Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-157-5 | CAS number: 103-90-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other:
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other:
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Toxicology Study Of Acetaminophen In F344/N Rats (Feed Studies)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material:Acetaminophen was obtained from S.B. Penick & Company in two lots.Lot number 7042-LAR-5 was used.
- Purity :greater than 99%
RADIOLABELLING INFORMATION (Not applicable)
- Radiochemical purity: N/A
- Specific activity:N/A
- Locations of the label:N/A
- Expiration date of radiochemical substance:N/A
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material:Throughout the studies, the bulk chemical was stored in sealed containers protected from light at 25 degC.
- Stability under test conditions:Stability studies performed with HPLC found that acetaminophen was stable as a bulk chemical when stored protected from light for 2 weeks at tempera- tures up to 60degC. Stability of the bulk chemical was monitored by the study laboratory using infrared and ultraviolet spectroscopies. No changein the study material was detected. - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Fischer 344
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories (Kingston, NY)
- Age at study initiation:Rats: 7-8 weeks old
- Housing:The rats were housed five per cage
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):NIH-07 Rat and Mouse Ration, powdere (Zeigler Bros., Inc., Gardners, PA); available ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):Tap water (City of Worcester Public Water Supply) via outside-the-cage automatic watering system (Edstrom Industries, Waterford, WI) available ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 19days
- Method ofAnimal Distribution: Animals distributed to weight classes and then assigned to test and control groupsso that all cage weights were equal for each sexand species.
- Animals per Cage: 5
- Method of Animal Identification: Ear punch
Bedding: AspenBed heat-treated hardwood chips (American ExcelsiorCo., Baltimore, MD); changed twice weekly
Cage Filters: Nonwoven fiber filters (Snow Filtration, Cincinnati, OH)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):21.6°-27.2° C
- Humidity (%):34%-73%
- Air changes (per hr): 12-15/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12hours/day
IN-LIFE DATES: From:23 February 1981 To:8 March 1981 - Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- other: diet
- Details on oral exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency):once
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food):The dose formulations were prepared by mixing appropriate quantities of acetaminophen with feed in a blender. Dose formulations were prepared once for the 14-day studies.
- Storage temperature of food: 25 degC. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Studies were conducted by the analytical chemistry laboratory to determine homogeneity and stability of the dosed feed preparations. For homogeneity analyses, the formulations were extracted with methanol and the concentrations determined by an ultraviolet method at 247 nm. For the stability studies, the formulations were extracted using a methanol/acetic acid (95/5) solution and then injected into a HPLC system equipped with a µBondapak C18 column and a 254 nm detector. The mobile phase was methanol:water (24:76) with a flow rate of 1mL/minute.
Acetaminophen at the 20,000 ppm dose level mixed in rodent feed (NIH-07 Rat and Mouse Ration) produced a homogeneous blend and was found to be stable when stored protected from light in sealed containers at temperatures up to 25 degC. There was a 4% loss of chemical in feed stored 2 weeks at 45 degC.
Periodic analyses of the dose formulations of acetaminophen were conducted at the study laboratory and at the analytical chemistry laboratory using ultraviolet spectroscopy. For the 14day studies, dose formulations were analyzed prior to study initiation. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 14 Days
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 ppm
- Remarks:
- 0 mg/kgbw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 800 ppm
- Remarks:
- 80 mg/kgbw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 600 ppm
- Remarks:
- 160 mg/kgbw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 3 100 ppm
- Remarks:
- 310 mg/kgbw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 6 200 ppm
- Remarks:
- 620 mg/kgbw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 12 500 ppm
- Remarks:
- 1250 mg/kgbw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Control: 5 males and 5 females
80mg/kg: 5 males and 5 females
160mg/kg: 5 males and 5 females
310mg/kg: 5 males and 5 females
620mg/kg: 5 males and 5 females
1250mg/kg: 5 males and 5 females - Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule:clinical findings noted during the daily checks were recorded.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations:The animals were weighed at study initiation and on days 7 and 14.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Feed consumption was measured weekly.
FOOD EFFICIENCY:No data
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data
- Time schedule for examinations:
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No data
- Time schedule for examinations: No data
- Dose groups that were examined: No data
HAEMATOLOGY: No data
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: No data
- Time schedule for collection of blood:
- Animals fasted: Yes / No / No data
- How many animals:
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined.
URINALYSIS: No data
- Time schedule for collection of urine:
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: Yes / No / No data
- Animals fasted: Yes / No / No data
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined.
