Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Biodegradation in soil

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
biodegradation in soil
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well documented and scientifically sound study.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1996
Report date:
1996

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Measuring the amount of 14CO2 produced form the aerobic biodegradation of 2,4-TDA in soils.
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
laboratory

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4-methyl-m-phenylenediamine
EC Number:
202-453-1
EC Name:
4-methyl-m-phenylenediamine
Cas Number:
95-80-7
Molecular formula:
C7H10N2
IUPAC Name:
4-methylbenzene-1,3-diamine
Details on test material:
2,4-TDA recrystallised by M. Kimak of Air Products and Chemicals.
Purity 99.9%

Uniformly 14C ring labeled 2,4-diaminotoluene dihydrochloride (custom synthesised by Dupont New England Nuclear (Boston, MA) with a specific activity of 1.9mCi/mmole and a radiochemical purity of 99% as deteremined by TLC)
Radiolabelling:
yes

Study design

Oxygen conditions:
aerobic
Soil classification:
other: Washington Silt Loam
Soil properties
Soil no.:
#1
Soil type:
silt loam
% Clay:
19
% Silt:
60
% Sand:
21
pH:
5
CEC:
13.6 meq/100 g soil d.w.
Details on soil characteristics:
Surface soil obtained from a farm field in Pennsylvania.

Soil type: Washington silt loam
21% sand
60% silt
19% clay
Cation exchange capacity: 13.6 meq/100g
Ca: 7.59 meq/100g
Mg: 1.26 meq/100g
K: 0.68 meq/100g
pH: 5
Combustible content: 5.7 %
Field capacity at 1/3 Bar: 23.05%
TOC: 1.3%
Duration of test (contact time)
Soil No.:
#1
Duration:
365 d
Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
CO2 evolution
radiochem. meas.
Experimental conditions
Soil No.:
#1
Temp.:
25°C
Details on experimental conditions:
Test substance added to the soil at 5 microg/g and at approx. 4-5*10(6) disintegrations per minute of 14C per flask (1.8 - 2.3 microCi per flask)

To 50g of air-dried, 2 mm sieved silt loam was added water to provide 75% of 1/3 bar moisture tension in the soil. The test substance was added to the soil at the 5 microg/g level and at approximately 4-5*10(6) disintegrations per minute of 14C per flask (1.8 - 2.3 microCi per flask). The flasks were incubated in darkness in a microbial incubator at 25°C for up to one year. Sodium hydroxide solution was used to trap the carbon dioxide formed and liquid scintillation counting was performed using a Beckman Model LS 3801 instrument.

Results and discussion

% Degradation
Soil No.:
#1
% Degr.:
ca. 0
Parameter:
radiochem. meas.
Sampling time:
73 d
Transformation products:
not specified
Evaporation of parent compound:
not specified
Volatile metabolites:
not specified
Residues:
not specified
Details on results:
% Biodegradation

Time (days), % biodegradation

3d, 1.9%
7d, 4.0%
14d, 7.9%
28d, 10.8%
56d, 14.8%
210d, 36.8%
365d, 34.2%

Any other information on results incl. tables

The 14C labeled 2,4-TDA started to biodegrade immediately with the aerobic soil. The biodegradation slowed later perhaps due to the increasing binding of the 2,4-TDA with humic acids in the soil.

This study also demonstrated the strong binding of 2,4-TDA to soil.

2,4-TDA apparently undergoes aerobic biodegradation in soil.

NB. Apparently some of the 14CO2 was lost during the latter period of incubation, so that the % biodegradation figures given above for 210d and 365d were calculated from the loss of C-14 from the soil plus the water extracts of the soil. Therefore, the last two results (210d and 365d) should be considered as not relevant.

Applicant's summary and conclusion