Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
December 13, 2006 to Januray 29, 2007
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted according to OECD method and in accordance with GLP. Study material is well characterized.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: Unnamed report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2007
Report date:
2007

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Test material form:
liquid

Method

Target gene:
five histidine-requiring strains
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
other: Salmonella typhimurium: TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100, TA102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S-9 mix(2.5%) from Aclor 1254-induced rat liver
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
For genotoxicity experiment concentrations (with & without metabolic activation) used:

The dose ranges were determined in a preliminary toxicity assay.

Concentration range in the main test 1 & 2 (with and without metabolic activation): 50,150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate using direct plate method.
Vehicle / solvent:
solvent- dimethyl sulphoxide
Controlsopen allclose all
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
(vehicle controls used in parallel with the test material)
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
mitomycin C
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Positive controls:
other: 2-Aminoanthracene: 1 ug/plate(TA100), 2.0 ug/plate (TA 98,TA1535&TA1537 without S-9.
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
True negative controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
benzo(a)pyrene
True negative controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 1,8 dihydroxyanthraquinone at 10 ug/plate for T102
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
Toxicity: no precipitation was noted in any test concentration
Evaluation criteria:
Evaluation criteria: test article would be considered mutagenic if:
the increase in the number of revertants is concentration-related;
at one concentration tested (at least), the number of revertant colonies is equal to or greater than twice the number of spontaneous revertants
the positive responses described above were reproducible in an independent assay.
Statistics:
Mean and standard deviation of the plate counts for each treatment were determined

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
> 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
No toxicologically significant increase in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains with any dose of the test material with and without metabolic activation. Small increases in revertant colony frequency was observed for bacterial strains T100 ( without s9) at 500 and 1500 ug/plate in the second experiment. The increases were considered to be of no biological relevance because there was no evidence of dose response relationship or reproducibility. Inn addition, the revertant counts at 500 and 1500 ug/plate were within in house control ranges for the strain and the fold increases were only 1.17 and 1.27 times the concurrent vehicle control at 500 and 1500 ug/plate,respectively.



Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Observations: All positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with and without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9 mix were validated.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with metabolic activation
ambiguous without metabolic activation

No dose-related and reproducible increases in revertant colony frequency were observed in any tester strains at any concentration, both with and without S9. The test substance was not genotoxic in the Ames test