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No data
- Time schedule for examinations:
- Dose groups that were examined:
- Battery of functions tested: sensory activity / grip strength / motor activity / other: - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
Necropsy were performed on all animals.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: No - Statistics:
- Survival Analyses:
The probability of survival was estimated by the product-limit procedure of Kaplan and Meier (1958) and is presented in the form of graphS. Animals were censored from the survival analyses at the time they were found dead from other than natural causes. Animals dying from natural causes were not censored.Statistical analysis for a possible dose-related effect on survival used the method of Cox (1972) for testing two groups for equality and Tarone's (1975) life table
test to identify dose-related trends. All reported P values for the survival analysis are two sided. - Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- All rats survived to the end of the studies.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The final mean body weight of male rats receiving 1250 mg/kg bw/day acetaminophen was 20% lower than the mean final body weight of controls.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The average feed consumption by male and female rats receiving 1250 mg/kg bw/day was lower than that of controls.
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No compound-related lesions were found at necropsy and no histopathology was performed.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEL
- Effect level:
- 12 500 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: effects on food consumption,body weight
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The Lowest Observed Effect Level (LOEL) of Acetaminophen (Paracetamol) on rats by the oral route was observed at a dose concentration of 12500 ppm (1250 mg/kg bw) in a 14 days study period.
- Executive summary:
- The toxic effects of acetaminophen (paracetamol) were examined in a 14-day feed study in F344rats. Rats were fed diets containing 0, 800, 1,600, 3,100, 6,200, or 12,500 ppm acetaminophen.Different parameters like clinical effects,mortality,body weights,feed consumption and gross pathology were analyezed. All rats survived to the end of the studies . The final mean body weight of male rats receiving 1250 mg/kg acetaminophen was 20% lower than the mean final body weight of controls. The average feed consumption by male and female rats receiving 1250 mg/kg was lower than that of controls. No compound-related lesions were found at necropsy and no histopathology was performed.Thus from above findings we can conclude that the Lowest Observed Effect Level (LOEL) of Acetaminophen (Paracetamol) on rats by the oral route was observed at a dose concentration of 12500 ppm (1250 mg/kg bw) in a 14 days study period.
Reference
|
** Significantly different (PSO.01) from the control group by Dunn's or Shirley's test
a Number suMng/number initially in group
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- 1 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- The data is K2 level
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: inhalation
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Justification for type of information:
- QSAR prediction: migrated from IUCLID 5.6
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Estimated data
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Prediction is done using QSAR Toolbox version 3.1
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Type of inhalation exposure:
- whole body
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 28 days
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Effect level:
- 66.208 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No effects was observed.
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The subchronic repeated dose toxicity NOAEC ( No observed adverse effect concentration) of Paracetamol to Wistar rats by inhalation route was observed at a dose concentration of 66.208 mg/m³ air in a 28 days study period.Thus it is concluded that the test substance Paracetamol is non toxic by repeated dose exposure within the concentration level mentioned.
- Executive summary:
The subchronic repeated dose toxicity NOAEC ( No observed adverse effect concentration) of Paracetamol to Wistar rats by inhalation route was observed at a dose concentration of 66.208 mg/m³ air in a 28 days study period.Thus it is concluded that the test substance Paracetamol is non toxic by repeated dose exposure within the concentration level mentioned.
Reference
The prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following descriptors: NOAEC
Estimation method: Takes average value from the 5 nearest neighbours
Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain
(("a" or "b" or "c" or "d" or "e" or "f" ) and ("g" and "h" ) )
Domain logical expression index: "a"
Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Phenols (Acute toxicity) by US-EPA New Chemical Categories
Domain logical expression index: "b"
Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Aryl AND Carboxamide AND Phenol AND Precursors quinoid compounds by Organic functional groups
Domain logical expression index: "c"
Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Carboxamide AND Overlapping groups AND Precursors quinoid compounds by Organic functional groups (nested)
Domain logical expression index: "d"
Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Alcohol, olefinic attach [-OH] AND Aliphatic Carbon [CH] AND Aliphatic Carbon [-CH2-] AND Aliphatic Carbon [-CH3] AND Aliphatic Nitrogen, one aromatic attach [-N] AND Amide, aliphatic attach [-C(=O)N] AND Aromatic Carbon [C] AND Carbonyl, aliphatic attach [-C(=O)-] AND Hydroxy, aromatic attach [-OH] AND Miscellaneous sulfide (=S) or oxide (=O) AND Nitrogen, two or tree olefinic attach [>N-] AND Olefinic carbon [=CH- or =C<] AND Oxygen, one aromatic attach [-O-] by Organic functional groups (US EPA)
Domain logical expression index: "e"
Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Aromatic compound AND Carbonic acid derivative AND Carboxylic acid amide AND Carboxylic acid derivative AND Carboxylic acid sec. amide AND Hydroxy compound AND Phenol by Organic functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol)
Domain logical expression index: "f"
Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Group 14 - Carbon C AND Group 15 - Nitrogen N AND Group 16 - Oxygen O by Chemical elements
Domain logical expression index: "g"
Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= -2.36
Domain logical expression index: "h"
Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= 2.68
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- 66.208 mg/m³
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- The data is K2 level as the data has been obtained from the QSAR model considered by OECD.
