Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1981
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1981
Report date:
1981

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
No examination was done 1 hour after instillation, observation for 7 days.
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
pre-GLP

Test material

1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
[2-(1-ethoxyethoxy)ethyl]benzene
EC Number:
219-868-9
EC Name:
[2-(1-ethoxyethoxy)ethyl]benzene
Cas Number:
2556-10-7
Molecular formula:
C12H18O2
IUPAC Name:
[2-(1-ethoxyethoxy)ethyl]benzene

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Remarks:
albino
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Housing: caged individually
- Other: the animals receive no hay or other extraneous material that might enter the eyes

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1 mL testing material
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Single instillation
Observation period (in vivo):
7 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
6
Details on study design:
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize and Kelley (1952)
The eyes of the animals were examined before testing and only those animals without observable eye defects were used.
The test material is allowed to fall on the everted lower lid of one eye of each rabbit and the upper and lower eye lid are then carefully closed and subsequently held together for at least one second before releasing to prevent loss of material.
The eyes were not washed following the installation and the animals were released immediately.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal: 1 to 6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal: 1 to 6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal: 1, 2 and 4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.66
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal: 5 and 6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal: 2 to 6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Slight redness of the conjunctivae in four out of six rabbits and slight swelling of the conjunctivae in one out of six rabbits were noted. After seven days all lesions cleared up.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: Not an eye irritant
Remarks:
Based on EU CLP criteria (EC 1272/2008 and its updates)
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this test (simialr to OECD TG 405), Hyacinth body is not considered to be an eye irritant.
Executive summary:

The eye irritation potential of Hyacinth body was tested in an in vivo study performed similar to OECD 405 but with (acceptable) deviations on the observation period and therefore a Klimisch 2 rating was assigned. In this study, 6 New Zealand white rabbits were used. Prior to instillation, eyes of the animals were examined for visible eye defects. 0.1 mL of testing material per animal was instilled in one eye and the other eye served as control. Eyes were not washed after instillation. Animals were observed at 24, 48, 72 and 7 days after instillation. No cornea and iris effects were noted. Slight redness of the conjunctivae in four out of six rabbits was seen (score 1 in 1 animal and score 0.66 in 3 animals; out of max. score 3), as well as a slight swelling of the conjunctivae in one out of six rabbits was noted (score 0.33 out of max. score 4). After seven days all lesions had cleared up. Under the conditions of this test, Hyacinth body is not considered to be an eye irritant.