Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
March 1977
Reliability:
3 (not reliable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
significant methodological deficiencies
Remarks:
The study was performed pre-GLP and pre-OECD Test Guidelines. It was performed by an experienced reputable laboratory. Limited information is provided on the method used.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1977
Report date:
1977

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Principle of test: Analysis of mutagenic activity of 1-Butene, 4-bromo-3,3,4,4-tetrafluoro- in the Salmonella/microsome assay.
- Short description of test conditions: Five histidine-requiring strains of Salomonella typhimurim were sued in the assays. Strains 1535 and TA 100 were used in the detection of base-pair substitution mutations, with strains TA 1537, TA 1538 and TA 98 used ti detect frame-shift mutations. The assays were performed in the presence and absence of a ra-liver homogenate activation system (S.9) .
GLP compliance:
no
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4-bromo-3,3,4,4-tetrafluorobut-1-ene
EC Number:
242-440-8
EC Name:
4-bromo-3,3,4,4-tetrafluorobut-1-ene
Cas Number:
18599-22-9
Molecular formula:
C4H3BrF4
IUPAC Name:
4-bromo-3,3,4,4-tetrafluorobut-1-ene
Test material form:
not specified

Method

Target gene:
Not stated
Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Not stated
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1538
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Not stated
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Not stated
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Not stated
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Not stated
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9: Not stated
- method of preparation of S9 mix:
- concentration or volume of S9 mix and S9 in the final culture medium: 0.5ml of S.9 mixture was applied to the chemical-top solution. The S.9 mixture contained 0.3 ml of the 9,000 X g supernatant of homognized rat liver
- quality controls of S9 (e.g., enzymatic activity, sterility, metabolic capability): Not stated
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
The test material was tested at 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000 ug/plate in tests with and without metabolic activity. No justification on test concentrations were provided in the study report
Vehicle / solvent:
- Solvent used: DMSO

- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: A justification for the choice of solvent was not provided in the study report.

- Justification for percentage of solvent in the final culture medium: A justification for the percentage solvent in the final culture medium was not provided in the study report.
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
- S.9 control
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
-S.9 control
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
2-nitrofluorene
N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
other: 2- Aminoanthracene
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: Duplicate
- Number of independent experiments: Two

METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): Not stated
- Test substance added in medium; A solution of the test material was added to the top agar solution where the solution was then mixed and added to the agar plate. For the metabolic activation system the addition of S.9 mixture was added to the mixture prior to applying to the agar plate.

TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period, if applicable: N/A
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment:49 hours
- Harvest time after the end of treatment (sampling/recovery times): Not stated

METHODS FOR MEASUREMENTS OF GENOTOXICIY
Not stated
Rationale for test conditions:
A rationale for the test conditions was not provided in the study report.
Evaluation criteria:
The criteria used to determine the mutagenic potential of the test substance was a significant/lack of increase in the spontaneous mutation frequency.
Statistics:
No statistics are provided in the study report.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not determined
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not determined
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1538
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not determined
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not determined
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not determined
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: No mutagenic potential

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Mutagenic activity of 1-Butene, 4-Bromo-3,3,4,4-Tetrafluoro- in Salmonella Typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100 with metabolic activation

 

 

 

 

Histidine+ Revertants Per Plate **

Compound added

TA 1535

TA 1537

TA 1538

TA 98

TA 100

DMSO

 

 

13

17

21

37

101

-S.9*

(1000 µg/plate)

12

10

7

18

100

10, 943

200 µg/plate

7

11

18

37

98

 

400 µg/plate

9

17

20

35

98

 

600 µg/plate

12

20

22

42

118

 

800 µg/plate

12

14

21

45

98

 

1000 µg/plate

13

13

14

29

100

2AA

5 µg/plate

-

-

-

-

933

 

10 µg/plate

209

-

782

2561

-

 

100 µg/plate

-

284

-

-

-

DMSO = Dimethylsulfoxide (solvent control)

10,943 = 1-butene, 4-bromo-3,3,4,4-tetrafluoro-

2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene (positive control)

* = Test plate without S.9 Activation

** = Average of two plates

 

Table 2: Mutagenic activity of 1-Butene, 4-Bromo-3,3,4,4-Tetrafluoro- in Salmonella Typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100 without metabolic activation

 

 

 

 

Histidine+ Revertants Per Plate *

Compound added

TA 1535

TA 1537

TA 1538

TA 98

TA 100

DMSO

 

 

4

14

7

22

93

10, 943

200 µg/plate

9

16

13

20

91

 

400 µg/plate

6

23

15

29

83

 

600 µg/plate

9

19

9

22

95

 

800 µg/plate

9

15

11

26

78

 

1000 µg/plate

5

15

9

26

101

MNNG

2 µg/plate

1966

 

-

-

1278

9AAc

1050 µg/plate

-

2022

--

-

-

2NF

10025 µg/plate

-

-

1964

3915

-

DMSO = Dimethylsulfoxide (solvent control)

10,943 = 1-butene, 4-bromo-3,3,4,4-tetrafluoro-

MNNG = N-Methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (positive control)

9AAc = 9-Aminoacridine

2NF = 2-ANitrofluorene (positive control)

* = Average of two plates

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this study, the test item is considered not mutagenic in concentrations up to 1000 ug/plate in either the presence or absence of a liver microsomal system on Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100.
Executive summary:

The study was performed to assess the mutagenic potential of the test material to Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100 in the presence and absence of a liver microsomal system (S.9). For treatments in the absence of the liver microsomal system a volume of 0.1mL test substance and 108 bacterial were added to 2ml of the top agar. This solution was applied to the surface of the Davis minimal agar plate.

 

Treatment in the presence of the liver microsomal system were the same as that in the absence of the liver microsomal system with the exception that 0.5 mL S.9. mixture was added to the chemical topped agar solution. All plates were incubated at 37˚C for 48 hours. Positive and negative controls were used in both test systems and it was not indicated if these were within the acceptable historical control ranges. No applicability criteria were provided for this test method therefore this could not be determined. Under the conditions of the study, the test substance showed no evidence of mutagenic activity and it was concluded to be negative as it did not significantly increase the spontaneous mutation frequency in Salmonella typhimurium.