Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
12 Mar - 20 Aug 2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
Version / remarks:
adopted 23 Mar 2006, Annex 5 corrected 28 Jul 2011
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
Version / remarks:
adopted 24 Aug 2009
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD Guidance No. 23, Document on Aquatic Toxicity Testing of Difficult Substances and Mixtures
Version / remarks:
adopted 14 Dec 2000
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Rheinland-Pfalz, Landesamt für Umwelt, Wasserwirtschaft ud Gewerbeaufsicht, Mainz, Germany
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
- Concentrations: all test concentrations
Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
One day before start of the test, the test solutions were prepared. This was done by weighing the respective nominal load, i.e. 4.6, 10, 22, 4.6 and 100 mg/L, adding the corresponding amount of dilution water (1000 mL) and shaking vigorously for 24 hours. The resulting solutions were filtrated through 0.45 µm filters. Each treatment loading rate was prepared separately and split into three aliquots for each replicate. In addition a dilution water control was prepared in parallel.
Test organisms (species):
Desmodesmus subspicatus (previous name: Scenedesmus subspicatus)
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Green alga.
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): The culture of Desmodesmus subspicatus was obtained in Oct 2011 from MBM Science-bridge GmbH (Institut für Pflanzenphysiologie of Universität Göttingen). The algae are kept as stock culture on solid agar at 8 °C. From the stock culture, a permanent culture was prepared. From an aliquot of the permanent culture, the pre-culture was prepared.
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): Three days before the start of the test, an aliquot of the stock culture containing a few cells was brought into pre-culture medium and incubated for 72 hours. The resulting culture was growing exponentially. Before usage, the culture was checked on the absence of cell aggregates. After the adjustment to a cell concentration of about 2 - 5 x10^4/mL through photometric measurement and addition of algal medium the culture was usable for the test.
Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h
Test temperature:
24 °C
pH:
7.6 to 8.6 in the control and 7.9 – 9.2 in the test solutions
Nominal and measured concentrations:
control, 4.6, 10, 22, 46 and 100 mg/L (nominal)
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel:
- Type (delete if not applicable): open
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: glass flasks 50 mL, fill volume 45 ± 5 mL
- Initial cells density: 2-5 x10^4 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 7 x10^5 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6

GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes (OECD medium)

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: deionised water
- Culture medium different from test medium: yes. The algae are kept as stock culture on solid agar.
- Intervals of water quality measurement: temperature each 24h, pH at the start and at the end

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Photoperiod: continuous light
- Light intensity and quality: 4800 lux

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable):
- Determination of cell concentrations: spectrophotometer, 440 nm, every 24 hours

TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: ca. 2.2
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
Potassium dichromate
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL50
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat. (dissolved fraction)
Remarks:
loading rate
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks:
, biomass and yield
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOELR
Effect conc.:
46 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat. (dissolved fraction)
Remarks:
loading rate
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks:
, biomass and yield
Details on results:
- Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test): none
- Any stimulation of growth found in any treatment: Algal growth was higher in the treatments 4.6 to 46 mg/L than in the control. At 100 mg/L a significant inhibition of growth was observed.
Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Results with reference substance valid? yes
- 72h ErC50: 1.40 mg/L
Reported statistics and error estimates:
For the treatments with the nominal test item concentrations 46 mg/L and 100 mg/L , it was tested whether the differences between treatment and control were significant. The values for the area under the curve, Yield and the growth rate were used for the assessment of observed effect levels. In order to select a suitable test for significance, it was checked whether equality of variance was given. If equality of variance was given, the t-test was used; else, the WEIR test was used.

 Table 1: Measured Al concentrations in mg/L

Test concentration (nominal)

Measured Al Conc

0 h

Measured Al Conc

72 h

Recovery

geom. Mean.

