Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

In view of the human exposure assessment and patch test, no further testing is considered to be necessary. The substance is classified as Skin Sens 1

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Remarks:
Human patch test
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Justification for type of information:
Peer reviewed research.
The research was performed after reported sensitisation by those in contact with genipin
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Human patch test performed following reported allergic reactions among those in contact with genipin based products to confirm the components causing allergic reactions
Genipin was demonstrated to be a skin sensitiser to humans.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
patch test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Human study
Species:
other: Human
Sex:
not specified
Route:
epicutaneous, semiocclusive
Vehicle:
DMSO
Concentration / amount:
1%
Day(s)/duration:
2 days application
Adequacy of induction:
other: Typical concentration used in cosmetic products
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, semiocclusive
Vehicle:
DMSO
Concentration / amount:
1%
Day(s)/duration:
2
Adequacy of challenge:
other: Concentration used in cosmetic products
No. of animals per dose:
Not specified
Details on study design:
Methods described as 'standard European methods for human patch testing'
Challenge controls:
The study was performed using other ingredients present in the cosmetic leading to an allergic reaction, including citric acid and potassium sorbate - these proved negative and therefore acting as controls
Positive control substance(s):
no
Positive control results:
Not tests
Reading:
other: Observations over several days from repeated application
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
1% in DMSO
Clinical observations:
No other adverse effect recorded
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Remarks:
Number of volunteers and number with reactions are not reported.
Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (skin sensitising) based on GHS criteria
Remarks:
Reported as clear positive effects
Conclusions:
In view of the human exposure assessment and patch test, no further testing is considered to be necessary. The substance is classified as Skin Sens 1
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (sensitising)

Justification for classification or non-classification