Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 944-855-6 | CAS number: 199445-85-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Genetic Toxicity and Cytotoxicity: Negative, OECD 471 (AMES test), Anon, 2016
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 09-August-2016 to 31-August-2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Study was conducted in accordance with international guidelines and in accordance with GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 21-July-1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- 31 May 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Version / remarks:
- 31 March 2011
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Version / remarks:
- August 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- RADIOLABELLING INFORMATION (if applicable)
- Radiochemical purity: N/A
- Specific activity: N/A
- Locations of the label: N/A
- Expiration date of radiochemical substance: N/A
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature
- Stability under test conditions: Assumed stable. Stability at higher temperatures not availbale.
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: N/A
- Reactivity of the test substance with the solvent/vehicle of the cell culture medium: N/A
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: N/A
- Preliminary purification step (if any): N/A
- Final dilution of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel: N/A
- Final preparation of a solid: N/A
FORM AS APPLIED IN THE TEST (if different from that of starting material): N/A
OTHER SPECIFICS: N/A - Target gene:
- Histidine
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 5.4, 17, 52, 164, 512, 1600 and 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO and saline solution
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Not reported - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 2-aminoanthracene (2AA)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: Solution pre-incubated for 30 minutes prior to addition to 3 mL of molton top agar which was subsequently added to the selected agar plate.
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): 10000000000 cells/mL
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 30 minutes
- Exposure duration: N/A
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 ± 4 h
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): N/A
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): N/A
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): N/A
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): N/A
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): N/A
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: N/A
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: N/A
NUMBER OF METAPHASE SPREADS ANALYSED PER DOSE (if in vitro cytogenicity study in mammalian cells): N/A
CRITERIA FOR MICRONUCLEUS IDENTIFICATION: N/A
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: N/A
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: N/A
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: N/A
- Determination of endoreplication: N/A
- Methods, such as kinetochore antibody binding, to characterize whether micronuclei contain whole or fragmented chromosomes (if applicable): N/A
- OTHER: N/A - Rationale for test conditions:
- Preliminary test conducted at seven concentrations of the test item; 5.4, 17, 52, 164, 512, 1600 and 5000 µg/plate in the tester strains; TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and WP2uvrA.
Based on the results of the first pre-incubation assay, five doses (increasing with approximately half-log steps) of the test item were selected and tested in triplicate in each strain in the second pre-incubation assay.
The highest concentration of the test item used in the second mutation assay was the level at which the test item inhibited bacterial growth unless the test item. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the test if:
a) The total number of revertants in tester strain TA100 or WP2uvrA is not greater than two (2) times the concurrent control, and the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537 or TA98 is not greater than three (3) times the concurrent control.
b) The negative response should be reproducible in at least one follow up experiment.
A test item is considered positive (mutagenic) in the test if:
a) The total number of revertants in tester strain TA100 or WP2uvrA is greater than two (2) times the concurrent control, or the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537 or TA98 is greater than three (3) times the concurrent control.
b) In case a repeat experiment is performed when a positive response is observed in one of the tester strains, the positive response should be reproducible in at least one follow up experiment. - Statistics:
- None.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: N/A
- Effects of osmolality: N/A
- Evaporation from medium: N/A
- Water solubility: N/A
- Precipitation: Precipitation of the test item on the plates was not observed at the start or at the end of the incubation period in all tester strains.
- Definition of acceptable cells for analysis: No
- Other confounding effects: No
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The test item was tested in the tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and WP2uvrA with concentrations of 5.4, 17, 52, 164, 512, 1600 and 5000 µg/plate in the absence and presence of 5% (v/v) S9-mix.
CYTOKINESIS BLOCK (if used)
- Distribution of mono-, bi- and multi-nucleated cells: N/A
NUMBER OF CELLS WITH MICRONUCLEI
- Number of cells for each treated and control culture: N/A
- Indication whether binucleate or mononucleate where appropriate: N/A
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data: Yes
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: Yes
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
- Measurement of cytotoxicity used: visual observation of bacteria lawn made using dissection microscope.
- Other observations when applicable: N/A - Conclusions:
- Based on the results of this study it is concluded that the test substance is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
- Executive summary:
The mutagenic and cytotoxic potential of the test substance was determined in accordance with OECD 471 guidance and GLP.
In the first mutation assay, the test item was tested up to concentrations of 5000 µg/plate in the absence and presence of 5% (v/v) S9-mix. The test item precipitated on the plates at the top dose of 5000 μg/plate. Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants and a reduction in the bacterial background lawn, was observed in all tester strains in the absence and presence of S9-mix.
In the first mutation test, not enough non-toxic dose levels were present in all five tester strains, therefore an additional experiment was performed to complete the data of the first mutation experiment. In this additional mutation experiment,the test item was tested at a concentration range of 0.056 to 5.4 µg/plate in the absence of S9-mix and at a range of 0.18 to 5.4 µg/plate in the presence of S9-mix. The test item did not precipitate on the plates at this dose level. The bacterial background lawn was not reduced at any of the concentrations tested and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed.
