Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2013
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
other: chromosome aberration

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Reaction mass of methyl dihydrogen phosphate and orthophosphoric acid and dimethyl hydrogen phosphate
EC Number:
908-996-7
IUPAC Name:
Reaction mass of methyl dihydrogen phosphate and orthophosphoric acid and dimethyl hydrogen phosphate
Test material form:
liquid

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
lymphocytes: human
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Type and identity of media: Dulbeccos's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F12 medium. Properly maintained: yes.
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
rat liver S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
With metabolic activation:
Experiment I: 32.5, 56.8, 99.5, 174.1, 304.6, 533.1, 932.9, 1632.7, 2857.1, 5000.0 µg/mL
Experiment II: 304.6, 533.1, 932.9, 1632.7, 2857.1, 5000.0 µg/mL

Without metabolic activation:
Experiment I: 32.5, 56.8, 99.5, 174.1, 304.6, 533.1, 932.9, 1632.7, 2857.1, 5000.0 µg/mL
Experiment II: 32.5, 56.8, 99.5, 174.1, 304.6, 533.1, 932.9, 1632.7, 2857.1, 5000.0 µg/mL
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Deionised water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: solubility and relatively low cytotoxicity in accordance to the OECD Guideline 473
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
ethylmethanesulphonate
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
Two independent experiments were performed. In Experiment I the exposure period was 4 hours with and without metabolic activation. In Experiment II the exposure period was 4 hours with S9 mix and 22 hours without S9 mix. The chromosomes were prepared 22 hours after start of treatment with the test item. Evaluation of two cultures per dose group.

METHOD OF APPLICATION: in culture medium

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 hours (+/- S9 mix) and 22 hours (- S9 mix)
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 22 hours


SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Colcemid
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa


NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: about 1.5


NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 per culture


DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index
Evaluation criteria:
Evaluation of the cultures was performed (according to standard protocol of the "Arbeitsgruppe der Industrie, Cytogenetik") using NIKON microscopes with 100x oil immersion objectives. Breaks, fragments, deletions, exchanges, and chromosome disintegrations were recorded as structural chromosome aberrations. Gaps were recorded as well but not included in the calculation of the aberration rates. 100 well spread metaphases per culture were scored for cytogenetic damage on coded slides.
Only metaphases with characteristic chromosome numbers of 46 ± 1 were included in the analysis. To describe a cytotoxic effect the mitotic index (% cells in mitosis) was determined.
Statistics:
Statistical significance was confirmed by means of the Fisher´s exact test (p < 0.05).

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
lymphocytes: human
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid

Any other information on results incl. tables

The test item, dissolved in deionised water, was assessed for its potential to induce chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes in vitro in the absence and presence of metabolic activation by S9 mix. Two independent experiments were performed. In Experiment I the exposure period was 4 hours with and without S9 mix. In Experiment II the exposure period was 4 hours with S9 mix and 22 hours without S9 mix. The chromosomes were prepared 22 hours after the start of treatment with the test item. In each experimental group two parallel cultures were analysed. 100 metaphases per culture were scored for structural chromosomal aberrations. 1000 cells were counted per culture for determination of the mitotic index. The highest treatment concentration in this study, 5000.0 µg/mL was chosen with respect to the OECD Guideline for in vitro mammalian cytogenetic tests. No visible precipitation of the test item in the culture medium was observed. No relevant influence on osmolarity was observed. The pH was adjusted to physiological values. In this study, in the absence as well as in the presence of S9 mix, no biologically relevant cytotoxicity indicated by clearly reduced mitotic indices could be observed.  In both experiments, in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no biologically relevant increase in the number of cells carrying structural chromosome aberrations was observed. The aberration rates of the cells after treatment with the test item (0.0 – 1.5 % aberrant cells, excluding gaps) were within the range of the solvent control values (0.0 – 2.0 % aberrant cells, excluding gaps) and within the range of the laboratory historical solvent control data.  No evidence of an increase in polyploid metaphases was noticed after treatment with the test item as compared to the control cultures. In both experiments, either EMS (550 or 770 µg/mL) or CPA (7.5 or 20.0 µg/mL) were used as positive controls and showed distinct increases in cells with structural chromosome aberrations.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce structural chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes in vitro. Therefore, Hordaphos CC MS is considered to be non-clastogenic in this chromosome aberration test, when tested up to the highest required concentration.
Executive summary:

The test item, dissolved in deionised water, was assessed for its potential to induce structural chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes in vitro in two independent experiments. In each experimental group two parallel cultures were analysed. Per culture 100 metaphases were evaluated for structural chromosomal aberrations. The highest applied concentration in this study (5000.0 µg/mL of the test item) was chosen with regard to the current OECD Guideline 473. Dose selection of the cytogenetic experiment was performed considering the toxicity data in accordance with OECD Guideline 473. In the absence and presence of S9 mix, no cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest applied concentration. In both independent experiments, neither a statistically significant nor a biologically relevant increase in the number of cells carrying structural chromosomal aberrations was observed after treatment with the test item. No evidence of an increase in polyploid metaphases was noticed after treatment with the test item as compared to the control cultures. Appropriate mutagens were used as positive controls. They induced statistically significant increases in cells with structural chromosome aberrations.


Categories Display