Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From 1993-07-06 to 1993-07-27
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1993
Report date:
1993

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 472 (Genetic Toxicology: Escherichia coli, Reverse Mutation Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N,N-diethylprop-2-enamide
EC Number:
679-769-5
Cas Number:
2675-94-7
Molecular formula:
C7-H13-N-O
IUPAC Name:
N,N-diethylprop-2-enamide
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Batach No.: not specifed
Purity: not specifed

Method

Target gene:
Histidine locus in several strains of Salmonella typhimurium and tryptophan locus of Escherichia coli (E. coli) strain
Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
other: S. typhimurium TA 1538
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Rat liver metabolic activation system (S-9 mix)
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
-Dose-range Finding Test: TA 98, TA 100, TA 1538, TA 1535, TA1537 and the WP2uvrA, both with and without S9-mix: 5, 50, 500, 5000 μg/ plate.

Mutatuion Test 1: TA 98, TA 100, TA 1538, TA 1535, TA1537 and the WP2uvrA, both with and without S9-mix: 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 μg/ plate.

Mutatution Test 2: TA 98, TA 100, TA 1538, TA 1535, TA1537 and the WP2uvrA, both with and without S9-mix: 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 μg/ plate.
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Prior to commencing testing the solubiity of the material was assessed at 50 mg/mL in water in which it was found to be completely miscible. Water was therefore used as the solvent for this study.
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
2-nitrofluorene
N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
Remarks:
without S-9 mix
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 2-Aminoanthracene
Remarks:
with S-9 mix
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation
- Cell density at seeding: 2E+9 cells per mL

DURATION
- Exposure duration: all plates were incubated 3 days
Evaluation criteria:
The mean number of revertant colonies for all treatment groups is compared with those obtained for solvent control groups. The mutagenic activity of a test material is assessed by applying the following criteria:
a) If treatment with a test material produces an increase in revertant colony numbers of at least twice the concurrent solvent controls, with some evidence of positive dose-relationship, in two separate experiments, with any bacterial strain either in presence or absence of S-9 mix it’s considered to show evidence of mutagenic activity in this test system. No statistical analysis is performed.
b) If treatment with a test material does not produce reproducible increases at least 1.5 times the concurrent controls, at any does level with any bacterial strain, it’s considered to show no evidence of mutagenic activity in this test system. No statistical analysis is performed.
c) If the result obtained fail to satisfy the criteria for a clear “positive” or “negative” response given in paragraphs (a) and (b), the following approach is taken in order to resolve the issue of the material’s mutagenic activity in this test system.
(1) Repeat test may be performed using modifications of the experimental method. These modifications include (but are not restricted to), the use of narrower dose range that already tested; the use of different levels of liver homogenate S-9 fraction in the S-9 mix. Should an increase in revertant colony numbers be observed which satisfies paragraph (a) the material is considered to show evidence of mutagenic activity in this test system. No statistical analysis is performed.
(2) If no clear “positive” response can be obtained the test data may be subjected to analysis to determine the statistical significance of any observed increases in revertant colony numbers. The statistical procedures used will be those described by Mahon et al. (1989).

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA1538
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
No substantial increases in revertant colony numbers of any the tester strains were observed following treatment with the test item at any dose level, in the presence or absence of S-9 mix in either mutation test.
Tester strain TA 98 was contaminated in the second mutation test but this contamination did not affect the counting of the plates.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
When tested in water, the test item shows no evidence of mutagenic activity in this bacterial system.
Executive summary:

In this in vitro assessment of the mutagenic potential of test item, histidine dependent auxotrophic mutants of Salmonella typhimurium (strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100) and a tryptophan dependent mutant of Escherichia coli (WP2 uvrA) were exposed to the test material, diluted in water which was used as a negative control.

 

Two independent mutation tests were performed, in the presence and absence of liver preparations from Aroclor 1254-induce rats.

 

In the preliminary dose range finding study with dose levels of up to 5000μg/plate no toxicity was observed. A top dose level of 5000μg/plate was chosen for subsequent mutation study. other dose levels used in mutation assays were: 2500, 1250, 625, 312.5μg/plate.

 

No evidence of mutagenic activity was seen at any dose level of test item in either mutation test.

 

The concurrent positive control compounds demonstrated the sensitivity of the assay and the metabolizing activity of the liver preparations.

 

It's concluded that, when tested in water, the test item shows no evidence of mutagenic activity in this bacterial system.