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity: dermal
- Data waiving:
- exposure considerations
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Repeated dose toxicity (Oral)
For Repeated dose toxicity
Based on the various studies available with Klimish rating 2 for the target as well as read across substances for CAS: 103-90-2. The results are summarized as follows
As describe by A. A. Oyagbemi, et.al (Toxicologist.216,2009) test was conducted on wister rats for the duration of 10days and Toxicologist.216,2009 repeated dose toxicity LOEL value of Paracetamol to rats by the oral route was observed at a dose concentration of 3000mg/kg bw .
In summary, the results obtained in this study show that lower dosages (100mg/kg and 500mg/kg) of Cnidoscolus aconitifolius may potentiate the toxicity associated with Paracetamol overdose while high dosage (1000mg/kg body weight) of the extract showed promising hepato-protective effect against hepatic damage induced by Paracetamol poisoning.
Another study reported by National Toxicology Program Technical Report Series No. 394 reported the LOEL (low observed effect level ) of Acetaminophen (Paracetamol) at a dose concentration of 1250g/kg bw/day calculated as :1250mg/kg diet) in a 14 days study period. Similar study report the The LOEL (low observed effect level) of Acetaminophen to mouse by the oral route was observed at a dose concentration of 25000 ppm-4166.6mg/kg bw(calculated as : 4166.6 mg/kg bw/day) in a 13 weeks study period.
According the study presented by Mohamed H. et.al (Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 305,123,2003) the subchronic repeated dose toxicity TDLo (Lowest published toxic dose) of Paracetamol to rats by the oral route was observed at a dose concentration of 500 mg/kg bw/day in a 30 days study period where the dosage of paracetamol was given continuously. This indicates that paracetamol does not exhibit any toxic effects to rat by the oral route below the above mentioned dose level.
Based on the studies summarized in the above table with repeated dose oral routes it can be observed that LOEL values varies from 1250 - 3000 mg/Kg bw/ d. Also the published lowest toxic dose value (TDLo value) is 500 mg/kg bw/d. The effects observed on the these doses was listed as follows
· Liver - hepatitis (hepatocellular necrosis),significant reduction in ALP, TP, ALB, TC and HDL
· Change in hematology, body weights, microscopic (hepatocellular hypertrophy) liver changes associated.
· effect on food consumption, body weight, organ weight were observed
· Kidney/Ureter/Bladder - renal function tests depressed
. BIOCHEMICAL: Metabolism (intermediary) changes were observed Thus based on above discussion it can be concluded that substance CAS: 103-90-2 has low effect dose value (LOAEL) as >1250 mg/Kg bw/d. Thus based on this value it can be concluded that substance CAS: 103-90-2 is considered to be not toxic to repeated dose via oral route for the above mentioned dose. Also there are no known evidence of adverse effect to Human of CAS: 103-90-2 and also mechanistic trigger does not indicate the toxicity of paracetamol.Repeated dose toxcity :Inhalation
The subchronic repeated dose toxicity NOAEC ( No observed adverse effect concentration) of Paracetamol to Wistar rats by inhalation route was observed at a dose concentration of 66.208 mg/kg air in a 28 days study period.Thus it is concluded that the test substance Paracetamol is non toxic by repeated dose exposure within the concentration level mentioned.
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal
Toxicity testing by the dermal route was considered for waiver due to the following exposure considerations; the physicochemical and toxicological properties of paracetamol do not suggest potential for a significant rate of absorption through the skin. In addition, for paracetamol, the most likely route of exposure is oral considering its use. Considering that paracetamol is a solid, the other potential route of exposure could be inhalation, given the exposure to the fine particles. Thus considering the exposure scenario of paracetamol; this end point was considered for waiver.
Justification for selection of repeated dose toxicity via oral route - systemic effects endpoint:
The LOEL (low observed effect level ) of Acetaminophen (Paracetamol) to rat by the oral route was observed at a dose concentration of 12500 ppm(calculated as :1250mg/kg diet) in a 14 days study period.
Justification for selection of repeated dose toxicity inhalation - systemic effects endpoint:
The subchronic repeated dose toxicity NOAEC ( No observed adverse effect concentration) of Paracetamol to Wistar rats by inhalation route was observed at a dose concentration of 66.208 mg/m³ air in a 28 days study period.Thus it is concluded that the test substance Paracetamol is non toxic by repeated dose exposure within the concentration level mentioned.
Justification for selection of repeated dose toxicity dermal - systemic effects endpoint:
Toxicity testing by the dermal route was considered for waiver due to the following exposure considerations; the physicochemical and toxicological properties of paracetamol do not suggest potential for a significant rate of absorption through the skin. In addition, for paracetamol, the most likely route of exposure is oral considering its use. Considering that paracetamol is a solid, the other potential route of exposure could be inhalation, given the exposure to the fine particles. Thus considering the exposure scenario of paracetamol; this end point was considered for waiver.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The substance Paracetamol do not show repeated dose toxicity effect for oral and inhalation route and thus will not be considered for further classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.