Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 269-144-1 | CAS number: 68188-18-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- two-generation reproductive toxicity
- Remarks:
- - Effects upon reproductive function (including two-generation reproductive toxicity)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- before January 1978
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 978
- Report date:
- 1978
Materials and methods
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Feeding study on both reproductive function and intra-uterine development in the rat, 3 dose groups were fed diets containing 1000, 3000 and 10000 ppm test material.
For assessment of reproductive function: 25 male and 25 female rats of F0 and F1 generation/group were fed diets continuously for 60 days prior to mating and throughout three successive pregnancies, interim kill after 60 days of treatment on 5 males and 5 females, terminal sacrifice of 20 male and 20 female animals following the 3rd mating on Day 13 and in Day 21 of gestation.
Endpoints investigated: clinical signs, body weight/body weight gain, compound intake, haematology, reproductive parameters, litter observations, gross necropsy, organ weights, histology. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Limit test:
- no
- Justification for study design:
- The study was planned and conducted before 1978, therefore the test design is different to nowadays standard. However, the test design does include e.g. a pre-mating treatment period (60 days), mating of the F1 animals to produce an F2 generation and a 21-day rearing period of the offspring and is therefore considered acceptable for the assessment.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sulfonic acids, C14-17-sec-alkane, sodium salts
- EC Number:
- 307-055-2
- EC Name:
- Sulfonic acids, C14-17-sec-alkane, sodium salts
- Cas Number:
- 97489-15-1
- Molecular formula:
- H3C-(CH2)m-CH-(SO3Na)-(CH2)n-CH3
- IUPAC Name:
- not available
- Test material form:
- solid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Information from study report:
- Name of test material: Hostapur SAS 60
- Appearance/Further information: aqueous slurry (60 % w/w active ingredient); Hostapur (SAS 60) is
equal to 60 % Hostapur SAS 93 in water
- Batch number: batch received on 3 September 1974 (lot number NR T 2/112)
- Purity (of Hostapur SAS 93): 91-95 % active ingredient
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the diet: No data
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Strain: Sprague Dawley CD strain
- Source: Charles River U.K. Ltd., Margate, Kent, England
- Weight at study initiation (mean): F0 males 78-80 g, F0 females 87-89 g
- Housing: high density polypropylene and stainless steel cages (Type RC1 and RM2 from North Kent Plastics Ltd., Dartford, Kent)
- Diet and water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: "short acclimation period" is stated in report, but not specified
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 ± 2°C
No further data
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Remarks:
- substance given in complete rodent diet
- Details on exposure:
- For converting substance concentrations in feed into daily doses the factor of 0.09 was used (default factor for subchronic studies, i.e. two-generation study, for rats; Guidance on selected default values to be used by the EFSA Scientific Committee, Scientific Panels and Units in the absence of actual measured data, EFSA Journal 2012;10(3):2579)
- Details on mating procedure:
- Following the pre-mating period, twenty females from each group were paired on a one to one basis with males from the same treatment level avoiding sibling matings wherever possible. Each morning following pairing, vaginal smears were taken from all females and examined for the presence of spermatozoa. The day on which a sperm positive smear was found was designated Day 1 of gestation. Once mating had occurred, the males and females were separated.
Females failing to mate within five days were placed with another male; this was repeated on two further occasions thereby allowing each female a maximum of 20 days in which to mate.
Approximately 20 days after weaning of the first (A) litters the females were re-mated with different males to produce the second (B) litters. This was repeated a second time to produce the third (C) litters. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Treatment was given continuously to both sexes of F0 and F1 generations for 60 days prior to mating and throughout three successive pregnancies.
- Frequency of treatment:
- not applicable, diet was freely available to rats
- Details on study schedule:
- The study on toxicity to reproduction investigates both effects upon reproductive function and developmental toxicity.The complete study extended over three pregnancies derived from each of two generations (F0, F1).
