Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 295-033-2 | CAS number: 91782-61-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute oral toxicity:
LD50=310 mg/kg
Acute toxicity, dermal:
Conduct of an acute dermal toxicity study is unjustified since dermal uptake is considered negligible (cf. Annex VIII section 8.5 Column 2 of regulation (EC) 1907/2006).
Acute toxicity, inhalation:
The classification from the acute oral toxicity is read-across to the acute toxicity via inhalation. Further results from the ongoing testing programme will be included upon availability.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012-12-13 to 2013-01-15
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 425 (Acute Oral Toxicity: Up-and-Down Procedure)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test type:
- up-and-down procedure
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories, Inc.
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 11 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 171 - 211 grams
- Fasting period before study: prior to each dosing, experimentally naive rats were fasted overnight. Feed was replaced approximately 3-4 hours after dosing.
- Housing: the animals were singly housed in suspended stainless steal caging with mesh floors, which conform to the size recommendations in the most recent Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Natl. Res. Council, 2011).
- Diet (ad libitum, except during fasting): Harlan Teklad Global 16% Protein Rodent Diet® #2016
- Water (ad libitum): filtered tap water
- Acclimation period: 6 -27 days
Enrichment (e.g. toy) was placed in each cage.
during the fasting period, the rats were examined for health and weighed (initial).
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 19-23°C
- Relative humidity: 19-49%; the humidity was below the targeted lower limit for 3 days during the study. A portable humidifier was used to raise the humidity levels during this time.
- Air changes: 14/per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on oral exposure:
- DOSAGE PREPARATION:
Prior to use, the test substance was ground in a coffee mill (Cuisinart, Model #DCG-20N). The ground sample was administered as a 40% w/w mixture in distilled water. A tissue homogenizer (Tissue tearor, Biospec, model 985370) was used to facilitate the preparation ofa homogeneous mixture. Preliminary solubility testing conducted by the laboratory, indicated that mixtures in excess of 40 (i.e., 45 - 80%) were too viscous to be administered properly.
MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED:
Individual doses were calculated based on the initial body weights, taking into account the density (1.003 g/mL; determined by the laboratory) and concentration of the test mixture.
PROCEDURE:
Initially, a single animal received a limit dose of 5,000 mg/kg. Due to mortality of this animal, a Main Test was conducted. For the Main Test, the test substance was administered in sequence to the animals (please refer to "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables"). The decision to proceed with the next animal was based on the survival of the previous animal following dosing. Dose progressions and stopping criteria were determined using the statistical program The Acute Oral Toxicity (Guideline 425) Statistical Program (Westat, version 1.0, May 2001). - Doses:
- 55, 175, 550, 1750 and 5000 mg/kg
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 9 female rats
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: individual body weights of the animals were recorded prior to test substance administration (initial) and again on Days 7 and 14 (termination) following dosing or after death. The animals were observed for mortality, sings of gross toxicity, and behavioural changes during the first several hours post-dosing and at least once daily thereafter for 14 days after dosing or until death occurred.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
Surviving rats were euthanized via CO2 inhalation at the end of the 14-day observation period. Gross necropsies were performed on all decedents and euthanized animals. Tissues and organs of the thoracic and abdominal cavities were examined. - Statistics:
- The Acute Oral Toxicity (Guideline 425) Statistical Program (Westat, version 1.0, May 2001) was used for all data analyses including: dose progression selections, stopping criteria determinations and/or LD50 and confidence limit calculations.
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 310.2 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: LD50 based on maximum likelihood, & on assumed sigma of 0.5. Approx. 95% profile-likelihood based confidence interval of 0 mg/kg to > 20000 mg/kg & an approx. 90% profile-likelihood based confidence interval of 38.02 mg/kg to > 2530 mg/kg.
- Mortality:
- - 55 mg/kg dose level (1 animal):
This animal survived test substance administration.
- 175 mg/kg dose level (3 animals):
One animal was found dead within 3 hours of test substance administration.
- 550 mg/kg dose level (3 animals):
Two animals were found dead within 2.5 hours of test substance administration.
- 1750 mg/kg dose level (1 animal)
This animal was found dead within 40 minutes following test substance administration.
- 5000 mg/kg dose level (1 animal)
This animal was found dead within one hour of test substance administration. - Clinical signs:
- other: - 55 mg/kg dose level (1 animal): This animal appeared active and healthy during the study. There were no signs of gross toxicity, adverse pharmacologic effects, or abnormal behaviour. - 175 mg/kg dose level (3 animals): Clinical signs of the deceased an
- Gross pathology:
- - 55 mg/kg dose level (1 animal):
No gross abnormalities were noted for this animal when necropsied at the conclusion of the 14-day observation period.
