Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Biodegradation in water: screening tests

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1999-03-23 to 1999-04-21
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.4-C (Determination of the "Ready" Biodegradability - Carbon Dioxide Evolution Test)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Oxygen conditions:
aerobic
Inoculum or test system:
activated sludge, domestic, non-adapted
Details on inoculum:
- Source of inoculum/activated sludge: A sample of activated sludge was taken on 1999-03-03 from an oxidation ditch in the municipality of Berkel en Rodenrijs, the Netherlands.

- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: The sludge suspension and the water used to prepare the medium were each aerated with CO2-free air overnight before use.

- Concentration of sludge: 30mg/L

Duration of test (contact time):
28 d
Initial conc.:
47 mg/L
Based on:
test mat.
Initial conc.:
20 other: mg carbon per litre
Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
CO2 evolution
Details on study design:
TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: A medium with a higher nitrogen content than that specified in the guideline was used, in order to prevent nutrient limitation during the course of the degradation study.

- Test temperature: 20 ± 2°C

- Aeration of dilution water: yes

TEST SYSTEM

- Culturing apparatus: Two-litre glass bottles closed with plastic screw caps. A 20 mL glass vial containing the CO2 absorbing fluid (5 mL of 0.4M NaOH solution) was suspended from the screw cap of each bottle.

- Number of culture flasks/concentration: Three

- Details of trap for CO2 and volatile organics if used: 5 mL of 0.4M NaOH solution


SAMPLING

- Sampling frequency: The carbon dioxide traps were removed and replaced on the following test days: 1, 3, 6, 10, 14, 17, 21, and 28

- Sampling method: CO2 absorbed was determined by titration of the sodium hydroxide with 0.1M HCl using a Metrohm 686 Titroprocessor

CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM

- Inoculum blank: Yes, reference substance sodium acetate

- Abiotic sterile control: Yes

- Toxicity control: Yes, reference substance sodium acetate

STATISTICAL METHODS:
The mineralisation data (% degradation) were fitted to various production equations using non-linear regression.
Reference substance:
acetic acid, sodium salt
Key result
Parameter:
% degradation (CO2 evolution)
Value:
50
Sampling time:
28 d
Details on results:
Reference substance:
Toxicity control indicated no inhibition

Table 1: CO2 evolved (mg/L) and calculated % biodegradation for inoculum blank, test substance, reference substance and toxicity control

Type of suspension

1d

3d

6d

10d

14d

17d

21d

28d

CO2evolved (mg/l)

(%) biodeg

CO2evolved (mg/l)

 (%) biodeg

CO2evolved (mg/l)

(%) biodeg

CO2evolved (mg/l)

(%) biodeg

CO2evolved (mg/l)

(%) biodeg

CO2evolved (mg/l)

(%) biodeg

CO2evolved (mg/l)

(%) biodeg

CO2evolved (mg/l)

(%) biodeg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inoculum Blank (mean of three replicates)

1.7

-

4.5

-

9.0

-

13.4

-

16.2

-

17.7

-

19.2

-

20.9

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Test substance (mean of three replicates)

4.3

6

12.1

17

23.4

32

29.2

40

32.6

45

33.5

46

34.7

47

35.9

(36.7 including CO­2in the medium released by acidification)

49

(50)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reference substance

(mean of two replicates)

4.4

6

20.1

28

36.5

50

45.9

63

51.8

(56.9 including CO­2in the medium released by acidification)

71

(78)

54.2

74

56.3

77

58.9

(62.6 including CO­2in the medium released by acidification)

81

(86)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Toxicity control

(mean of two replicates)

6.8

5

30.4

21

55.9

38

71.3

49

81.3

56

84.8

58

88.3

60

92.7

(96.6 including CO­2in the medium released by acidification)

63

(66)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Interpretation of results:
not readily biodegradable
Conclusions:
Biodegradation of 50% in 28 days (CO2 evolution) was determined in a reliable study according to an appropriate test protocol and in compliance with GLP.

Description of key information

Biodegradation in water: screening tests: 50% in 28 days (OECD Method 301B (CO2 evolution, modified Sturm test)). The silanol hydrolysis products, [3-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)propyl]silanetriol and vinylsilanetriol, are not expected to biodegrade to any significant extent.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Biodegradation in water:
under test conditions no biodegradation observed

Additional information

A reliable biodegradation study is available with the registration substance and is selected as the key study. The study was conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 301B, and gives a biodegradation result of 50% degradation in 28 days.

The constituents of the registration substance hydrolyse rapidly (half-life <12 hours at pH 7 and 25°C) to [3-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)propyl]silanetriol, vinylsilanetriol, acetic acid/acetates and methanol. The biodegradation observed in the studies is attributable to the biodegradation of acetic acid and methanol, which are readily biodegradable. Neither [3-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)propyl]silanetriol nor vinylsilanetriol are expected to biodegrade to any significant extent.