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 90 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Corresponding dose for group receiving diet with 1000 ppm test substance
- Dose / conc.:
- 270 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Corresponding dose for group receiving diet with 3000 ppm test substance
- Dose / conc.:
- 900 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Corresponding dose for group receiving diet with 10000 ppm test substance
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- F0- and F1-generation: 20; Within each group 25 male and 25 female animals were initially used, but interim investigations and sacrifice was carried out after 60 days of treatment on 5 males and 5 females in each group, lowering the number of animals per sex and dose to 20.
- Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Details on study design:
- In both the F0 and F1 generations, haematological investigations were carried out after 60 days of treatment on five males and five females in each group prior to subsequent macroscopic and histopathological examination. The remaining animals were paired, within groups, on a one to one basis on three consecutive occasions. After the first two matings (F1A, F1B, F2A, F2B) the females were allowed to litter naturally and rear their young to weaning. Following the third mating the dams were killed on Day 13 and 21 of gestation, to permit examination of their uterine contents (see chapter 7.8.2 "Developmental toxicity").
Within each group 25 male and 25 female weanlings were selected at random from amongst those constituting the F1b generation (2nd litter). After a maturation period of 60 days, these animals were mated to produce the F2 generation, using the same procedures and examinations as were applied to the F0 generation.
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: All animals were examined daily for evidence of adverse reaction to treatment.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Animals were weighed weekly throughout the study.
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
In both the F0 and F1 generations, haematological investigations were carried out after 60 days of treatment on five males and five females in each group. The following parameters were investigated: Erythrocyte Count (RBC), Leucocyte Count (WBC) - total, Haemoglobin Concentration, Packed Cell Volume (PCV), Leucocyte Count (WBC) - differential.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
During the pre-mating period, the food intake per cage of five rats was recorded and the mean intake per rat calculated. - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- From Days 55 to 59 of treatment, daily vaginal smears were taken from all females to determine the presence of oestrus.
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- The length of time that elapsed between pairing and detection of mating was recorded for each mating. This time was termed the pre-coital interval.
- Litter observations:
- Within 24 hours of birth, the offspring were counted, weighed and examined for external abnormalities. Any dead or moribund pups were noted. Daily records were made of mortalities and litter size. Wherever possible, any pups which died were examined externally and internally in an attempt to determine the cause of death. The offspring were weighed on Days 4 and 21 post partum. The speed of physical development of the offspring was assessed in terms of pinna unfolding, hair growth, tooth eruption and eye opening.
Examinations at weaning were auditory function (assessed using a startle response to a sudden sharp noise) and visual function (assessed by examination of the pupil closure response to a bright point source of light).
For the first two matings in each generation (i.e. F1A and F1B or F2A and F2B) the females were allowed to litter naturally in order to provide the following information: gestation length, litter size at birth, litter weight at birth, viability and normality of offspring, sex of offspring at Day 4 post partum. - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- Interim kill: On Day 60 following blood sampling, five male and five female rats from each group were killed, a gross macroscopic examination was performed and the following organs removed and weighed: Heart, Kidneys, Liver, Ovaries, Testes. Following weighing, representative samples of these organs, together with those listed below, were conserved prior to histological processing and evaluation: Adrenals, Lung, Pancreas, Small intestine, Spleen, Stomach, Thymus, Urinary bladder.
GROSS NECROPSY
All rats that died were subjected to a thorough macroscopic examination to determine, where possible, the cause of death. At, or shortly after Day 13 or Day 21 of the third pregnancy all parent animals were killed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation and a thorough macroscopic examination carried out.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
Five males and five females from each group were randomly selected for histopathological evaluation.
The following organs were removed and weighed from five male and five female rats from eachgroup: Heart, Kidneys, Liver, Ovaries/testes. Following weighing, representative samples of these organs, together with those listed below, were conserved prior to histological processing and evaluation: Adrenals, Lung, Pancreas, Small intestine, Spleen, Stomach, Thymus, Urinary bladder. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- All offspring, except those selected to form the F1 generation, were killed after Day 21 post partum by carbon dioxide asphyxiation and examined for external and gross internal abnormalities. The sex of each offspring was recorded.
