Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
oxidising solids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1995-05-29
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
according to UN recommendations on the transport of dangerous goods
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: UN Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (Manual of Tests and Criteria, Third edition, 1995)
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Test described in the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, Manual of Tests and Criteria, third revised edition, test O.1: Test for oxidizing solids (section 34.4.1). Also known as the conical pile test.
GLP compliance:
no
Contact with:
other: sawdust or cellulose
Key result
Sample tested:
4:1 sample-to-cellulose ratio
Parameter:
mean burning time
Remarks on result:
mixture does not ignite and burn
Key result
Sample tested:
1:1 sample-to-cellulose ratio
Parameter:
mean burning time
Result:
219 s
Remarks on result:
other: combustion with little flames
Sample tested:
reference: 3:7 mixture potassium bromate + cellulose
Parameter:
mean burning time
Result:
106 s
Remarks on result:
other: combustion with little flames
Sample tested:
reference: 2:3 mixture potassium bromate + cellulose
Parameter:
mean burning time
Result:
61 s
Remarks on result:
other: combustion with little flames

The data presented in the above field named 'Test results (Oxidising solids)' are those obtained during the test performed according to the current UN method.

1) Test according to the UN method in place in 1995:

 

Sample

Ratio sample / sawdust

Burning time (s)

Observations

N°1

N°2

N°3

Average

Praseodymium trinitrate

4/1

-

-

-

-

No burning. The burning started when the flame was brought in contact with the pile, but stopped immediately after the cut off of the flame. An incomplete reaction was observed.

 

Praseodymium trinitrate

1/1

525

410

340

425

Burning on the surface of the pile (probably with oxygen from the air)

Ammonium persulfate

1/1

40

34

41

38

 

The lowest mean burning time obtained for the mixture praseodymium trinitrate/sawdust (ratio 1:1) is more than that of the mixture with ammonium persulphate. Therefore, praseodymium trinitrate is not considered as an oxidizing material according to the UN method in place in 1995.

2) Test according to the current UN method:

Sample

Ratio sample / cellulose

Burning time (s)

Observations

N° 1

N° 2

N° 3

N° 4

N° 5

Average

Praseodymium trinitrate

4/1

-

-

-

-

-

-

No burning was observed

Praseodymium trinitrate

1/1

135

150

304

229

276

219

Combustion with little flames

Potassium bromate

3/7

113

105

102

107

103

106

 

Potassium bromate

2/3

85

60

60

46

52

61

 

The mixture of praseodymium trinitrate / cellulose in the ratio 4 / 1 does not burn.
The mixture of praseodymium trinitrate / cellulose in the ratio 1 / 1 burns with little flames. All the burning times are higher than those of the reference mixture.

According to these results, praseodymium trinitrate is not considered as oxidizer and should not be classified under Division 5.1.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Praseodymium trinitrate gave a negative result according to the UN method in place in 1995 and according to the current method.
Praseodymium trinitrate is not considered as an oxidizer.

Description of key information

Lodel (1995) studied the oxidising properties of praseodymium trinitrate (99,9% crystallised) according to UN Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (Manual of Tests and Criteria, Third edition, 1995). The substance was observed not to be oxidising.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Oxidising properties:
non oxidising

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

Praseodymium trinitrate was tested not to have oxidising properties and needs thus not to be classified for this endpoint according to CLP criteria.