Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 259-515-6 | CAS number: 55184-72-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Oral acute toxicity was tested according to OECD 401 method in rats and mice, leading to a LD50 of
>7000 mg act.ingr./kg bw. Dermal acute toxicity was tested according to OECD 402 method in male
rabbits, demonstrating a LD50 of >3500 mg act.ingr./kg bw. Acute inhalation toxicity was waived based
upon the fact that acute inhalation exposure as such is very unlikely for sulfosuccinates due to their
substance properties.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1968
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted non-GLP, with limited data on study design, however the study was conducted according to state of the art methods at that time period. The study is considered adequate, reliable and relevant.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Fasting period before study:24 hours - Route of administration:
- oral: unspecified
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on oral exposure:
- Animals fasted for 24 hours were dosed with the product as received.
- Doses:
- 10.0 mL/kg, 5.0 mL/kg, 2.5 mL/kg and 1.25 mL/kg
Taking into account a 70% active ingredient purity, dose levels correspond with 7000, 3500, 1750 and 875 mg act. ingr./kg bw. - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 (male rats in 4 dose groups)
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Observations: daily; Frequency of weighing: initially and terminally
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: signs of intoxication, mean body weight - Sex:
- male
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 10 mL/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- =70% aqueous solution
- Sex:
- male
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 7 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Mortality:
- No
- Clinical signs:
- other: other: No
- Gross pathology:
- Normal
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The acute oral LD50 of the test item Butanedioic acid, sulfo-, 1,4-ditridecyl ester, sodium salt (70% active ingredient) in male rats was greater than 10 mL/kg bw or 7000 mg active ingredient/kg bw.
This test item is considered to be practically non-toxic by ingestion in single doses. - Executive summary:
Wistar rats fasted for 24 hours were dosed with Butanedioic acid, sulfo,- 1,4 -ditridecyl ester, sodium salt (70% active ingredient) at dosages of 10.0 mL/kg, 5.0 mL/kg, 2.5 mL/kg and 1.25 mL/kg. There were no mortalities. There were no signs of intoxication observed and gross autopsy was normal. The oral LD50 of the test item was greater than 10 mL/kg bw or 7000 mg active ingredient/kg bw.
Reference
Table 1. Single oral dose, male albino rats (MR Wistar) LD50> 10 ml/kg
Dosage Ml/kg |
Onset of (S) Signs, (D) Death, Hours and Days |
Died/ Dosed |
Mean Wt. |
Time of (R)Recovery, Days |
||||||||||||||||
0-6 |
6-24 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8-14 |
I |
T |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7-14 |
|||
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0/5 |
162 |
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
0/5 |
138 |
237 |
|||||||||||||||||
2.5 |
0/5 |
139 |
240 |
|||||||||||||||||
1.25 |
0/5 |
137 |
241 |
|||||||||||||||||
Signs of intoxication: None observed
Gross autopsy: Normal
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 3 500 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Klimisch 2
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Data waiving:
- other justification
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1968
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted non-GLP, with limited data on study design, however the study was conducted according to state of the art methods at that time period. The study is considered adequate, reliable and relevant.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: albino
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Not provided
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on dermal exposure:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: Not provided
- % coverage: Not provided
- Type of wrap if used: an impervious cuff
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Not provided
- Time after start of exposure: 24h
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 5.0 ml/kg and 2.5 ml/kg
- Concentration (if solution): 70% active ingredient - Duration of exposure:
- 24 hours
- Doses:
- 5.0 mL/kg and 2.5 mL/kg corresponding with 3500 and 1750 mg active ingredient/kg bw.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 males per dose, 2 dosages
- Control animals:
- no
- Sex:
- male
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 5 mL/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- =70% aqueous solution
- Sex:
- male
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 3 500 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Mortality:
- No
- Clinical signs:
- other: other: Diarrhea in 2 animals of the 5.0 mL/kg dose group 6-24 hours after application. The animals recovered day 2 after application. Mild to moderate erythema. Product formed waxy film where applied.
- Gross pathology:
- Normal
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The acute dermal LD50 of the test item, Butanedioic acid, 1,4-ditridecyl ester, sodium salt ( 70% active ingredient) in male rabbits was > 5 mL/kg bw, corresponding to > 3500 mg active ingredient/kg bw. The test item is considered to be practically non-toxic by single skin applications.