- Statistics:
- The significance of inter-group differences was examined using the Mann-Whitney non-parametric U test in the case of bodyweights and the chi-squared test incorporating Yates' correction in the analysis of pre- and post-implantation losses and viability. Statistical analysis of offspring bodyweight gains was carried out on bodyweight.increments calculated from litter mean offspring weights.
- Reproductive indices:
- The following indices were calculated: Mean litter size, Mean litter weight, Live birth index
- Offspring viability indices:
- The following indices were calculated: Mean offspring weight, Mean offspring weight on Day 4 post partum, Viability index
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
Details on results (P0)
CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
There were no test substance related mortalities. The general condition of F0 males remained similar to that of the controls throughout the F0 generation. F0 females from treated groups were comparable with control females prior to pairing, but during the reproductive phases females in high and medium dose group (10000 ppm and 3000 ppm, continous treatment) showed a reduction in grooming performance, and an inferior general condition compared with the other groups.
BODY WEIGHT AND FOOD CONSUMPTION (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
In the F0 generation, slight depression of bodyweight gain was observed in males treated continuously with the test substance at 10,000 ppm. A similar reduction was observed in F0 females treated prior to mating, the effect at 10000 ppm achieving statistical significance (p < 0.05). During the three subsequent pregnancies, some fluctuation in bodyweight gain was recorded in treated females, but no significant inter-group variation was observed. In the F1-generation, a significant depression of bodyweight gain (p < 0.05) was observed in males treated continuously with 3000 or 10000 ppm; those treated with 1000 ppm were only marginally affected. Because of a depressed rate of bodyweight gain during lactation, the mean bodyweight of female offspring from the group treated continously with 10000 ppm was significantly depressed at weaning (p < 0.05). Subsequently however, the rate of bodyweight gain in this group was comparable with that of the controls.
TEST SUBSTANCE INTAKE (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
Group mean food consumption of both males and females during the pre-mating period was similar for all groups.
HAEMATOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS:
There were no treatment-related inter-group variations in haematological parameters in either male or female animals.
REPRODUCTIVE FUNCTION:
In both generations, oestrous cycles, mating performance and conception rates were unaffected by treatment.
GROSS PATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS)/HISTOPATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
Interim kill: No treatment related findings were reported.
Macroscopic examination, absolute and relative organ weights and histopathological evaluation of F0 and F1 parent animals showed no adverse treatment-related effects.
Effect levels (P0)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- General Toxicity
- Effect level:
- ca. 270 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Slight depression of somatic growth in next higher dose group
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- Fertility
- Effect level:
- ca. 900 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No dose related effect on fertility consistent over two generations reported
Results: P1 (second parental generation)
Details on results (P1)
Effect levels (P1)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- General Toxicity
- Effect level:
- ca. 270 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Slight depression of somatic growth in next higher dose group
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- Fertility
- Effect level:
- ca. 900 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No dose related effect on fertility consistent over two generations reported
Results: F1 generation
Details on results (F1)
The viability index was significantly depressed (p < 0.05) in the F1A litters of females receiving 3000 ppm or 10000 ppm continuously, and in the F2B litters of the females receiving 3000 ppm continuously. In all other groups, the viability index was comparable with that of the control group.
CLINICAL SIGNS (OFFSPRING)
A marginal delay in physical development of F2B offspring was recorded in all treated groups.
BODY WEIGHT (OFFSPRING)
The bodyweight of offspring at Day 1 post partum, showed no significant inter-group variations. However, the bodyweight gain of offspring from females receiving 10000 ppm continuously was depressed in the F1A, F1B, F2A and F2B litters, achieving statistical significance (p < 0.05) in all but the F2A litters. All other treated offspring gained weight at a similar rate to the controls.
GROSS PATHOLOGY (OFFSPRING)
No indication of any treatment-related findings.