In the second mutation assay, the test item was tested up to concentrations of 52 and 164 µg/plate (absence and presence of 10% (v/v) S9-mix, respectively) in the tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA100 and TA98, and up to 164 and 512 µg/plate (absence and presence of 10% (v/v) S9-mix, respectively) in tester strain WP2uvrA. The test item did not precipitate on the plates at these dose levels. Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, reduction of the bacterial background lawn and/or the presence of microcolonies, was observed in all tester strains in the absence and presence of S9-mix. The test item did not induce a significant dose-related increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in each of the four tester strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and in the number of revertant (Trp+) colonies in tester strain WP2uvrA both in the absence and presence of S9-metabolic activation in any experiment.
In this study, acceptable responses were obtained for the negative and strain-specific positive control items indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.
Based on the results of this study it is concluded that the test item is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
Reference
Table 1: Experiment 1- Mutagenic response in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay
Dose (µg/plate) |
Mean number of revertant colonies/3 replicate plates (± S.D.) with |
||||
|
|
TA98 |
TA100 |
WP2uvrA |
|
Without S-9 Mix |
|||||
Positive control |
967 ± 82 |
85 ± 79 |
1820 ± 203 |
783 ± 109 |
124 ± 33 |
Solvent control |
14 ± 5 |
13 ± 79 |
17 ± 3 |
117 ± 18 |
20 ± 9 |
5.4 |
11 ± 2 |
15 ± 79 |
15 ± 6 |
139 ± 8 |
22 ± 5 |
17 |
11 ± 3n |
8 ± 7n |
17 ± 5n |
114 ± 27n |
18 ± 8n |
52 |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
15 ± 4m |
164 |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
512 |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
1600 |
0 ± 0a NP |
0 ± 0a NP |
0 ± 0a NP |
0 ± 0a NP |
0 ± 0a NP |
5000 |
0 ± 0a SP |
0 ± 0a SP |
0 ± 0a SP |
0 ± 0a SP |
0 ± 0a SP |
With S-9 Mix |
|||||
Positive control |
144 ± 26 |
210 ± 12 |
693 ± 76 |
1337 ± 103 |
586 ± 44 |
Solvent control |
14 ± 6 |
12 ± 1 |
23 ± 7 |
108 ± 9 |
31 ± 5 |
5.4 |
12 ± 10 |
19 ± 0 |
27 ± 5 |
131 ± 11 |
29 ± 8 |
17 |
12 ± 1n |
11 ± 4n |
27 ± 7n |
116 ± 13n |
37 ± 4 |
52 |
5 ± 3m |
4 ± 3m |
20 ± 2m |
85 ± 3m |
31 ± 3n |
164 |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
18 ± 2m |
512 |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
0 ± 0a |
e MC a |
1600 |
0 ± 0a NP |
0 ± 0a NP |
0 ± 0a NP |
0 ± 0a NP |
0 ± 0a NP |
5000 |
0 ± 0a SP |
0 ± 0a SP |
0 ± 0a SP |
0 ± 0a SP |
0 ± 0a SP |
1preincubation assay (5 % S9)
MCmicrocolonies
NPno precipitate
SPslight precipitate
abacterial background lawn absent
ebacterial background lawn extremely reduced
mbacterial background lawn moderately reduced
nnormal bacterial lawn
Table 2: Experiment 1- Mutagenic response in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay (additional test)
Dose (µg/plate) |
Mean number of revertant colonies/3 replicate plates (± S.D.) with |
||||
|
|
TA98 |
TA100 |
WP2uvrA |
|
Without S-9 Mix |
|||||
Positive control |
109 6 ±79 |
97 ± 9 |
2088 ± 77 |
813 ± 23 |
231 ± 30 |
Solvent control |
10 ± 4 |
2 ± 4 |
15 ± 4 |
107 ± 10 |
25 ± 4 |
0.056 |
17 ± 10 |
8 ± 3 |
15 ± 3 |
100 ± 17 |
21 ± 4 |
0.18 |
14 ± 2 |
3 ± 2 |
15 ± 2 |
98 ± 4 |
17 ± 6 |
0.55 |
16 ± 3 |
7 ± 5 |
19 ± 10 |
109 ± 4 |
23 ± 3 |
1.7 |
16 ± 9 |
6 ± 4 |
16 ± 5 |
102 ± 27 |
24 ± 3 |
5.4 |
12 ± 2n NP |
3 ± 3n NP |
14 ± 2n NP |
97 ± 10n NP |
25 ± 1n NP |
With S-9 Mix |
|||||
Positive control |
127 ± 7 |
183 ± 17 |
737 ± 38 |
1696 ± 181 |
632 ± 33 |
Solvent control |
14 ± 4 |
6 ± 1 |
22 ± 4 |
116 ± 26 |
35 ± 2 |
0.18 |
12 ± 4 |
4 ± 1 |
22 ± 2 |
103 ± 21 |
37 ± 8 |
0.55 |
15 ± 4 |
8 ± 5 |
20 ± 6 |
106 ± 1 |
34 ± 5 |
1.7 |
10 ± 2 |
12 ± 6 |
24 ± 5 |
105 ± 17 |
34 ± 5 |
5.4 |
16 ± 8n NP |
7 ± 4n NP |
24 ± 9n NP |
107 ± 12n NP |
38 ± 4n NP |
1preincubation assay (5% S9)
NPno precipitate
nnormal bacterial background lawn
Table 3: Experiment 2- Mutagenic response in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay
