
- Score:
- 19.7
- Max. score:
- 21
- Irritation parameter:
- maximum mean total score (MMTS)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 hours
- Score:
- 34.3
- Max. score:
- 41
- Irritation parameter:
- maximum mean total score (MMTS)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 48 hours
- Score:
- 27.7
- Max. score:
- 39
- Irritation parameter:
- maximum mean total score (MMTS)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 72 hours
- Score:
- 17.7
- Max. score:
- 39
- Irritation parameter:
- maximum mean total score (MMTS)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 7 days
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1.7
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 2.7
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1.7
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 2.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The individual scores are presented. A dulling of the normal lustre of the corneal surface was noted in two treated eyes one hour after treatment. Diffuse corneal opacity was noted in all treated eyes at subsequent 24, 48 and 72-hour observations. Iridial inflammation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment and at the 24 and 48-hour observations and in one treated eye at the 72-hour observation.
Moderate to severe conjunctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment and at the 24-hour observation. Moderate conjunctival irritation continued to be noted in two treated eyes at the 48-hour observation and in one treated eye at the 72-hour observation.
Minimal conjunctival irritation was noted in one treated eye at the 48- hour observation and in another treated eye at the 72-hour observation.
Two treated eyes appeared normal seven days after treatment. The remaining animal was sacrificed for humane reasons following the 72-hour observation.
The test material produced a maximum group mean score of 34.3 and was classified as a moderate irritant (class 5 on a 1 to 8 scale) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system. - Interpretation of results:
- irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results obtained in this study, group mean scores calculated (maximum group mean score of 34.3) and scoring according Kay and Calandra (1962) the test item was considered moderately irritant.
- Executive summary:
A study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test material to the eye of the New Zealand White rabbit. The study followed EU Method B.5 and OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion).
A single application of the test material to the non-irrigated eye of three rabbits produced a dulling of the normal lustre of the corneal surface, diffuse corneal opacity, iridial inflammation and moderate to severe conjunctival irritation. The test material produced a maximum group mean score of 34.3 and was classified as a moderate irritant (Class 5 on a 1 to 8 scale) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the data available the substance is classified and labeled as Eye irritation category 2, H319 Causes serious eye irritation according to Regulation 1272/2008/EEC (CLP) and Irritating Xi, R36 Irritating to eyes according to Directive 67/548/EEC (DSD).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.