Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From May 10 to 13, 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Version / remarks:
2015
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
Version / remarks:
2009
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Acid Red 018
IUPAC Name:
Acid Red 018
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder

In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Details on test system:
PREPARATION
- Procedure used: on day of receipt, tissues were conditioned by incubation to release transport stress related compounds and debris. Duration of pre-incubation before treatment was 60 min.

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 25 min at room T, 35 min at 37 °C

REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
- Number of washing steps: after 60 ± 1 min from start of exposure, tissues were rinsed with PBS and transferred to a fresh medium; after 24 ± 20 min of post-incubation period, the medium was replaced by a fresh-one
- Observable damage in the tissue due to washing: no
- Modifications to validated SOP: no

DYE BINDING METHOD
- Dye used in the dye-binding assay: MTT
- Spectrophotometer: Libra S22
- Wavelength: 570 nm
- Filter: no external filter
- Filter bandwidth: 2-3 nm

NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TESTING RUNS / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: single experiment, composed of 3 replicate tissues

PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA
- In case the test chemical is found to be non-corrosive (e.g. based on guideline 430, 431 or 435) and tissue viability after exposure and post-treatment incubation is less than (<=) 50 %, the test chemical is considered to be irritant to skin in accordance with UN GHS category 2.
- The test test chemical may be considered as non-irritant to skin in accordance with UN GHS no category, if the tissue viability after exposure and post-treatment incubation is more than (>) 50 %.
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent MTT non-specific colour control
Amount/concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 25 mg atop previously moistened tissue with 25 µl PBS

POSITIVE CONTROL
- Concentration: 5 % SDS in aqueous solution
Duration of treatment / exposure:
60 minutes: 25 minutes at room temperature and 35 minutes at culture conditions
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
24 h and 20 minutes, then medium was replaced by a fresh one and tissues were incubated for 19 h and 7 minutes.
Number of replicates:
3

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
1
Value:
90.3
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: no
- Direct-MTT reduction: no
- Colour interference with MTT: no

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes (OD570 is 1.682)
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes (% of negative control tissues in 2.9 %)
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: yes (SD of 3 identically treated replicates is < 18 % in all cases)

Any other information on results incl. tables

Average viability of treated tissues was 91.4 % of negative control viability. Negligible OD570 was observed in colorant control tissues extract though correction could be done.

True tissue viability = 91.4 % - 1.1 % = 90.3 %.

OD570 values obtained at MTT test, averages, standard deviations (%) and relative viabilities

treatment OD570 avg SD average viability (% NC)
1 2 3
NC PBS 1.752 1.728 1.567 1.682 0.082 100
% viab. NC 104.1 102.7 93.1 100 4.882
C1 PBS 1.529 1.601 1.483 1.538 0.049 91.4
% 90.9 95.2 88.2 91.4 2.887

C1

CC

medium, no MTT 0.019 0.018 - 0.018 0.001 1.1
% 1.129 1.011 - 1.1 0.059
PC 5 % SDS 0.065 0.069 0.066 0.067 0.002 4.0
% 3.9 4.1 3.9 4.0 0.101

C1 test substance

CC colorant control

NC negative control

PC positive control

SD standard deviation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: non classified according to the CLP Regulation (EC 1272/2008)
Conclusions:
Average tissue viability upon treatment with test substance is 90.3 %.
Effect of test substance in EpiDermTM model was negative.
Executive summary:

Method

In vitro skin irritation study according to OECD guideline 439. One single experiment was run, using 3 replicates for test substance, positive and negative control. After pre-incubation of tissues, 25 mg test substance were spread on the tissue surface. Exposure duration was 60 minutes. After substance removal, tissues were post-incubated for ca. 42 hours. Afterwards, 3 hours incubation with MTT and 3 hours extraction followed. Optical density (OD570) of isopropyl alcohol was measured on a spectrophotometer.

Controls for colour interference and direct MTT reduction were also carried out.

Results

Slight colour interfernce and no direct MTT reduction were found.

Average cell viability was 90.3 %, i.e. above 50 %. Therefore, effect of the substance in EpiDermTM model was negative.