Effect levels (F1)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- ca. 270 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Slight depression of somatic growth in next higher dose group
Results: F2 generation
Details on results (F2)
Effect levels (F2)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F2
- Effect level:
- ca. 270 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Slight depression of somatic growth in next higher dose group
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Executive summary:
The influence of the test material upon reproductive function and fertility was assessed over two generations in rats of the Charles River CD strain. For this purpose, the substance was administered in the diet to both the F0 and F1 generations at levels of 1000, 3000 or 10000 ppm. Treatment was given either continuously to both sexes for 60 days prior to mating and throughout three successive pregnancies (F1A, F1B, F1C, F2A, F2B and F2C) or to females only during the organogenesis stage of three successive pregnancies. Animals were randomly selected from the F1B litters to form the second generation.
In both the F0 and F1 generations, haematological investigations were carried out after 60 days of treatment on five males and five females in each group, prior to carbon dioxide asphyxiation and subsequent macroscopic and histopathological examination. The remaining animals were paired, within groups, on a one to one basis on three consecutive occasions. After the first two matings (F1A, F1B, F2A, F2B) the females were allowed to litter naturally and rear their young to weaning. Following the third mating (F1C, F2C) half of the dams in each group were killed on day 13 of gestation, and the remainder were killed on day 21 of gestation, to permit examination of their uterine contents.
After termination of each generation, all parent animals were examined macroscopically. Five males and five females from each of the continuously treated groups, together with five females only from each of the groups treated during organogenesis, were randomly selected for histopathological evaluation.
In both generations prior to mating, food intake, haematological parameters, absolute and relative organ weights and histopathological evaluation of tissues showed no adverse treatment-related effects.
In the F0 generation, slight depression of bodyweight gain was observed in males treated continuously with the substance at 10,000 ppm. A similar reduction was observed in F0 females treated prior to mating. During the three subsequent pregnancies, some fluctuation in bodyweight gain was recorded in treated females, but no significant inter-group variation was observed.
In the F1 generation, a slight depression of bodyweight gain was observed in males treated continuously with 3,000 or 10,000 ppm; those treated with 1,000 ppm were only marginally affected.
Because of a depressed rate of bodyweight gain during lactation, the mean bodyweight of female offspring from the group treated continuously with 10,000 ppm was significantly depressed at weaning. Subsequently however, the rate of bodyweight gain in this group was comparable with that of the controls. With the exception of females receiving 10,000 ppm during organogenesis, in which a significant reduction in bodyweight was recorded in the third pregnancy, no significant inter-group variations in bodyweight gain were observed.
Neither generation, during the first two pregnancies (F1A, F1B, F2A, F2B), showed any treatment-related effects in the number of litters containing at least one viable young, the litter size at birth, or the live birth index.
The viability index was significantly depressed in the F1A litters of females receiving 3000 or 10000 ppm continuously, and in the F2B litters of the females receiving 3000 ppm continuously. These observations are not regarded as compound related adverse effects because no consistent dose response or consistent effect over generations is observed. The observation on the F1A litter is due to a single dam that failed to lactate. In all other groups, the viability index was comparable with that of the control group.
The bodyweight of offspring at Day 1 post partum, showed no significant inter-group variations. However, the bodyweight gain of offspring from females receiving 10,000 ppm was depressed in the F1A, F1B and F2B litters, achieving statistical significance. All other treated offspring gained weight at a similar rate to the controls.
In both generations, the sex ratio at Day 4 post partum and at weaning were unaffected by treatment. A marginal delay in physical development of F2B offspring was recorded in all treated groups with unknown biological significance.
There was no consistent effect on pre-implantation loss, litter parameters or foetal development. Macroscopic examination, absolute and relative organ weights and histopathological evaluation of Fa and FI parent animals showed no adverse treatment-related effects.
It was concluded from these investigations that continuous treatment with the test material at a level of 10,000 ppm gave rise to a slight depression of somatic growth in parent animals and offspring in both generations. There were no indications for an embryotoxic or teratogenic effect related to treatment in any dose groups.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.