- Executive summary:
2 Groups of 5 male albino rabbits underwent a covered application in continuous 24-hour contact with the shaved skin with the test item Butanedioic acid, sulfo-, 1,4 -ditridecyl ester, sodium salt (70% active ingredient) at dosages of 5.0 mL/kg and 2.5 mL/kg, corresponding to 3500 and 1750 mg active ingredient/kg bw. There were no mortalities. There were 2 animals with diarrhea but gross autopsy was normal. The oral LD50 of the test item was > 5 mL/kg bw or > 3500 mg active ingredient/kg bw. This test item is considered to be practically non-toxic by single skin applications.
Reference
Table1. Single dermal dose, male albino rabbits, LD50> 5mL/kg
Dosage mL/kg |
Onset of (S) Signs, (D) Death, Hours and Days |
Died/ Dosed |
Mean Wt. |
Time of (R)Recovery, Days |
||||||||||||||||
0-6 |
6-24 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8-14 |
I |
T |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7-14 |
|||
5.0 |
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0/5 |
3.03 |
3.14 |
|
R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0/5 |
3.32 |
3.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LD50 Greater than 5 mL/kg
Signs of Intoxication: Diarrhea in 2 animals.
Skin irritation: Mild to moderate erythema. Product formed waxy film where applied.
Gross autopsy: Normal.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 3 500 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Klimisch 2
Additional information
Acute oral toxicity
- A key study for acute oral toxicity was performed wiht the registered substance in male and female Wistar rats with a test item containing 70% active ingredient at 10, 5, 2.5 and 1.25 mL/kg bw, corresponding to 7000, 3500, 1750 and 875 mg act.ingr./kg bw (American Cyanamid Company, 1968a). There were no mortalities. There were no signs of intoxication observed and gross autopsy was normal. The oral LD50 was >10 mL/kg bw or >7000 mg act.ingr./kg bw.
- Support studies were further available in rats and mice:
a. A test item containing 10% aqueous solution or dispersion in male albino rats dosed at 5 g test item/kg bw and followed for 7 days showed an LD50 > 3500 mg act. ingr./kg bw (Levinskas and Shaffer, 1961).
b. A test item administered as a 50% dispersion in oil in male mice dosed at 15, 17.5, 20 and 25 g test item/kg bw corresponding with 10500, 12250, 14000 and 17500 mg act. ingr./kg and followed for 10 days showed an LD50 of 14525 mg act. ingr./kg bw (Hazleton, 1950).
c.A test item administered as a 50% dispersion in oil in male mice dosed at 10.5, 15, 20 and 25 g test item/kg bw corresponding with 7000, 10500, 14000 and 17500 mg act. ingr./kg and followed for 7 days showed an LD50 of 11200 mg act. ingr./kg bw (Hazleton, 1951a).
- In conclusion, there was no acute oral toxicity hazard as the LD50 was consistently >2000 mg/kg bw. The LD50 >3500 mg/kg bw of the key study was selected as the most conservative value.
Acute dermal toxicity
- A key study for acute dermal toxicity (American Cyanamid Company, 1968b) was performed in male albino rabbits with the registered test substance containing 70% active ingredient at 5 and 2.5 mL/kg bw, corresponding to 3500 and 1750 mg act.ingr./kg bw. There were no mortalities. There were 2 animals with diarrhea but gross autopsy was normal. The LD50 was >5 mL test item/kg bw or >3500 mg act.ingr./kg bw.
- Further, there was a disregarded study with a test item administered as 1 cc test item/kg bw corresponding with 500 mg test item/kg bw or 350 mg act. ingr./kg bw and followed for 11 days (Hazleton, 1951b). As the volume was too low, the study was not considered adequate and relevant. Further, one animal died during the study, however relation to test item was not expected in comparison with other study, therefore the study was not considered to be reliable.
Acute inhalation toxicity
Intoxication due to acute inhalation exposure of industrial workers or even the acute inhalation exposure as such is very unlikely for sulfosuccinates due to large particle size, low vapour pressure and high hydrophilic properties of the substance. Based on these and other physicochemical properties, the inhalation and dermal route are not appropriate, and the default oral route of administration is most appropriate (ECHA R7a Guidance p 342). Additional inhalation testing would therefore neither lead to a better risk assessment, nor improve the safety of applications. On the basis of the argumentation summarized above an acute inhalation toxicity is waived.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint Key study
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint Key study
Justification for classification or non-classification
As LD50 values were above limit dose of 2000 mg/kg bw for oral and dermal application, the test item containing 70% active ingredient does not need to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for acute oral and dermal toxicity according to the EC Directive (No.93/21/EEC) and CLP (No. 1272/2008 of 16 December 2008).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