Dose (µg/plate) |
Mean number of revertant colonies/3 replicate plates (± S.D.) with |
||||
|
|
TA98 |
TA100 |
WP2uvrA |
|
Without S-9 Mix |
|||||
Positive control |
837 ± 51 |
80 ± 15 |
1568 ± 44 |
663 ± 94 |
140 ± 45 |
Solvent control |
7 ± 2 |
4 ± 1 |
13 ± 3 |
93 ± 7 |
19 ± 9 |
0.17 |
5 ± 2 |
4 ± 1 |
11 ± 4 |
94 ± 8 |
|
0.55 |
8 ± 3 |
2 ± 2 |
14 ± 4 |
92 ± 10 |
18 ± 3 |
1.7 |
5 ± 3 |
5 ± 5 |
14 ± 6 |
87 ± 4 |
22 ± 7 |
5.4 |
5 ± 3 |
4 ± 1 |
9 ± 3 |
90 ± 6 |
19 ± 4 |
17 |
6 ± 2n |
4 ± 1n |
12 ± 4n |
89 ± 8n |
23 ± 9n |
52 |
e MC NP |
e MC NP |
0 ± 0a NP |
e MC NP |
11 ± 3m |
164 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 ± 0a NP |
With S-9 Mix |
|||||
Positive control |
71 ± 2 |
97 ± 8 |
335 ± 15 |
1432 ± 78 |
539 ± 33 |
Solvent control |
7 ± 6 |
5 ± 2 |
19 ± 8 |
81 ± 16 |
25 ± 4 |
0.17 |
8 ± 3 |
5 ± 0 |
20 ± 3 |
82 ± 8 |
|
0.55 |
9 ± 4 |
5 ± 1 |
16 ± 4 |
86 ± 11 |
32 ± 8 |
1.7 |
4 ± 1 |
5 ± 3 |
20 ± 5 |
91 ± 16 |
35 ± 13 |
5.4 |
5 ± 1 |
5 ± 2 |
23 ± 4 |
70 ± 7 |
33 ± 8 |
17 |
5 ± 3n |
8 ± 1 |
22 ± 2n |
75 ± 13n |
29 ± 1 |
52 |
e MC NP |
0 ± 0a NP |
e MC NP |
e MC NP |
30 ± 3n |
164 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
e MC NP |
1preincubation assay
MCmicrocolonies
NPno precipitate
abacterial background lawn absent
ebacterial background lawn extremely reduced
mbacterial background lawn moderately reduced
nnormal bacterial background lawn
- not tested
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
The mutagenic and cytotoxic potential of the test substance was determined in accordance with OECD 471 guidance and GLP.
In the first mutation assay, the test item was tested up to concentrations of 5000 µg/plate in the absence and presence of 5% (v/v) S9-mix. The test item precipitated on the plates at the top dose of 5000 μg/plate. Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants and a reduction in the bacterial background lawn, was observed in all tester strains in the absence and presence of S9-mix.
In the first mutation test, not enough non-toxic dose levels were present in all five tester strains, therefore anadditional experiment was performed to complete the data of the first mutation experiment. In this additional mutation experiment,the test itemwas testedat a concentration range of 0.056 to 5.4 µg/plate in the absence of S9-mix and at a range of 0.18 to 5.4 µg/plate in the presence of S9-mix. The test item did not precipitate on the plates at this dose level. The bacterial background lawn was not reduced at any of the concentrations tested and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed.
In the second mutation assay, the test item was tested up to concentrations of 52 and 164 µg/plate (absence and presence of 10% (v/v) S9-mix, respectively) in the tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA100 and TA98, and up to 164 and 512 µg/plate (absence and presence of 10% (v/v) S9-mix, respectively) in tester strain WP2uvrA. The test item did not precipitate on the plates at these dose levels. Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, reduction of the bacterial background lawn and/or the presence of microcolonies, was observed in all tester strains in the absence and presence of S9-mix. The test item did not induce a significant dose-related increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in each of the four tester strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and in the number of revertant (Trp+) colonies in tester strain WP2uvrA both in the absence and presence of S9-metabolic activation in any experiment.
In this study, acceptable responses were obtained for the negative and strain-specific positive control items indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.
Based on the results of this study it is concluded that the test item is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimuriumreverse mutation assay and in theEscherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
Justification for classification or non-classification
No classification criteria are met in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.