Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 284-461-5 | CAS number: 84896-44-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Oral:
Sanders, A 2010 ACUTE ORAL TOXICITY IN THE RAT - FIXED DOSE METHOD Testing Laboratory: Harlan Laboratories Limited, Shardlow Business Park, Shardlow, Derbyshire, DE72 2GD, UK. Owner company: Chemtura Corporation, 199 Benson Road, Middlebury, CONNECTICUT 06749, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Report date: 3103/0068
The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bodyweight (OECD 420).
Dermal:
Both available acute dermal toxicity studies have included as a weight of evidence.
Arcelin. G (2001) Mark 17M: Acute Dermal Toxicity Study in Rats. Testing Laboratory: RCC Ltd, Toxicology Division, Wölferstrasse 4, CH-4414, Füllinsdorf Switzerland. Owner company: Crompton Vinyl Additives GmbH, Chemiestrasse 22, D-68623 Lampertheim, Germany. Report No.: 785687. Report date: 2001-06-21.
Sarasin G (1981) Acute Dermal LD50 in the Rat of TK 10'701. Testing Laboratory: CIBA-GEIGY Limited, Basle, Switzerland. Owner company: Plastics and Additives Division, CIBA-GEIGY MARIENBERG GMBH, 6140 Marienberg Post Bensheim. Report No.: 810905. Report date: 1981-09-17
Arcelin G (2001) was assigned a reliability score of 1, however this is reduced to 2 as the study is being used for read-across purposes. The study was performed to the guideline OECD 402 and conducted in line with GLP. The second study Sarasin G (1981) was also performed to a method equivalent to OECD 402 and assigned a reliability score of 2.
The lowest LD50 was selected as the key value.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 777 mg/kg bw
Additional information
ORAL
Key value for chemical safety assessment:
LD50 (oral): >2000 mg/kg bw
The key study (Sanders, 2010) was performed to assess the acute oral toxicity of the test material in the Wistar strain rat. The method was designed to meet the requirements of the following:
OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No 420 “Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method” (2001)
Method B1 bis Acute Toxicity (Oral) of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008
A reliability score of 1 was assign according to Klimisch, 1997 as the study was conducted to recognised guidelines and GLP.
Following a sighting test at dose levels of 300 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg, a further group of four fasted females was given a single oral dose of the undiluted test material at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. Clinical signs and bodyweight development were monitored during the study. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy.
DERMAL
Read across from DBT-2EHMA (CAS: 10584-98-2) has been used for this endpoint as this is considered the most structurally similar organotin substance with regards to diisotridecyl 3,3'-[(dibutylstannylene)bis(thio)]dipropionate.
Two studies were available for the assessment of the acute dermal toxicity endpoint. The LD50 value selected for assessment was that from the Sarasin (1981) study. The study was performed to a good scientific standard, with a good level of reporting. The study was therefore assigned a reliability score of 2 in line with the criteria in Klimisch (1997).
The Arcelin (2001) study was assigned a reliability score of 1. The study was performed in compliance with GLP and to the OECD guideline 402, however it was considered preferable to take the worst case value from the Sarasin study. Furthermore, the test material in the Sarasin study contained a higher percentage of the substance in question.
In the Arcelin study according to OECD test guideline 402, groups of 9 week old male and 10 - 11 week old female rats were dermally exposed to Mark 17 M for 24 hours at doses of 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw. Animals dosed with 1000 mg/kg bw were then observed for 14 days. All animals treated with 2000 mg/kg were killed for ethical reasons on day 8 due to severe signs of irritation observed. The LD50 result for these test animals are classified as inconclusive (>1000 mg/kg).
In Sarasin, groups of 7-8 week old male and female rats were dermally exposed to TK 10'701 for 24 hours at doses of 250, 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw. Animals were then observed for 14 days.
LD50 = 777 mg/kg bw (95% C.I. of 575 and 1052 mg/kg)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.