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

mg/L

0

< LOQ

< LOQ

-

-

4.6

0.07

0.06

80.88

0.06

10

0.15

0.13

84.31

0.14

22

0.35

0.31

87.57

0.33

46

0.57

0.41

72.13

0.48

100

0.55

0.43

77.84

0.48

LOQ = 0.025 mg/L (after 10 fold enrichment)

Table 2: Results stability in algal test medium (Al), mg/L

Time

Conc. Al mean 1

Conc. Al mean 2

Mean

Oh

1.66

1.70

1.68

72 h

1.54

1.46

1.50

Stability (= Mean 72h / Mean Oh)

89%

Table 3: Results stability in algal test medium (V), mg/L

Time

Conc. V mean 1

Conc. V mean 2

Mean

Oh

0.262

0.273

0.268

72 h

0.278

0.296

0.287

Stability (= Mean 72h / Mean Oh)

107%

Table 4: Cell number/mL in main study

Nominal concentration in mg/L

Parameter

Cell number/mL

 

 

0 h

24 h

48 h

72 h

0

Mean

2206

26104

122065

443406

0

SD

0

3800

12176

22840

4.6

Mean

2206

26472

147434

522822

4.6

SD

0

1103

12688

50630

10

Mean

2206

31252

148905

506645

10

SD

0

4458

25797

40442

22

Mean

2206

28678

129786

503336

22

SD

0

1910

14975

13159

46

Mean

2206

29413

129786

500027

46

SD

0

2547

8279

47982

100

Mean

2206

29413

109197

251484

100

SD

0

1274

23163

87221

Table 5: Growth rate µ, area under the curve AUC, yield

Nom. Concentration in mg/L

Meas. Concentration in mg/L

 

Growth Rate [day-1]

AUC
[Cell Concentration/mL*day]

Yield
[Cell Concentration/mL]

0

-

Mean

1.77

364358

441200

SD

0.02

25178

22840

4.6

0.06

Mean

1.82

429802

520616

SD

0.03

37834

50630

10

0.14

Mean

1.81

427964

504439

SD

0.03

45314

40442

22

0.33

Mean

1.81

404617

501130

SD

0.01

16548

13159

46

0.48

Mean

1.81

403698

497821

SD

0.03

27426

47982

100

0.48

Mean

1.56

258837

249278

SD

0.13

65478

87221

 

Table 6: Inhibition values main study

Nominal Concentration in mg/L

% Inhibition

 

Growth Rate [x]

Area under the Curve AUC

Yield

0

0!

0!

0!

4.6

-3.07

-17.96

-18.00

10

-2.50

-17.46

-14.33

22

-2.41

-11.05

-13.58

46

-2.23

-10.80

-12.83

100

11.59

28.96

43.50

Description of key information

EL50 (72h, growth rate) > 100 mg/L (nominal, loading rate) (OECD 201, Desmodesmus subspicatus)

NOELR (72h, growth rate) = 46 mg/L (nominal, loading rate) (OECD 201, Desmodesmus subspicatus)

The measured concentrations for Al were 0.06 - 0.48 mg/L (geom. mean)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
46 mg/L

Additional information

One study according to OECD 201 and GLP is available to evaluate the acute toxicity of aluminium magnesium vanadium oxide to freshwater green alga Desmodesmus subspicatus at nominal concentrations ranging from 4.6 to 100 mg/L (2013). The substance has a low water solubility and therefore the test solution was prepared by adding the appropriate test item to 1 liter of dilution water. After shaking vigorously for 24 hours the resulting solution was filtrated through 0.45 μm filters. Following this, the filtrates were used for the main test without dilution. The test solutions included the dilution water control and nominal loading rates of 4.6, 10, 22, 46, and 100 mg/L test item. The corresponding mean measured concentrations for Al were 0.06, 0.14, 0.33, 0.48, 0.48 mg/L (geom. mean measured). Each treatment loading rate was prepared separately and split into four aliquots for each replicate respectively. Al was determined in the test solutions using AAS. The concentrations remained stable in the test medium over the study period of 72 h. In a preliminary limit test with a loading of 100 mg/L vanadium was not detectable in the test solutions at the start of the study. Therefore, it is considered that the vanadium concentration in the test solutions were below the detection limit (0.25 mg/L). As a consequence, in the main test only the Al concentration in the test solutions was determined at the beginning and at the end of the test. The 72h NOELR based on growth rate was determined as 46 mg/L. The corresponding EL50 for the growth rate was determined as > 100 mg/L. LOELR and EL50 are based on nominal loading rates.