Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
21.2 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
By inhalation
DNEL related information
Overall assessment factor (AF):
4.5
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
190 mg/m³
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
95.5 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

See discussion below.

Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
22 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
By inhalation
DNEL related information
Overall assessment factor (AF):
18
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
190 mg/m³
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
394 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

See discussion below.

Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - workers

No acute exposure scenarios are envisaged for this substance and as such there is no requirement to calculate Acute/short term systemic or local DNELs, as the substance is also not classified for acute toxicity.

Chronic, Systemic, Inhalation DNEL

The starting point for the calculation of the systemic, long term exposure DNEL is the NOAEC taken from the 3 month inhalation study of 190 mg/m3

The assessment factors chosen to convert this dose to a worker DNEL are as follows:

Allometric scaling - not needed as starting point is inhalation dose.

'Additional uncertainty' in allometric scaling - 1 - Recent research indicated that the factor of 2.5 is not justified in the majority of cases. In this particular case, there is little evidence that effects observed in the rat study were influenced by non-allometric factors.

Worker variability - 3 (Based on ECETOC guidance)

Time Extrapolation - 1.5 (Based on Recent publication by Batke et al. 2010 and ECETOC guidance)

Total Assessment Factor = 4.5

Starting point for DNEL derivation is 3-month rat inhalation study NOAEC of 190 mg/m3

Conversion to Human LOAEC =190 * 6/8 * 6.7/10

= 95.5 mg/m3

Application of AF leads to an inhalation DNEL (worker) of 21.2 mg/m3

Chronic, systemic, Worker Dermal DNEL

The starting point for the long-term, systemic Dermal DNEL is the 13 week inhalation study NOEL of 190 mg/m3

In the summary of toxicokinetic properties of this substance it is indicated that the rate of absorption through the gut is far greater than the rate through the skin; It is estimated that a maximum of approximately 10% of the material would be expected to pass through the skin following dermal exposure. Inhalation exposure is expected to lead to 100% absorption and therefore a factor of 10 will be used to convert from inhalation to dermal exposure to account for differences in bioavailablity.

Extrapolation from inhalation dose to dermal dose:

Systemic dose from rat study = 190 mg/m3 * 0.29 m3/kg bw = 55.1 mg/kgbw for 5 days per week

Convert 5 day to 7 day = 55.1 * 5/7 = 39.4 mg/kg bw/day

Taking into account dermal penetration of 10% = 39.4 * 10 = 394 mg/kg bw/day

The assessment factors for extrapolating to a DNEL are as follows:

Allometric scaling - 4 (rat to man)

'Other differences' - 1 - Recent research indicated that the factor of 2.5 is not justified in the majority of cases. In this particular case, there is little evidence that effects observed in the rat study were influenced by non-allometric factors.

Worker variability - 3 (based on the recent ECETOC guidance)

Time extrapolation - 1.5 (Based on Recent publication by Batke et al. 2010 and ECETOC guidance)

Quality of the database - 1 (the data are consistent and sufficient to conclude on a safe human level of exposure)

Total assesment factor - 18

Dermal DNEL (long term, systemic) = 394 / 18 = 22 mg/kg bw/day

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - General Population

There are no exposure scenarios leading to consumer exposure to this substance, therefore general population DNELs set as no hazard identified.