Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2012-10-18 to 2012-11-28
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: method by Stern et al.
Version / remarks:
M. Stern, M. Klausner, R. Alvarado, K. Renskers, M. Dickens (1998). Evaluation of the EpiOcular Tissue Model as an Alternative to the Draize Eye Irritation Test. Toxicology In Vitro 12, 455-461.
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: protocol of the supplier of the tissue models
Version / remarks:
MatTek Corporation, 200 Homer Avenue, Ashland MA 01721 (2001). Ocular Irritation Protocol: Neat Method (MTT ET-50) For Use with EpiOcular Tissue Model (OCL-200). Rev. 1/1/01, 1-6.
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 492 (Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) Test Method for Identifying Chemicals Not Requiring Classification and Labelling for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
carbon
EC Number:
701-026-1
Cas Number:
7440-44-0
Molecular formula:
C up to (C80N5H16O)n
IUPAC Name:
carbon
Test material form:
solid: fibres
Details on test material:
- milled carbonised PAN based fibre (Sigrafil C30 M150 UNS)
- for further details on the test material, see section 1.4, endpoint "Non-graphitic carbon fibre (carbonised PAN based fibre, milled)", attached document "Analytics_milled_carbonised_PAN_based_fibre.pdf"

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
other: corneal model consisting of human-derived epidermal keratinocytes
Strain:
other: not applicable

Test system

Vehicle:
water
Amount / concentration applied:
approximately 200 mg of the test substance in a 1:1 mixture with water
Duration of treatment / exposure:
test item: 3 min, 30 min, 60 min
negative control: 60 min
positive control: 4 min, 15 min, 45 min
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
not applicable
Details on study design:
see description in "any other information on materials and methods inc. tables"

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation parameter:
other: irritation class according to Stern et al.
Remarks:
- irritation class is derived from the ET50 value (effective time of exposure to reduce tissue viability to 50%) of the test item - the ET50 is determined in human-derived EpiOcularTM corneal tissue models via a colorimetric viability test (MTT assay)
Run / experiment:
- the ET50 is calculated from the optical density (OD) as the percentage of viability referred to the negative control (= 100%) - the OD is measured during the MTT viability test (MTT = 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide)
Value:
> 60
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks:
- the ET50 value of > 60 min corresponds to a classification as non/minimally irritant according to Stern et al.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 2: Individual values of the optical density (OD) being corrected about the blank as well as the means and percentages of the tissue viability calculated from these and derived ET50 values.

test substance

exposure time

[min]

tissue

n

optical density minus Ø Blank = 0,031

viability

[% NC]

ET50

[min]

aliquot 1

aliquot 2

aliquot 3

Ø

Ø tissue

negative control

60

1

2

3

1,688

1,725

1,739

1,642

1,735

1,650

1,708

1,730

1,698

1,680

1,730

1,696

 

1,702

 

100

 

MILLED CARBONISED PAN BASED FIBRE; SIGRAFIL C30 M150 UNS

3

 

30

 

60

1

2

1

2

1

2

1,624

1,580

1,596

1,377

1,696

1,650

1,667

1,542

1,609

1,347

1,628

1,584

1,678

1,628

1,648

1,364

1,689

1,614

1,657

1,584

1,618

1,363

1,671

1,616

1,620

 

1,491

 

1,644

95

 

88

 

97

 > 60

positive control

4

15

45

1

1

1

1,799

1,017

0,314

1,791

1,006

0,304

1,788

1,018

0,315

1,793

1,014

0,311

 

105

60

18

 approx. 19

NC = negative control, OD = optical density, Ø = mean

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Because no deviations from the study protocol are reported and the study was performed according to the Principles of Good Laboratory Practice it is regarded as valid. The only slight decrease in tissue viability after exposition to the test item (milled carbonised PAN based fibre) and the determined ET50 value of > 60 minutes indicates at most a minimal irritation potential of the test item. Based on these results the test item shall be categorised as non/minimally irritant.
Executive summary:

The eye irritant potential of the test item (milled carbonised PAN based fibre) was investigated according to the methods by STERN et al. (1998)1 and the protocol2 of the tissue models supplier, the MatTek Corporation. Approximately 200 mg of a 1:1 mixture of the test item and water was applied to human, three-dimensional corneal models EpiOcularTM. The reference items (negative control = water; positive control = 0,3% Triton X-100) were applied in amounts of 100 µL each. After the termination of the 3, 30, and 60-minute exposure period the test item was removed from the tissue surface by rinsing with phosphate buffer saline (DPBS), the tissues were submerged into medium for 10 minutes and then the cell viability was determined using the MTT assay. The exposition periods for the reference items were 4, 14 and 45 minutes for the positive control as well as 60 minutes for the negative control. Based on the obtained exposure time-related viability curve the time of exposure needed for the test item to reduce the viability of the treated tissue to 50% of control tissues (ET50) was determined. Based on the exposure time-related viability curve as result of the MTT assay the ET50 value of the test item was determined to be above 60 minutes. The positive control responded with a decrease of the tissue viability depending on the exposure time and meeting the expectations. The determined ET50 value was approx. 19 minutes and showed a moderate irritant effect of the positive control.

Under the experimental conditions described and based on the obtained results the test item shall be categorised as non/minimally irritant.

References

1) M. Stern, M. Klausner, R. Alvarado. K. Renskers, M. Dickens (1998). Evaluation of the EpiOcular(TM) Tissue Model as an Alternative to the Draize Eye Irritation Test. Toxicology In Vitro 12, 455 -461.

2) MatTek Corporation, 200 Homer Avenue, Ashland MA 01721 (2001). Ocular Irritation Protocol: Neat Method (MTT ET-50) For Use with EpiOcular Tissue Model (OCL-200). Rev. 1/1/01, 1-6.