- 175 mg/kg dose level (3 animals):
Gross necropsy of the decedent revealed red lungs. No gross abnormalities were noted for the euthanized animals when necorpsied at the conclusion of the 14-day observation period.
- 550 mg/kg dose level (3 animals):
Gross necropsy of the decedents revealed distention of the stomach. No gross abnormalities were noted for the euthanized animal when necropsied at the conclusion of the 14-day observation period.
- 1750 mg/kg dose level (1 animal)
Gross necropsy of the decedent revealed distention of the stomach.
- 5000 mg/kg dose level (1 animal)
Gross necropsy of the decedent revealed distention of the stomach. - Interpretation of results:
- Category 4 based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- LD50 (female rats): 310.2 mg/kg bw
According to the EC-Regulation 1272/2008 and subsequent regulations, the test item is classified as Category 4.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 310 mg/kg bw
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
Additional information
Key study
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
Weight of evidence information.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Acute oral toxicity
The reference McKenzie (2013) is considered as the key study for acute oral toxicity and will be used for classification. The test was conducted according to OECD 425. The LD50 for female rats was calculated to be 310.2 mg/kg bw
The classification criteria according to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 as acutely toxic category 4 (CLP) are met since the ATE is between 300 and 2000 mg/kg body-weight. Cobalt borate propionate will be classified in accordance with regulation (EC) 1272/2008 as acutely toxic category 4 (H302) and in accordance with 67/548/EEC as harmful if swallowed (R22).
Specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single exposure: oral
The classification criteria according to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 as specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single exposure, oral are not met since the toxic effects observed in the acute oral toxicity test already leads to an acute oral toxicity classification. No additional effects in animals or humans are known that would justify a specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single exposure: oral classification.
Acute dermal toxicity
Conduct of an acute dermal toxicity study is unjustified since dermal uptake is considered negligible.
Specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single exposure: dermal
Conduct of an acute dermal toxicity study is unjustified since dermal uptake is considered negligible.
Acute inhalation toxicity andSpecific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single exposure: inhalation
Cobalt compounds are not generally associated with local effects following acute inhalation exposure; only after long-term exposure, some inflammatory responses are seen. Thus, any acute inhalation toxicity may reasonably be assumed to be predominantly determined by systemic availability.
Based on the outcome of dustiness testing (Heubach rotating drum method; for details, please refer to the IUCLID endpoint study record under IUCLID section 7.1.1 basic toxicokinetics) coupled with particle size analysis of the airborne fraction, all cobalt compounds have moderate to low values for total dustiness, indicating similar propensities to become airborne. Based on the concurrent particle size analysis, inhalation deposition modelling via MPPD clearly indicates that only minor substance amounts can be expected to be deposited in the pulmonary fraction of the respiratory tract of humans; in contrast, the majority of inhaled material will deposit in the extra thoracic and tracheo-bronchiolar regions, and therefore can safely be assumed to undergo translocation to the gastrointestinal tract via mucociliary escalation and subsequent swallowing.
Thus, any systemic effects may be read across from acute oral toxicity.
Based on the LD50 for cobalt borate propionate of 310 mg/kg observed in an acute oral toxicity test, it is therefore proposed to adopt the classification as acutely oral toxic category 4 also for acute inhalation toxicity, and to waive the testing requirement for acute inhalation toxicity in accordance with section 1.1, annex XI of regulation (EC) 1907/2006.
Furthermore a testing programme is currently being executed, investigation the acute toxicity of eleven cobalt compounds via inhalation. The aim was to cover a wide spectrum of substances to allow read-across to non-testes substances, to reduce the number of animals. The test items were selected according to the following criteria:
- high dustiness, as determined in the Heubach rotating drum method
- small MMAD to ensure highest possible exposure of the respiratory tract of the test animals
- coverage of high, medium and low bioaccessible substances, determined in artificial alveolar lining fluid (ALF)
According to the above criteria, the following substances were selected for testing: cobalt metal powder (fine and coarse sample), cobalt carbonate, cobalt resinate, cobalt stearate, cobalt acetyl acetonate, cobalt sulfate, cobalt monoxide, tricobalt tetraoxide, cobalt sulfide.
The registrant ensures that the results will be included in the respective dossiers upon availability.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
