Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-106-7 | CAS number: 7439-97-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Epidemiological data
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- epidemiological data
- Type of information:
- other: human data
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- data from 1953 - 1978
- Reliability:
- other: reliable report; not rated acc. to Klimish
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The epidemiological data reported is relevant for risk assessment.
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- A mortality study of men exposed to elemental mercury.
- Author:
- Cragle, D.L.; et al.
- Year:
- 1 984
- Bibliographic source:
- J. Occup. Med. Nov. 26(11): 817-21
Materials and methods
- Study type:
- cross sectional study
- Endpoint addressed:
- carcinogenicity
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Mortality and cancer indices were studied in a cohort of 2133 white men exposed to inorganic mercury vapours in an USA plant between 1953 and 1963 and followed up through the end of 1978. Death certificates were obtained from 371 of 378 workers who were reported to be deceased. Standard mortality rates (SMR) were calculated for a comparable unexposed worker population at the same plant.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Mercury dichloride
- EC Number:
- 231-299-8
- EC Name:
- Mercury dichloride
- Cas Number:
- 7487-94-7
- IUPAC Name:
- mercury dichloride
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): elemental mercury vapours
No further information given.
Constituent 1
Method
- Type of population:
- occupational
- Ethical approval:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION:
- Type: Record review / Work history
STUDY PERIOD: exposure period 1953 - 1963, follow-up until 1978
SETTING: occupational, USA
STUDY POPULATION:
- Total population (total no. of persons in cohort from which the subjects were drawn): 5,663 individuals (all white male employees who worked for at least 4 months between Jan. 1953 and April 1958).
- Selection criteria: white male workers in a Y-12 plant located in Oak Ridge, Tennesse, USA, (i) who were exposed to elemental mercury vapours between 1953 and 1963, and who were monitored by urinalysis for mercury exposure (mercury-exposed group) and (ii) non-monitored workers who were never at risk for mercury exposure (non-mercury exposed workers)
- Total number of subjects participating in study: 2,133 mercury exposed (monitored) subjects and 3,260 never at risk, non-exposed (not moniored) subjects.
- Sex/age/race: men, white Americans, ages not reported.
COMPARISON POPULATION:
- Type: state registry
- Details: age ajusted mortality experience of the U.S. white male population
HEALTH EFFECTS STUDIED
- Disease(s): underlying causes of death were coded to the eight revision of ICD; the mortality experience for each group was followed from Jan. 1953 or the date of hire.
- Death certificates were obtained from 371 of 378 workers who were reported to be deceased.
- Standard mortality rates (SMR) were calculated for a comparable unexposed worker population at the same plant. - Exposure assessment:
- measured
- Details on exposure:
- TYPE OF EXPOSURE: Occupational exposure to elemental mercury vapours in a Y-12 plant located in Oak Ridge, Tennesse, USA. Elemental mercury was used in the lithium isotope separation process.
TYPE OF EXPOSURE MEASUREMENT:
(i) Biomonitoring (urine): A mercury urinalysis program statred in mid-1953; from 1954 on everone working in the mercury process was required to submit a specimen approxemately quaterly .
(ii) air-monitoring
EXPOSURE LEVELS:
(i) the plant action value (PAV) was set at 0.3 mg Hg/L urine; employees whose urine exceeded 0.6 mg Hg/L were removed from their work assignments until their levels fell below the PAV.
(ii) the highest air concentrations of mercury occured in 1955 and 1956 (up to 67.7 % of sample >0.10 mg/m3), see table 1
EXPOSURE PERIOD: The production process was placed in operation between December 1953 and Septemer 1955. The production doscontinued in 1963.
POSTEXPOSURE PERIOD: follow-up from 1963 to 1978 - Statistical methods:
- no data
Results and discussion
- Results:
- - Highest air concentrations (% of samples > 0.10 mg/m3) were measured in the years 1955/56 (max 87%) and declined until 1960 with percentage samples above 0.10 mg/m3 in the range 0.8 to max. 10%.
- In the mercury exposed and the non-mercury exposed groups, overall mortality rates were lower than expected. The number of observed cancers in each group was not significantly greater than expected based on US white male death rates.
- Incidences of both cancer of the lung (SMR = 1.34) and cancer of the brain and other CNS tissues (SMR = 2.30) were statistically significantly elevated in the non-mercury group. A higher SMR for lung cancer (SMR =1.34) was also observed in mercury workers, although not statistically significant.
- Selected categories and causes of death for the mercury workers who exceeded the “plant action value” (PAV) of 0.3 mg Hg/l urine (n=858) and for Hg workers who were exposed for one year and longer (n=1741) exhibited a significant deficit in the number of overall deaths when compared to the US white male population.
- Since excess of lung cancer was evident in both groups of workers, it is unlikely that they are related to mercury exposure. - Confounding factors:
- Other factors than mercury present in the plant and other life-style factors.
- Strengths and weaknesses:
- no data
Any other information on results incl. tables
Numbers of observed (Obs) and expected (Exp) deaths for selected causes for the non-mercury workers and the mercury workers (incl. standardised mortality ratio SMR)
. |
Non-mercury workers (n=3,260) |
Mercury workers (n=2,133) |
||||
Obs |
Exp |
SMR |
Obs |
Exp |
SMR |
|
All causes of death (001-998) |
710 |
794.50 |
0.89 |
378 |
440.55 |
0.86 |
All malignant neoplasms (140-209) |
175 |
159.22 |
1.10 |
85 |
90.82 |
0.94 |
All cancer of the liver (155, 156) |
2 |
2.96 |
0.68 |
2 |
1.56 |
1.28 |
All cancer of the lung (162, 163) |
71 |
52.93 |
1.34 |
42 |
31.36 |
1.34 |
Cancer of the kidney (189) |
3 |
4.19 |
0.72 |
4 |
2.43 |
1.65 |
Cancer of the brain and other CNS (191, 192) |
13 |
5.65 |
2.30 |
4 |
3.28 |
1.22 |
All disease of the nervous system and sense organs (320- 389) |
5 |
6.86 |
0.73 |
2 |
3.84 |
0.52 |
All vascular lesions of the CNS (430-438) |
36 |
46.36 |
0.78 |
24 |
24.03 |
1.00 |
All respiratory tract diseases (460-519) |
37 |
43.52 |
0.85 |
18 |
23.98 |
0.75 |
Chronic nephritis (582) |
3 |
4.19 |
0.72 |
1 |
2.09 |
0.48 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Since excess of lung cancer was evident in both groups of workers (mercury exposed and non-mercury exposed), it is unlikely that they are related to mercury exposure. In conclusion, exposure to mercury vapours was not related to any excess of death from diseases or cancer of mercury target organs (liver, lung, brain, CNS and kidneys). No increases of incidences were found when level of exposure or length of exposure were considered.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.